International Journal of Agriculture and Forestry
p-ISSN: 2165-882X e-ISSN: 2165-8846
2013; 3(6): 244-248
doi:10.5923/j.ijaf.20130306.07
Lale N. E. S., Zakka U., Atijegbe S. R., Chukwu. O.
University of Port Harcourt, Faculty of Agriculture, Department of Crop and Soil Science, PMB 5323, Choba, Rivers State, Port Harcourt, Nigeria
Correspondence to: Lale N. E. S., University of Port Harcourt, Faculty of Agriculture, Department of Crop and Soil Science, PMB 5323, Choba, Rivers State, Port Harcourt, Nigeria.
| Email: | ![]() |
Copyright © 2012 Scientific & Academic Publishing. All Rights Reserved.
The stability of resistance of fifteen maize varieties to infestation by three generations of Sitophilus zeamais, was investigated in the laboratory of Faculty of Agriculture, University of Port Harcourt, Nigeria. The experiment was laid out in a completely randomized design (CRD) and each treatment was replicated three times. Developmental period, number of adult progenies, and weight loss were variables used to differentiate the performance of the three generations on maize varieties. Grain hardness, weight, length, width and moisture content of the maize seeds were also determined for the various varieties .The result shows that adult progeny development decreased progressively with increasing generation in all the varieties and that influence of grain hardness on the resistance of maize varieties to infestation by S. zeamais was not consistent.
Keywords: Stability, Sitophilus zeamais, Generation, Maize, Resistance
Cite this paper: Lale N. E. S., Zakka U., Atijegbe S. R., Chukwu. O., The Response of Different Maize Varieties to Three Generations of Sitophilus zeamais (Motsch.) Infestation, International Journal of Agriculture and Forestry, Vol. 3 No. 6, 2013, pp. 244-248. doi: 10.5923/j.ijaf.20130306.07.
Where:Y = initial weightZ = Final weightMc = % moisture content on wet basis Grain hardness: 10 grains were randomly selected from each cultivar and tested for grain hardness using a California Bearing Ratio (CBR) machine. Each grain was carefully placed in a vertical position on the stage meter and crushed; the hardness of the grain was calculated by multiplying the value that was obtained from the machine by a factor (23.8 N/div). Bioassays: three replicates of 10g of grains of each maize variety were placed in separate 50 ml transparent plastic containers covered with lids. Four pairs of newly emerged S. zeamais were introduced on each 10g lot of maize variety and were allowed to oviposit for seven days after which they were removed. The experimental containers were left undisturbed in the laboratory until the emergence of the F1 generation. The F1 adult weevils were counted over a period of 14 days. In the second set of the experiment, four pairs of S. zeamais that emerged in the F1 from each variety were introduced to start up the F2 generation from which their adult progeny were also used to infest the maize grains in the F3 generation.The experiment was carried out in a completely randomized design (CRD) and each treatment was replicated three times. Data were collected on developmental period, number of adult progeny in each generation, grain weight loss, grain moisture content before and after the experiment and grain length and width.The level of damage caused in each of the 3 generations of S. zeamais on the 15 maize cultivars was analyzed; developmental period, total numbers of adult progeny and grain physical parameters were other parameters analyzed. Data collected were subjected to analysis of variance, and means were separated using the Student-Newman-Keuls test (SNK) at 5% level of probability. For the generational study the data were subjected to two factor ANOVA with maize variety and generation of adult weevil progeny as factors and differences between means were handled in a similar manner.
|
|