International Journal of Textile Science

p-ISSN: 2325-0119    e-ISSN: 2325-0100

2016;  5(6): 132-140

doi:10.5923/j.textile.20160506.02

 

Review of Renewable Biosorbent from Coir Pith Waste for Textile Effluent Treatment

Muksit Ahamed Chowdhury1, Konica Jannat Fatema2

1Assistant Professor, Department of Textile Engineering, Ahsanullah University of Science and Technology, Dhaka, Bangladesh

2Senior Scientific Officer, Chemistry Division, Bangladesh Atomic Energy Center, Dhaka, Bangladesh

Correspondence to: Muksit Ahamed Chowdhury, Assistant Professor, Department of Textile Engineering, Ahsanullah University of Science and Technology, Dhaka, Bangladesh.

Email:

Copyright © 2016 Scientific & Academic Publishing. All Rights Reserved.

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY).
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Abstract

Biosorption is an innovative technology aimed at the removal of toxic metals from effluent utilizing abundantly available agricultural waste biomaterials. Among several agricultural wastes studied as biosorbents for effluent treatment, coir pith has been of great importance for the removal of diverse type of pollutants from effluent water. As an agricultural waste, coir pith has gained wide attention as effective biosorbents due to the significant adsorption potential for the removal of various aquatic pollutants. Cost-effectiveness, abundant availability and renewability makes them as an economical alternative for water treatment and waste remediation. In this review, the perspective of coir pith based biosorbents for textile effluent treatment from vast literature has been compiled and their adsorption capacities for various types of as available in the literature are presented.

Keywords: Coir pith, Activated carbon, Biosortion, Agricultural waste materials, Effluent treatment

Cite this paper: Muksit Ahamed Chowdhury, Konica Jannat Fatema, Review of Renewable Biosorbent from Coir Pith Waste for Textile Effluent Treatment, International Journal of Textile Science, Vol. 5 No. 6, 2016, pp. 132-140. doi: 10.5923/j.textile.20160506.02.

1. Introduction

Textile industries are large industrial consumers of waters as well as producers of waste waters. With the increased demand for textile products, the textile industry and its waste waters have been increasing proportionally, making it one of the main sources of severe pollution problems worldwide [1]. The chemical reagents used in textile processing are very diverse in chemical composition, ranging from inorganic compounds to polymers and organic products [2]. Textile waste water may include many types of dyes, detergents, insecticides, pesticides, grease and oils, sulfide compounds, solvents, heavy metals, inorganic salts and fibers, in amounts depending on the processing system [3]. Colored matter discharged from textile industries is not only aesthetically displeasing, but also affect aquatic ecosystems by inhibiting sunlight penetration and posing certain hazards and environmental problems. Many types of dye are used in the textile industry such as direct, reactive, acid and basic and disperse dyes, which can be toxic to some microorganisms and may cause direct destruction or inhibition of their metabolism. Color removal of effluent from the textile dyeing and finishing operation is becoming important because of aesthetic as well as environmental concerns. It is reported that there are over 100,000 commercially available dyes and more than 7.5 X 105 metric tons are produced all over the world every year and most of them are completely resistant to biodegradation processes [4, 5]. Many of these dye wastes are toxic and even carcinogenic [6] and this poses a serious hazard to aquatic living organisms. It is estimated that 10–15% of the dye is lost in the effluent during manufacturing and processing operations [7]. As a result, many governments have established environmental restrictions with regard to the quality of colored effluents and have forced dye houses to decolorise their effluents before discharging.
Wastewaters containing dyes are difficult to remove because of their inert properties. The conventional methodologies for the removal of dyes such as – adsorption, adsorption on activated carbons, coagulation, flocculation, reverse osmosis, activated sludge, bacterial action, chemical oxidation, ozonation, and physical methods like membrane filtration, ion exchange and electrochemical techniques are either expensive or inadequate because of their stability towards light, oxidising agents and resistance towards aerobic digestion, besides generating sludge with disposal problem [8-11]. Different treatment processes available to textile effluent are given in Table 1 [12].
Table 1. Effluent treatment operation and processes
     
The removal of dyes and organics from water in an economical way remains an important challenge to scientists. Recently, adsorption techniques using easily available low cost adsorbents mainly of biological origin like rice husk, bagasse, pine wood, hazel nut shell, date pits, straw, banana peel, orange peel, neem sawdust, treated cotton, activated sludge, chitosan, microbial biomass etc. to reduce dye concentration of waste water have emerged as a cost effective and efficient alternative as these are cheaper, renewable and abundantly available [13-16]. Among several agricultural wastes studied as biosorbents, coir pith, a lignocellulosic light fluffy biomaterial generated as a by-product during the separation of fiber from the ripened coconut husk, have been extensively studied as biosorbents for the removal of diverse type of pollutants from effluent water [17].

