Management

p-ISSN: 2162-9374    e-ISSN: 2162-8416

2012;  2(4): 125-130

doi: 10.5923/j.mm.20120204.07

Investigation in Passenger Air Traffic: Opportunities for Companies

Giovanni Ossola , Elisa Giacosa , Guido Giovando

Department of Management, University of Turin, Turin, 10134, Italy

Correspondence to: Elisa Giacosa , Department of Management, University of Turin, Turin, 10134, Italy.

Email:

Copyright © 2012 Scientific & Academic Publishing. All Rights Reserved.

Abstract

This study ascertained that the air transport sector is still of interest for the firms that choose to operate in it, despite the global economic crisis. It can be stated that there is a relationship between the economic trends of a continent and the trends in the passenger air transport sector. This relationship varies according to the geographical area considered. The emerging countries are those that are most affected by the increase in the demand for passenger air transport: of the emerging economies, the Middle East has the highest ratio of growth in passenger air traffic to gross domestic product growth. In addition, we identified the continents with an attitude to attract investments in creating large airport infrastructures. The Asian airports had the highest capacity to attract investments for large airport infrastructures, due to a phase of expansion of its air transport market. In contrast, Europe and America exhibited a low attitude to attract investments in creating big airport infrastructures: in these continents, air transport market demand is in a maturity phase.

Keywords: Passenger Air Transport Sector, Airport Infrastructure

1. Introduction

Air transport is a tool for facilitating trade within a country or between several countries and, consequently, for promoting their development. Inadequate airport infrastructure creates barriers to interaction between the various players operating in a global scenario.
The air transport sector has been recently affected by profound changes connected with market deregulation, which has favoured the entry of new competitors into the passenger and cargo transport market, including both large players and low-cost operators. The business model of the economic operators has therefore radically changed.
The objectives of the study are manifold. We aim to analyse whether the economic trends of a continent influence the passenger air transport demand in that geographical area. We identified the continents characterised by a more intense level of reactivity in terms of passenger air traffic demand than that of the gross domestic product. These continents are those of greatest interest for the firms operating in the air transport sector, since they are characterised by a greater increase in market demand.
In addition, we identified the continents with an attitude to attract investments in creating large airportinfrastructures. The Asian airports had the highest capacity to attract investments for large airport infrastructures, due to a phase of expansion of its air transport market. In contrast, Europe and America exhibited a low attitude to attract investments in creating big airport infrastructures: in these continents, air transport market demand is in a maturity phase.

2. Literature

A substantial body of literature has considered the sectors that are associated with air transport. Some have studied the various functions of airport management companies([1],[2],[3],[4]) whereas others have considered marketing([5],[6]), organisation[7], finance[8] and logistics[9] in specific.
In addition, some studies have conducted quantitative analyses of data taken from the financial reports of airport management companies to ascertain the stability of their financial performance and standing([10],[11]). In particular, some studies correlated the gross domestic product to the net post-tax profit margin of the companies; in addition, the cash flow of these companies is so far, except in Europe[12].
Airports have traditionally been defined as “natural” monopolies([13],[14]). However, in recent decades, across countries, liberalisation of all or some airport services has taken place([15],[16]). This liberalisation process has prevented airports from becoming monopolies, creating more competitive airport systems([17],[18]). In addressing liberalisation, many scholars have concentrated on corporate governance. In particular, they have examined the influence of public administration or other similar bodies on firm capital in various countries([19],[20],[21]) and specifically in Europe[17].
For carriers, deregulation has precipitated the creation and development of new airline companies referred to as low-cost companies([22],[23]) and new alliances between existing companies([24],[25],[26]).
Some scholars have highlighted the correlation between local development and airport infrastructure, which has positive indirect effects on the surrounding territory([19],[27],[28]), increasing economic activity([29],[30],[31],[32],[33],[34]). Some studies have evaluated these economic effects in individual countries([35],[36],[37]).
Numerous scholars have researched the strategic behaviour of airport management companies([38],[39],[40]), analysing and redefining the company business models used[41]. Some studies have analysed how the strategies of low-cost carriers develop([42],[43]), whereas others researchers focused on managing airport hubs([44],[45],[46]).
Particular attention has been paid to the largest airports, which can employ new approaches such as system dynamics[47]. The different types of revenues obtained and tariff systems to be adopted have also been analysed([48],[49],[50],[51]), with particular attention to the European and Italian markets([52],[53],[54]).
Our work differs from the previous studies thanks to the following reasons. First, we elaborated a previsional perspective to compare growth in world gross domestic product and airline traffic over a 20-year time horizon. Therefore, we didn’t use only historical overview of these data. Secondly, we focused on the attitude of particular continent to attract investments in creating big airport infrastructure.

