Marine Science

p-ISSN: 2163-2421    e-ISSN: 2163-243X

2011;  1(1): 22-29

doi: 10.5923/j.ms.20110101.03

Assessing the Physico-Chemical Parameters of Sediment Ecosystem of Vasai Creek at Mumbai, India

Pravin U. Singare 1, Manisha P. Trivedi 1, 2, Ravindra M. Mishra 1, 2

1Department of Chemistry, Bhavan’s College, Munshi Nagar, Andheri (West), Mumbai, 400058, India

2Department of Chemistry, Shri. Jagdishprasad Jhabarmal Tibrewala University, Jhunjhunu, Rajasthan, 333001, India

Correspondence to: Pravin U. Singare , Department of Chemistry, Bhavan’s College, Munshi Nagar, Andheri (West), Mumbai, 400058, India.

Email:

Copyright © 2012 Scientific & Academic Publishing. All Rights Reserved.

Abstract

The present study is concerned with the pollution load monitoring along Vasai Creek of Mumbai with reference to the physico-chemical parameters of sediments. The study was carried for a span of two years from 2009-11 at four sampling stations namely Vasai bundar, Bhayandar west side below Railway Bridge, Bhayandar east side near Retibundar and Ghodbundar site along the flow of Vasai Creek. It was observed that most of the physico-chemical parameters like electrical conductivity, chloride, sulfate, sulfide and phosphate content in the sediment samples were higher during the assessment year 2010-11 as compared to that during the year 2009-10. However the pH values recorded during the year 2009-10 were higher than that recorded during the year 2010-11. The results of present investigation suggest that the present increasing pollution load along the Vasai Creek may affect sediment dwelling organisms and fish resulting in decrease survival, reduced growth, or impaired reproduction and lowered species diversity.

Keywords: Sediments, Physico-Chemical Parameters, pH, Electrical Conductivity, Sulfate, Sulfide, Chloride, Phosphate, Vasai Creek, Mumbai, India

Cite this paper: Pravin U. Singare , Manisha P. Trivedi , Ravindra M. Mishra , "Assessing the Physico-Chemical Parameters of Sediment Ecosystem of Vasai Creek at Mumbai, India", Marine Science, Vol. 1 No. 1, 2011, pp. 22-29. doi: 10.5923/j.ms.20110101.03.

1. Introduction

Aquatic ecosystems are affected by several health stressors that significantly deplete biodiversity. In the future, the loss of biodiversity and its effects are predicted to be greater for aquatic ecosystems than for terrestrial ecosystems[1]. Sediments form a natural buffer and filter system in the material cycles of waters. Sediment in our rivers is an important habitat as well as a main nutrient source for aquatic organisms. Sediment strata serve as an important habitat for the benthic macro invertebrates whose metabolic activities contribute to aquatic productivity[2]. Sediment is also the major site for organic matter decomposition which is largely carried out by bacteria. Important macro-nutrients are continuously being interchanged between sediment and overlying water[2]. Furthermore, sediments have an impact on ecological quality because of their quality, or their quantity, or both[3]. It is observed that continuous accumulation of pollutants due to biological and geochemical mechanisms, and cause toxic effect on sediment dwelling organisms and fish, resulting in decrease survival, reduced growth, or impaired reproduction and lowered species diversity[4,5]. Aquatic systems are subjected to strong variations of flow rate, substance input and transport, and sedimentation.Sediment analysis is increasingly important in evaluatingqualities of the total ecosystem of a body of water, in addition to the water sample analysis practiced for years[6-14]. In comparison to water testing, sediment testing reflects the long term quality situation independent of current inputs[15,16]. In water testing it is not possible to clearly divide between true suspension substances and temporary suspension substances stirred-up from the sediments. Sediment testing is not, or only minimally, affected by other influences. The suspended and precipitated (non-floating) substances and organic substances in waters are capable of adhering pollutant particles (adsorption). The sediments, both suspended and precipitated substances stored on the water bottom, form a reservoir for many pollutants and trace substances of low solubility and low degree of degradability[17-19]. Pollutants are conserved in sediments over long periods of time according to their chemical persistence and the physical-chemical and biochemical characteristics of the substrata. This can allow conclusions to be drawn regarding sources of contamination. Since sediments act as a sinks and sources of contaminants in aquatic systems, chemical analysis for characterization of sediments also provides environmentally significant information about natural and anthropogenic influence on the water bodies[20-25].
Extensive surveillance, monitoring, and research activities are required to assess the extent and severity of sediment contamination, to evaluate the effects of contaminated sediments on freshwater and marine environment, and to prepare a plan for appropriate remedial action. Therefore we carried out a study to understand the physico-chemical properties of sediments samples collected along Vasai Creek of Mumbai which is subjected to heavy pollution load. It is expected that the pollution data generated from such regular scientific study will help to implement compatitable policies and programmes to gauge the extent of pollution. The pollution data of the present study is also expected to help in rational planning of pollution control strategies and their prioritization; assessment of nature and extent of pollution control needed; evaluation of effectiveness of pollution control measures already is existence; evaluation of water quality trend over a period of time; assessment of assimilative capacity of a water body thereby reducing cost on pollution control; understand the environmental fate of different pollutants and also in assessment of creek water fitness for different uses.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Area of Study

