International Journal of Agriculture and Forestry

p-ISSN: 2165-882X    e-ISSN: 2165-8846

2014;  4(3A): 4-7

doi:10.5923/s.ijaf.201401.02

Evaluation the Some Physical Properties of Chickpea Seeds in Kurdistan Region of Iran

Salah Ghamari1, Khosro Mohammadi2, Abdolvahed Khanahmadzadeh1, Hadi Goli1

1Department of Agricultural Machinery, College of Agriculture, Sanandaj Branch, Islamic Azad University, Sanandaj, Iran

2Department of Agronomy, College of Agriculture, Sanandaj Branch, Islamic Azad University, Sanandaj, Iran

Correspondence to: Salah Ghamari, Department of Agricultural Machinery, College of Agriculture, Sanandaj Branch, Islamic Azad University, Sanandaj, Iran.

Email:

Copyright © 2014 Scientific & Academic Publishing. All Rights Reserved.

Abstract

Physical and mechanical properties of food crops gain importance during design, improvement and optimization of separation and cleaning. The objective of this work was comparing some physical properties between four varieties of chickpea seeds (Kaka, Pirooz, ILC and Jam). From each variety, 100 seeds were selected randomly and the length, width, thickness, geometric mean diameter, arithmetic mean diameter, surface area, sphericity, mass, true density, bulk density and porosity of them were measured. Analysis of the statistical parameters for each variety shows that the Jam and Kaka variety respectively presented high and low mean values for all of the geometric properties except sphericity, whose the high mean value belongs to ILC. The maximum values of bulk density and true density among the varieties were obtained for kaka, and jam had the highest porosity. The results of this research can be used for design and adjustment of agricultural machines of these varieties and recognition and classification of them.

Keywords: Chickpea, Physical properties, Seed variety

Cite this paper: Salah Ghamari, Khosro Mohammadi, Abdolvahed Khanahmadzadeh, Hadi Goli, Evaluation the Some Physical Properties of Chickpea Seeds in Kurdistan Region of Iran, International Journal of Agriculture and Forestry, Vol. 4 No. 3A, 2014, pp. 4-7. doi: 10.5923/s.ijaf.201401.02.

1. Introduction

Pulses play an important role in supply the needs of food in human society, especially in the developing countries. Chickpea (Cicer arientum L.) is considered the 5th valuable legume in terms of worldwide economical standpoint. Chickpea is planted in Southern and Western areas of Asia and Mediterranean [10].
The chickpea is a good source of protein and carbohydrate and its protein quality is better than other legumes such as pigeon pea, black gram and green gram. It also supply some minerals (Ca, Mg, Zn, K, Fe, P) and vitamins like thiamine and niacin [25].
Information on physical and aerodynamic properties of agricultural products is needed in design and adjustment of agricultural machines [8]. The geometric properties such as size and shape are the most important physical properties considered during the separation and cleaning of agricultural grains [18].
In view of this, several studies have been conducted on the physical properties such as size, shape, bulk density, true density, porosity, angle of repose and coefficient of static and dynamic friction of different agricultural crops, such as; quinoa seeds [24], hemp seed [21], lentil seeds [3], safflower seeds [4], popcorn kernels [12], linseed [22], coriander seeds [5], faba bean [2], cucurbit seeds [16], wheat, barley, chickpea and lentil seeds [9], arigo seeds [6], rice seed [11], Parkia speciosa [1].
In a research, several physical properties of chickpea seeds including the average length, width, thickness, geometric mean diameter, unit mass, projected area, angle of repose, terminal velocity and static and dynamic coefficients as functions of moisture content were evaluated [13]. In another research, some moisture dependent physical properties of chickpea seeds of large kabuli, small kabuli and desi varieties were measured [15].
Because of varietal variability in chickpea seeds, knowing the physical properties of different varieties of them is necessary. The objective of this work was to study some physical properties of four varieties of chickpea seeds (Kaka, Pirooz, ILC, Jam) to develop appropriate technologies in design and adjustment of machines used during harvesting, separating, cleaning, handling and storing of them.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Sample Preparation

