International Journal of Optics and Applications
p-ISSN: 2168-5053 e-ISSN: 2168-5061
2015; 5(4): 133-146
doi:10.5923/j.optics.20150504.04
Alhuda A. Al-Mfrji1, Shelan K. Tawfeeq1, Raad S. Fyath2
1Institute of Laser for Postgraduate Studies, University of Baghdad, Iraq
2College of Engineering, Al-Nahrain University, Iraq
Correspondence to: Raad S. Fyath, College of Engineering, Al-Nahrain University, Iraq.
| Email: | ![]() |
Copyright © 2015 Scientific & Academic Publishing. All Rights Reserved.
The ring modulator described in part I of this paper is designed here for two operating wavelengths 1550nm and 1310nm. For each wavelength, three structures are designed corresponding to three values of polymer slot widths (40, 50 and 60nm). The performance of these modulators are simulated using COMSOL software (version 4.3b) and the results are discussed and compared with theoretical predictions. The performance of intensity modulation/direct detection short range and long rang optical communication systems incorporating the designed modulators is simulated for 40 and 100Gb/s data rates using Optisystem software (version 12). The results reveal that an average energy per bit as low as 0.05fJ can be obtained when the 1550nm modulator is designed with a phase shifter length equals twice the coupling length.
Keywords: Ring modulator, Hybrid plasmonic phase shifter, Electro-Optic polymer
Cite this paper: Alhuda A. Al-Mfrji, Shelan K. Tawfeeq, Raad S. Fyath, Modeling and Analysis of a Miniaturized Ring Modulator Using Silicon-Polymer-Metal Hybrid Plasmonic Phase Shifter. Part II: Performance Predictions, International Journal of Optics and Applications, Vol. 5 No. 4, 2015, pp. 133-146. doi: 10.5923/j.optics.20150504.04.
ring modulators designed with different polymer slot widths
. The design methodology presented in Part I of this paper is used to find the corresponding values of silicon waveguide width that makes the real parts of the effective indices of the photonic mode and plasmonic mode equal and hence ensuring phase matching between the two modes. The refractive indices of silicon, silica, and silver used in the simulation are 3.48 [1], 1.44, and 0.15 + j11.5 [2], respectively. The electro-optic (EO) organic material used in the simulation is Carbazole-Phenoxy based Methacrylate homopolymer. The refractive index of the polymer is characterized by
at zero applied voltage and an EO coefficient
of
. The common geometric parameter values used to simulate the three modulators are silicon waveguide height
, polymer slot height
, and height of silica space between silicon waveguide and plasmonic waveguide
.
and
, respectively. (i) The silicon-plasmonic hybrid phase shifter behaves as a directional coupler where two eigen modes (quasi-odd and quasi-even modes) will be excited when the hybrid phase shifter is driven by the input photonic mode. The effective (ii) The phase velocity mismatch between the photonic mode and plasmonic mode δ and the coupling constant characterizing the virtual hybrid phase shifter coupler
are calculated using the relations
and
[3] where
is the propagation constant of the photonic mode,
is the propagation constant of the metal-dielectric-metal (MDM) plasmonic mode (
is the vacuum propagation constant). Further, the propagation constants of the quasi-even and quasi-odd modes are given, respectively, by
and
.(iii) The coupling length between the photonic and plasmonic waveguides is estimated using the relation
. Note that the three modulators are characterized by
which indicates perfect velocity match between the photon mode (in silicon waveguide) and the plasmonic mode (in the MDM waveguide). (iv) The length of the hybrid phase shifter
is set equals to
to ensure high transfer of power from the plasmonic mode to the photonic mode at the end of the phase shifter.(v) The ring circumference
is set initially to
in the design and then tuned slightly to ensure a resonance wavelength of 1550nm via simulation for each of the designed modulators.(vi) The mean attenuation length of the hybrid wavelength
is computed as
.(vii) The simulation results reveal that the roundtrip loss of the
silicon waveguide section in the racetrack is about 0.18dB. Thus the loss factor
. For each designed modulator, the length of the coupler section between the waveguide bus and the microning is tuned to achieve a critical coupling that satisfies
.![]() | Table 1. Parameter values obtained via simulation for the three 1550nm modulators |
as represented by points A, B, and C in Fig. 1. The corresponding values of silicon waveguide width
are 410,373 and 351.8nm, respectively.![]() | Figure 1. Real part of the effective refractive indices of photonic and plasmonic modes as a function of silicon waveguide width W_si for different polymer slot widths of 40nm, 50nm, and 60nm |
. The modulator is excited by 1550nm optical signal under zero applied voltage. It can be seen that the electric fields in the plasmonic arm are much stronger than those in dielectric arm. For the quasi-even eigen mode, the electric field orientation in the two arms are the same while they become opposite in the quasi-odd eigen mode. ![]() | Figure 2. Electric field distribution for photonic (a), plasmonic (b), quasi-even (c), and quasi-odd (d) modes associated with modulator operating at 1550nm and zero applied voltage |
![]() | Figure 3. 3D simulated electromagnetic energy density distribution for the 50nm-width polymer slot at 1550nm photonic mode excitation |
![]() | Figure 4. Energy density distribution in the hybrid phase shifter for the three modulators under zero applied voltage ![]() |
(from
to
, where
is the phase shifter length). The results are presented for the three modulators under zero applied voltage. Due to the presence of losses, the variation of the power in each waveguide with propagation distance
has a damped sinusoidal behavior. As z increases, the field transfers from the silicon waveguide to the plasmonic waveguide (and vice versa) gradually owing to the interference of the quasi-even mode and quasi-odd mode. Investigating the results in this figure reveals that at
, 66%, 74%, and 78.5% of the incident power is transmitted to the of the power silicon waveguide arm when
, and 60nm, respectively.
