Science and Technology
p-ISSN: 2163-2669 e-ISSN: 2163-2677
2012; 2(5): 122-129
doi: 10.5923/j.scit.20120205.03
Waqar A. A. Syed 1, 2, Nazar A. Shah 3, Z. Wazir 2
1Blackett Laboratory, Imperial College of Science, Technology and Medicine, London SW7 2AZ, UK
2Department of Physics, International Islamic University, Islamabad, Pakistan
3Department of Physics, COMSATS institute of Information Technology, Islamabad, Pakistan
Correspondence to: Z. Wazir , Department of Physics, International Islamic University, Islamabad, Pakistan.
| Email: | ![]() |
Copyright © 2012 Scientific & Academic Publishing. All Rights Reserved.
We report the experimental work for the determination of wavelength standard to validate the measurements of Fourier transform spectrometer. A dc run hollow-cathode discharge with two anodes on either sides of a cathode is designed for the precise measurements of He II lines at 4686 Å. The Doppler width and ion-drift shift were measured by using each anode alternatively which changes the direction of electric field from 0o to 180o. The stability of He II line has been investigated and comparable precision with respect to previous work has been obtained. Excellent wavelength accuracy with relative uncertainty in line position of the order of 108 is within reach of single point calibration factor.
Keywords: Frequency Standards, Fourier Transform Spectroscopy, Width and Shift of Lines
’ against ‘
’ should be a horizontal line. The true wavenumber ‘
’ can be expressed in terms of observed wavenumber ‘
’![]() | (1) |
, and
. The wavenumber scale of an FTS is determined by the cosine of angle between optical axis and the light being measured. ‘
’ is of the order of ‘
and therefore, is independent of ‘
’ and can be found from a single reference standard. Theoretically, only one calibration line is needed but the common practice is to calculate ‘
’ for every line of sufficient strength for which a trusted wavelength is available. This aggregate would typically be used to calculate a single ‘
’ as a mean and reduce the uncertainty in the calibration.The calibration lines employed should ideally possess wavenumber measurements, at least an order of magnitude greater in accuracy than the lines in the spectrum to be calibrated, however this may not always be possible. On plotting ‘
’ against ‘
’, a horizontal line should be obtained where the value of offset from zero is the calibration constant needed to put the line number on an absolute scale. Obtaining the sloping line implies the pressure of illumination shifts. The linearity of the wavenumber scale means that the wavenumber calibration can be transferred from one spectrum to another if the spectra are overlapping.The requirement of an absolute calibration limits us to calibrate with the lines generated within the same lamp[7]. Argon is one of the most useful sources of standard wavelengths, carefully determined Norlen[10]. He excited the Ar II spectrum in water cooled hallow cathode at a pressure of 0.2 torr and measured the vacuum wavelength with a Fabry-Perot interferometer. We have compared the observations from our double-anode hollow cathode with the Norlen’s standards. The plot of ‘
’ against ‘
’ clearly deviates from the horizontal line, similar to the pattern observed by the IC group and at Kitt-Peak. In this plot the scatter is a little bigger as compared with the work of Pickering[11] and Learner[7] at IC, they described this shift due to the difference of pressure and running conditions of the lamp. Salit et al[8] believed that the apparent slope between their FTS measurements and the Fabry-Perot measurements of Kaufman[12] is not due to the operating conditions of lamp. Regardless of the linewidth or source an asymmetry was found in the FTS instrumental line shape in the spectra and no significant change in slope is found when line shape asymmetry was reversed. An extensive 'Th' atlas was prepared with FTS at Kitt Peak[13] showing a systematic bias between FTS and Fabry-Perot measurements as a function of wavenumbers. Both Fabry-Perot and FTS possess very high levels of internal consistency, and it was not clear whether the observed disagreements were due to FTS, or due to Fabry-Perot, measurements; which deepens our concern that these wavelength standards are a primary source of the observed bias and are not quite adequate standards.
