Journal of Microbiology Research

p-ISSN: 2166-5885    e-ISSN: 2166-5931

2015;  5(4): 123-127

doi:10.5923/j.microbiology.20150504.01

Nasal Carriage Rates of Staphylococcus aureus and CA-Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus aureus among University Students

Mahde S. Assafi1, Reem Qasim Mohammed1, Nawfal R. Hussein2

1Department of Biology, Faculty of Sciences, University of Zakho, Zakho, Kurdistan region, Iraq

2Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine Faculty of Medical Sciences, University of Duhok, Duhok, Kurdistan region, Iraq

Correspondence to: Mahde S. Assafi, Department of Biology, Faculty of Sciences, University of Zakho, Zakho, Kurdistan region, Iraq.

Email:

Copyright © 2015 Scientific & Academic Publishing. All Rights Reserved.

Abstract

The treatment of methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infection is challenging because of their high resistance to different antibiotics. The objectives of this study were to determine the prevalence of S.aureus and MRSA nasal carriers among healthy students in Zakho University and to study their resistance pattern to vancomycin. During December 2013 to July 2014, a total of 405 nasal swabs were collected from healthy students and screened for S. aureus. The microorganisms were identified based on morphology and biochemical tests. Then, antibiotic susceptibility to methicillin and vancomycin was determined. The nasal carriage rate of S.aureus and MRSA among participated students were 17.5% (71/405) and 4.2% (17/405), respectively. The highest nasal carriage rate of S.aureus was found in third year students (24.7%, p =0.04). The nasal carriage rate of S.aureus was more common in males than females (20.6% and 14.8%, respectively, p = 0.14). However, the nasal carriage rate of MRSA was more common in females than males (5% and 3% respectively, p = 0.45). All isolates were sensitive to vancomycin.S.aureus and MRSA nasal carriage rates observed amongst university students were comparable to other studies. The transmission of S.aureus and MRSA colonization, infection, and treatment should be explained to the students in order to prevent the spread and control their infections.

Keywords: Nasal carriage, S.aureus, MRSA, Iraq

Cite this paper: Mahde S. Assafi, Reem Qasim Mohammed, Nawfal R. Hussein, Nasal Carriage Rates of Staphylococcus aureus and CA-Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus aureus among University Students, Journal of Microbiology Research, Vol. 5 No. 4, 2015, pp. 123-127. doi: 10.5923/j.microbiology.20150504.01.

1. Introduction

Staphylococcus aureus is one of the most successful and adaptable human pathogens and responsible for difficult infections [1]. Overuse and misuse of antibiotics have led to increased levels of antibiotics-resistance. Methicillin was invented for the treatmentof pencillin-resistnat S. aureus [1]. However, methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) emerged and at the beginning such strains were a challenge in hospitals and health care units. Then, MRSA turned into the public-health problem affecting healthy individuals and has become the most frequent cause of skin and soft-tissue infections in the community [2-4]. As a result and to discriminate between community and healthcare facility strains, community-associated MRSA (CA-MRSA) and health care-associated MRSA (HA-MRSA) have been used. Several studies have examined the prevalence of MRSA nasal carriage among health workers, outpatient settings, injection drug users and medical students [5-8]. Also, researchers have investigated the CA-MRSA carriage rates in a general population [9, 10]. The aims of this paper were to study the prevalence of S. aureus and MRSA in the anterior nares of healthy students and to study their susceptibility to vancomycin at Zakho university, Kurdistan region, Iraq.

2. Materials and Methods

Setting and sample collection
A cross-sectional study was conducted in University of Zakho, Zakho city, Kurdistan region-Iraq. The study was conducted with the approval of ethics committee in the University of Zakho. A total of 432 students aged 19 to 25 years were participated in this study from December 2013 to July 2014. Nasal swabs (moistened with sterile distilled water) were taken from anterior nares of the participants. The swab was inserted about 2 cm into the naris and directly transported for specimen processing.
Laboratory analysis of S. aureus and MRSA isolates
Nasal swabs were screened for S. aureus and MRSA. Samples were directly cultured on Mannitol Salt Agar (Oxoid) and incubated at 35ºC for 24 hours. Positive colonies on mannitol salt agar were identified as S. aureus strains based on morphology, Gram stain and biochemical tests including catalase and coagulase.
The bacterial suspension was adjusted to the concentration of 0.5 McFarland and then 10μl inoculum was spread on the agar plate (final concentration = 106 CFU/ml). Antimicrobial susceptibility testing to oxacillin was carried out according to Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) recommendations using Kirby-Bauer disk diffusion and agar dilution assay methods using Muller-Hinton agar (Oxoid Limited, Hampshire, England). BHI agar plates supplemented with 6 μg/ml vancomycin were used for testing of strains for vancomycin resistance [11].
Data analysis
Statistical analysis of data was performed by using the chi-squared test with significance set at a p value of <0.05 using Minitab 15 software (Minitab Ltd., Coventry, UK).

