Advances in Analytical Chemistry
p-ISSN: 2163-2839 e-ISSN: 2163-2847
2015; 5(A): 19-25
doi:10.5923/s.aac.201501.03
Ali Ehsani 1, 2, Malihe Ahmadi 1, Mohammad Ghanbari 2
1Department of Chemistry, Faculty of science, University of Qom, Qom, Iran
2Department of Chemistry, Payame Noor University, Iran
Correspondence to: Ali Ehsani , Department of Chemistry, Faculty of science, University of Qom, Qom, Iran.
| Email: | ![]() |
Copyright © 2015 Scientific & Academic Publishing. All Rights Reserved.
New synthesized 1-(4-nitrophenyl)-5-amino-1H-tetrazole s inhibitory effect on the corrosion of aluminium (Al) in sulfuric acid was investigated by means of potentiodynamic polarization and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS). According to electrochemical results, excellent inhibiting properties for SS corrosion in sulfuric acid has been obtained. The adsorption of 1-(4-nitrophenyl)-5-amino-1H-tetrazole onto the Al surface followed the Langmuir adsorption model with the free energy of adsorption ΔG0ads of -11.25 kJ mol-1. Quantum chemical calculations were employed to give further insight into the mechanism of inhibition action of 1-(4-nitrophenyl)-5-amino-1H-tetrazole.
Keywords: Organic inhibitor, Adsorption, Aluminum, Impedance, Nanoparticles
Cite this paper: Ali Ehsani , Malihe Ahmadi , Mohammad Ghanbari , Inhibitory Effect of Newly Synthesized Organic Compound in Corrosion of Aluminum: Electrochemical Investigation, Advances in Analytical Chemistry, Vol. 5 No. A, 2015, pp. 19-25. doi: 10.5923/s.aac.201501.03.
![]() | Figure 1. SEM micrograph of synthesized 1-(4-nitrophenyl)-5-amino-1H-tetrazole |
![]() | Figure 2. Potentiodynamic polarisation curves of aluminium in 0.5 M H2SO4 solution in the absence and presence of various concentrations of the 1-(4-nitrophenyl)-5-amino-1H-tetrazole |
![]() | (1) |
, is referred to as the Tafel constant. The corrosion inhibition efficiency was calculated using the relation:![]() | (2) |
where t is the time (s), M is the equivalent molar weight of Al (g mol-1), F is Faraday constant (96500 Cmol-1), S is the surface area of electrode, d is the density of iron, the constant 10 is used to convert the unit cm to mm. The results are presented in table 1. The inhibitor molecule first adsorbs on the Al surface and blocks the available reaction sites. As concentration of the inhibitor increases the linear polarization resistance increases and corrosion rate (CR) decreases. The surface coverage increases with the inhibitor concentration and the formation of inhibitor film on the Al surface reduces the active surface area available for the attack of the corrosive medium and delays hydrogen evolution and metal dissolution [22]. In cathodic domain, as seen in Table 1, the values of βc had small changes with increasing inhibitor concentration, which indicated that the 1-(4-nitrophenyl)-5-amino-1H-tetrazole was adsorbed on the metal surface and the addition of the inhibitor hindered the acid attack on the Al electrode. In anodic domain, the value of βa decreases with the presence of 1-(4-nitrophenyl)-5-amino-1H-tetrazole. The shift in the anodic Tafel slope βa might be attributed to the modification of anodic dissolution process due to the inhibitor modules adsorption on the active sites. Compared to the absence of 1-(4-nitrophenyl)-5-amino-1H-tetrazole, the anodic curves of the working electrode in the acidic solution containing the 1-(4-nitrophenyl)-5-amino-1H-tetrazole shifted obviously to the direction of current reduction, as it could be seen from these polarization results; the inhibition efficiency increased with inhibitor concentration.![]() | Figure 3. Nyquist plots of aluminium in 0.5 M H2SO4 solution in the absence and presence of 1-(4-nitrophenyl)-5-amino-1H-tetrazole. Electrical equivalent circuit used for modeling metal/solution interface in the absence and presence of inhibitors |
![]() | (3) |
![]() | (4) |
is the frequency at which the imaginary part of the impedance has a maximum. As seen from Table 2, the double layer capacitance (Cdl) decreases with increase in concentration. This can be attributed to the gradual replacement of water molecules by the adsorption of the organic molecules at metal/solution interface, which is leading to a protective film on metal surface. In addition, the more the inhibitor is adsorbed, the more the thickness of the barrier layer is increased according to the expression of the Helmholtz model [28]: ![]() | (5) |