3. Material and Methods

The data used are taken from important research organisations such as Eurocontrol, Eurostat and Istat, which periodically announce annual trends in the main economic parameters that indicate the “state of health” of an economy. The market data were made available by important trade associations and market research companies operating in the field of air transport, such as Boeing, the International Air Transport Association (IATA), the Airports Council International (ACI) and Enac.
First, the subject of the research was analysed in a review of the existing literature. In addition, more than one hundred fifty articles published in international journals were analysed, including articles in both sector journals and economics and management journals. In addition to analysing previous studies, we identified the following research questions:
1) RQ1: Is there a relationship between the economic trends of a continent and its passenger air transport demand?
2) RQ2: Is it possible to ascertain the capacity of a continent to produce intense passenger traffic given airport infrastructure?
To address the above RQs quantitative analysis has been used. RQ1 has been addressed using a ratio (“RATIO A”) that relates the growth in passenger air traffic of a continent to its gross domestic product over a 20-year time horizon:
The gross domestic product of that continent is not the only economic measure to compare with passenger growth. Nevertheless, as this is an initial research, we start to analyse this economic indicator, with the perspective to improve our method.
The possible scenarios for RATIO A are as follows:
a) RATIO A is > 0: Passenger air traffic and the gross domestic product of a continent increase or decrease at the same time. In other words, a given economic trend produces the same effect on passenger air traffic. The two possible effects are as follows:
- The trends are both positive: the growth of the gross domestic product produces growth in passenger air traffic;
- The two trends are both negative: the reduction in the gross domestic product of a continent produces a reduction in passenger air traffic;
b) RATIO A is < 0: The trends in passenger air and in the gross domestic product of a continent are inconsistent; one is increasing, whereas the other is decreasing. The economic situation of the continent has not yet had repercussions for passenger air traffic.
RQ2 is examined using another ratio (“RATIO B”). This ratio considers the presence of high traffic airports (those among the twenty-six main airports with the highest traffic in the world) relative to the total number of airports in the continent. Usually, official reports draw up the lists of the world's major airports in terms of traffic. We decide to use one of them, which is particularly representative for the amount of considered airport. RATIO B is used to measure the capacity of particular continents to attract investments in creating big airport infrastructures.
The possible scenarios for RATIO B are as follows:
a) RATIO B is = 0: The continent does not have any airports among the twenty-six airports with the highest traffic in the world;
b) RATIO B is > 1: The continent has a higher % of airports with high traffic than the % of airports in that continent. It follows that this continent has the capacity to attract investments in creating big airport infrastructures;
c) RATIO B is < 1: The continent has a higher % of airports with low traffic than the % of airports in that continent. It follows that this continent has the capacity to attract investments in creating big airport infrastructure.

4. Results and Discussion

Companies operating in the air transport sector can be represented by their market, in which the purchase of the production factors and thproe sale of the products produced take place. To analyse the air transport market, a distinction must be made between:
a) Passenger air transport demand as indicated by RQ1;
b) Passenger air transport supply as indicated by RQ2.

4.1. Analysis of Passenger Air Transport Demand

In considering RQ1, one can relate the trends in market demand with the economic trends of an area to verify whether the latter influences the demand for air transport. The forecasts for market demand for world air transport during the period 2009-2029 are shown below compared with the trends in the gross domestic product (Table 1). To consider RQ1 for a single continent or area, it is helpful to use “RATIO A” to relate the growth in passenger air traffic with that of the gross domestic product (GDP) (Table 2).
Table 1. Air transport market demand forecast in the period 2009-2029
     
Table 2. Ratio of growth in passenger air traffic to growth in gross domestic product (2009-2029)
     