2. Coir Pith

Coir pith, a waste product obtained during the extraction of coir fibre from coconut husk, is very light, highly compressible and highly hygroscopic. A cross-section of a coconut is illustrated in Figure 1. Coconut, a common fruit produced abundantly in different countries like Indonesia, Philippine, India, Thailand, Malaysia and Bangladesh [15]. Coconut husk is the mesocarp of coconut and a coconut consists of 33–35% of husk. Husks are composed of 70% pith and 30% fiber on a dry weight basis. Raw coir pith consists of 35.0% cellulose, 25.2% lignin, 7.5% pentosans, 1.8% fats and resins, 8.7% ash content, 11.9% moisture content and 10.6% other substances. Physical and chemical characteristics of coir pith are given in Table 2 [18, 19].
Figure 1. Cross-section of a coconut
Table 2. Physical and chemical characteristics of coir pith
     
Coir pith generated during the separation process of the fiber from the coconut husk is not used for any purpose. For every ton of fiber extracted, the pith is produced to the extent of 2 tons. It is estimated that at present there is an accumulated stock of 10 X106 metric tons of coir pith in the southern states of India and about 7.5 X105 tons of coir pith are produced annually in India. They are generally disposed into roadside pits or dumped as an agro waste or disposed of by burning. Because of its low degradation in the environment, the hillocks of coir pith collected or dumped pose serious health hazards and loss of fertile lands. Because of the high carbon to nitrogen (C/N) ratio, 75 to 186, together with 35% to 54% lignin content; therefore, coir pith is highly resistant to biological degradation. Although composting is of high potential as an effective method for treating coir pith to land application by converting organic materials into a readily usable form, efficiency of coir pith composting suffers still from several drawbacks like it may require several months to obtain matured coir pith compost even though aeration was provided. If the solid wastes could be used as low-cost adsorbents, it will provide a twofold advantage to environmental pollution. Firstly, the volume of waste materials could be partly reduced and secondly the low-cost adsorbent if developed can reduce the pollution of waste waters at a reasonable cost. In view of the low cost of such adsorbents, it would not be necessary to regenerate the spent materials [21, 22]. Thus, a number of researchers investigate the use of coir pith for the removal of pollutants from wastewaters.
Although many review articles have been published [23-28] so far discussing the importance of low-cost adsorbents and/or biosorbents water pollution control, but many of them are generally either adsorbate-specific (metals, dyes, phenols, etc.) or adsorbent-specific. No previous review is available where readers can get an overview the sorption capacities of coir pith based biosorbents used for the removal of different aquatic pollutants.

3. Preparation of Absorbent

The general schematic diagram for preparation of powdered activated carbon from agricultural solid waste, i.e. coir pith has been given in Fig. 2. At first coir pith need to wash properly to remove any mud, debris, etc., dried and then ground to a particle size of 2 mm for the further process of carbonization. The waste materials are generally carbonized in a conventional electric furnace by a two stage carbonization process under optimized conditions. Char was prepared by keeping the biomass waste in covered stainless steel vessels and carbonized at 400°C for 30 min in a muffle furnace followed by chemical activation by impregnating with ZnCl2 for 24 h at a 1.75 ZnCl2/char ratio and dried at 100 ± 5°C. The dried and impregnated char was carbonized at 650°C for 15 min. Before utilization, the activated product need to be treated with 1:1 HCl for the removal of impregnating salt, followed by washing with hot distilled water for the removal of chlorides and acidity. Finally the activated product dried properly to obtain powder activated carbon [28].
Figure 2. Process flow diagram of activated carbon preparation from agricultural residue [29]

4. Application of Coir Pith for Removal of Dyes from Effluent Water

The worldwide high level of dyes production and their extensive use in dyeing textiles generate colored wastewaters which cause severe water pollution. The colored dye effluents are generally considered to be highly toxic to the aquatic biota and also cause many health related problems such as allergy, dermatitis, skin irritation, cancer, and mutations in humans [30]. Thus, the removal of dyes from effluents before they are mixed up with natural water bodies is important. Coir pith-based biosorbents have been widely explored for the removal of different classes of dyes from aqueous solutions.

4.1. By Raw Coir Pith

Removal of acid dyes (acid yellow 99) was carried out using ‘waste’ coir pith as adsorbent by Khan et al. Adsorption capacities of coir pith for acid yellow was found to be 442.13 mg/g. The adsorption process is found to be a function of pH of the solution, the optimum pH value being 2.0 and it is not affected by incubation temperature. The process was found very fast initially and both chemisorptions and physisorptions take place simultaneously [8].