lines of hydrogen but with a factor of Z2 (=4) in energy. The fine structure of the ionized helium He II ,3s, p, d −4s, p, d, f line complex
is sixteen times wider and Doppler widths fifty percent smaller than corresponding structure in hydrogen, and therefore λ4860 Å offers a better opportunity than ‘
’ for the resolution of its components. The relative separations of these components provide a fundamental test for the predictions of quantum electrodynamics[15][16-17]. The excitation[20] requires a relatively violent gas discharge, which favors neither a small Doppler width nor freedom from the influence of electric fields. Its attraction as a test of radiation theory lies particularly in the possibility of checking the predicted dependence of term shift on ‘n’ and on ‘Z’. Larson et al[21] have used gaseous atomic beam light source with pressure scanned Fabry-Perot spectrometer. The measured widths were about 0.085 cm-1 comparable to those of hallow cathodes, but much wider than the observed natural width. Berry & Roesler[17] have described these widths arises in the excitation process, as the atomic beam density is low enough to rule out any collision during decay![]() | Figure 1. Double anode lamp used in this study |
of the complex are given in the table. An offset of 51 mK has been applied before making this comparison. The best position measurements of the past studies[17].recorded on Fabry-Perot instrument are also included in Table 1. In our studies the recorded linewidth of the components are about 235 mK for the strong isolated components i.e. 5 and 8+9 with an uncertainty of ±1.6 and ±1.3mK respectively, which is 8/1000 and 6/1000 of the line widths respectively. This indicates the high precision attained in this experiment. Fig. 3. shows the recording of He II, 3s, p, d −4s, p, d, f line complex from the double anode hallow cathode together with the fitted profile of line. The superior resolution and precise calibration allow good measurements to be made on all well resolved lines. After getting a satisfactory fit the centre of each line was measured with respect to the reference component 5. Although the low signal to noise ratio makes it difficult to determine the width and profile more accurate, the resolution was sufficient to obtain measurements of the more widely spaced components 10 and 11 to the accuracy comparable with the reference[17]. For the component 5, (
) was calculated to calibrate the wavenumber in the spectrum, where
. a plots of
versus showing the effects of wavenumber correction is given in Fig. 4. It is interesting to note that the value of
is almost the same (4 × 10-8) for the argon standards for the wavenumber 21300 K, and He II line (21335 K).![]() | Figure 2. Plot of wavenumber offset versus residual left on overlapping the experimental profile with the theoretical one |
![]() | Figure 3. Spectra of He II 3s,p,d-4s,p,d,f complex, observed from double anode hollow-cathode together with the fitted profile |
![]() | Figure 4. versus , solid line represents before applying the correction and dotted line represents after correction, taking component 5 as reference |
complex relative to that of,
as 100 are presented in Table 2. Concerning the blends between components, assuming that all the lines would have the same recorded profile if they were unblended, a standard profile of the blend (8+9) was determined by neglecting the small separation between 8 and 9. Relative to the strongest component, the intensities and widths of the other components were allowed to vary to obtain best match to observed pattern, except where two components have the same upper level their relative intensities were clamped at theoretical ratios. The fitted FWHM of eight components, including the component 5, which is well resolved and with a good signal to noise ratio, is of the order of 235±3.2 mK, and that the width is assumed to be the FWHM of all thirteen components of the complex.
|
![]() | (9) |
) of He II 4686 Å and He I line 4713 Å
. We define the shift to be positive when the shift implies a motion of the ion towards the spectrometer. A very small shift in the neutral helium lines shows consistency with the explanation that the Doppler shift of neutral atomic line is caused by momentum transfer from electrons, which drift opposite the field direction. The importance of the drift shift is its effect on the determination of the correct wavenumber, and obviously measurements taken with the field direction alternatively towards and away from the spectrometer must be averaged. The summarized results for the components having reasonable signals to noise ratio of He II 4686 Å, He I 4713 Å and Norlen's Ar II standards observed during this experiment are presented in Table 3. The plots represent calibration lines with respect to selected lines of Norlen's Ar II standards and spectrum on observing the He-Ar lamp in two directions i.e. 0o to 180o to the anode cathode axis are given in Fig. 5. The positive shift implies a motion of ions away from the anode, which can be considered as significant shift.
