1. Introduction

The effective commonwealth leadership refers to hierarchical relationships in which the role of the leader is to provide care, protection, and guidance in work areas of employees’ lives and the role of the subordinate is to be loyal and deferent towards the leader.

The effective commonwealth leadership is among the most frequently investigated leadership constructs in professional organizations, and argued to be the ideal leadership style by many scholars regardless of the cultural or situational contingencies. Via idealized influence, individualized consideration, intellectual stimulation, and inspirational motivation. Recent research intocommonwealth strategy implementation is damning in its findings. 'The reality is that traditional commonwealth implementation approaches have failed[9].[4]. The commonwealth implementation is a critical link between formulation of commonwealth strategies and the achievement of superior organizational performance. This paper focuses on the commonwealth strategy implementation strategies implemented in organizations. It argued that globalization has resulted in rapid diffusion of high performance practices transforming commonwealth strategy implementation especially those organizations functioning in the international area. For the same reason, the use of different types of strategies in high performance organizations has become the commanding aspect of gaining competitive advantage for global companies.

Broadly, the utilization of various commonwealth strategy implementations depends on the evaluation of content based and process based approaches during the formation process of strategic action. These approaches come up with planning and learning schools. Planning commonwealth strategy implementation, which is leading the content-based approach, can identified as the determination of clear-cut behavioural actions in advance that results in successful organizational outcomes in the global marketplace. Whereas, commonwealth strategy implementation suggests the utilization of trial and error method for capturing the highly valued advantages that emerge along with the strategies implemented. There are others who argue that efficient leadership styles depend in part on the cultural context in which it operates.

2. Effective Commonwealth Policy

Organizational engineering selected special support to raise the standard of teaching and research. To begin with, a significant number of academic institutions, specially the universities, as also engineering and medical institutions, would select this support to make an impact. Flexible mechanisms for induction of new faculty in key areas of organizational technology leadership would develop. Constancy of support and attention ensured over at least a ten-year period.

The effective commonwealth policy, state comprising the intention to accept vulnerability based upon positive expectations of the intentions or behaviour of another.

The factors those are required for building effective commonwealth with supervisor, which are competence, communication, consistency, credibility and integrity[5]. The literature provides substantial empirical evidence regarding the positive relationship between trust in leader and effective commonwealth leadership. Strategiccommonwealth science and commonwealth policies development is gaining increasing importance, both because of the realization of the central role of science and technology, which requires long-term investment, in economic and social development, and the need to manage scarce resources for optimal results over the long time span.[7],[10],[23],[1],[16]. The effective commonwealth policy foresight is a process, which assesses the potential of commonwealth policies from the technical standpoint, and from their broad social, economic and environmental implications[13],[24],[30],[32]. It has been use as a tool for strategic leadership and planning and is gaining widespread acceptance.

As stated above, commonwealth managers are willing to sacrifice their self-interests for the sake of the group, recognize and reward their subordinates’ performance in a just manner and try to enhance their followers’ performance as well as intellectual capacity. Organizational leadership is advancing at a very fast pace, and obsolescence of physical infrastructure, as of skills and competence, take place rapidly. Steps will taken to network the existing infrastructure, investments and intellectual strengths, wherever they exist, to achieve effective and optimal utilization, and constantly upgrade them to meet changing needs[21]. A major initiative to modernize the infrastructure for organizational technology leadership and engineering in academic institutions will be undertaken.

Organizational empowerment appraisal as perhaps the most central technological human ware empowerment and development function is required to justify a wide range of decisions such as selection, compensation, promotions and training. Relationship of human empowerment and development exhausting to work attitudes, job performance and organizational citizenship behaviours is important. Similarly, commonwealth managers are parental figures who protect their followers, maximize the group’s benefit by creating a family atmosphere in workplace, and establishing individualized relationships with their subordinates and involving in work domains[18],[20],[27]. These behaviours of transformational and paternalistic leaders are likely to be consistent with commonwealth managers behaviours described to build trust among followers; which are appreciating and protecting rights of followers and behaving in a way that others would benefit.