Four common chickpea varieties called Jam, ILC, Pirooz and Kaka, which are grown in Iran, were prepared from Kurdistan Center for Agricultural and Natural Resources Research. The samples were cleaned manually to remove stones, straw, and dirt and then sieved to remove broken and damaged seeds. Initial moisture content (MC) of samples was determined by using oven method at 105°C for 24 h [7]. Initial MC of Jam, ILC, Pirooz and Kaka were 7.45, 7.82, 6.95, 7.33% (w.b.), respectively.

2.2. Dimensions, Size, Surface Area and Sphericity

From each variety, 100 seeds were selected randomly. Length (L), width (W), and thickness (T) of seeds were the morphological features that were measured by micrometer with 0.02 mm accuracy. The geometric mean diameter, arithmetic mean diameter and surface area of seeds were respectively calculated by using the following equation [23]:
(1)
(2)
(3)
Where: Dg = geometric mean diameter of seed (mm).
Da = arithmetic mean diameter of seed (mm).
S = surface area of seed (mm2).
The used criteria to describe the shape of the seed are the sphericity. Thus, the sphericity (Sp) was computed as [8]:
(4)

2.3. Dimensions, Size, Surface Area and Sphericity

Mass (M) of individual seeds was measured by using a digital scale with 0.0001 gram accuracy. Seed volumes (cm3) and true density (g.cm-3) were measured by water displacement method. For each chickpea variety 100 seeds were weighed and replaced in water. Mass of water displaced by the seeds was recorded. Finally true densities (g.cm-3) were calculated by using the following equation:
(5)
where ρt is the true density (g.cm-3), ρw is the water density (1.05 g.cm-3 at laboratory temperature); M and Mw are mass of seeds and water, respectively [20].
Bulk density, ρb, is based on the volume occupied by the bulk sample as poured into a container of known volume. In order to measure the bulk density, the chickpea seeds without any compaction were poured into a calibrated container of known volume and weight. The ratio of the mass and volume was expressed as bulk density:
(6)
where: ρb is the bulk density (g.cm-3), M and V are mass of seeds and box volume, respectively [14].
The porosity (ϵ) was calculated from the measured values of bulk density and true density using the following relationship [17]:
(7)

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Dimensions, Size, Surface Area and Sphericity

The average, minimum, maximum, standard deviation and coefficient of variation values for the length, width, thickness, geometric mean diameter, arithmetic mean diameter, surface area and sphericity of four chickpea varieties are shown in Tables 1 to 7.
Analysis of the statistical parameters for each variety shows that the Jam and Kaka variety respectively presented high and low mean values for all of mentioned physical properties in table 1 to 7 except sphericity, whose the high mean value belongs to ILC. The mean sphericity of kaka and jam, and mean sphericty of ILC and Jam varieties were in the same range, respectively.
The importance of dimensions is in determining the aperture size of machines, particularly in separation of materials [19]. These dimensions may be useful in estimating the size of machine components. The major axis has been found to be useful by indicating the natural rest position of the material and hence in the application of compressive forces to induce mechanical rupture. The values sphericity indicate strong tendency of seed shape towards a sphere.
Table 1. The statistical parameters for length (mm) of chickpea varieties
varietymeanminmaxSTDCV
kaka7.56.529.060.4532596.043456
pirooz8.457.29.540.496395.874438
ILC9.027.7610.360.4672185.179797
jam9.698.5610.880.5121825.285679
Table 2. The statistical parameters for width (mm) of chickpea varieties
varietymeanminmaxSTDCV
kaka5.063.566.740.4295838.48979
pirooz5.74.626.380.3647216.398609
ILC7.15.868.820.4488436.321734
jam7.566.149.480.4806856.358261
Table 3. The statistical parameters for thickness (mm) of chickpea varieties
varietymeanminmaxSTDCV
kaka5.164.15.840.3344636.481847
pirooz5.854.66.540.3233775.527809
ILC7.36.488.620.3631394.974503
jam7.744.7210.080.5484667.086125
Table 4. The statistical parameters for geometric mean diameter (mm3) of chickpea varieties
varietymeanminmaxSTDCV
kaka5.85.066.610.3122525.383647
pirooz6.555.67.330.3224214.922462
ILC7.766.78.570.347614.479515
jam8.277.049.860.3968024.798084
Table 5. The statistical parameters for arithmetic mean diameter (mm3) of chickpea varieties
varietymeanminmaxSTDCV
kaka5.915.26.730.3133715.302387
pirooz6.675.767.450.3256174.881812
ILC7.816.748.620.3489674.468209
jam8.337.349.860.3887134.666421
Table 6. The statistical parameters for surface area (mm2) of chickpea varieties
varietymeanminmaxSTDCV
kaka105.9380.32137.1711.422210.78278
pirooz136.198.65219.6413.096779.6229
ILC189.7140.86230.5416.824818.869169
jam215.49155.85305.5920.81679.66017
Table 7. The statistical parameters for sphericity (%) of chickpea varieties
varietymeanminmaxSTDCV
kaka77.3769.385.072.6691843.449896
pirooz77.6267.6883.52.7527973.546505
ILC86.1580.6193.812.65453.081254
jam85.4673.8398.233.5378034.139718