To describe Table 1, the forecasts for the period 2009-2029 are as follows: the gross domestic product will undergo mean annual growth of 3.2%, and passenger air transport demand will undergo an increase of 5.3%. During a period of twenty years at the global level, in conjunction with economic expansion, the demand for passenger air transport also increases.
To describe Table 2, for all continents or area, RATIO A is > 0. Thus, GDP and passenger air traffic are consistent, and GDP growth induced growth in the demand for passenger air transport. RATIO A varies according to the geographical area considered.
The emerging countries are those that are most affected by the increase in the demand for passenger air transport. The Asia Pacific region has the largest GDP growth (4.6%), and the growth rate for passenger air traffic is also one of the highest (6.8%), generating a RATIO A of 1.5. The Middle East is characterised by GDP growth of 4.0%, and the increase in passenger air traffic is the highest in the world (7.1%), yielding a RATIO A of 1.8. Latin America, which has an economic growth rate equal to that of the Middle East, has exhibited an air traffic increase of 6.9% and a RATIO A of 1.7. Therefore, of the emerging economies, the Middle East has the highest ratio of growth in passenger air traffic to GDP growth.
In North America, GDP growth of 2.7% is predicted, and this growth will drive an increase in air traffic of 3.4%. The resulting RATIO A is 1.3. Europe is the continent with the lowest predicted increase in GDP (1.9%), and the increase in passenger air traffic is 4.4% (the second-lowest after that of North America). The resulting RATIO A is 2.3 (it should be noted that GDP growth in Europe is fairly limited and is the lowest of those of the various continents).
Regarding RQ1, it can be stated that there is a relationship between the economic trends of a continent and the trends in the passenger air transport sector.

4.2. The Market Supply

For RQ2, the main market supply data are presented below. The number of airports globally, grouped per continent, are shown below (Table 3). The twenty-six main airports in the world based on passenger numbers are grouped by continent as follows; for each continent, we calculated RATIO B (Table 4).
To describe Table 3, the European continent has 46% of the world’s airports, whereas the American continent has 39%. These continents are followed by Asia with 8.6%, Africa with 4% and, lastly, Oceania with 2.7%.
Table 3. Number of main commercial airports at world level
     
Table 4. Main world airports according to passenger numbers per continent at 31.12.2010
     
Referring Table 4, about only the twenty-six main airports in the world based on passenger numbers, we can reach the following conclusions. Asia has a RATIO B of 4.9: it has the highest number of busy airports (42.3%). Although Asia has only 8.6% of the total world airports, Asian airports are characterised by high passenger traffic; this continent demonstrates the capacity to attract investments in creating big airport infrastructures. Oceania has a RATIO B of 1.4: it has one busy airport (3.8%). Given that this continent has 2.7% of the total world airports, the airports of Oceania exhibit a modest capacity to attract investments in creating big airport infrastructures. Europe has a RATIO B of 0.7: it has 30.8% of airports with the highest passenger traffic. However, given that Europe has 46% of the total world airports, European airports are characterised by a low capacity to attract investments in creating big airport infrastructures. America has a RATIO B of 0.6: it has 23.1% of the airports with the highest passenger traffic. Thus, given that America has 38.8% of the total world airports, American airports are characterised by a low capacity to attract investments in creating big airport infrastructures. Africa does not have airports among those with the highest passenger air traffic; therefore, RATIO B was not calculated for Africa.
Regarding RQ2, it emerged that the Asian airports show the highest capacity to attract investments in creating big airport infrastructures. This capacity is certainly influenced by Asian economic trends, as indicated by its relatively high level of GDP growth, but also by the availability of places to build airport infrastructures.

5. Conclusions

This study has shown that the economic trends of a continent is one of the factor that influence its trends in passenger air transport demand. In particular, in periods characterised by economic expansion, the demand for air transport grows; conversely, during an economic recession, this demand decreases.
This study ascertained the capacity of particular continents to attract investments in creating big airport infrastructures. The Asian airports had the highest capacity for two reasons: the economic growth in Asia, which produces intense air transport demand; the weaker airport infrastructure of Asia compared to that of other continents with more mature economies. In contrast, Europe and America exhibited a low attitude to attract investments in creating big airport infrastructures; they feature a greater percentage of the world’s airports, but a smaller percentage of those with the highest passenger traffic. In these continents, air transport market demand is in a maturity phase.
The implications of this research follow from the above conclusions. It has been forecast that over a twenty-year time horizon at the world level, there will be a 5.3% increase in passenger air transport demand, which will be driven by a 3.2%increase in the GDP. Therefore, despite the global economic crisis, the air transport sector is still of interest for the firms that choose to operate in it.
Our research presents some limits that can be summarized as follows. The gross domestic product of that continent is not the only economic measure to compare with passenger growth. Nevertheless, as this is an initial research, we start to analyse this economic indicator, with the perspective to improve our method. In addition, it would be motivating to apply this study model to other sectors, in order to make a comparison with the trends of the airport sector. At the same time, this study constitutes a starting base that has highlighted the trend of the operational context of the firms involved in the airport sector. For this purpose, it would be extremely interesting to analyse the characteristics of their business model, with reference to both the airport management companies and the airline companies.