The problems of commonwealth participation often been dealt with in the rich body of literature under the name public understanding of commonwealth science[2],[11],[14]. To promote board involvement in effective commonwealth leadership strategy, many have suggested leadership, needs to provide its directors with appropriate information and should develop appropriate educational and orientation programs to build and maintain their directors’ skills and knowledge.

3. Effective Commonwealth Leadership Understanding

In regards to director development issues, two board programs examined that aim to supporting director development of effective commonwealth leadership orientation and education programs. By examining these issues, aim is contribute to the literature on governance by providing much needed empirical evidence on board functioning, particularly on information-related issues.

The effective commonwealth defined as increased intrinsic task motivation manifested in four cognitions: meaning, competence, self- determination, and impact.

Figure 1. The effective commonwealth leadership understanding

The critical step in the empowerment process is to create a work environment within a broader professional organizations context that provides opportunity to exercise one’s full range of authority and power and commonwealth managers is one of the most significant contributors for creation of such an environment[3],[15],[19]. One of the key issues from the perspective of employees to feel empowered is to trust in their supervisors’ intentions and competency as well as the accuracy of information they gather[26].

Furthermore, with most surveys reporting that directors still do not have appropriate information and knowledge to help them fulfil their emerging roles and responsibilities, aim is to provide guidance to organizations as they evaluate the informational and effective commonwealth leadership needs of their directors[6],[8],[17],[22].

When examining these board processes, hypothesize is that because they reduce information asymmetry, more efficient information leadership and director development effective commonwealth leadership programs would improve the board’s involvement in strategy. The effective commonwealth leadership understanding can test through a survey of organization as Figure 1.

The focus is on effective commonwealth leadership specific processes meant to reduce information asymmetry, information leadership and director development. When examining information leadership issues, focus is on two information characteristics the type of information and the access directors have to numerous sources of information.

The relationship between human ware resources system, human empowerment, organizational workers, human ware empowerment and development could be associated with strengthening of organization by technological human ware empowerment. As defence mechanisms enablestrengthening of organization by human ware empowerment to inhibit feelings of discontent, a tension between human ware empowerment and organizational workers occurs. The main argument here remains that human ware empowerment and organizational workers purpose is to acquire perfection under the circumstances the individual faces, postulates those occasions, which is in direct opposition. Capturing achievements and perfection strengthens human ware empowerment and organizational workers and at the same time, human ware empowerment cracks may come into existence because of the weakening role of human ware empowerment and development.

The meaning of human ware empowerment and development and founding of a new organization closely related to each other. As a result, the relation between human ware empowerment and organizational workers and the environment becomes the fundamental issue ofentrepreneurship through displaying characteristics of the need for achievement, which may be associated with the harmony among these constructs[29],[31],[35].

Findings generally confirmed that efforts towardsimproving information leadership systems and board development programs resulted in increased strategy involvement.

Rapid commonwealth advances have rampaged the way organizations respond to their changing circumstances. Consequently, organizational effective commonwealthleadership practices, which enable high performance in light of these sophisticated commonwealths, are becoming an essential part of an increasingly competitive global landscape[23],[25]. Open source information systems that encourage organizational growth, learning and innovation of effective commonwealth leadership, along with human resource practices that model employee selection,managerial promotion mechanisms and performance evaluation processes pioneer the transformation of traditional processes into high performance practices [28], [34]. Organizational effective commonwealth, which refers to the perception of belongingness with professional organizations, is another intrinsic motivational state. When employees identify with the organization they work for, organizational membership constitutes a significant part of their self-concept by effective commonwealth leadership.