Vasai Creek is an estuarine creek, one of the two main distributaries of the Ulhas Creek in Maharashtra state of western India. The Ulhas Creek splits at the northeast corner of Salsette Island into its two main distributaries, Vasai Creek and Thane Creek. Vasai Creek which lies between latitude 19.315°N longitude 72.875°E, forms the northern boundary of Salsette Island, and empties west into the Arabian Sea. The Creek receives domestic raw sewage as well as industrial waste water effluent from surrounding habitation and nearby industrial belt. The activities like cattle washing, cloth washing, and religious activities like immersion of idols of Lord Ganesha and Deity Durga during Ganesh festival and Navratri festival is also a major source of pollution of creek water.

2.2. Climatic Conditions

Climate is subtropical, with mild winters and warm summers. The weather is typical coastal sultry and humid. The average rainfall of records from 1500 mm to 2000 mm. The place experiences the onset of the monsoon in the month of June and experiences monsoon till the end of September. The average temperature recorded in varies from 25 to 37 degrees.

2.3. Requirements

The chemicals and reagent used for analysis were of analytical reagent grade. The procedure for calculating the different parameters were conducted in the laboratory. The laboratory apparatus were soaked in nitric acid before analysis and then rinsed thoroughly with tap water and de-ionised distilled water to ensure any traces of cleaning reagents were removed. Finally, it is dried and stored in a clean place[26]. The pipettes and burette were rinsed with the same solution before final use.

2.4. Sediment Sampling, Preparation and Analyses

The sediment samples were collected randomly four times in a month in morning, afternoon and evening session from four different sampling stations namely Vasai Bundar (S-1) , Bhayandar west side of Railway Bridge (S-2), Bhayandar east side near Reti Bundar (S-3), and Ghodbundar site (S-4) along the Vasai Creek (Figure 1). The samples were collected and subsequently analysed for a span of two years starting from October 2009 to September 2011. The sampling was done in three shifts i.e. morning shift between 07:00 a.m. to 09:00 a.m., afternoon shift between 02:00 p.m. to 04:00 p.m. and evening shift between 07:00 p.m. to 09:00 p.m. Sediment samples were collected by hand-pushing plastic core tubes (7 cm diameter) as far as possible into the sediment. The sediment cores retrieved in the field were sliced on arrival at the lab at 1-cm depth intervals for the first 15 cm, 2-cm depth intervals from 15–25 cm, and then every 5 cm for the deeper sections of the cores. The sediments were kept cool in icebox during the transportation to the laboratory[27,28]. They were then ground manually to a fine powder in an alumina mortar; it is passed through a 2-mm mesh screen and stored in polyethylene bags based on method used by for further analysis.
Figure 1. Geographical map showing sampling stations along Vasai Creek of Mumbai.

2.5. Physico-Chemical Study

The present study provides a detailed description of the physico-chemical criteria of sediment samples collected from four different sampling stations along Vasai Creek. The samples collected were analysed for pH, electrical conductivity, chloride, sulfate, sulfide and phosphate content. The standard techniques and methods were followed for physical and chemical analysis of sediment samples[29,30].

2.6. Quality Control/Assurance

Sediment samples were collected with plastic-made implements to avoid contamination. Samples were kept in polythene bags that were free from heavy metals and organics and well covered while transporting from field to the laboratory to avoid contamination from the environment. All reagents were standardised against primary standards to determine their actual concentrations. All instruments used were calibrated before use. Tools and work surfaces were carefully cleaned for each sample during grinding to avoid cross contamination. Duplicate samples were analysed to check precision of the analytical method and instrument.

