Public Health Research

p-ISSN: 2167-7263    e-ISSN: 2167-7247

2024;  14(1): 22-26

doi:10.5923/j.phr.20241401.03

Received: Jan. 26, 2024; Accepted: Feb. 17, 2024; Published: Feb. 22, 2024

 

Obesity in Relation to Old Age Complications

Md. Habibur Rahman, Soma Chowdhury Biswas

Department of Statistics, University of Chittagong, Chattogram, Bangladesh

Correspondence to: Md. Habibur Rahman, Department of Statistics, University of Chittagong, Chattogram, Bangladesh.

Email:

Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Scientific & Academic Publishing.

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY).
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Abstract

Obesity is a worldwide health concern for all ages. It is associated with morbidity and death from a variety of diseases. This study focused on the impact of obesity on the elevated levels of HbA1c, CRP, and Cystatin C in the elderly. High concentrations of these parameters are linked to numerous medical issues. The study is longitudinal based on Health and Retirement Study (HRS) data. Mean levels of these parameters were found to be highest on all the occasions for the respondents having obesity. The impact of the respondents' BMI status (obesity, pre-obesity, normal weight, and underweight) on their levels of HbA1c, CRP, and Cystatin C has been assessed using profile analysis models. The effect of obesity is found to be significant in all the models. The results of profile analysis models pertaining to HbA1c and Cystatin C produced significant interaction effects associated with obesity: Year.f14 (p = 0.0003 for HbA1c and 0.0134 for Cystatin C). Interaction effect obesity: Year.f10 is found significant (p = 0.0124) in the profile analysis model of CRP. These findings suggest that individuals with obesity are more likely to develop high levels of HbA1c, CRP, and Cystatin C over time. Hence obesity in old age is a crucial risk factor for the worsening of the elderly situation.

Keywords: Obesity, HbA1c, CRP, Cystatin C

Cite this paper: Md. Habibur Rahman, Soma Chowdhury Biswas, Obesity in Relation to Old Age Complications, Public Health Research, Vol. 14 No. 1, 2024, pp. 22-26. doi: 10.5923/j.phr.20241401.03.

1. Introduction

Population aging is now a very common phenomenon all over the world. According to the World Health Organization, more than two billion people are expected to be over 60 years old by 2050. This demographic transition towards an aging society presents different challenges to providing their necessary medical facilities and ensuring a supportive environment for the elders. Various geriatric conditions and deterioration of health with aging reduce the quality of life of seniors [1]. Older people often suffer from various life-threatening infectious diseases as well as age-related non-communicable chronic diseases (NCDs) [2]. One of the main factors thought to contribute to the development and severity of non-communicable diseases is obesity. It is a global health issue that affects people of all ages [3]. A number of studies were carried out related to obesity and its impact on the elderly. Numerous medical issues, especially those related to obesity, pose a concern for the elderly (e.g., T2DM, arthritis, cardiovascular disease, metabolic syndrome, urine incontinence, and depression) [3]. According to Segula (2014) type 2 diabetes mellitus and reduced glucose tolerance are associated to obesity [4]. Honolulu Heart Program and Japanese data survey stated that there is still a predictable relationship between obesity and hypertension [5,6]. Obesity increases the risk of coronary artery disease (CAD) as in [7,8]. Obesity is linked to dyslipidemia, which is characterized by decreased high density lipoprotein (HDL) and elevated triglycerides [9]. According to Aspeden et al. (2001) osteoarthritis (OA) is common in obesity [10]. In addition to raising the risk of several chronic diseases, obesity also contributes to functional disabilities [11]. In this study effort is made based on longitudinal data to check association between obesity of the aged individuals and the elevated levels of HbA1c, C-Reactive protein (CRP), and Cystatin C. The analysis of the study was done using the nlme package of R programming [12]. The three-month average blood sugar level is evaluated using the HbA1c test, which can also be used to diagnose diabetes [13,14]. It is a crucial blood test that provides a reliable indication of how effectively diabetes is being managed. The liver releases a molecule called c-reactive protein (CRP) in reaction to bodily inflammation. High levels of CRP may mean there is a serious health condition that causes inflammation [15]. Myocardial infarction, stroke, peripheral artery disease, and sudden cardiac death are all predicted by c-reactive protein (CRP). CRP appears to be a more accurate clinical predictor of cardiovascular events than LDL cholesterol [16]. Cystatin c is a protein produced by the cells in our body, and used as a biomarker of kidney function. When the kidneys are functioning normally, concentrations of cystatin c in the blood are stable. However, as kidney function deteriorates, the concentrations begin to rise. This test measures the amount of cystatin c in blood to help evaluate kidney function [17,18].