is the vacuum permittivity and A is the surface area of the electrode. The equation used for calculating the percentage inhibition efficiency is:![]() | (6) |
|
![]() | (9) |
at different inhibitor concentrations in 0.5 M H2SO4 was evaluated from impedance measurment (
= IE(%)/100) at 25°C. The plot of
against inhibitor oncentration C displayed a straight line for tested inhibitor (Fig. 4). The linear plot clearly revealed that the surface adsorption process of 1-(4-nitrophenyl)-5-amino-1H-tetrazole on the Al surface obeys the Langmuir isotherm. Likewise, it suggests that an adsorption process occurs, which can be expressed as follows [30]:![]() | (10) |
![]() | (11) |
![]() | Figure 4. Langmuir adsorption plot for aluminium in 0.5 M H2SO4 containing different concentrations of 1-(4-nitrophenyl)-5-amino-1H-tetrazole |
![]() | Figure 5. (a) Structure of 1-(4-nitrophenyl)-5-amino-1H-tetrazole; (b) Optimized molecular structure of 1-(4-nitrophenyl)-5-amino-1H-tetrazole, H atoms have been omitted for clarity; (c) The highest occupied molecular orbital (HOMO) of 1-(4-nitrophenyl)-5-amino-1H-tetrazole; (d) The lowest unoccupied molecular orbital (LUMO) of 1-(4-nitrophenyl)-5-amino-1H-tetrazole; (e) Muliken charge population analysis and vector of dipole moment of 1-(4-nitrophenyl)-5-amino-1H-tetrazole; (f) Natural charge population analysis of 1-(4-nitrophenyl)-5-amino-1H-tetrazole |
| [1] | A.S. Fouda, A.A. Al-Sarawy, F.S. Ahmed, H.M. El-Abbasy, Corros. Sci. 51 (2009) 485–492. |
| [2] | D. Mercier, M.G. Barthes-Labrousse, Corros. Sci. 51 (2009) 339–348. |
| [3] | A.K. Maayta, N.A.F. Al-Rawashdeh, Corros. Sci. 46 (2004) 1129–1140. |
| [4] | C.M.A. Brett, Corros. Sci. 33 (1992) 203–210. |
| [5] | R. Grilli, M.A. Baker, J.E. Castle, B. Dunn, J.F. Watts, Corros. Sci. 52 (2010) 2855–2866. |
| [6] | V. Moutarlier, M.P. Gigandet, B. Normand, J. Pagetti, Corros. Sci. 47 (2005) 937–951. |
| [7] | M. Pourbaix, Atlas of Electrochemical Equilibria in Aqueous Solutions, Pergamon Press, London, 1966. |
| [8] | H. Ashassi-Sorkhabi, B. Shabani, B. Aligholipour, D. Seifzadeh, Appl. Surf. Sci. 252 (2006) 4039–4047. |
| [9] | M. Abdallah, Corros. Sci. 46 (2004) 1981–1996. |
| [10] | J. Aljourani, K. Raeissi, M.A. Golozar, Corros. Sci. 51 (2009) 1836–1843. |
| [11] | M.L. Zheludkevich, K.A. Yasakau, S.K. Poznyak, M.G.S. Ferreira, Corros. Sci. 47 (2005) 3368–3383. |
| [12] | I.B. Obot, N.O. Obi-Egbedi, S.A. Umoren, Corros. Sci. 51 (2009) 276–282. |
| [13] | M.G. Hosseini, M. Ehteshamzadeh, T. Shahrabi, Electrochim. Acta 52 (2007) 3680–3685. |
| [14] | S, S_afak, B, Duran, A. Yurt, G. Turkoglu, Corrosion Science 54 (2012) 251–259. |
| [15] | H.H. Hassan, E. Adbelghani, M.A. Amin, Electrochim. Acta 52 (2007) 6359–6366. |
| [16] | Y. Abdoud, A. Abourrriche, T. Saffaj, M. Berrada, M. Charrouf, A. Bennamara, N. Al Himidi, H. Hannache, Mater. Chem. Phys. 105 (2007) 1–5. |
| [17] | M.A. Quaraishi, J. Rawat, M. Ajmal, J. Appl. Electrochem. 30 (2000) 745– 751. |
| [18] | K.F. Khaled, M.A. Amin, Corros. Sci. 51 (2009) 1964–1975. |
| [19] | I.B. Obot, N.O. Obi-Egbedi, Corrosion Science 52 (2010) 282–285. |
| [20] | D. Habibi, M. Nasrollahzadeh, H. Sahebekhtiari, R.V. Parish, Tetrahedron, 69 (2013), 3082-3087. |
| [21] | M.G. Mahjani, R. Moshrefi, A. Ehsani, M. Jafarian, Anti corrosion method and material, 58 (2011) 250-257. |
| [22] | T. Zhihua, Z. Shengtao, L. Weihua, H. Baorong , Ind. Eng. Chem. Res 50 (2011) 6082–6088. |
| [23] | A. Ehsani, M.G. Mahjani, M. Jafarian, Turkish. Journal of chemistry, 35 (2011) 1-9. |
| [24] | A. Ehsani, M. Nasrollahzadeh, MG. Mahjani, R. Moshrefi, H. Mostaanzadeh, Ind. Eng. Chem. 20(2014) 4363. |
| [25] | A. Ehsani, M. G. Mahjani, M. Jafarian, A. Naeemy, Electrochim. Acta 71 (2012) 128-133. |
| [26] | A. Ehsani, M.G. Mahjani, M. Jafarian, A. Naeemy, Prog. Org. Coat, 69 (2010) 510-516. |
| [27] | A. Ehsani, MG. Mahjani, R. Moshrefi, H. Mostaanzadeh, J. Shabani Shayeh, RSC. Adv. 4(2014) 2231. |
| [28] | Hassan, H. Electrochim. Acta 2006, 51, 5966–5972. |
| [29] | H.J.W. Lenderink, M.V.D. Linden, J.H.W. DE Wit, Electrochim. Acta 38 (1993) 1989. |
| [30] | Li. Xianghong, D. Shuduan, F. Hui, Corrosion Science 53 (2011) 1529-1536. |
| [31] | K.F. Khaled, M.M. Al-Qahtani, Mater. Chem. Phys. 113 (2009) 150-158. |
| [32] | S. Martinez, Mater. Chem. Phys. 2002, 77, 97–102. |
| [33] | P. Hohenberg, W. Kohn, Phys. Rev. A136 (1964) 864. |