|
![]() | Figure 5. Plot showing versus , here . Plot represents the selected Norlen’s standards and on observing He-Ar lamp in two directions i.e. 0° and 180° |
| [1] | P. Luc and S. Gerstenkorn, “Fourier transform spectroscopy in the visible and ultraviolet range,” Appl. Opt. 17, 1327 - 1331 (1978). |
| [2] | J. W. Brault, “Fourier transform spectrometry in relation to other passive spectrometers,” Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London. Ser. A307, 503 - 511 (1982). |
| [3] | A. P. Thorne, “High-resolution Fourier transform atomic spectrometry,” J. Anal. At. Spectrom. 2, 227 - 232 (1987). |
| [4] | A. P. Thorne, “Fourier transform atomic spectroscopy in the ultraviolet,” Anal. Chem. 63, 57A - 65A (1991). |
| [5] | A. P. Thorne, Spectrophysics (2nd ed. Chapman and Hall, London, 1988). |
| [6] | B Edlén, " Wavelength measurements in the vacuum ultra-violet," Rep. Prog. Phys. 26 181 - 212 (1963). |
| [7] | R. C. M. Learner and A. P. Thorne, “Wavelength calibration of Fourier-transform emission spectra with applications to Fe I,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. B 5, 2045 - 2059 (1988). |
| [8] | M. L. Salit, J. C. Travis, and M. R. Winchester, “Practical wavelength calibration considerations for UV-visible Fourier-transform spectroscopy’, Appl. Opt. vol. 35, No. 16, 2960 - 2970 (1996). |
| [9] | M. L. Salit, C. J. Sansonetti, Damir Veza, and J. C. Travis, "Investigation of single-factor calibration of the wavenumber scale in Fourier transform spectroscopy," J. Opt. Soc. Am. B.21, No. 8, 1543 - 1550 (2004). |
| [10] | G. Norlen, "Wavelengths and Energy Levels of Ar I and Ar II based on New Interferometric Measurements in the Region 3 400-9 800 Å," Physica Scripta. 8 249-268 (1973). |
| [11] | J. C. Pickerring, "Ph.D. dissertation, University of London" (1993). |
| [12] | V. Kaufman, “Wavelengths, energy levels, and pressure shifts in mercury 198,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. 52, 866 - 870 (1962). |
| [13] | Palmer, B. A., and Engleman Jr. R. E., ‘Atlas of the Thorium Spectrum’, Los Almos National Laboratory Rep. LA-9615 (National Technical Information Service, Springfield, Va. (1983) pp.8 |
| [14] | A. Fowler, "Hydrogen, Spectrum of, Observations of the principal and other series of lines in the," Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 73, 62–105 (1912). |
| [15] | G. W. Series,"The Fine Structure of the Line 4686 angstrom of Singly Ionized Helium," Series Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Mathematical and Physical Sciences. 226, No. 1166 (Nov. 23, 1954) 377 - 392 (1951). |
| [16] | F. L. Roesler and J. E. Mack, "Behavior of the He II 3s, p, d-4s, p, d, f Line Complex in a Hollow Cathode Plasma," Phys. Rev. 135, No.1, A58 - A71 (1964). |
| [17] | H. G. Berry and F. L. Roesler, "Excitation of Ionized Helium States in a Cooled Hollow- Cathode Discharge" Phys. Rev. A. 1, 1504 - 1517 (1970). |
| [18] | J. D. Garcia and J. E. Mack, "Energy Level and Line Tables for One-Electron Atomic Spectra," J. Opt. Soc. Am. 55, 654 - 685(1965). |
| [19] | H. A. Bethe and E. E. Salpeter, Quantum Mechanics of One- and Two- Electron Atoms (Plenum Publishing Corporation, Newyork 1977) |
| [20] | J. M. Hariman, “Numerical Values for Hydrogen Fine Structure”, Phys. Rev. 101, 594 – 598 (1956). |
| [21] | H. P. Larson and R. W. Stanley, "Analysis of the He II 4686 Angstroms (n=4 to n=3) line complex excited in an atomic-beam light source," J. Opt. Soc. Am. 57, 1439-1449 (1967). |
| [22] | A. P. Thorne, C. J. Harris, I. Wynne-Jones, R. C. M. Learner, and G. Cox, “A Fourier transform spectrometer for the ultraviolet: design and performance,” J. Phys. E 20, 54-60 (1987). |
| [23] | A. P. Thorne, in Proceeding of an ESA Workshop on Solar Physics and Astrophysics at interferometric esolution, ESA SP-344, 191(1992) |
| [24] | J. W. Brault, computer code GREMLIN (national Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Aeronomy Laboratory, Boulder, CO, 1994-1995) |
| [25] | S. Tolanski, Introduction to Atomic Physics (Longman, 1963). |
| [26] | F. Llewelyn-Jones, "The Glow Discharge and Introduction to Plasma Physics," Metuen and Co. Ltd., London (1966). |
| [27] | H. A. Bethe and E. E. Salpeter, Quantum Mechanics of One and Two Electron Atoms (Academic Press Inc, New York 1957). |
| [28] | F. L Roesler and L De Noyer, (1964), "Differential Motion of Excited He+ Ions in a Hollow Cathode Plasma" Phys. Rev. letters, 12, 396-398 |