2. Methods and Materials

In our research work we have used data from the Health and Retirement Study (HRS). The HRS is sponsored by the National Institute on Aging (grant number NIA U01AG009740) and is conducted by the University of Michigan. Bugliari et al. (2020) described the details of the dataset [19]. It is a national cohort study for Americans over age 50 and their spouses. Beginning in 1992, samples of people were followed every two years for their social, economic, and health issues. HRS began collecting biomarkers in 2006. Biomarker refers to one-time biochemical or hematological measures made on blood or other available bodily fluids. Five biomarker viz. a. Total cholesterol b. HDL cholesterol, indicators of lipid levels c. Glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) – an indicator of glycemic control over the past 2-3 months d. C-reactive protein (CRP), a general marker of systemic inflammation e. Cystatin C, an indicator of kidney functioning are considered for this purpose [20].
A random one half of the 2006 sample was preselected for biomarker information. The other half was selected in 2008. In 2010, the first half was again interviewed, and in 2012 the second half was interviewed for a second time. This creates a four-year interval between biomarker collections.
To obtain the data for the study, Biomarker 2006, 2010 and 2014 data sets were merged with randhrs 1992_2016 longitudinal data file [21-24]. Finally wave 8, wave 10, and wave 12 were considered for the data of the study. In our study the following variables are chosen as response variables
1. Glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) – an indicator of glycemic control over the past 2-3 months
2. C-reactive protein (CRP), a general marker of systemic inflammation
3. Cystatin C, an indicator of kidney functioning.
BMI of the respondents are classified in four categories as obesity (30+), pre obesity (25.0-29.9), normal weight (18.5-24.9), and underweight (<18.5) according to World Health Organization. This BMI status is used as categorical covariate. The influence of the covariate over response variables were carried out using three different profile analysis models. Profile analysis is used to compare different groups of subjects in terms of mean response over time [25]. The method requires a single categorical covariate (denoting different treatment or exposure groups) and a balanced longitudinal design. Identifying the patterns of change in the mean response over time in the groups and figuring out if the shapes of the mean response profiles differ between groups are the key objectives of the study of response profiles [25].

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. HbA1c

Considering complete cases 3281 respondents were found having HbA1c value in all three (wave 8, wave 10, and wave 12) occasions. Among them number of individuals belong to obesity, pre-obesity, normal weight, and underweight are 1115, 1295, 844, and 27 respectively. Mean HbA1c levels over times according to BMI status are shown in the following table
Table 1. Mean levels of HbA1c over time based on BMI status of the respondents
     
It is seen that mean levels of HbA1c are highest for obesity on all the occasions. The graphical display below shows that the increasing trend of mean HbA1c levels over time is sharp for obesity compared to other categories. That is people with obesity are more likely to develop diabetes compared to others.
Figure 1. Mean HbA1c over time based on BMI status of the respondents
The profile analysis model of HbA1c with BMI status as covariate yielded the following result
Table 2. Results of profile analysis model with HbA1c as response variable and BMI status as covariate
     
Results show significant effect of BMI status and year. f (time) on HbA1c level of the respondents. Their interaction is also significant. REML estimates of the regression coefficients and standard errors are shown in the following table
Table 3. Estimated regression coefficients and standard error based on profile analysis model of HbA1c
     
Normal weight and year 2006 are considered here as reference category. From the table we see that obesity and pre obesity have significantly higher HbA1c compared to normal weight. Significant positive effect of Year.f10 (2010) and Year.f14 (2014) imply that HbA1c level is increasing over time. Interaction effect Obesity: Year.f14 is positive and significant (p value, 0.0003), implying that individuals having obesity are more vulnerable to diabetes over time.