3. Results and Discussion

The experimental data on physico-chemical properties of sediment samples collected from four different sampling stations along the Vasai Creek of Mumbai are presented in Tables 1-4.
Table 1. Physico-Chemical Properties of Sediment Samples Collected at Sampling Station S-1.
     
Table 2. Physico-Chemical Properties of Sediment Samples Collected at Sampling Station S-2.
     
Table 3. Physico-Chemical Properties of Sediment Samples Collected at Sampling Station S-3.
     
Table 4. Physico-Chemical Properties of Sediment Samples Collected at Sampling Station S-4.
     
pH is a measure of the acidity or alkalinity of water and is one of the stable measurements. pH is a simple parameter but is extremely important, since most of the chemical reactions in aquatic environment are controlled by any change in its value. Anything either highly acidic or alkaline would kill marine life. Aquatic organisms are sensitive to pH changes and biological treatment requires pH control or monitoring. Surface waters having a pH values below six can be hazardous to aquatic life. Thus, pH is having primary importance in deciding the quality of waste water effluent. Waters with pH value of about 10 are exceptional and may reflect contamination by strong base such as NaOH and Ca(OH)2[31].In the present investigation, the biyearly average pH values of effluent samples collected from different sampling stations vary between minimum of 5.1 in the samples collected at S-1 sampling station to maximum of 7.1 at S-2 and S-3 sampling stations (Tables 1,2 and 3). It was observed that at all the four sampling stations; the pH of sediment samples in 2009-10 was higher than that collected in 2010-11 (Figure 2).
It is well known that electrical conductance is a good measure of dissolved solids. Conductivity is a measurement used to determine mineralization of water. Certain physiological effects on plants and animals are often affected by the number of available ions in the water. In the present investigation, the biyearly average conductivity values of the water samples varies from minimum of 165 µmhos/cm to maximum of 279 µmhos/cm at S-1 and S-3 sampling stations respectively (Tables 1 and 3). From the results of present investigation it was observed that electrical conductivity values for the assessment year 2009-10 were lower than that obtained for the assessment year 2010-11 which is represented graphically in the Figure 3.
Figure 2. Variation in pH values of sediment samples collected along Vasai Creek.
Figure 3. Variation in electrical conductivity values of sediment samples collected along Vasai Creek.
Chloride occurs in all natural waters in widely varying concentrations. Plants do not thrive as well on chlorinated as on unchlorinated water; wild animals develop atherosclerosis by consumption of chlorinated water[32]. The biyearly average chloride content in the sediment samples collected at S-1, S-2, S-3 and S-4 sampling stations were found to be 184 mg/L, 997 mg/L, 147 mg/L and 190 mg/L respectively (Tables 1-4). It was observed that the average chloride content for the assessment year 2010-11 was more than that obtained for the year 2009-10 (Figure 4).
Figure 4. Variation in chloride content of sediment samples collected along Vasai Creek.
The sulfate pollution can be the result of prolonged high atmospheric deposition, sulfate containing fertilizers, and, probably the most important cause at many locations, oxidation of pyrite deposits in the deeper subsoil[33,34]. Sulfates can interfere with the disinfection efficiency by scavenging residual chlorine in the distribution system[35]. Sulfate reducing bacteria produce hydrogen sulfide and lower the aesthetic quality of the water by imparting an unpleasant taste and odour and increases corrosion of metal and concrete pipes[36]. Sulfates can affect industrial water supplies due to formation of hard scales in boilers and heat exchangers. High amount of sulfates in wastewater may lead to problems due to the formation of hydrogen sulfide gas[37]. High sulfate loads in polluted rivers and groundwater have led to increased sulphur fluxes and concentrations in fens and marshes, e.g. in New York[38]. In freshwater wetland systems, it may lead to suppressed growth and development, iron chlorosis, leaf necrosis, suppressed flowering, black and flaccid roots, root decay and even the death of the whole plant[39,40]. In the present investigation, the biyearly average concentration of sulfate in sediment samples collected at S-1, S-2, S-3 and S-4 sampling station was found to be 247 mg/L, 319 mg/L, 146 mg/L and 247 mg/L respectively. Similarly the sulfide concentration were found to be 25 mg/L, 14 mg/L, 24 mg/L and 27 mg/L respectively (Tables 1-4). It is important here to note that these pollutants which are accumulated in the sediments will get released in creek water under certain conditions. As a result the sulfate and sulfide concentration in water may increase above the permissible limit of 200 mg/L and 2 mg/L respectively set for inland surface water[41]. The results also indicate increase in average sulfate and sulfide concentration for the assessment year 2010-11 as compared to 2009-10 (Figures 5 and 6).
Figure 5. Variation in sulfate content of sediment samples collected along Vasai Creek.
Figure 6. Variation in sulfide content of sediment samples collected along Vasai Creek.
Phosphorus pollution accelerates a process called eutrophication, which is essentially the process of a rivers biological death due to depleted bioavailable oxygen. Algal blooms caused by excess phosphorus impact fisheries because the blooms favour the survival of less desirable fish over more desirable commercial and recreation species. Phosphorus pollution caused enormous blooms of the Blue-Green Algae, a form of cyanobacteria, which produces toxins that damage aquatic ecosystems, fisheries, and water quality. Excess amounts of phosphorus and nitrogen cause rapid growth of phytoplankton, creating dense populations, or blooms. These blooms become so dense that they reduce the amount of sunlight available to submerged aquatic vegetation. Without sufficient light, plants cannot photosynthesize and produce the food they need to survive. The loss of sunlight can kill aquatic grasses. The results of present study indicates that the biyearly average phosphate level was low (0.07 mg/L) only at S-4 sampling station, while at S-1, S-2 and S-3 sampling stations the phosphate concentration was found to be relatively high of 0.14 mg/L, 0.10 mg/L and 0.35 mg/L. The phosphate pollutants will settle down and get accumulated in bottom sediments, under certain conditions they may get released back to surface water. Such release of phosphate pollutants may result in increase in the phosphate concentration above the permissible limit of 5 mg/L set for inland surface water[41]. The graphical representation showing average phosphate concentration in sediment samples collected at different sampling stations indicates higher concentration of phosphates during the assessment year 2010-11 as compared to 2009-10 (Figure 7).
Figure 7. Variation in phosphate content of sediment samples collected along Vasai Creek.