and insertion loss
of the three ring modulators and the results are depicted in Figs. 6 and 7, respectively. Figure 6 displays the transmission characteristics versus wavelength for two values of applied voltage
, 0 and 1V. Note that the 1V-applied voltage shifts the resonance frequency from 1550nm to 1550.38nm, 1550.23nm, and 1550.18nm (red shift) for the 40nm, 50nm, and 60nm slot width modulators, respectively. The corresponding extinction ratio (insertion loss) are 51.4dB (20.0dB), 46.0dB (21.8dB), 41.0dB (230.5dB), respectively.![]() | Figure 6. Transmission spectra of the three designed modulators under 0 and 1V applied voltages. ![]() |
and
are almost symmetric around zero voltage. An extinction ratio of
is achieved when
for three modulators.![]() | Figure 7. Extinction ratio (a) and insertion loss (b) as a function of the applied voltage for the three 1550nm modulators |
. Investigating the results in this table highlights the following findings(i) The three modulators are characterized by high extinction ratio (more than 40dB). Recent experimental demonstration of high bit rate optical communication systems indicate that optical modulators with extinction ratio as low as
satisfy the requirement [4-6].(ii) Bandwidth due to photon life time
dominates the modulator bandwidth. The modulator bandwidth is 485, 523, and 561 GHz for slot width 40, 50, and 60nm, respectively. Note that the three modulators are designed with almost the same value of
. Therefore, the decrease in modulator bandwidth comes from the effect of the critical coupling
(see eqn. (57b) in Part I of this paper).(iii) The average dissipated energy per bit
decreases with increasing
. According to eqn. (60) given in Part I of this paper,
is directly proportional to the modulator capacitor. For the three modulators under investigation, the energy per bit is proportional to
since the slot height is the same for three devices. Note further
decreases slightly as
increases (see Table 1). Thus assuming that
depends linearly only on
will slightly under estimate the modulation bandwidth.(iv) Theoretical predictions are in good agreement with simulation results.
|
). In this subsection, performance comparison among ring modulators designed with different phase shifter lengths are addressed. Four modulator structures having
and
are designed and simulated for 1550nm operation with
. Note that the phase shifter lengths
are even number of the coupling length in all the four structures and hence satisfy maximum power transfer for the plasmonic waveguide to the silicon waveguide at the end of the phase shifter.Mode analysis is performed for the hybrid phase shifters in the four structures using COMSOL software and the results reveal that the modal characteristics of the plasmonic and photonic modes are not affected by the length of the phase shifter. The reason behind that is the cross section dimensions and the materials of the phase shifter structure are the same for the four modulators. The modal simulation ends with
and
for these devices.Figure 8a-d show the field distribution in the hybrid phase shifter when
and
, respectively. Note that when
increases, the peak of the energy density decreases at the last part of the phase shifter due to the losses associated with the plasmonic waveguide.![]() | Figure 8. Energy density distribution in the hybrid phase shifter for the four modulators under zero applied voltage and ![]() ![]() |
for
and
, respectively. The corresponding critical coupling
obtained via simulation is 0.9060, 0.8376, 0.7742, and 0.7156, respectively.Table 3 lists the main performance parameters of the four structures under investigations. These results can be explained by noting that increasing the phase shifter length will increase both cavity loss and modulator capacitance (the latter is directly proportional to
). Investigating the results in Table 3 highlights the following findings(i) The insertion loss is almost independent of phase shifter length and this effect is more pronounced when
.(ii) The extinction ratio increases slightly
as the phase shifter length increases by
.(iii) The bandwidth due to modulator RC time constant
is inversely proportional to the phase shifter length. Note that
is inversely proportional to modulator capacitance and hence inversely proportional to the phase shifter length.(iv) The average dissipated energy per bit 
increases linearly with
due to the modulator capacitance effect.
