Nanoscience and Nanotechnology
p-ISSN: 2163-257X e-ISSN: 2163-2588
2014; 4(3): 52-58
doi:10.5923/j.nn.20140403.03
Safayat-Al Imam, Nasheen Kalam, Sharmin Abdhullah
Department of EEE, Ahsanullah University of Science and Technology, Dhaka, Bangladesh
Correspondence to: Safayat-Al Imam, Department of EEE, Ahsanullah University of Science and Technology, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
| Email: | ![]() |
Copyright © 2014 Scientific & Academic Publishing. All Rights Reserved.
This paper deals with a simulation model to analyse the behaviour of carbon nanotube field effect transistors (CNTFETs) under non-ballistic conditions and based on the changes of gate dielectric constant the performance of CNTFETs has been explored in detail as a function of temperature. A thorough study of the combined non-ballistic effect on the performance of CNTFETs has been conducted with different principle characteristics of CNTFETs and the output of the device has been analysed. Effects on the drain current under different temperature with different dielectric constant is observed under different gate voltages Also it has been observed that within a certain range of temperature both on-state and off-state current retains in steady state. However with a higher value of temperature and dielectric constants, on and off state current changes and as a result it degrades the current ratio. In addition, the ratio of quantum to insulator capacitance, drain-induced barrier lowering (DIBL) with respect to the changes of gate dielectric constant as a function of temperature are further investigated. Quantum capacitance increased with temperature which increases the ratio of quantum to insulator capacitance. The DIBL vary slightly with higher value dielectric material and reaches to desired ballistic condition value with an ambient temperature.
Keywords: On-state current, Off-state current, Drain-induced barrier lowering (DIBL), Quantum Capacitance
Cite this paper: Safayat-Al Imam, Nasheen Kalam, Sharmin Abdhullah, Temperature Dependence of Carbon Nanotube Field Effect Transistor under Non-Ballistic Conduction Considering Different Dielectric Materials, Nanoscience and Nanotechnology, Vol. 4 No. 3, 2014, pp. 52-58. doi: 10.5923/j.nn.20140403.03.
![]() | (1) |
is the density of positive velocity states filled by the source,
is the density of negative velocity states filled by the drain and
is the equilibrium electron density. Elastic scattering has an impact on the channel length of the CNTFET and also in the mean free path (MFP).For this reason, the channel resistance is affected which introduced a modified drain voltage (VDS) due to elastic scattering Therefore, the FET operates on a modified lower voltage, [10]![]() | (2) |
is the channel length,
is the diameter,
is the reference diameter with a value of 1.5 nm.
denotes the elastic scattering MFP, the value of which is taken to be about 200 nm [10]. The transport properties of a CNT is also dependent on physical strain. When subjected to strain, the bandgap of CNT is changed and the effective bandgap is different from the actual bandgap. The new bandgap can be calculated using the following equation![]() | (3) |
,
are the carbon
nearest-neighbor bond length and energy of the tight bonding model respectively and
is the tuned bandgap in equation (3).
is the shift of the bandgap because of strain and
is the distortion factor because of strain with a value of 0.1 [11].Diameter of the nano tube depends upon the chiral indices and chiral angle. Diameter can be defined as
with
Here
is the atomic radius with a value 2.49A0, n and m are chiral indices,
is the chiral angle for a (n,m ) CNT. The rate of change of the bandgap can be calculated using the following formula [11]![]() | (4) |
is the overlap integral of the tight-binding C-C model and it has a value of 2.7.
is the Poisson’s ratio and for this research,
= 0.2. p can be obtained using
.The effect of tunnelling is calculated using a two-step method. In this way, at first, a parameter called tunnelling probability (Tt) is introduced. When m* is the effective mass, q is the charge of the electron, ℏ is the reduced Planck’s constant and Tt is given by [11]![]() | (5) |
![]() | (6) |
![]() | (7) |
![]() | (8) |
![]() | (9) |
is the source (drain) Fermi level,
is the probability that a state with energy E is occupied (Fermi-Dirac probability), D(E) is the nanotube density of states (DOS) at top of the barrier and
is the self- consistent potential at the top of the barrier. For simplicity, assume source Fermi level as the reference, thus
and
where q is electronic charge.The complete solution is found by adding the two contribution
where,
Here
and
are gate and drain control parameters respectively. According to the ballistic CNT ballistic transport theory, the drain current caused by the transport of the non-equilibrium charge across the nanotube can be calculated using the Fermi-Dirac statistics as follows: [11]![]() | (10) |
represents the Fermi-Dirac integral of order 0, T is the temperature and
is the reduced Planck’s constant. Here degeneracy factor is 2. Finally, considering the non-ballistic effects, the total current would be the summation of the modified ballistic drain current and the tunnelling current. So the equation of the total current would be![]() | (11) |
![]() | Figure 1. (a) Cross sectional view of the devices. (b). 2D Capacitor model for ballistic transistors. Top barrier potential controlled by capacitive effect of gate, source and drain potential [7] |
![]() | Figure 4. ION/IOFF current ratio versus Temperature (a) for different dielectric constant (b) for a higher value (κ=120) of dielectric constant |
![]() | (12) |
is the charge density and
is local electrostatic potential. The limit of
is vital in case of propagation delay parameter where total capacitance is considered [15]. As shown in figure 5, the value of quantum capacitance increases as the temperature increases. Also with a higher value of κ, the value remains small which effects the performance of CNTFET devices in an adverse way. In this simulation gate voltage is taken as 0.3V. ![]() | Figure 5. Quantum Capacitance vs Temperature for different dielectric constants |
![]() | Figure 6. Variation of gm/Id (/V) ratio vs Temperature with different κ values |
![]() | Figure 7. Capacitance ratio vs Temperature for different dielectric constants |
![]() | (13) |
is the permittivity of free space (F/cm2). The small value of the ratio indicates that in deep nanometer regime, quantum capacitance in CNTFET devices decreases. So an ambient temperature as well as optimised choice of dielectric constant value should be chosen for designing a devices. Also a higher quantum capacitance/insulator capacitance can be reached at a gate voltage of 0.3V with higher dielectric constant value. So lower gate voltage shows significant capacitive effect.Figure 6 shows the drain induce barrier effect (DIBL) as a function of temperature. DIBL increases the leakage current with the capability of swinging the channel from off state to conduction state. As a result, it turns the device ON very quickly and hence lowers down the threshold voltage. So the control of the gate voltage over the channel is reduced. Also with higher value of dielectric constants the DIBL remains almost unchanged. Due to all this reasons, the circuit should designed with a reduced DIBL effect. The figure shows that by increasing the temperature the undesirable DIBL increases. ![]() | Figure 8. Drain-induced barrier lowering (DIBL) as a function of temperature with different dielectric constant |