3. Results

Because hospitalization and admission to healthcare facilities increase the risk of MRSA colonization, we excluded every student with history of hospitalization, surgery, dialysis or residence in a long-term care facility within one year of the MRSA culture date, the presence of an indwelling catheter or a percutaneous device at the time of culture and history of previous isolation of MRSA. A total of 432 participants volunteered in this study, 27 students (6.25%) were excluded because of the above mentioned factors. The included students (405) were examined for presence of S. aureus and MRSA. The male and female participants were 47% (189/405) and 53% (216/405) respectively. A total of 71 S. aureus and 17 MRSA were isolated from 405 participants, giving an overall positivity rate of 17.5% and 4.2%, respectively (Table 1). With regard to the year of study, prevalence of S. aureus rate was higher in the 3rd stage students 24.7% (24/97) than students in other stages (p=0.045) (Table 1).
Table 1. Distribution of S. aureus and MRSA nasal carriage among students
     
Among the 189 males screened, 39 (20.6%) and 6 (3%) were positive for S. aureus and MRSA respectively, compared to 32 (14.8%) and 11 (5%) of the 216 females. However, there were no significant differences of the prevalence of S. aureus and MRSA among students as regard to their gender (p > 0.05) (Table 2). Fortunately, all isolates were sensitive to vancomycin antibiotics.
Table 2. Distribution of S. aureus and MRSA nasal carriage the different genders
     

4. Discussion

S. aureus is a normal commensal in the nose of about 25-30% of healthy people [12]. Different factors contribute to the transmission of this microorganism such as crowded living conditions, and poor hygiene [13, 14]. The presence of S. aureus on the skin appears to play a key role in the pathogenesis of infection with S. aureus [15, 16]. Eradication of S. aureus from the nose reduced the incidence of invasive infection [16, 17]. In this study, the prevalence of S. aureus nasal carriage among students was 17.5%. This result is comparable with other studies from Iraq, Iran and Turkey [9, 18-20] and is lower than those reported in Nigeria, Ethiopia and India [21-25]. S. aureus nasal carriage rate was significantly higher among third year students. Outbreaks have been reported among different groups such as athletes, military recruits, prisons detainees, livestock handlers, pet owners, intravenous drug users, students [14, 26, 27]. There are different factors contributing to spread of S. aureus and MRSA including crowded living conditions, poor hygiene habits, close skin-to-skin contact, sharing of personal items, frequent antibiotic exposure, hospitalization and intravenous drug abuse [28]. It was found that the carriage rate of S. aureus was higher on participants who had been hospitalized within the past 1 year than those who had not [7]. One factor that could assist to distribute S. aureus among third year students is that the colonization of these bacteria among household members is shown to be higher than rates reported among the general population [4]. Member of this group of students may live in shared houses or accommodate internal departments of the university. More study is needed to explore this result.
MRSA was identified as a nosocomial pathogen which is one of the causative agents of healthcare associated infections worldwide. MRSA has traditionally considered as associated with healthcare settings. However, new strains have emerged in the community and an increasing numbers were observed in people who have not been hospitalized or had a medical procedure [29, 30]. Different studies showed variable rate (0.8 - 36%) of MRSA nasal colonization [7, 31-34]. In our region, the nasal carriage rate of MRSA was 4.2%. Combination of factors could contribute to the nasal carriage of S. aureus and MRSA among population including host, geographical, environmental and bacterial factors.
Epidemiological evidence supports that the mechanism for transmission S. aureus and MRSA usually via direct contact with patients and other close contacts [35]. In our study, male students had a highest prevalence of S. aureus nasal carriage. This is in agreement with other studies that found that S. aureus nasal carriage rate is higher in males than females [7, 36, 37]. In agreement with other study, it was found that the prevalence of MRSA was more common in females than males [38, 39]. A similar result was abstained by Braga et al. [28] who showed that the prevalence of S. aureus are more common in males and MRSA are more prevalence in females. It is observed that females harbour a greater diversity of bacteria on their hands than males, but it is not obvious whether this is due to physiological factors or differences in hygiene and cosmetic usage [40]. Furthermore, the microbial differences between male and female could be due to the physiological and anatomical differences between genders cutaneous environments such as sweat, sebum and hormone production [41].
Vancomycin is considered one of the last options of treatment for S. aureus infections that are resistant to other antibiotics. Analysis of different studies revealed the emergence of Vancomycin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus (VRSA) from different parts of the neighboring countries [42-45]. Fortunately, no vancomycin-resistant S. aureus (VRSA) isolates was found in this study.
In conclusion, the nasal carriage rate of S. aureus and MRSA observed in this study was relatively low and comparable to other studies in surrounding area. No vancomycin-resistant S. aureus was observed in our study. The implications of S. aureus and MRSA colonization, infection, and treatment should be explained to the students in order to prevent the spread and control their infections.