4.2. By Activated Carbon Prepared from Coir Pith

As previously mentioned, coir pith is rich in lignocellulosic content; these materials can be used for the preparation of activated carbon. Activated carbon is a crude form of graphite with a random or amorphous structure, which is highly porous, exhibiting a broad range of pore sizes, from visible cracks, crevices and slits of molecular dimensions [31]. However, activated carbons are expensive due to their regeneration and reactivation procedures. In recent years, growing research interest in the production of carbon based has been focused on agricultural residues.
Activated carbon prepared from coir pith was successfully used for removal of dyes. The removal efficiency of three highly used reactive dyes (C.I. Reactive Orange 12, C.I. Reactive Red 2 & C.I. Reactive Blue 4) in the textile industry was investigated by Santhy et al. using activated carbon prepared from coir pith [31]. The results showed that activated carbon prepared from coir pith was a suitable adsorbent for removal of reactive dyes from both synthetic and textile effluent. Adsorption followed the first-order rate expression and the adsorption increased with an increase of contact time and carbon dose and decreased with an increase in solute concentration. Removal of dyes was higher at the acidic pH range. The exhausted carbon could be completely regenerated and put to repeated use by elution with 1.0 M NaOH. The coir pith activated carbon was not only effective in removal of color but also significantly reduced COD levels of the textile wastewater.
Using ‘waste’ coir pith as adsorbent, removal of acid dyes (acid violet and acid brilliant blue) and basic dyes (rhodamine B and methylene blue) were carried out Namasivayam et al [32]. Adsorption capacities of coir pith for acid violet, acid brilliant blue and rhodamine B were found to be 1.65, 16.67 and 203.25 mg/g, respectively. At alkaline pH, lower adsorption of acid violet and acid brilliant blue was observed and it was attributed to the presence of excess OH− ions competing with dye anion for the adsorption sites, whereas a reverse trend was observed for methylene blue. Lower adsorption of methylene blue at highly acidic pH was attributed to the presence of excess H+ ions competing with the dye cation for the adsorption sites. But rhodamine B showed a different trend, where the adsorption was maximum (85%) at acidic pH (3.03) and decreased to 26.6% with further increase in pH (11.03). From desorption experiments, it was confirmed that for the dyes, acid brilliant blue and methylene blue, the major mode of adsorption was ion exchange, whereas acid violet showed physical adsorption. For rhodamine B, chemisorption was suggested to be the major mode of adsorption.
The suitability of coir pith carbon was also examined for the adsorption of rhodamine-B and acid violet by Namasivayam et al [33]. The adsorption capacity was found to be 2.56 mg and 8.06 mg dye per g of the adsorbent for rhodamine-B and acid violet, respectively. Acidic pH was found favorable for the adsorption of acid violet and alkaline pH for rhodamine-B. The desorption studies showed that the major modes of adsorption might be ion exchange and physical adsorption.
Coir pith carbon has also been employed for the adsorption of Congo red [34]. The adsorption capacity was found to be 6.72 mg per g of the adsorbent. Acidic pH was favourable for the adsorption of Congo Red. Complete removal of the dye can be achieved using an appropriate dosage of the adsorbent and pH for wastewaters. Desorption studies suggest that chemisorption might be the major mode of adsorption.
Kavitha et al. investigate the feasibility of thermally activated coir pith carbon prepared from coconut husk for the removal of methylene blue [35]. The adsorption capacity was found to be 5.87 mg/g by Langmuir isotherm for the adsorbent particle size of 250–500 µm. The equilibrium time was found to be 30 and 60 min for 10 and 20 mg/l and 100 min for 30, 40 mg/l dye concentrations, respectively. At pH 6.9, a maximum removal of 97% was obtained for an adsorbent dose of 100 mg/50 ml and 100% removal was obtained for an adsorbent dose of 600 mg/50 ml of 10 mg/l dye concentration. Based on pH and desorption studies, the authors concluded that chemisorption might be the major mode of the adsorption process.
The same researchers also studied the potential feasibilities of thermally activated coir pith carbon for the removal of acid brilliant blue dye from aqueous solution [36]. At pH 2 maximum removals for acid brilliant blue with carbon was observed, when the surface was positively charged with excess protons in solution. The adsorption capacity was found to be 15.24 mg/g by Langmuir isotherm. The pH effect and desorption studies suggested that chemisorption might be the major mode of the adsorption process.

4.3. By Surface Modified Coir Pith

The adsorption capacity of coir pith toward anionic dyes was found to be very low. To enhance the sorption capacity towards anionic contaminants, the surface modification of the coir pith was performed using a cationic surfactant, hexadecyl trimethyl ammonium bromide [37]. Adsorption of two anionic dyes, acid brilliant blue (acid dye) and procion orange (reactive dye), were studied. It was found that modified coir pith yielded adsorption capacities of 159 and 89 mg/g for acid brilliant blue and procion orange, respectively. Dye adsorption increased with increased temperature, indicating that the process was endothermic. The main mechanisms involved in the process were suggested as ion exchange and chemisorption for the uptake of dyes.
Table 3. Adsorption capacities of coir pith-based biosorbents for the removal of various dyes from effluent water
     