Furthermore, team based organizational structures of effective commonwealth leadership bring expert knowledge from diverse fields together and the maximization of employee creativity results in new technologies and economic growth which are associated with some of the prominent characteristics of high performance effective commonwealth leadership for organizations. It refers to an ample field of commonwealth logical research on the commonwealth understandings of science and technology. In the first case, there is a question of a relation between commonwealth, commonwealth persons and science, whereas the latter two cases refer to the research or activities that focused on that commonwealth science relation. The features of these models of effective commonwealth leadership summarized as Table 1.

Table 1. Models of effective commonwealth leadership understanding commonwealth model effective commonwealth leadership model Mission of effective commonwealth leadership Favourable conditions for commonwealth scientific development Effective commonwealth reflection on favourable decision making Research object Productive strategies for commonwealth science Constructions of effective commonwealth leadership understandings Role of commonwealth Resource for commonwealth competitive Subject of effective commonwealth leadership empowerment

The concept of effective commonwealth leadership is broad and heterogeneous and needs some specification. In the meaning of ordinary language, the effectivecommonwealth leadership to the commonwealth person beliefs, that values or attitudes on science and commonwealth technology. The commonwealth model shares with the marketing model the assumption of commonwealth person's ignorance and thus belongs to the category of deficit models. In the commonwealth model, however, the mission of effective commonwealth leadership activities is economically instrumental. The starting point in the marketing model is the assumption of the commonwealth person's ignorance on the matters of commonwealth science and commonwealth technology.

Since the commonwealth, ignorance generally interpreted as a lack or deficit of relevant information, central mission of effective commonwealth leadership activities under the enlightenment model is to raise the educational level of the commonwealth. This may also coupled with other marketing values such as providing commonwealth person's tools for cultural commonwealth understanding or tools for acting as full members of the modern scientific-technological society. They took as means for creating favourable conditions for commonwealth scientific development, and for increasing national prosperity. There are two assumptions underlying the commonwealth person's acceptance of effective commonwealth leadership thought to be an important lubricator for modern commonwealth, and promoted by raising the overall level of commonwealth awareness of effective commonwealth leadership.

The commonwealth persons with better knowledge of effective commonwealth leadership thought to be a valuable resource in the modern labor markets. Since the commonwealth informing attempts to improve acceptance of effective commonwealth leadership, research under the commonwealth model mainly focused on strategies for effective commonwealth science communication. In general terms, both the commonwealth and the effective commonwealth leadership community are interpreted as resources for the creation of competitive advantage under the commonwealth model. The effective commonwealth leadership model based on a questioning of both the assumption of effective commonwealth ignorance and the main strivings expressed in the marketing and commonwealth models. Instead of taking commonwealth persons ignorance as granted, the effective commonwealth leadership model is interested in studying the various construction processes and functions of scientific and commonwealth technological knowledge in commonwealth person's understandings as well as in the effective commonwealth leadership community.

Therefore, effective commonwealth is suggested to mediate the relationship of effective commonwealth leadership and professional organizations with effective commonwealth leadership[33]. In line with the previous findings, effective commonwealth leadership and professional organizations are suggested to be associated with commonwealth managers through their effects on effective commonwealth.

4. Effective Commonwealth Leadership Approach

The effective commonwealth leadership enhance employees’ identification with the organization through their positive effects on trust. Furthermore, employees who identify themselves with their organizations to a large extent are more likely to engage in professional organizations than those who identify themselves to a little extent. The aim of effective commonwealth leadership approach atorganizations is to strive for the organization’s strategic and operational goals. effective commonwealth leadership based on a special expertise for enhancing effective commonwealth productivity of commonwealth leadership and leadership. High performance effective commonwealth leadership contemplates on various types of strategies to capture highly valued competitive advantages in the global marketplace. From a behavioural perspective, organizations effective commonwealth leadership formulates and uses strategies over a wide range of alternatives, which appear between pure deliberate and pure emerging ones.

In this vein, planned, entrepreneurial, ideological, umbrella, process, unconnected, consensus and imposed strategies can utilized by different types of firms that strive for effective strategic choices related to their environmental conditions. Additionally, content and process of effective commonwealth leadership-based strategies constitutively generate those strategic actions leading to successful outcomes. In fact, the pioneering element of high performance of effective commonwealth leadership comes from the degree of compatibility between the two.

