Public Health Research
p-ISSN: 2167-7263 e-ISSN: 2167-7247
2018; 8(2): 35-45
doi:10.5923/j.phr.20180802.02

Yusuf OB, Gbadebo BM, Afolabi RF, Adebowale AS
Epidemiology and Medical Statistics, Faculty of Public Health, College of Medicine, University of Ibadan, Nigeria
Correspondence to: Yusuf OB, Epidemiology and Medical Statistics, Faculty of Public Health, College of Medicine, University of Ibadan, Nigeria.
| Email: | ![]() |
Copyright © 2018 The Author(s). Published by Scientific & Academic Publishing.
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY).
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

We determined the prevalence, pattern and socioeconomic predictors of underweight among young married women (15-24yrs) in Nigeria. Two rounds (2008; n=1681 and 2013; n=3596) of a nationally representative data were analyzed. Descriptive statistics and logistic regression model were used. The proportion underweight was higher in 2008 (18.6%) than in 2013 (15.6%). In 2008, the proportion underweight was 24.0% and 8.4% among poor and rich women respectively. The proportion of underweight women reduces as household wealth increases. The likelihood of underweight was lower among participants who had one (OR=0.47; C.I=0.28-0.77, p<0.01) and two (OR=0.57; C.I=0.35-0.92, p<0.05) compared to those who had ≤3 children. The odds of underweight was higher among women who married at ages below 18yrs (OR= 2.49, C.I=1.65-3.75, p<0.001) compared to those who married at >18yrs. Underweight is still common among young married women; early marriage is a potential risk factor while lesser number of children is protective.
Keywords: Underweight, Early marriage, Poverty, Nigeria
Cite this paper: Yusuf OB, Gbadebo BM, Afolabi RF, Adebowale AS, Trends, Pattern and Socioeconomic Predictors of Underweight among Young Married Women in Nigeria, Public Health Research, Vol. 8 No. 2, 2018, pp. 35-45. doi: 10.5923/j.phr.20180802.02.
with the unit measured in
. During data collection, mass and weight were captured with the use of weigh balance calibrated in kilogram and tape rule respectively.
However, in the course of data analysis at the level of multivariate, the nutritional status was reclassified into two categories as; underweight =1 and others =0 with underweight as a status category. The explanatory variables are; age, parity, age at 1st marriage, household wealth, work status in the 12 months prior to the survey and decision on how to spend family earnings. Others are; place of residence, education, family type and husband’s education.Data analysisThe data were weighted before use by creating a new variable from the variable called ‘sampling weight’ which was included in the original data set. Weighting of the data set became necessary because cluster design approach was used during the data collection exercise for 2008 and 2013 NDHS and this will extrapolate and take into account of other areas not included in the clusters during the surveys. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, Chi-square and logistic regression model. Frequency distribution was used to present the data and Chi-square test was conducted to determine factors that are significantly associated with body mass index as a measure of nutritional status. At multivariate level of analysis, logistic regression was used due to dichotomous nature of the dependent variable to identify the predictors of underweight among the studied women. At this stage of analysis, five models were used to describe the relationship between underweight and background characteristics of the studied subjects. The variables included in each of the five models are as follows. Model 1 is the bivariate model while model 2 is a multivariate model that involves a dependent variable (underweight) and demographic variables (Age, Parity and Age at 1st Marriage). Models 3 and 4 included only the dependent variable and economic (Household wealth, Work status in the past 12 months prior to the survey and Decision on how to spend family earning) and social (Residence, Education, Family Type and Husband’s education) explanatory variables. In the last model all variables found to be statistically significant at bivariate level were included in the model in order to identify the important predictors of underweight among the studied women. All statistical tests were performed at 5.0% level of significance. The logistic regression model is of the form;
Where p is the proportion of women who are underweight and βi are regression parameters to be estimated with exponential of β being the odds ratio and
, are the explanatory variables. All analyses were done using IBM SPSS version 20 [32]. Ethical considerationEthical approval was obtained from the National Ethical Review Board of the Federal Ministry of Health before conducting the survey. Informed consent was obtained from the study participants at the point of data collection and all the consented participants were assured of confidentiality and anonymity of the information they supplied.
|
![]() | Figure 1. Trend in percentage distribution of the respondents according to Body Mass Index |
![]() | Figure 2. Percentage cumulative distribution of young married women in Nigeria by Body Mass Index according to wealth index and place of residence |
|
|
|