3.2. Mass, True Density, Bulk Density and Porosity

The average, minimum, maximum, standard deviation and coefficient of variation values of Mass are shown in table 8. As this table shows the Jam and Kaka variety respectively presented high and low mean values of seeds mass.
Table 9 shows the average values of true density, bulk density and porosity for chickpea seeds. It appears that true and bulk density decrease, and porosity increases with regard to increasing size.
The seed mass, bulk density and true density are very important in separating and grading of grains according to density and aerodynamic properties.
Table 8. The statistical parameters for mass (g) of chickpea varieties
VarietymeanminmaxSTDCV
kaka0.1290.0880.19420.9165816214.41
pirooz0.2020.1330.3131.0320815362.42
ILC0.3240.2150.45445.0807113913.8
jam0.3910.2920.4946.3572811856.08
Table 9. The average values of true density, bulk density and porosity for chickpea seeds
varietyTrue density(g.cm-3)Bulk density(g.cm-3)Porosity(%)
kaka1.4080.82541.4
pirooz1.4020.80942.3
ILC1.3860.77244.3
jam1.3790.75945

4. Conclusions

The present study provides information on some physical properties of four Iranian varieties of chickpea. The results showed that these properties vary from variety to variety. Among the varieties, jam had the highest and kaka had the lowest values of geometric properties. The maximum values of bulk density and true density among the varieties were obtained for kaka, and jam had the highest porosity.
This data can be used for design and adjustment of agricultural machines in agricultural process of these varieties of chickpea. Another application of this data can be recognition and classification of them.