3.2. C - Reactive Protein (CRP)

Considering complete cases 3102 individuals were found having CRP levels on three occasions. Log transformation of the response variable CRP was made in order to ensure normality. Mean log CRP over times based on BMI status is shown in the following table
Table 4. Mean log CRP over time based on BMI status of the respondents
     
Highest score of mean log CRP are seen on all the occasions for respondents having obesity. The graph presented below also shows that mean levels of log CRP are highest in obesity followed by pre obesity and normal weight.
Figure 2. Mean log CRP over time based on BMI status
Profile analysis model of CRP based on 3102 individuals produced the following results
Table 5. Results of profile analysis model with log CRP as response variable and BMI status as covariate
     
Table above shows that BMI status of the respondents has significant effect on the CRP level of the respondents. Insignificant interaction effect implies that no grouptime effect is present. REML estimates of the regression coefficients and standard errors are shown in the following table
Table 6. Estimated regression coefficients and standard error based on profile analysis model of log CRP
     
Normal weight is considered here as reference category. From the above table we see that respondents in obesity have significantly higher CRP value compared to respondents having normal weight. Thus obesity is a significant risk factor for developing high CRP concentration.

3.3. Cystatin C

Log transformation of the response variable Cystatin C was also made in order to ensure normality. Total of 3064 respondents were found in complete data with Cystatin C measurements. Among which 1064 respondents in obesity class, 1200 in pre obesity, 777 in normal weight and only 23 in underweight. Mean log Cystatin C over time based on BMI status is shown in the following table
Table 7. Mean log Cystatin C over times based on BMI status
     
Table shows that mean levels of log Cystatin C are highest for obesity in the group on all the occasions. The graph below displays an increasing trend over time and rate is higher for obesity compared to other categories
Figure 3. Mean log Cystatin C over time based on BMI status
The Results of the profile analysis model of log Cystatin C is presented in the following table
Table 8. Results of profile analysis model with log Cystatin C as response variable and BMI status as covariate
     
Table above shows that BMI status of the respondents has significant effect on the level of Cystatin C concentration of the respondents. Insignificant interaction effect implies that no group×time effect is present. REML estimates of the regression coefficients and standard errors are shown in the following table
Table 9. Estimated regression coefficients and standard error based on profile analysis model of log Cystatin C
     
Normal weight is considered as reference category in the above table. From the table we see that respondents in obesity have significantly higher Cystatin C compared to respondents having normal weight. Significant effects of Year.f10 and Year.f14 (p = 0.0000) indicate concentration of Cystatin C increases over time and the situation deteriorates for obesity because the effect of Obesity: Year.f14 is significant (p = 0.0134). Thus obesity in aged persons is significantly responsible for developing high concentration of Cystatin C.

4. Conclusions

Elevated levels of HbA1c, CRP, and Cystatin C are related to a number of medical conditions. Results of this study show that aged persons having obesity developed high levels of all the mentioned parameters. Hence obesity makes geriatric circumstances more vulnerable.