Further test was also carried out for the removal of direct red 12B (acidic dye) and rhodamine B (basic dye) using the same modified adsorbent [38]. It was found that modified coir pith yield adsorption capacity of 76.3 mg/g and 14.9 mg/g for direct red 12B and rhodamine B, respectively. It was found that removal of direct Red 12 B by modified coir pith was substantially greater than that by raw coir pith and removal of rhodamine B was comparable with raw coir pith. Thermodynamical studies indicated that the adsorption process was spontaneous and endothermic. Desorption studies showed that chemisorption might be the major mechanisms governing the dye uptake by the surfactant-modified adsorbent.
Deferent fibrous activated carbons were prepared by Phan et al. from natural precursors (jute and coconut fibers) by physical and chemical activation [39]. Physical activation was carried out by thermal treatment of raw fibers at 950°C in an inert atmosphere followed by an activation step with CO2 at the same temperature. In chemical activation consisted of impregnation of the raw fibers in a solution of phosphoric acid and heated at 900°C in an inert atmosphere. The adsorption properties of the activated carbons were tested towards pollutants representative of industrial effluents: phenol, Acid Red 27 dye and Cu2+ ion. Chemical activation by phosphoric acid shows the most suitable process to produce fibrous activated carbon from cellulose fiber. This method leads to an interesting porosity (SBET up to 1500 m2/g), which enabled a high adsorption capacity for micro-pollutants like phenol (reaching 181 mg/g). Moreover, it produced numerous acidic surface groups, which were involved in the adsorption mechanisms of dyes and metal ions.

4.4. Mechanism of Absorption of Dye by Coir Pith Carbon

The surface chemistry of carbon is determined to a large extent by the number and the nature of the surface functional groups or complexes. Mineral admixtures present in activated carbons can also influence the surface chemistry of carbons. Carbon–oxygen surface compounds are by far the most important in influencing surface reactions, surface behaviour, hydrophilicity and electrical and catalytic properties of carbons, cationic or anionic exchange capacities have been observed for carbons depending on surface functionality [40].
In one study, adsorption interactions of dyes, phenol and chlorophenols onto coir pith carbon from aqueous solution were investigated using FTIR spectroscopy, Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM), and X-ray diffraction techniques by Namasivayam and Kavitha [41]. IR studies indicate the participation of some of the surface functional groups in the adsorption mechanism and SEM studies visualized the formation of the molecular cloud of the dye/phenol over the surface. The XRD data of the adsorbate loaded carbon had evidence of the crystalline nature of carbon changing in amorphous nature after adsorption which suggested that the dye and phenol molecules diffuse into micro-pores and macro-pores of the adsorbent and adsorb mostly by chemisorptions with altering the structure of the carbon, as a result of the adsorption reaction.