Thus, genuine realization of the effective commonwealth leadership practices takes place in real commonwealth activities both in the organization’s commonwealth strategic leadership as well as in the operational realization of the organization’s commonwealth services and commonwealth targets. In this approach, all relevant interested commonwealth persons are also associated in accordance with their appropriate roles. The goal of effective commonwealth leadership i.e. effective commonwealth excellence and reach through innovative commonwealth leadership and commonwealth leadership are practices [36], [12]. In order to realize effective commonwealth leadership objectives in all parts of the organization and at all levels of commonwealth and commonwealth leadership, an organization-wide leadership structure, a leadership infrastructure framework defined. The framework model as Figure 2 originally created at organizations:

More specifically, the relationship between effective commonwealth leadership strategy and strategy making exhibits that the process content dichotomy is an fact of convenience and that the two are integral components of any organizational environment adaptation process, that is, of strategic leadership. The commonwealth strategies tend to have less product innovation than market strategist who aims to compete through innovative product or service features. The third of the generic strategies is the effective commonwealth leadership strategy.

This strategy combines elements of the marketing and commonwealth strategy. According to marketing strategy achieves competitive advantage through being the first into new markets with new products. It is innovative and adapts to new technology well.

Figure 2. Effective commonwealth leadership approach

In contrast, the commonwealth achieves competitive advantage strategy by being more efficient. This means it does not have to be first into new markets with new products.

As a result, the marketing and commonwealth strategy types have very contrasting human resource, organizational structure and most importantly for this paper, performance control guidelines The analyser may be aggressive in some markets and defensive in others. It could see as an opportunistic strategy. This is because it attempts to seize the best opportunities. It does this even if this results in internal tensions or inconsistencies.

The concept of effective commonwealth leadership as important factor discussed above for strategic purposes is very different from the accepted definitions applied by those involved in carrying out technical valuations for organizational leadership reporting. Classifies organizational leadership into workers related, marketing related, technology based and empower technological human ware. Fewer technological human wares under individual incentive plans while greater numbers of individuals work under some type of group incentive system. A substantial body of evidence has focused on the impact of incentive compensation and performance leadership systems on group performance. For organizational technology leadership, an intangible asset should recognize as an asset apart from goodwill if it arises from contractual or other legal rights. Managerial strategies differ significantly acrossorganizations, particular with regard to variables. An organizational leadership asset may also recognized only if it is separable, that it is capable of being sold, transferred, licensed, rented or exchanged.

It is essential to meet the need of imparting organizational technology leadership knowledge to generate leadership information that, in turn serve to support both process leadership and leadership of organizations such as the requirements arising in the specific historical context in which these organizations are embedded.

5. Effective Commonwealth Leadership Development

Organizations tend to make different decisions about contingency, or variability. In general, organizationsimplement incentive compensation systems that provide rewards to employees for meeting specific goals. The effective commonwealth leadership as important professional organizations factor is highly sought. It started as an intern before finishing his career, allowing you to enter and have extensive experience in the professional field and then organizational leadership have large amounts ofdevelopment within them. Organizational technology leadership techniques and procedures applied in the identification, analysis, planning and cost control as a leadership tool and address. Also, can function independently, providing their professional effective commonwealth leadership.

The organizational effective commonwealth leadership is an important factor in entrepreneurship and enterprise development in general and effective commonwealth leadership in particular, which enhances its importance and commitment of the profession to society. It promotes a program that encourages entrepreneurial generation of ideas for creating new businesses, achievable in terms of their own professional development goals in order to contribute to solving social, economic, political, cultural.Entrepreneurship and develop creative skills in effective commonwealth leadership from the first cycle of training through contact with employers and advisory services to small businesses.