References

[1]  Doganis R., The airport business, Routledge, United Kingdom, 2000.
[2]  Ossola G., L’economia delle aziende di gestione aeroportuale, Giappichelli, Italy, 1996.
[3]  Pellicelli A.C., Le compagnie aeree. Economia e gestione del trasporto aereo, Giuffrè, Italy, 1996.
[4]  Dominici D., La gestione aeroportuale nel sistema del trasporto aereo, Giuffrè, Italy, 1982.
[5]  Corvi E., Bonera M., “Le tendenze evolutive nelle politiche di marketing e comunicazione dell’impresa aeroportuale”, in Proceedings of International Conference Le tendenze del marketing, Italy, 2006.
[6]  Jarach D., Marketing Aeroportuale, Egea, Italy, 2002.
[7]  Ashford N., Stanton H.P., Moore A., Airport operations, McGraw-Hill, Milano, 1997.
[8]  Ashford N., Moore A., Airport Finance, Van Nostrand Reinhold, United States, 1992.
[9]  Rossi D., La logistica degli operatori aeroportuali, in Martellini M. (Eds.), Economia e gestione delle imprese aeroportuali, FrancoAngeli, Italy, pp.200-225, 2006.
[10]  Tsekeris T., “Greek airports Efficiency measurement and analysis of determinants”, Elsevier, Journal of Air Transport Management, vol.17, no.2, pp.140-142, 2011.
[11]  Teodori C., Carini C., Falini A., L’analisi di bilancio delle imprese di gestione aeroportuale, in Martellini M. (Eds.), Economia e gestione delle imprese aeroportuali, FrancoAngeli, Italy, pp.275-336, 2006.
[12]  Pearce B., “Industry Outlook”, in 68th IATA Annual General Meeting, China, 2006.
[13]  Cabral L., Economia industriale, Carocci, Italy, 2002.
[14]  Reed A., “The High Cost of Monopoly: Airlines Complain about European Ground Handling Monopolies”, Air Transport World, vol.31, no.9, pp.93-100, 1994.
[15]  Forsyth P., “Privatization and Regulation of Australian and New Zealand Airports”, Elsevier, Journal of Air Transport Management, vol. 8, pp.19-28, 2002.
[16]  de Neufville R., “Airport Privatization: Issues for the United States. Safety, Economic, Environmental, and Technical Issues in Air Transportation”, Transportation Research Record 1662, Paper 99.0218, pp.24-31, 1999.
[17]  Bertoli G., Le imprese di gestione aeroportuale: dal monopolio alla concorrenza, in Martellini M. (Eds.), Economia e gestione delle imprese aeroportuali, FrancoAngeli, Italy, pp.27-71, 2006.
[18]  Ponti M., Prospettive e problemi della regolazione economica degli aeroporti, in: Masutti A. (Eds.), La liberalizzazione dei servizi di handling aeroportuale, Clueb, Italy, pp.41-46, 2002.
[19]  Vasigh B., Erfani G.R., “Evaluation of airport performance: public versus private ownership”, in Proceedings of International Conference on Economics and Administration, Romania, 2009.
[20]  Oum T.H., Yan J., Yu C., “Ownership forms matter for airport efficiency: A stochastic frontier investigation of worldwide airports”, Elsevier, Journal of Urban Economics, vol.64, no.2, pp.422-435, 2008.
[21]  Graham A., Managing airport. An international perspective, 2nd edition, Elsevier, United Kingdom, 2003.
[22]  Morrell P., Can long-haul low cost airlines be successful?”, Elsevier, Research in Transportation Economics, vol.24, no.1, pp.61-67, 2008.
[23]  Morrison S.A., Winston C., The Evolution of the Airline Industry, Brookings Institution, United States, 1995.
[24]  Pellicelli A.C., Le alleanze strategiche nel trasporto aereo, Giappichelli, Italy, 2008.
[25]  Kleymann B., Seristo H., Managing Strategic Airline Alliances, Ashgate, United Kingdom, 2004.
[26]  Harbison J.R., Pekar P., Smart alliances. A practical guide to repeatable success, Booz Allen & Hamilton, United States, 1998.
[27]  Baccelli O., La valorizzazione degli aeroporti come catalizzatori di nuove attività, in Sinatra A. (Eds.), Aeroporti e sviluppo regionale, Guerini, Italy, 2001.
[28]  Shearman P., Air-transport: Strategic issues in planning and development, Pitman Publishing, United Kingdom, 1992.