References

[1]  Gerard JT, Berdell RF, and Christine LC. Microbiology: An Introduction with MasteringMicrobiology. 10th ed San Francisco: Pearson Benjamin Cummings 2010.
[2]  Yan M, Pamp SJ, Fukuyama J, Hwang PH, Cho DY, Holmes S, and Relman DA. Nasal microenvironments and interspecific interactions influence nasal microbiota complexity and S. aureus carriage. Cell Host Microbe 2013; 14:631-40. doi:10.1016/j.chom.2013.11.005.
[3]  Zetola N, Francis JS, Nuermberger EL, and Bishai WR. Community-acquired meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: an emerging threat. Lancet Infect Dis 2005; 5:275-86. doi:10.1016/S1473-3099(05)70112-2.
[4]  Zafar U, Johnson LB, Hanna M, Riederer K, Sharma M, Fakih MG, Thirumoorthi MC, Farjo R, and Khatib R. Prevalence of nasal colonization among patients with community-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infection and their household contacts. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2007; 28:966-9. doi:10.1086/518965.
[5]  Lari AR, Pourmand MR, Ohadian MS, Abdossamadi Z, Namvar AE, and Asghari B. Prevalence of PVL-Containing MRSA Isolates Among Hospital Staff Nasal Carriers. Lab Medicine 2011; 42:283-286. doi:10.1309/lman7hr6vjea3nmr.
[6]  Amorim ML, Vasconcelos C, Oliveira DC, Azevedo A, Calado E, Faria NA, Pereira M, Castro AP, Moreira A, Aires E, et al. Epidemiology of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) nasal colonization among patients and healthcare workers in a Portuguese hospital: a pre-intervention study toward the control of MRSA. Microb Drug Resist 2009; 15:19 - 26.
[7]  Chen CS, Chen CY, and Huang YC. Nasal carriage rate and molecular epidemiology of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus among medical students at a Taiwanese university. International Journal of Infectious Diseases 2012; 16:799-803. doi:10.1016/j.ijid.2012.07.004.
[8]  Kaminski A, Kammler J, Wick M, Muhr G, and Kutscha LF. Transmission of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus among hospital staff in a German trauma centre: a problem without a current solution? J Bone Joint Surg Br 2007; 89:642 - 645.
[9]  Habeeb A, Hussein NR, Assafi MS, and Al-Dabbagh SA. Methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus nasal colonization among secondary school students at Duhok City-Iraq. J Microbiol Infect Dis 2014; 4:59-63. doi:10.5799/ahinjs.02.2014.02.0128.
[10]  Lindenmayer JM, Schoenfeld S, O'Grady R, and Carney JK. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in a high school wrestling team and the surrounding community. Arch Intern Med 1998; 158:895-9. doi:10.1001/archinte.158.8.895.
[11]  CLSI. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. Methods for Broth Dilution Susceptibility Testing of Bacteria Isolated from Aquatic Animals, Approved Guideline. Document M49-A CLSI, Wayne, Pennsylvania 19087-1898, USA. 2006b.
[12]  CDC. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Workplace Safety & Health Topics. MRSA and the Workplace. Last updated September 19, 2014, Accessed 11 April 2015., 2014.
[13]  Shibabaw A, Abebe T, and Mihret A. Nasal carriage rate of methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus among Dessie Referral Hospital Health Care Workers; Dessie, Northeast Ethiopia. Antimicrob Resist Infect Control 2013; 2:25. doi:10.1186/2047-2994-2-25.
[14]  David MZ and Daum RS. Community-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: epidemiology and clinical consequences of an emerging epidemic. Clin Microbiol Rev 2010; 23:616-87. doi:10.1128/CMR.00081-09.
[15]  Casewell MW and Hill RL. Elimination of nasal carriage of Staphylococcus aureus with mupirocin ('pseudomonic acid') a controlled trial. J Antimicrob Chemother 1986; 17:365-72. doi:10.1093/jac/17.3.365.