4. Conclusions

Around the world as countries are struggling to arrive at an effective regulatory regime to control the discharge of industrial effluents into their ecosystems, Indian economy holds a double edged sword of economic growth and ecosystem collapse. The present experimental data indicates increasingly high level of pollution along the Vasai creek of Mumbai. The experimental data suggests a need to implement common objectives, compatible policies and programmes for improvement in the industrial and domestic waste water treatment methods. It also suggests a need of consistent, internationally recognized data driven strategy to assess the quality of waste water effluent and generation of international standards for evaluation of contamination levels. The existing situation if mishandled can cause irreparable ecological harm in the long-term well masked by short term economic prosperity.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

The authors are extremely thankful to SAP Productions for developing and maintaining the manuscript template.

References

[1]  Sala O.E., Chapin III F.S., Armesto J.J., Berlow E., Bloomfield J., Dirzo R., Huber-Sanwald E., Huenneke L.F., Jackson R.B., Kinzig A., Leemans R., Lodge D.M., Mooney H.A., Oesterheld M., Poff N.L., Sykes M.T., Walker B.H., Walker M. and Wall D.H. (2000), Global biodiversity scenarios for the year 2100, Science, 287(5459), 1770–1774.
[2]  Abowei, J.F.N. and Sikoki, F.D. 2005, Water Pollution Management and Control, Double Trust Publications Company, Port Harcourt; ISBN: 978-30380-20-16, pp: 236.
[3]  Stronkhorst J., Brils J., Batty J., Coquery M., Gardner M., Mannio J., O'Donnell C., Steenwijk J. and Frintrop P., 2004, Discussion document on Sediment Monitoring Guidance for the EU Water Framework Directive., Version 2. EU Water Framework Directive expert group on Analysis and Monitoring of Priority Substances. May 25th, 2004
[4]  Mucha, A.P., Vasconcelos, M.T.S.D., and Bordalo, A.A., 2003, Macrobenthic community in the Douuro Estuary: relation with trace metals and natural sediment characteristics., Environmental Pollution, 121(2), pp.169 –180.
[5]  Praveena, S. M., Ahmed, A., Radojevic, M., Abdullah, M. H., Aris, A. Z., 2007, Factor-cluster analysis and enrichment study of mangrove sediments-an example from Mengkabong, Sabah., Malaysian J. Anal. Sci., 11(2), pp. 421-430
[6]  Lokhande, R.S., Singare, P.U., and Pimple, D.S., 2011, Pollution in Water of Kasardi River Flowing Along Taloja Industrial Area of Mumbai, India,. World Environment (In Press).
[7]  Lokhande, R.S., Singare, P.U., and Pimple, D.S., 2011, Toxicity Study of Heavy Metals Pollutants in Waste Water Effluent Samples Collected From Taloja Industrial Estate of Mumbai, India., Resources and Environment (In Press).
[8]  Lokhande, R.S., Singare, P.U., and Pimple, D.S., 2011, Study on Physico-Chemical Parameters of Waste Water Effluents from Taloja Industrial Area of Mumbai, India. International Journal of Ecology (In Press)
[9]  Singare, P.U, Lokhande, R.S., and Bhanage, S.V. 2011, Study of water pollution due to Heavy metals in Kukshet lakes of Nerul, Navi Mumbai, India. International Journal of Global Environmental Issues, 11(1), pp.79–90.
[10]  P.U. Singare, Lokhande, R.S., and Jagtap, A.G., 2011, Water pollution by discharge effluents from Gove Industrial Area of Maharashtra, India: Dispersion of heavy metals and their Toxic effects., International Journal of Global Environmental Issues, 11(1), pp.28–36.