5. Application of Coir Pith for Removal of Toxic Metal Ions from Water

The presence of elevated concentrations of toxic metal ions in the water body represents a major risk to plants, animals and human health. Various toxic metal ions are discharged into the environment through various industrial activities, constituting one of the major causes of environmental pollution. One of the important features that distinguish heavy metals from other pollutants is that the former are not biodegradable. Once metal ions enter the environment, their chemical form largely determines their potential toxicity. Coir pith has been extensively investigated as adsorbents for the removal of diverse metal ions from wastewater by different researchers.
Coir pith waste was used for the adsorptive removal of Pb(II) from aqueous solution by Kadirvelu and Namasivayam [44]. The adsorption capacity was reported to be 263 mg/g for Pb(II) removal which was found to increase with increasing pH from 2 to 4 and remained constant up to pH 10.
Parab et al. studied coir pith as adsorbent for Co(II), Cr(III) and Ni(II) adsorption in both single and multi-component systems [45]. The maximum adsorption capacity of coir pith was found to be 12.82, 11.56 and 15.95 mg/g for cobalt, chromium and nickel, respectively. Optimum pH values for maximum metal ion adsorption were found as 4.3 for cobalt, 3.3 for chromium and 5.3 for nickel.
In a study Suksabye et al. investigated the use of coir pith for the removal of hexavalent chromium from electroplating wastewater [46]. The maximum removal (99.99%) was obtained at 2% (w/v) dosage, particle size b75 µm, at initial Cr(VI) concentration 1647 mg/L, system pH 2, and an equilibrium time of 18 h. The maximum adsorption capacity of coir pith for Cr(VI) at 15, 30, 45 and 60°C was 138.04, 197.23, 262.89 and 317.65 mg Cr(VI)/g coir pith, respectively.
Namasivayam and Sureshkumar [47] investigated the feasibility of coconut coir pith as biosorbent for the removal of Cr(VI) after modification with a cationic surfactant, hexadecyl trimethyl ammonium bromide. Optimum pH for Cr(VI) adsorption was found to be 2.0. Reduction of Cr(VI) to Cr(III) occurred to a slight extent during the removal. The adsorption capacity of the biosorbent was found to be 76.3 mg/g.
The removal of nickel from the waste water was investigated by Ewecharoen et al. [48]. The optimum condition for nickel removal by coir pith in a batch system was found solution pH of 4–7, adsorbent dosage of 5% (w/v), an equilibrium contact time of 10 min and a temperature of 30°C. The maximum uptake of nickel by coir pith and modified coir pith were 9.5 and 38.9 mg/g, respectively. Sodium hydroxide increased metal binding site (free O-) of modified coir pith. It was found that lignin and holo-cellulose were the main components in coir pith that played a major role in nickel adsorption. The IR spectrum study revealed that the main functional groups which were involved in the nickel adsorption were hydroxyl and methoxy groups.
Kadirvelu et al. examined the use of carbonized coir pith for the adsorption of Ni(II) from aqueous solution [49]. It was reported that a decrease in the carbon concentration with constant Ni concentration, or an increase in the Ni concentration with constant carbon concentration resulted in a higher nickel uptake per unit weight of carbon. The adsorption capacity was found 62.5 mg/g at an initial pH of 5.0 at 30°C for the particle size 250–500 µm. The adsorption of Ni increased with pH from 2 to 7 and remained constant up to 10. The recovery of Ni(II) after adsorption was carried out by treatment of the Ni loaded carbon with HCl. Desorption studies confirmed that adsorption mechanism was ion exchange.
Kadirvelu and Namasivayam developed activated carbon from coir pith for the adsorption of Cd(II) from aqueous solution [50]. The adsorption capacity was found 93.4 mg/g at an initial pH of 5.0 at 30°C for the particle size 250–500 mm. The percent removal increased with pH from 2 to 4 and remained constant up to pH 10. The maximum percentage recovery of Cd(II) was observed as 100% with 0.075 M HCl solution, showing that ion exchange was involved in the adsorption process.
Carbonized coir pith has also been used for Cu(II) removal from aqueous solutions by Namasivayam and Kadirvelu [51]. The percent removal increased from 50 to 90 with the increase of pH from 2.0 to 4.0 and remained constant up to pH 10.0 for Cu(II) concentration of 20 mg/L. The adsorption capacity of carbonized coir pith was found to be 39.7 mg/g at pH 4.2 for the particle size 250 to 500 µm. The percent recoveries of Cu(II) for carbonized coir pith were 60.0, 74.0, 93.0, 100.0 and 100.0 by 0.025, 0.05, 0.10, 0.15 and 0.2 M HCl, respectively, suggesting that ion exchange was involved in the sorption process. A summary of the adsorption capacity of coir pith based biosorbents for different metal ions has been presented in Table 4.
Table 4. Adsorption capacities of coir pith-based biosorbents for the removal of different metal ions from effluent water
     

6. Application of Coir Pith for Removal of Phenolic Pollutant from Water

Though textile effluent contributes a little phenol pollution, phenols are generally considered to be one of the important organic pollutants discharged into the environment. The discharge of effluent containing phenolic pollutants from various industries into natural water bodies is an ongoing and serious threat to human health and natural water quality. The ubiquitous nature of phenols, their toxicity even in trace amounts and the stricter environmental regulations make it necessary to develop processes for the removal of phenols from wastewaters. Coir pith based biosorbents have also been investigated for the removal of phenolic pollutants from water and wastewater. Table 5 illustrates the summary of the adsorption capacities of coir pith base biosorbents for the removal of various phenols from water.
Table 5. Adsorption capacities of coir pith based biosorbents for the removal of various phenols from water
     

7. Bioregenaration

Bioregeneration is the renewing of activated carbon by microbial activities. Bioregeneration can be achieved either by mixing bacteria with saturated activated carbon in off line [62] or it can be achieved in the course of biological treatments as in the case of PACT or BAC systems. Bioregeneration can be optimized by varying the nature of microorganisms, the environmental conditions and the loading on activated carbon [63].
Bioregeneration can only occur with compounds that readily desorb. Hence, bioregeneration is controlled by the reversibility of adsorption [62]. Effective bioregeneration processes depend on numerous factors including reversibility of adsorption, the presence of microbial organisms capable of metabolizing the adsorbate, the settings of optimal microbial growth conditions including nutrients (nitrogen, phosphorus, sulfur, etc.) temperature, dissolved oxygen, etc. and optimization of microbial and adsorbate concentration ratios [31].