References

[1]  Stout, R. W., & Crawford, V. (1988). Active-life expectancy and terminal dependency: trends in long-term geriatric care over 33 years. The Lancet, 331(8580), 281-283.
[2]  Mathers, C. (2008). The global burden of disease: 2004 update. World Health Organization.
[3]  Amarya, S., Singh, K., & Sabharwal, M. (2014). Health consequences of obesity in the elderly. Journal of Clinical Gerontology and Geriatrics, 5(3), 63-67.
[4]  Segula, D. (2014). Complications of obesity in adults: a short review of the literature. Malawi Medical Journal, 26(1), 20-24.
[5]  Masaki KH, Curb JD, Chiu D, Petrovitch H, Rodriguez BL. 1997. Association of body mass index with blood pressure in elderly Japanese American men. The Honolulu Heart Program. Hypertension 29:673–7.
[6]  Matsumura K, Ansai T, Awano S, et al. 2001. Association of body mass index with blood pressure in 80-year-old subjects. J Hypertens 19: 2165–9.
[7]  Wilson PW, D’Agostino RB, Sullivan L, Parise H, Kannel WBl. 2002. Overweight and obesity as determinants of cardiovascular risk; the Framingham experience. Arch Intern Med 162: 1867–72.
[8]  Willett WC, Manson JE, Stampfer MJ, Colditz GA, Rosner B, Speizer FE, et al. 1995. Weight, weight change and coronary heart disease in women. Risk within the ‘normal’ weight range. JAMA 273:461–5.
[9]  Despres JP. 1991. Obesity and lipid metabolism: relevance of body fat distribution Curr Opin Lipidol, 2: 5–15.
[10]  Aspeden RM, Scheven BA, Hutchison JD. 2001. Osteoarthritis as a systemic disorder including stromal cell differentiation and lipid metabolism. Lancet 357(9262): 1118-20.
[11]  Na, Y. M., Park, H. A., Kang, J. H., Cho, Y. G., Kim, K. W., Im Hur, Y & Lee, S. H. (2011). Obesity, obesity related disease, and disability. Korean journal of family medicine, 32(7), 412.
[12]  Pinheiro J, Bates D, R Core Team (2023). nlme: Linear and Nonlinear Mixed Effects Models. R package version 3.1-164, https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=nlme.
[13]  World Health Organization. (2011). Use of glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) in diagnosis of diabetes mellitus: abbreviated report of a WHO consultation (No. WHO/NMH/CHP/CPM/11.1). World Health Organization.
[14]  Higgins, T. (2013). HbA1c for screening and diagnosis of diabetes mellitus. Endocrine, 43(2), 266-273.
[15]  Young, B., Gleeson, M., & Cripps, A. W. (1991). C-reactive protein: a critical review. Pathology, 23(2), 118-124.
[16]  Ridker, P. M. (2003). Clinical application of C-reactive protein for cardiovascular disease detection and prevention. Circulation, 107(3), 363-369.
[17]  Zhang, Z., Lu, B., Sheng, X., & Jin, N. (2011). Cystatin C in prediction of acute kidney injury: a systemic review and meta-analysis. American Journal of Kidney Diseases, 58(3), 356-365.
[18]  Soto, K., Coelho, S., Rodrigues, B., Martins, H., Frade, F., Lopes, S., & Devarajan, P. (2010). Cystatin C as a marker of acute kidney injury in the emergency department. Clinical journal of the American Society of Nephrology: CJASN, 5(10), 1745.
[19]  Bugliari, D., Carroll, J., Hayden, O., Hayes, J., Hurd, M., Karabatakis, A., & Emanuel, N. (2020). RAND HRS longitudinal file 2016 (V2) documentation.
[20]  Crimmins, E., Guyer, H., Langa, K., Ofstedal, M. B., Wallace, R., & Weir, D. (2008). HRS documentation report. Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan.
[21]  Health and Retirement Study. (Apr 2013). (2006 Biomarker Data) sensitive dataset. Produced and distributed by the University of Michigan with funding from the National Institute on Aging (grant number NIA U01AG009740). Ann Arbor, MI. https://hrsdata.isr.umich.edu/data-products/2006-biomarker-data.
[22]  Health and Retirement Study. (Apr 2015). (2010 Biomarker Data) sensitive dataset. Produced and distributed by the University of Michigan with funding from the National Institute on Aging (grant number NIA U01AG009740). Ann Arbor, MI. https://hrsdata.isr.umich.edu/data-products/2010-biomarker-data.
[23]  Health and Retirement Study. (Dec 2017). (2014 Biomarker Data) sensitive dataset. Produced and distributed by the University of Michigan with funding from the National Institute on Aging (grant number NIA U01AG009740). Ann Arbor, MI. https://hrsdata.isr.umich.edu/data-products/2014-biomarker-data.
[24]  Health and Retirement Study. (Apr 2020). (RAND HRS Longitudinal File 2016 (V2)) public use dataset. Produced and distributed by the University of Michigan with funding from the National Institute on Aging (grant number NIA U01AG009740). Ann Arbor, MI. (https://hrs.isr.umich.edu/data-products/access-to-public-data).
[25]  Fitzmaurice, G. M., Laird, N. M., & Ware, J. H. (2004). Applied longitudinal analysis, John Wiley & Sons. Inc., Haboken, NJ.