increases from
to
as
increases from
to
.(v) The cavity photon lifetime decreases with increasing
due to the increase of associated loss. Therefore, the bandwidth due to photon lifetime increases with increasing
.
increases from
to
as
increases from
to
.
|
of polymers generally increases when wavelength decreases [7, 8]. The values of geometric parameters that are common for the three structures are silicon waveguide height
, polymer slot height
, and the height of silica space between silicon waveguide and plasmonic waveguide
. Thevalues of these three dimensions are identical to those used in the 1550nm design.The ring circumference L and the transmission coefficient between the bus waveguide and the ring
are tuned to achieve 1310nm resonance wavelength and critical coupling, respectively, for each designed modulators. Table 4 lists the geometric and physical parameters obtained via simulation when the phase shifter length
equals four times the coupling length
. Performance parameters of the modulators are summarized in Table 5. The results in the table highlights the following findings(i) For a specific value of polymer slot width
, the ratio
for three values of
considered here (40, 50, and
). Note the ratio between the two wavelengths is
Thus the normalized silicon waveguide width
is almost the same for both operating wavelengths when
is fixed. It is worth to mention here that in microwave and millimeter wave engineering, the geometric dimensions of the designed devices are usually expressed in a normalization form with respect to wavelength. This is useful to obtain a universal design which can be configured according to the required operating wavelength. This statement seems to be also applicable for the designed modulators where
scales with wavelengths ratio. However, the effective wavelength ratio
rather than 0.845 since the other silicon waveguide dimensions are kept the same for both wavelength designs.(ii) Recall that the coupling length
. At fixed value of
, the ratio
is approximately around
. This leaves 
which is good agreement with results reported in the table.(iii) Since the modulators are designed with
, then
. The modulator capacitance will increase by the same ratio,
. This yields an increase in the average energy per bit and a decrease in the modulator bandwidth due to RC time constant by 1.25 when one moves from 1550nm to 1310nm design.(iv) The quality factor
does not vary much for the two modulators designed at 1310nm and 1550nm resonance wavelength when
is fixed (see Table 6). This leaves the modulator bandwidth due to photon lifetime
is determined mainly by
. Thus
. This is in accord with average ratio of 1.2 estimated from both simulated and calculated bandwidth values, listed in Tables 2 and 5.(v) The 1310nm modulators are characterized by relatively lower extinction ratio and insertion loss compared with the 1550nm counterpart.
|
|
|
resistance with a capacitance calculated to yield the required bandwidth component according to
. The bandwidth of the driving circuit is set equal to 0.75 of the bit rate.Figures 9a and 9b show the transmitter eye diagrams corresponding to 40Gb/s nonreturn-to-zero (NRZ) and 50% return-to-zero (RZ) signaling, respectively, at 1550nm operation. Results related to 100Gb/s are given in Figs. 9c and 9d. No DC (bias) voltage is applied to the modulator while the binary data voltage is 0V for logic Zero and 1V for logic One.![]() | Figure 9. Transmitter eye diagrams at 1550 nm operation for ![]() |
identical spans. Each span contains a 80km SMF, with
2nd-order dispersion
and
loss
, and a
DCF having dispersion
and loss
. Note that the average 2nd-order dispersion of the span 
which indicates that the span is dispersionally compensated. (Here
and
are lengths of the SMF and DCF sections, respectively). An optical amplifier is also inserted after each fiber section to compensate its losses and hence spans with zero average loss are obtained. An optical bandpass filter, with optical bandwidth equals twice the receiver electrical bandwidth, is also inserted at the end of the transmission link to reduce the amount of accumulated amplified spontaneous emission generated by optical amplifiers that incident at the photodiode. An optical amplifier is also placed right of the modulator which acts as a power booster amplifier to compensate the modulator losses. Other parameter values used in the simulation are listed in Table 7.![]() | Figure 10. Long-reach optical communication system. The insert gives the components of a single span |
|
, the number of spans
should be less than 9, 11, 5, and 4, respectively.![]() | Figure 11. Dependence of BER on number of spans for 40Gb/s NRZ (a), 40Gb/s RZ (b), 100Gb/s NRZ (c), and 100Gb/s RZ (d) |
.Table 8 lists the maximum allowable transmission distance that yields a BER
. Results are reported for 40 and 100Gb/s bit rates, NRZ and RZ signal format, and 1550 and 1310nm operation.
|
![]() | Figure 12. Receiver eye diagrams for 1550nm short-reach operation with 40Gb/s NRZ (a), 40Gb/sRZ (b), 100Gb/sNRZ (c), and 100Gb/s RZ (d) |
![]() | Figure 13. Receiver eye diagram for 1310nm short-reach operation with 40Gb/s NRZ (a), 40Gb/s RZ (b), 100Gb/s NRZ (c), and 100Gb/s RZ (d) |