8. Conclusions and Future Perspective

To date, rapidly changing technologies, population growth, industrial products and practices are increasing worldwide, driving towards the overwhelming environment pollutions, ecological imbalance, upsetting of biological processes and threatening of the public health. Recently coir pith based biosorbents are extensively studied for the removal of diverse type of pollutants from wastewater. In this review, uses of coir pith for the adsorption of toxic dyes and metal ions from effluent water were summarized based on a substantial number of relevant published articles. The use of coir pith as a biosorbents for removing various types of dyes from effluent water offers many attractive features such as the outstanding adsorption capacity for many pollutants and the fact that these materials are low-cost, non-toxic and biocompatible. Although the amount of available literature data for the application of coir pith for adsorption of dyes and metal ions from aqueous solution is increasing at a remarkable pace, there are still several gaps which need more attention, such as enhancement of biosorption capacity through modification of biosorbent, assessment of biosorbents under multi-component dyes and pollutants, mechanistic modelling to correctly understand the sorption mechanisms, investigation of these materials with real industrial effluents, recovery of dyes, regeneration studies and continuous flow studies. There is a particular need for future studies to verify the performance of the coir pith as low-cost adsorbents at the pilot plant scale. There is a great need for additional research concerning how to further process or disposed of coir pith after it has been used to collect dyes, some of which may be toxic, slow to biodegrade, or subjected to leaching [33]. Despite various challenges has been identified and clarified, a widespread and greatly the progress of in this area can be expected in the future.