[11]  Singare, P.U., Lokhande, R.S. and Naik, K.U., 2011, Impact Assessment of Pollution in some Lake water Located at and around Thane City of Maharashtra, India: Physico chemical properties and Toxic effects of Heavy metal content., Interdisciplinary Environmental Review, 12 (3), pp.215-230.
[12]  Singare, P.U., Lokhande, R.S., and Bhanage, S.V., 2011, Water pollution study of the Shirvane and Nerul lakes situated at Nerul, Navi Mumbai, India., Interdisciplinary Environmental Review, 12(1),pp.1-11.
[13]  Singare, P.U., Lokhande, R.S., and Jagtap, A.G., 2010, Study of Physico-chemical quality of the Industrial Waste Water Effluent from Gove Industrial Area of Bhiwandi City of Maharashtra, India., Interdisciplinary Environmental Review, 11(4), pp.263-273.
[14]  Singare, P.U., Lokhande, R.S., and Naik, K.U., 2010, A Case Study of Some Lakes Located at and Around Thane City of Maharashtra, India, with Special Reference to Physico-Chemical Properties and Heavy Metal content of Lake Water., Interdisciplinary Environmental Review, 11(1), pp.90-107.
[15]  Hodson P.V., 1986, Water quality criteria and the need for biochemical monitoring of contaminant effects on aquatic ecosystem. In: Water Quality Management: Freshwater Eco-toxicity in Australia, Hart, B.T. (ed.), Melbourne Water Studies Center, pp. 7-21.
[16]  Haslam S.M., 1990, River pollution: An ecological perspective, Belhaven Press. London, pp.253.
[17]  Biney C., Amazu A.T., Calamari D., Kaba N., Mbome I.L., Naeve H., Ochumba P.B.O., Osibanjo O., Radegonde V., and Saad M.A.H., 1994, Review of heavy metals in the African aquatic environment., Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 31, pp. 134-159.
[18]  Barbour M.T., Gerritsen J., Snyder B.D., and Stribling J.B., 1998, USEPA Rapid Bioassessment Protocols for Use in Streams and Wadeable Rivers. Periphyton, Benthic Macroinvertebrates, and Fish., Second Edition. EPA/841-B-98-010. U.S. Environmental ProtectionAgency; Office of Water; Washington, D.C.
[19]  Barbour M.T., Gerritsen J., Snyder B.D., and Stribling J.B.,1999, Rapid bioassessment protocols for use in and wadeable rivers—Periphyton, benthic macroinvertebrates, and fish (2d ed.): U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Water, EPA 841–B—99–002.
[20]  Lokhande, R.S., Singare, P.U., and Pimple, D.S., 2011, Quantification Study of Toxic Heavy Metals Pollutants in Sediment Samples Collected from Kasardi River Flowing along the Taloja Industrial Area of Mumbai, India., The New York Science Journal 4(9), pp.66-71.
[21]  Singare, P.U., 2011, Distribution Behaviour of Trace and Toxic Metals in Soil and Sediment along the Thane Creek Near Mumbai, India., Interdisciplinary Environmental Review, 12(4), pp. 298–312.
[22]  Singare, P.U., Lokhande, R.S., and Bhattacharjee, S.S., 2011, Physico-Chemical Analysis of the Sediment Samples collected from Thane Creek of Maharashtra, India., Interdisciplinary Environmental Review, 12(2), 95-107.
[23]  Menounou, N., Presley, B.J., 2003, Mercury and Other Trace Elements in Sediment Cores from Central Texas Lakes., Arch. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 45(1), 11–29.
[24]  Spooner, D.R., Maher, W., and Otway, N., 2003, Trace Metal Concentrations in Sediments and Oysters of Botany Bay, NSW,Australia., Arch. Environ.Contam. Toxicol. 45(1), 92–101.