[29]  Brueckner J.K., “Airline traffic and urban economic development”, Sage Publications, Urban Studies, vol.40, pp.1455-1469, 2003.
[30]  Poole J., Pearce B., “The Value of Aviation”, in Proceedings of IATA Annual General Meeting, China, 2012.
[31]  Senn L., Zucchetti R., Metodologie per valutare l’impatto economico prodotto dagli aeroporti sulla regione di appartenenza, in Sinatra A. (Eds.), Aeroporti e sviluppo regionale, Guerini, Italy, pp.50-125, 2001.
[32]  Zucchetti R., Lio P., Tomberg L., La regolazione del traffico all’interno dei sistemi aeroportuali, in Sinatra A. (Eds.), Aeroporti e sviluppo regionale, Guerini, Italy, pp.9-40, 2001.
[33]  Zucchetti R., Baccelli O., Aeroporti e territorio, Guerini, Italy, 2001.
[34]  Button K., Taylor S., “International air transportation and economic development”, Elsevier, Journal of Air Transport Management, vol.6, no.4, pp.209-222, 2000.
[35]  Kim N., “The impact of remittances on labor supply: the case of Jamaica”, World Bank Policy Research, Working Paper, 4120, United States, 2007.
[36]  Cooper A., Smith P., The economic Catalytic Effect of Air Transport in Europe, Eurocontrol Experimental Centre, France, 2005.
[37]  Ossola G., Impatto economico degli investimenti in aeroporto con particolare riferimento al progetto all-cargo Alitalia, Piazza Editore, Italy, 1996.
[38]  Bruni M., Strategie nel settore aeroportuale, Egea, Italy, 2004.
[39]  Grant R.M., Contemporary Strategy Analysis: Concepts, Tecniques, Applications, 4th ed., Blackwell, United Kingdom, 2002.
[40]  Bronzetti G., Le imprese di gestione aeroportuale. Aspetti di programmazione e controllo, Franco Angeli, Italy, 2002.
[41]  Rispoli M., Sviluppo dell’impresa e analisi strategica, Il Mulino, Italy, 1998.
[42]  Falini A., Le opzioni strategiche delle società di gestione aeroportuale, in Martellini M. (Eds.), Economia e gestione delle imprese aeroportuali, FrancoAngeli, Italy, pp. 103-141, 2006.
[43]  Binggeli U., Pompeo L., Hyped Hopes for Europe’s low-cost Airlines, The McKinsey Quarterly, 4, 2002.
[44]  Button K., Wings across Europe: Toward an Efficient European Air Transport System, Ashgate, United Kingdom, 2004.
[45]  Kahn A.E., “The competitive consequences of hub dominance: A case study”, Springer, Rewiev of Industrial Organization, 8, pp.381-405, 1993.
[46]  Doganis R., Dennis N., “Lesson in Hubbing”, Flightglobal, Airline Business, vol.3, pp.42-47, 1989.
[47]  Marafioti E., Mollona E., “Governare un sistema complesso con l’approccio System Dynamics: la nascita di un hub”, Etas, Economia & Management, vol.6, pp.91-110, 2000.
[48]  Mason K.J., Alamdari F., “EU network carriers, low cost carriers and consumer behaviour: a Delphi study of future trends”, Elsevier, Journal of Air Transport Management, vol.13, pp.299-310, 2007.
[49]  Starkie D., “Making airport regulation less imperfect”, Elsevier, Journal of Air Transport Management, vol.11, no.1, pp.3-8, 2005.
[50]  Barret S., “How do the demands for airport services differ between full service carriers and low cost carries?”, Elsevier, Journal of Air Transport Management, vol.10, no.1, pp.33-39, 2004.
[51]  Abramowitz A.D., Brown S.M., “Market share and price determination in the contemporary airline industry”, Springer, Review of Industrial Organization, vol.8, no.4, pp.419-433, 1993.
[52]  Giannetti R., L’analisi dei costi delle imprese di gestione aeroportuale, Giappichelli, Italy, 2006.
[53]  Marin P.L., “Competition in European aviation: Pricing policy and market structure”, Wiley, The Journal of Industrial Economics, vol.43, no.2, pp.141-159, 1995.
[54]  Bean G., Metodologie contabili e modelli analitici di un’impresa aeroportuale, Consult, Italy, 1985.
[55]  Boeing commercial airplanes, “Current market outlook 2009-2029. Boeing commercial airplanes Market Analysis”, Boeing Commercial Airplanes, United States, 2010.