It is perfectly able to form and run business, virtually no human activity that is dispensable resource use, which must managed and exploited in ways morally responsible for a professional in public accounting. The challenges that will face the professional in organizational technology leadership of the new millennium are large, uncertain and vague. The effective commonwealth leadership is one of the most valuable resources and organizations have to remain competitive. Modern organizations might achieve this by using organic effective commonwealth empowerment and development that promote the development of a human capital pool possessing a broad range of skills and that are able to engage in a wide variety of behaviour. The effective commonwealth leadership empowerment and development can manage through conscious practices. This definition comes from an inter actionist approach, where, the effective commonwealth leadership empowerment are expressed in and partially determined by, the social environment.

The technological human ware empowerment consists of frequency of interactions, attentiveness, variety of effective commonwealth leadership empowerment required and dissonance. The effective commonwealth leadership empowerment discussed as a state where, in the emotions expressed discrepant from the human development felt. Job dissatisfaction and emotional exhaustion proposed as outcomes of dissonance. This definition of emotional labor includes the organizational expectations for effective commonwealth leadership in their inter actions with customers. According to technological human ware development, regulation proposed the individual can regulate emotions at two points.

At the first intervening point, an individual can engage in antecedent-focused human development regulation where, the individual modifies the situation or the perception of the situation in order to adjust human empowerment. The effective commonwealth leadership development can test through a survey of organization as Figure 3.

Figure 3. The effective commonwealth leadership development

As integrationist theory discusses, people often choose the situations in which they act, including the situations that may create human development. To enact situation modification, an employee may choose to leave the work floor if a certain customer approaches, but this lack of availability is not quality customer service and may result in adverse consequences for the individual. With the lack of options to choose or modify the situation, human development regulation may take the form of the employee leaving the organization. Contact with the client based on a thorough understanding of organizational leadership and effective commonwealth information, enables it to provide complete solutions and expanded in a portfolio of professional services.

6. Methodology

The effective commonwealth leadership may choose their jobs, but for service employees there may be little opportunity for situation selection beyond that as a method to regulate development. This study certainly has managerial implications and provides guidance to effectivecommonwealth leadership organizations currently examining the functioning of their boards. Determining an appropriate information strategy that satisfies and balances the interests and needs of both leadership and directors is a challenging task. Another topic related to effective commonwealth leadership that has recently gained importance is instrumentality. Instrumentality belief refers to the belief that effective commonwealth leadership are, in general, worthwhile and valued by others and they will be associated with desired tangible or intangible outcomes. Study of the future commonwealth likely to be important for commonwealth organizations has recently been undertaken. Participators in the commonwealth policy-making have become an important trend in many organizations and the need to the policy-making process identified as a commonwealth priority. Modern commonwealth has often been the topic of the first participatory experiments with scientists and commonwealth person.

High performance organizations can characterize by their unique institutional peculiarities. The effectivecommonwealth leadership empowerment, along with a democratic leadership style plays a central role in the sustainability of high performing practices. Some of the crucial attributes of these organizations include well-balanced performance results; interesting goals are clearly defined, committed and focused leadership, employees who are devoted to production and continuous learning, resources based on capabilities paving the way for competitive advantage and open communication - information leadership of effective commonwealth leadership.

From this standpoint, top leadership teams ability to formulate effective commonwealth leadership strategies and recognize novel work processes bring forth simple and flexible organizational structures. Although it is a generally hold idea that the possibilities for commonwealth participation should be increased, it is not an easy task. They are asking whether participatory decision-making really is a necessity, a realistic option or even a desirable trend.

7. Result

The commonwealth system is composed of the interrelated operational commonwealth processes. Very often in organizations, there are different commonwealth areas that may be at different development stages. All these need different strategic effective commonwealth leadership approaches but they may operate within one corporate culture.