References

[1]  Abdullah, M.H.R.O., Ch’ng, P.E., Lim, T.H., 2011, Some Physical Properties of Parkia speciosa seeds, International Conference on Food Engineering and Biotechnology IPCBEE, 9, IACSIT Press, Singapoore, 43-47.
[2]  Altuntas, E. Yildiz, M., 2007. Effect of moisture content on some physical and mechanical properties of faba bean (Vicia faba L.) grains. J. Food Eng., 78, 174-183.
[3]  Amin, M.N., Hossain, M.A., Roy, K.C., 2004. Effects of moisture content on some physical Properties of lentil seeds. J. Food Eng., 65, 83-87.
[4]  Baümler, E., Cuniberti, A., Nolasco, S.M. Riccobene, I.C., 2006. Moisture- dependent physical and compression properties of safflower seed. J. Food Eng., 79, 134–140.
[5]  Coskuner, Y., Karababa, E., 2007. Physical properties of coriander seeds (Coriandrum sativum L.). J. Food Eng., 80, 408-416.
[6]  Davies, R.M., 2010. Some physical properties of arigo seeds. Int. Agrophys., 24, 89-92.
[7]  Esref, I., Hulya, I., 2008. The effect of moisture of organic chickpea grain on the physical and mechanical properties. Int. J. Agric. Res. 3, 40-51.
[8]  Ghamari, S., 2012. Classification of chickpea seeds using supervised and unsupervised artificial neural networks. Afr. J. Agr. Res. 7, 3193-3201.
[9]  Gürsoy, S., Güzel, E., 2010. Determination of Physical Properties of Some Agricultural Grains, Research Journal of Applied Sciences. Engine. Technol. 2, 492-498.
[10]  Ionescu A., Aprodu I., Darabă A., Gurău G., Baciu C., Nichita A., 2009. chemical and functional characterization of chickpea protein derivates. The Annals of the University Dunarea de Jos of Galati Fascicle VI – Food Technology, New Series Year III, 16-27.
[11]  Jouki, M., Khazaei, N., 2012. Some Physical Properties of Rice Seed (Oryza sativa). Research Journal of Applied Sciences, Engine. Technol. 4(13), 1846-1849.
[12]  Karababa, E., 2006. Physical properties of popcorn kernels. J. Food Eng., 72, 100-107.
[13]  Konak M., Arman K.C., Aydin C., 2002. Physical properties of chick pea seeds. Biosystems Eng., 82, 73-78.
[14]  Koocheki, A., Razavi, S.M.A., Milani, E., Moghadam, T.M., Abedini, M., Alamatiyan, S., Izadkhah, S., 2007. Physical properties of watermelon seed as a function of moisture content and variety. Int. Agrophysics, 21, 349-359.
[15]  Masoumi A.A., Tabil L.G., 2003. Physical properties of chickpea (C. arietinum) cultivars. An ASAE Meeting presentation, Las Vegas, Nevada, 27-30 July, 2003, USA. Paper No: 036058.
[16]  Milani E., Razavi, S.M.A., Koocheki, A., Nikzadeh, V., Vahedi, N., Moein Fard, M., GholamhosseinPour, A., 2007. Moisture dependent physical properties of cucurbit seeds. Int. Agrophys., 21, 157-168.
[17]  Mohsenin, N.N., 1980. Physical properties of plant and animal materials. Gordon and Breach Sci. Publ., New York.
[18]  Nalbandi, H., Seiiedlou, S., Ghassemzadeh, H.R., 2010. Aerodynamic properties of Turgenialatifolia seeds and wheat kernels. Int. Agrophys., 24, 57-61.
[19]  Omobuwajo, T.O., Akande E.A., Sanni, L.A, 1999. Selected physical, mechanical and aerodynamic properties of African breadfruit (Treculia africana) seeds. J. Food Eng., 40, 241-244.
[20]  Rafiee, S., Keramat Jahromi, M., Jafari, A., Sharifi, M., Mirasheh, R., Mobli, H., 2007, Determining some physical properties of bergamot (Citrus medica), Int. Agrophys., 21, 293-297.
[21]  Sacilik, K., Ozturk, R., Keskin, R., 2003. Some physical properties of hemp seed. Biosys. Eng., 86, 191-198.
[22]  Selvi, K.C., Y. Pinar, and E. Yeşiloğlu. 2006. Some physical properties of linseed. Biosys. Engineering., 95(4), 607–612.
[23]  Tarighi, J., Mahmoudi, A., Alavi, N., 2011. Some mechanical and physical properties of corn seed. Afr. J. Agr. Res. 6, 3691-3699.
[24]  Vilche, C., Gely, M., Santall, E., 2003. Physical properties of quinoa seeds. Biosys. Eng., 86, 59-65.
[25]  Williams, P.C., Singh, U., 1987, Nutritional quality and the evaluation of quality in breeding programs, In the Chickpea. Wallingford, UK: CAB International, 329-356.