References

[1]  Santos, A. D. B., Cervantes, F. J., and Lier, J. B. V., 2007, Review paper on current Technologies for decolourisation of textile wastewaters: Perspectives for anaerobic Biotechnology, Bioresource Technology, 98 (12), 2369-2385.
[2]  Mishra, G., and Tripathy, M., 1993, A critical review of the treatments for decolourization of textile effluent, Colourage, 40, 35-38.
[3]  Grag, V. K., Kumar, R., and Gupta, R., 2004, Removal of malachite green dye from aqueous solution by adsorption using industrial waste: A case study, Dyes & Pigments, 62 (1), 1-10.
[4]  Young, L., and Jain, Y. U., 1997, Ligninase-catalysed decolorization of synthetic dyes, Water Research, 31(5), 1187-1193.
[5]  Lian, L., Guo, L., and Guo, C., 2009, Adsorption of Congo red from aqueous solutions onto Ca-bentonite, Journal of Hazardous Materials, 161 (1), 126-131.
[6]  Vandevivere, P. C., Bianchi, R., and Verstraete, W., 1998, Treatment and reuse of wastewater from the textile wet-processing industry: review of emerging technologies. Journal of Chemical Technology and Biotechnology, 72 (4), 289-302.
[7]  Ngaha, W. S. W., Teonga, L. C., and Hanafiah, M. A. K. M., 2011, Adsorption of dyes and heavy metal ions by chitosan composites: a review, Carbohydrate Polymers, 83 (4), 1446-1456.
[8]  Khan, M. R., Ray, M., and Guha, A. K., 2011, Mechanistic studies on the binding of Acid Yellow 99 on coir pith, Bioresource Technology, 102 (3) 2394-2399.
[9]  Crini, G., 2006, Non-conventional low-cost adsorbents for dye removal: a review, Bioresource Technology, 97 (9), 1061-1085.
[10]  Kushwaha, S., Soni, H., Ageetha, V., and Padmaja, P., 2013, An Insight into the production, characterization, and mechanisms of action of low-cost adsorbents for removal of organics from aqueous solution, critical reviews, Environmental Science and Technology, 43(5), 443-549.
[11]  Hubbe, M. A., Beck K. R., Neal W. G. O., and Sharma Y. C., 2012, Cellulosic subtract for removal of pollutants from aqueous systems: a review, Bioresources, 7(2), 2592-2687.
[12]  Ahmaruzzaman, M., 2008, Adsorption of phenolic compounds on low-cost adsorbents: A review, Advances in Colloid and Interface Science, 143(1-2) 48–67.
[13]  Aksu, Z., 2005, Application of biosorption for the removal of organic pollutants: a review, Process Biochemistry, 40 (3-4), 997-1026.
[14]  Fu, Y., and Viraraghavan, T., 2001, Fungal decolorization of dye wastewaters: a review, Bioresource Technology, 79 (3), 251-262.
[15]  Rangabhashiyam, S., Anu, N., and Selvaraju, N., 2013, Sequestration of dye from textile industry wastewater using agricultural waste products as adsorbents, Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering, 1(4 ), 629-641.
[16]  Sanghi, R., and Verma, P., 2013, Decolorisation of aqueous dye solutions by low-cost adsorbents: a review, Coloration Technology, 129 (2), 85-108.
[17]  Chadha, K.L., 2003, Coconut research in India—a review, Indian Coconut Journal, 36 (9), 13-16.
[18]  Namasivayam C., and Kavitha, D., 2003, Adsorptive removal of 2-chlorophenol by low-cost coir pith carbon, Journal of Hazardous Materials, 98(1-2), 257–274.
[19]  Tripetchkul, S., Pundee, K., Koonsrisuk S., and Akeprathumchai, S., 2012, International Journal of Recycling of Organic Waste in Agriculture, 15(1), 1-8.
[20]  Dan, T.K., 1993, Development of light weight building bricks using coconut pith, Indian Coconut Journal. 23 (11). 12-19.
[21]  Malik, R., Ramteke, D. S., and Wate S. R., 2007, Adsorption of malachite green on groundnut shell waste based powdered activated carbon, Waste Management, 27 ( 9), 1129-1138.
[22]  Bhatnagar, A., and Jain A. K., 2005, A comparative adsorption study with different industrial waste as adsorbent for removal of cationic dyes from water, Journal of Colloidal and Interface Science, 281(1), 49-55.
[23]  Bhatnagar, A., and Sillanpää, M., 2010, Utilization of agro industrial and municipal waste materials as potential adsorbents for water treatment—A review, Chemical Engineering Journal, 157 (2-3) 277–296.
[24]  Gupta, V. K., and Suhas, 2009, Application of low-cost adsorbents for dye removal – A review, Journal of Environmental Management, 90 (8) 2313–2342.
[25]  Ali. I., Asim, M., and Khan, T. A., 2012, Low cost adsorbents for the removal of organic pollutants from wastewater, Journal of Environmental Management, 113, 170-183.
[26]  Bhatnagar, A., Vilar, V. J. P., Botelho, C. M. S., and Boaventura, R. A. R., 2010, Coconut-based biosorbents for water treatment - A review of the recent literature, Advances in Colloid and Interface Science, 160 (1-2) 1-15.
[27]  Sud D., Mahajan G., and Kaur M. P., 2008, Agricultural waste material as potential adsorbent for sequestering heavy metal inos from aqueous solution, Bioresource Technology, 99(14), 6017-6022.
[28]  Mohan, D., and Pittman, C. U., 2006, Activated carbons and low cost adsorbents for remediation of tri- and hexavalent chromium from water, Journal of Hazardous Materials B, 137 (2), 762-811.
[29]  Bhattacharyya K. G., and Sharma, A., 2004 Azadirachta indica leaf powder as an effective biosorbent for dyes: a case study with aqueous Congo Red solutions, Journal of Environmental Management, 71 (3), 217-229.
[30]  Demirbas, A., 2009, Agricultural based activated carbons for the removal of dyes from aqueous solutions: a review, Journal of Hazardous Materials, 167 (1-3), 1-9.
[31]  Santhy, K., and Selvapathy P., 2006, Removal of reactive dyes from wastewater by adsorption on coir pith activated carbon, Bioresource Technology, 97(11), 1329-1336.
[32]  Namasivayam, C., Kumar, M. D., Selvi, K., Begum, R. A., Vanathi, T., and Yamuna, R.T., 2001, Waste coir pith—a potential biomass for the treatment of dyeing wastewaters, Biomass and Bioenergy, 21(6), 477-483.
[33]  Namasivayam, C., Radhika, R., and Suba, S., 2001, Uptake of dyes by a promising locally available agricultural solid waste: coir pith, Waste Management, 21 (4), 381-387.