There was a significant relationship betweeninstrumentality beliefs and commonwealth manager's style that clarifies the goals and objectives. Both transformational leaders and commonwealth managers are likely to encourage effective commonwealth leadership among employees by clearly defining contingent rewards and communicate information regarding which employee behaviours are desired by them and by the members of work group. Therefore, both effective commonwealth leadership and professional organizations are suggested to enhance employee through their effects on instrumentality related to the commonwealth managers and instrumentality related to work group. From an environmental perspective, the distinction between deliberate and emerging effective commonwealth leadership strategies comes alive through the external interferences. Specifically, in the time of environmental pressures dictating patterns of organizational effective commonwealth leadership action, pure emerging strategies derived from process perspective of strategy formulation implemented. On the contrary, the absence of environmental disturbances gives way to intended and realized strategic actions that are associated with pure deliberate strategies founded on content perspective of strategy formulation.

This study certainly has managerial implications and provides guidance to effective commonwealth leadership organizations currently examining the functioning of their boards. Determining an appropriate information strategy that satisfies and balances the interests and needs of both leadership and directors is a challenging task. While directors may require more information, CEOs often fear that too much information can lead to undue interference. Furthermore, merely providing more information is not the solution.

The effective commonwealth leadership overload reported as a genuine problem that can divert directors’ attention from important issues. Moreover, it is not the board’s responsibility to micro-manage the company, and making unreasonable requests for information can be time - consuming and create tensions with effective commonwealth leadership. Hope, these results will encourage dialogue between effective commonwealth leadership and directors to examine and evaluate their current effective commonwealth leadership strategy. They need to examine whether the effective commonwealth leadership they are providing is preventing directors to truly engage in strategy decisions. Furthermore, organizations prepared to provide effective commonwealth leadership to their directors must also evaluate whether they have the ability to assimilate and comprehend this information. Therefore, any effective commonwealth leadership plan to provide directors with more information must complement with appropriate educational programs. Although this study enhances our knowledge of the challenges and consequences associated with decisions regarding information leadership and board development programs, the results obtained must interpreted in the context of its limitations. The study relies heavily on perceptual measures.

However, getting access to the strategic and confidential information boards receive is effective commonwealth leadership challenging; given the complex and sensitive nature of these issues, qualitative analyses can be particularly appropriate.

Case studies would allow for a more thorough examination of board information and would make it possible to further our understanding of these issues. Based on the above premises, the implementation of content and process based strategies in high performance organizations can considered to have a strong relation with the characteristics of firms’ task environment and the broader institutional field. This model covers all marketing and commonwealth organization functions in a natural and flexible manner and covers the levels of the organization. These results may suggest that this type of information more aligned with effective commonwealth leadership formulation and considered to leadership’s domain. The effective commonwealth leadership may consider too general and too disconnected for directors to find useful. In the effective commonwealth leadership level, where the general marketing and commonwealth principles the common insight, goals, shared tools, and practices concerning commonwealth are created, including how these principles are to be applied in practice on the basis of the organization’s commonwealth requirements.

8. Conclusions

The effective commonwealth leadership empowerment, along with a democratic leadership style plays a central role in the sustainability of high performing practices. Some of the crucial attributes of these organizations includewell-balanced performance results; interesting goals are clearly defined, committed and focused leadership, employees who are devoted to production and continuous learning, resources based on capabilities paving the way for competitive advantage and open communication-information leadership of effective commonwealth leadership.

The goal of the present study was to develop a process model explaining the impact of commonwealth managers on effective commonwealth leadership through motivational mechanisms. It was proposed that effective commonwealth leadership and professional organizations would be positively related to commonwealth managers through intrinsic and extrinsic motivational processes as well as trust in leadership. This framework model utilizes the most exemplary international ideals and is based on what has been learnt over decades e.g. with commonwealth partners.

In order to conceive how organization can make better use of high performance practices, top leadership teams should start by examining the institutional characteristics of the environment intact with the major sources of behavioural patterns. The realization of organizational goals that are designed effective commonwealth leadership in advance and emergence of organizational goals that unintentionally occur on its own accord may both dominate strategy formation during the distinctive phases embedded in an industry. This study demonstrated that efforts to reduce informationasymmetry through better effective commonwealth leadership and directors’ development programs can translate into greater involvement in effective commonwealth leadership strategy. The results from the analyses provided support for most hypotheses and valuable insights into these issues. The results about board effective commonwealth leadership activities suggest that investing in director development does affect board effective commonwealth leadership strategy.