[16]  Wertheim HFL, Melles DC, Vos MC, van Leeuwen W, van Belkum A, Verbrugh HA, and Nouwen JL. The role of nasal carriage in Staphylococcus aureus infections. The Lancet Infectious Diseases 2005; 5:751-762.doi:10.1016/s1473-3099(05)70295-4.
[17]  von Eiff C, Becker K, Machka K, Stammer H, and Peters G. Nasal Carriage as a Source of Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia. New England Journal of Medicine 2001; 344:11-16. doi:10.1056/NEJM200101043440102.
[18]  Shehabi AA, Abu-Yousef R, Badran E, Al-Bakri AG, Abu-Qatouseh LF, and Becker K. Major characteristics of Staphylococcus aureus colonizing Jordanian infants. Pediatr Int 2013; 55:300-4. doi:10.1111/ped.12060.
[19]  Oguzkaya-Artan M, Baykan Z, and Artan C. Nasal carriage of Staphylococcus aureus in healthy preschool children. Jpn J Infect Dis 2008; 61:70-2.
[20]  Hussein NR, Basharat Z, Muhammed AH, and Al-Dabbagh SA. Comparative evaluation of MRSA nasal colonization epidemiology in the urban and rural secondary school community of kurdistan, iraq. PLoS One 2015; 10:e0124920. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0124920.
[21]  Onanuga A and Temedie TC. Nasal carriage of multi-drug resistant Staphylococcus aureus in healthy inhabitants of Amassoma in Niger delta region of Nigeria. Afr Health Sci 2011; 11:176-81.
[22]  Erami M, Soltani B, Taghavi Ardakani A, Moravveji A, Haji Rezaei M, Soltani S, and Moniri R. Nasal Carriage and Resistance Pattern of Multidrug Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Among Healthy Children in Kashan, Iran. Iran Red Crescent Med J 2014; 16:e21346. doi:10.5812/ircmj.21346.
[23]  Motamedifar M, Hassanzadeh P, and Ghafari N. Relative frequency of Staphylococcal carriage and antibiotic sensitivity of isolated Staphylococci in hemodialysis patients in Shiraz, Iran. Med Princ Pract 2010; 19:379-83. doi:10.1159/000316377.
[24]  Chatterjee SS, Ray P, Aggarwal A, Das A, and Sharma M. A community-based study on nasal carriage of Staphylococcus aureus. Indian J Med Res 2009; 130:742-8.
[25]  Shibabaw A, Abebe T, and Mihret A. Nasal carriage rate of methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus among Dessie Referral Hospital Health Care Workers; Dessie, Northeast Ethiopia. Antimicrobial Resistance and Infection Control 2013; 2:doi:10.1186/2047-2994-2-25.
[26]  Lowy FD, Aiello AE, Bhat M, Johnson-Lawrence VD, Lee MH, Burrell E, Wright LN, Vasquez G, and Larson EL. Staphylococcus aureus colonization and infection in New York State prisons. J Infect Dis 2007; 196:911-8. doi:10.1086/520933.
[27]  Zinderman CE, Conner B, Malakooti MA, LaMar JE, Armstrong A, and Bohnker BK. Community-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus among military recruits. Emerg Infect Dis 2004; 10:941-4. doi:10.3201/eid1005.030604.
[28]  Braga ED, Aguiar-Alves F, de Freitas Mde F, de e Silva MO, Correa TV, Snyder RE, de Araujo VA, Marlow MA, Riley LW, Setubal S, et al. High prevalence of Staphylococcus aureus and methicillin-resistant S. aureus colonization among healthy children attending public daycare centers in informal settlements in a large urban center in Brazil. BMC Infect Dis 2014; 14: 538.doi:10.1186/1471-2334-14-5381471-2334-14-538 [pii].
[29]  Naimi TS, LeDell KH, Como-Sabetti K, and et al. Comparison of community- and health care–associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infection. JAMA 2003; 290:2976-2984. doi:10.1001/jama.290.22.2976.
[30]  David MZ, Cadilla A, Boyle-Vavra S, and Daum RS. Replacement of HA-MRSA by CA-MRSA infections at an academic medical center in the midwestern United States, 2004-5 to 2008. PLoS One 2014; 9:92760. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0092760.