[34]  Namasivayam C., and Kavitha, D., 2002, Removal of Congo Red from water by adsorption onto activated carbon prepared from coir pith, an agricultural solid waste, Dyes and Pigments, 54 (1), 47-58.
[35]  Kavitha, D., and Namasivayam, C., 2007, Experimental and kinetic studies on methylene blue adsorption by coir pith carbon, Bioresource Technology, 98(1), 14-21.
[36]  Kavitha, D., and Namasivayam, C., 2008, Capacity of activated carbon in the removal of acid brilliant blue: Determination of equilibrium and kinetic model parameters, Chemical Engineering Journal, 139(3), 453-461.
[37]  Sureshkumar, M. V., and Namasivayam, C., 2008, Adsorption behaviour of Direct Red 12B and Rhodamine B from water onto surfactant-modified coconut coir pith, Colloids and Surfaces A, 317 (1-3), 277-283.
[38]  Namasivayam, C., and Sureshkumar, M. V., 2006, Anionic dye adsorption characteristics of surfactant modified coir pith, a ‘Waste’ lignocellulosic Polymer, Journal of Applied Polymer Science, 100(2), 1538-1546.
[39]  Phan, N. H., Rio, S., Faur, C., Coq, L. L., Cloirec, P. L., and Nguyen, T. H., 2006, Production of fibrous activated carbons from natural cellulose (jute, coconut) fibers for water treatment applications, Carbon; 44(12), 2569-2577.
[40]  Boehm, H. P., 1994, Some aspects of the surface chemistry of carbon blacks and other carbons, Carbon, 32 (5), 759-769.
[41]  Namasivayam C., and Kavitha, D., 2006, IR, XRD and SEM studies on the mechanism of adsorption of dyes and phenols by coir pith carbon from aqueous phase, Microchemical Journal, 82 (1), 43-48.
[42]  Kavitha, D., and Namasivayam, C., 2007, Recycling coir pith, an agricultural solid waste, for the removal of procion orange from wastewater, Dyes and Pigment, 74(1), 237-248.
[43]  Kavitha, D., and Namasivayam, C., 2007, Experimental and kinetic studies on methy-lene blue adsorption by coir pith carbon. Bioresource Technology, 98(1), 14-21.
[44]  Kadirvelu, K., and Namasivayam, C., 2000, Agricultural by-product as metal adsorbent: Sorption of lead (II) from aqueous solution onto coir pith carbon, Environmental Technology, 21(10), 1091–1097.
[45]  Parab, H., Joshi, S., Shenoy, N., Lali, A., Sarma, U. S., and Sudersanan, M., 2006, Determination of kinetic and equilibrium parameters of the batch adsorption of Co(II), Cr(III) and Ni(II) onto coir pith, Process Biochemistry. 41 (3), 609–615.
[46]  Suksabye P, Thiravetyan P, Nakbanpote W, Chayabutra S. 2007, Chromium removal from electroplating wastewater by coir pith, Journal of Hazardous Materials, 141(3), 637-644.
[47]  Namasivayam, C., and Sureshkumar, M. V., 2008, Removal of chromium (VI) from water and wastewater using surfactant modified coconut coir pith as a biosorbent, Bioresource Technology, 99(7), 2218-2225.
[48]  Ewecharoen, A., Thiravetyan, P., and Nakbanpote, W., 2008, Comparison of nickel adsorption from electroplating rinse water by coir pith and modified coir pith, Chemical Engineering Journal, 137(2), 181-188.
[49]  Kadirvelu, K., Thamaraiselvi, K., and Namasivayam, C., 2001, Adsorption of nickel(II) from aqueous solution onto activated carbon prepared from coirpith, Separation and Purification Technology, 24(3), 497-505.
[50]  Kadirvelu, K., and Namasivayam, C., 2003, Activated carbon from coconut coirpith as metal adsorbent: adsorption of Cd(II) from aqueous solution, Advanced in Environmental Research, 7(2), 471-478.
[51]  Namasivayam, C., and Kadirvelu, K., 1997, Agricultural solid wastes for the removal of heavy metals: Adsorption of Cu (II) by coirpith carbon, Chemosphere, 34(2), 377-399.
[52]  Conrad, K., and Hansen, H. C. B., 2007, Sorption of zinc and lead on coir, Bioresource Technology, 98(1), 89-97.
[53]  Gonzalez MH, Araùjo GCL, Pelizaro CB, Menezes EA, Lemos SG, Batista de Sousa G, Nogueira ARA. 2008, Coconut coir as biosorbent for Cr(VI) removal from laboratory wastewater, Journal of Hazardous Materials, 159(2-3), 252-256.
[54]  Namasivayam, C., and Kadirvelu, K., 1997, Agricultural solid wastes for the removal of heavy metals: Adsorption of Cu (II) by coirpith carbon, Chemosphere, 34(2), 377-399.
[55]  Quek, S.Y., Al-Duri, B., Wase D. A. J., and Forster, C. F., 1998, Coir as a biosorbent of copper and lead, Process safety and environmental protection,76(1), 50-54.
[56]  Unnithan, M. R., Vinod, V. P., and Anirudhan, T. S., 2004, Synthesis, characterization, and application as a chromium(VI) adsorbent of amine-modified Polyacrylamide- Grafted coconut coir pith, Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 43(9), 2247-2255.
[57]  Suryavanshi, U. S., and Shukla, S. R., 2009, Adsorption of Ga(III) on oxidized coir, Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, 48(2), 870-876.
[58]  Parab, H., Joshi, S., Shenoy, N., Lali, A., Sarma, U. S., and Sudersanan, M., 2008, Esterified coir pith as an adsorbent for the removal of Co(II) from aqueous solution, Bioresource Technology, 99(6), 2083-2086.
[59]  Pathak, J., Rupainwar, D. C., and Talat, M., 2006, Removal of basic dyes from aqueous solutions using coconut hard shell powder as a sorbent, Journal of the Indian Chemical Society, 83(12), 1253-1255.
[60]  Subha, R., and Namasivayaam, C. 2009, Kinetics and isothermal studies for the adsorption of phenol using low cost micro porous ZnCl2 activated coir pith, Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, 36(1), 148-159.
[61]  Namasivayam, C., and Kavitha D. 2005, Adsorptive removal of 2, 4-Dichlorophenol from aqueous solution by low cost carbon from an agricultural solid waste: coconut coir pith, Separation Science and Technology, 39(6), 1407-1425.
[62]  Silva, M., Fernandes, A., Mendes, A., Manaia, C. M., and Nunes, O. C., 2006, Preliminary feasibility study for the use of an adsorption/bioregeneration system for molinate removal from effluents. Water Research 38 (11), 2677-2684.
[63]  Vinitnantharat, S., Baral, A., Ishibashi, Y., and Ha, S. R., 2001, Quantitative bioregeneration of granular activated carbon loaded with phenol and 2, 4-dichlorophenol. Environmental Technology, 22 (3) 339-344.