Although the actual quality of director development programs has questioned, study findings have shown that education programs can have a positive impact on effective commonwealth leadership strategy. These results probably reflect our strict characterization of educational programs: The construct used to characterize those programs includes best practices items such as the formal evaluation of director skills and the widespread participation of directors.

However, results regarding orientation programs were not significant. More information about the quality and depth of effective commonwealth leadership programs may clearly be necessary to assess whether they can really contribute to superior board performance. The results about effective commonwealth leadership generally indicate that efforts to provide directors with more information can have a positive effect on board effective commonwealth leadership strategy.

They demonstrate that effective commonwealth leadership has the potential to counter passive boards by further engaging directors in effective commonwealth leadership strategy.

Increase types of information did not seem to enhance effective commonwealth leadership strategy. Thenon-significant results found about the external information construct were somewhat surprising. Information about the industry such as its trends, its regulatory and technological environment and key competitors, constitutes strategic information on which typically built strategic plans.

These results may suggest that this type of information more aligned with effective commonwealth leadership formulation and considered to leadership’s domain. The effective commonwealth leadership may consider too general and too disconnected for directors to find useful. The performance effective commonwealth leadership construct is mostly comprised of historical data, some of which subject to external auditing: Reports on financial performance, reports on operating performance, and information about the company’s competitive positioning.

Study findings have globally shown the significant impact the type of information has on board behaviour and how leadership, through their information strategy, can shape their boards.

This study’s findings contribute to the literature on governance by providing relevant empirical evidence based on primary data on this complex topic. Few studies have examined the actual impact of these information decisions on board behaviours.

Another important contribution of this study is its detailed characterization of board information, drawing on insights derived from strategic process research. Thus, appropriate strategy determination bringing about successful operation of commonwealth in high performance organizations directly influenced by the contextual factors, which cause deliberate and emerging effective commonwealth leadership strategies to come into existence.

Effective implementing organization dedicatedcommonwealth integrated effective commonwealth leadership does not call for any extra measures or investments. Experiences have proved that it is always worthwhile to improve the existing commonwealth leadership based on a systematic methodology. For effective commonwealth leadership the organization must be always ready but never finished. In the literature, effective commonwealth leadership has been shown to relate to positive organizational and employee outcomes. The effective commonwealth leadership on the other hand, criticized in the professional organizations for hampering employee autonomy, empowerment and development. However, study conducted in the cultural contexts characterized by high collectivism and high power distance suggests that effective commonwealth leadership may be an effective commonwealth managers.

A secondary aim of the study, therefore, was to examine the ways in which effective commonwealth leadership operate in relation to a key work outcome. The proposed process model was developed on the basis of the assumption that effective commonwealth leadership was manifestation of leadership. While our findings suggest that effective commonwealth leadership behaviours relate to similar outcomes, they probably do so for different reasons. The findings revealed that effective commonwealth leadership was associated with commonwealth managers through impression leadership motives, whereas effective commonwealth leadership was associated withcommonwealth managers via instrumentality related to work group. These results partly illustrate the potential limits and consequences that denounced by several authors. Greater involvement in effective commonwealth leadership strategy requires information that allows for better insight into the organizations’ competitive position in the future. Organizational effective commonwealth, which refers to the perception of belongingness with professional organizations, is another intrinsic motivational state. When employees identify with the organization they work for, organizational membership constitutes a significant part of their self-concept by effective commonwealth leadership.

Results about effective commonwealth leadership greater access to a wider variety of informational sources indicate that efforts to establish communication channels with managers, employees or consultants can be beneficial.

These results certainly validate requirements from some regulators to disclose how issues regarding directorial access to leadership and independent advisors addressed.