[31]  Fatholahzadeh B, Emaneini M, Gilbert G, Udo E, Aligholi M, Modarressi MH, Nouri K, Sedaghat H, and Feizabadi MM. Staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec (SCCmec) analysis and antimicrobial susceptibility patterns of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) isolates in Tehran, Iran. Microb Drug Resist 2008; 14:217-20. doi:10.1089/mdr.2008.0822.
[32]  Kuehnert MJ, Kruszon-Moran D, Hill HA, McQuillan G, McAllister SK, Fosheim G, McDougal LK, Chaitram J, Jensen B, Fridkin SK, et al. Prevalence of Staphylococcus aureus nasal colonization in the United States, 2001-2002. J Infect Dis 2006; 193:172-9. doi:10.1086/499632.
[33]  Akhtar N. Staphylococcal nasal carriage of health care workers. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak 2010; 20:439-43. doi:07.2010/JCPSP.439443.
[34]  Fritz SA, Garbutt J, Elward A, Shannon W, and Storch GA. Prevalence of and risk factors for community-acquired methicillin-resistant and methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus colonization in children seen in a practice-based research network. Pediatrics 2008; 121:1090-8. doi:10.1542/peds.2007-2104.
[35]  Skov R, Christiansen K, Dancer SJ, Daum RS, Dryden M, Huang YC, and Lowy FD. Update on the prevention and control of community-acquired meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (CA-MRSA). Int J Antimicrob Agents 2012; 39:193-200. doi:10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2011.09.029.
[36]  Olsen K, Sangvik M, Simonsen GS, Sollid JU, Sundsfjord A, Thune I, and Furberg AS. Prevalence and population structure of Staphylococcus aureus nasal carriage in healthcare workers in a general population. The Tromso Staph and Skin Study. Epidemiol Infect 2013; 141: 143-52. doi:10.1017/S0950268812000465.
[37]  Sangvik M, Olsen RS, Olsen K, Simonsen GS, Furberg AS, and Sollid JU. Age- and gender-associated Staphylococcus aureus spa types found among nasal carriers in a general population: the Tromso Staph and Skin Study. J Clin Microbiol 2011; 49:4213-8. doi:10.1128/JCM.05290-11.
[38]  Shakya B, Shrestha S, and Mitra T. Nasal carriage rate of methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus among at National Medical College Teaching Hospital, Birgunj, Nepal. Nepal Med Coll J 2010; 12:26-9.
[39]  Mainous AG, 3rd, Hueston WJ, Everett CJ, and Diaz VA. Nasal carriage of Staphylococcus aureus and methicillin-resistant S. aureus in the United States, 2001-2002. Ann Fam Med 2006; 4:132-7. doi:10.1370/afm.526.
[40]  Fierer N, Hamady M, Lauber CL, and Knight R. The influence of sex, handedness, and washing on the diversity of hand surface bacteria. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2008; 105:17994-9. doi:10.1073/pnas.0807920105.
[41]  Giacomoni PU, Mammone T, and Teri M. Gender-linked differences in human skin. J Dermatol Sci 2009; 55:144-9. doi:10.1016/j.jdermsci.2009.06.001.
[42]  Zarifian AR, Askari E, Pourmand MR, and Nasab MN. High-Level Vancomycin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus (VRSA) in Iran: A Systematic Review. Journal of Medical Bacteriology 2012; 1:53-61.
[43]  Tiwari HK and Sen MR. Emergence of vancomycin resistant Staphylococcus aureus (VRSA) from a tertiary care hospital from northern part of India. BMC Infect Dis 2006; 6:156. doi:10.1186/1471-2334-6-156.
[44]  Cesur S, Irmak H, Simsek H, Coplu N, Kilic H, Arslan U, Bayramoglu G, Baysan BO, Gulay Z, Hosoglu S, et al. Evaluation of antibiotic susceptibilities and VISA-VRSA rates among MRSA strains isolated from hospitalized patients in intensive care units of hospitals in seven provinces of Turkey. Mikrobiyol Bul 2012; 46:352-8.
[45]  Alzolibani AA, Al Robaee AA, Al Shobaili HA, Bilal JA, Issa Ahmad M, and Bin Saif G. Documentation of vancomycin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (VRSA) among children with atopic dermatitis in the Qassim region, Saudi Arabia. Acta Dermatovenerol Alp Pannonica Adriat 2012; 21:51-3. doi:10.2478/v10162-012-0015-2.