[25]  Sahu, S.K., Ajmal, P.Y., Pandit, G.G., and Puranik, V.D., 2009, Vertical distribution of polychlorinated biphenyl congeners in sediment core from Thane Creek area of Mumbai, India., Journal of hazardous materials, 164(2-3), 1573-1579.
[26]  Radojevic, M., and Bashkin, V. N., 1999, Practical Environmental Analysis. Royal Society of Chemistry, Cambridge, New York.
[27]  Al-Shiwafi, N., Rushdi, A. I., and Ba-Issa, A., 2005, Trace Metals in Surface Seawaters and Sediments from Various Habitats of the Red Sea Coast of Yemen., Environmental Geology. 48(4-5), pp.590-598.
[28]  Jung, H., Yun, S., Mayer, B., Kim, S., Park S., and Lee, P., 2005, Transport and Sediment-Water Partitioning Of Trace Metals in Acid Mine Drainage: An Example from the Abandoned Kwangyang Au-Ag Mine Area, South Korea., Environmental Geology. 48(4-5), pp.437-449.
[29]  APHA, AWWA and WEF, 1998, Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater., 20th edition, Clesceri, L.S. Greenberg, A.E. and Eaton, A.D. (Eds.), American Public Health Association, American Water Work Association, Water Environment Federation, Washington DC
[30]  Jackson, M.L., 1973, Soil Chemical Analysis., Prentice-Hall of India Private Limited, New Delhi.
[31]  Langmuir, D., 1997, Aqueous Environmental Chemistry., Prentice-Hall, Inc., New Jersey.
[32]  Hattersley, J.G., 2000, The Negative Health Effects of Chlorine., The Journal of Orthomolecular Medicine.15(2), pp.89-95.
[33]  akashima, T., Fukunishi, N., Nishiki, T., and Konishi, Y., 2002, Anaerobic oxidation of dissolved hydrogen sulfide in continuous culture of the chemoautotrophic bacterium Thiobacillus denitrificans., Kagaku Kogaku Ronbunshu, 28(1), pp.25–30.
[34]  Lucassen, E.C.H.E.T., Smolders, A.J.P., Van der Salm, A.L., and Roelofs, J.G.M., 2004, High groundwater nitrate concentrations inhibit eutrophication of sulfate-rich freshwater wetlands., Biogeochemistry, 67(2), pp.249–267.
[35]  Faust, S.D., and Osman, A., 1983, Chemistry of water treatment., Butterworth Publishers, Woburn, MA.
[36]  Singh, G., and Bhatnagar, M., 1989, Inhibition of bacterial activity in acid mine drainage., International Journal of Mine Water, 7(4), pp.13-26.
[37]  Hammarstrom, J.M., Seal, R.R., Meier, A.L., and Kornfeld, J.M., 2005, Secondary sulfate minerals associated with acid drainage in the eastern US: recycling of metals and acidity in surficial environments., Chemical Geology, 215(1-4), pp.407-431.
[38]  Boomer, K.M.B., and Bedford, B.L., 2008, Influence of nested groundwater systems on reduction-oxidation and alkalinity gradients with implications for plant nutrient availability in four New York fens., Journal of Hydrology, 351(1-2), pp.107–125.
[39]  Armstrong, J., Afreen-Zobayed, F., and Armstrong, W., 1996, Phragmites die-back: sulfide- and acetic acid induced bud and root death, lignifications, andblockages within aeration and vascular systems., New Phytologist, 134(4), pp.601–614.
[40]  Van der Welle, M.E.W., Smolders, A.J.P., Den Camp, H.J.M.O., Roelofs, J.G.M., and Lamers, L.P.M., 2007, Biogeochemical interactions between iron and sulfate in freshwater wetlands and their implications for interspecific competition between aquatic macrophytes., Freshwater Biology. 52(3), pp.434–447.
[41]  The Environment (Protection) Rules 1986 Available on Internet: cpcb.nic.in/GeneralStandards.pdf