Journal of Microbiology Research
p-ISSN: 2166-5885 e-ISSN: 2166-5931
2012; 2(5): 145-151
doi: 10.5923/j.microbiology.20120205.06
Wafaa M. Haggag 1, ElhamG. Abdallh 2
1Department of Plant Pathology, National Research Center, Dokki, Cairo, Egypt
2Biotechnology Unit, Ain Sham University
Correspondence to: Wafaa M. Haggag , Department of Plant Pathology, National Research Center, Dokki, Cairo, Egypt.
Email: | ![]() |
Copyright © 2012 Scientific & Academic Publishing. All Rights Reserved.
Microorganisms, which secret a complex of mycolytic enzymes are considered to be possible biological control agents of plant diseases. Since Chitinases are digestive enzymes that break down glycosidic bonds in chitin. In this present study, an industrial enzyme chitinase produced by endophyticStreptomyceswas purified and its antifungal activity was investigated against phytopathogens i.e. Rhizoctoniasolani,Fusariumoxysporum, Alternaria alternate, Aspergillusniger, Aspergillusflavus, Sclerotiniascleotiorum, Phytophthoraparasiticaand Botrytis cinerea.A chitinasewas produced byendophyticStreptomyceshygroscopicus in cultures containing chitin as the sole substrate that degrade chitin in 0.9 mm zone of clearance. The purification steps included ammonium sulfate precipitation, with columns of DEAE-Sepharose anion exchange chromatography and Sephacryl S-400 high resolution gel chromatography. The method gave a 5.4 fold increase of the specific activity and had a yield of 18%. The molecular weight of the chitinase was found to be around 80.8, 78 and 76 kDa by sodium dodecyl sulphate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) technique. Chitinase was optimally active at pH of 6.0 to7.0 and at 30℃. The chitanase were found to inhibit the growth of all phytopathogenic fungi.
Keywords: Antifungal Activity ,Chitinase, PlantPhytopathogens, Streptomyceshygroscopicus
![]() | Figure 1. Chitinolytic and antagonistic activities of Sterptomyceshygroscopicus |
![]() | Figure 2. Time-course experiments related to growth, chitinase activity in the Sterptomyceshygroscopicusstrain |
![]() | Figure 3. Activity gels of extracellular lytic chitinase enzyme secreted by Sterptomyceshygroscopicusshowing detection of lytic enzyme activities on Native gel; M = Marker; Streptomyces =Strep |
![]() | Figure 4. Effects of temperature on the chitinaseactivityofStreptomyces shygroscopicus. |
![]() | Figure 5. Effects of pH on the chitinaseactivity ofSterptomyceshygroscopicus |
![]() | Figure 6. Antifungal activity of chitinase fromSterptomyceshygroscopicusagainst somephytopathogens |
[1] | Shekhar, N., Bhattacharya, D., Kumar, D. and Gupta, R.K.(2006). Biocontrol of wood-rotting fungi with Streptomyces violaceusniger XL2. Can J Microbiol 52, 805–808. |
[2] | El-Tarabily, K.A. and Sivasithamparam, K. (2006) Non-streptomyceteactinomycetes as biocontrol agents of soil-borne fungal plant pathogens and as plant growth promoters. Soil Biol. Biochem 38, 1505–1520. |
[3] | Coombs, J.T., Michelsen, P.P. and Franco, C.M.M. (2004) Evaluation of endophyticactinobacteria as antagonists of Gaeumannomycesgraminis var. tritici in wheat. Biol Control 29, 359–366. |
[4] | Dahiya, N.,RupinderTewari, Gurinder Singh Hoondal. (2006). Biotechnological aspects of Chitinolytic enzymes: a review. Applied Microbiol Biotechnology, 71: 773-782 |
[5] | Yong,T., Jin Hong, Long Zhangfu, Zhang Li, Ding Xiuqiong, Tao Ke, GeShaorong, Liu Shigui (2005). Purification and characterization of an extracellular chitinase produced by bacterium C4.Annals of Microbiology, 55 (3): 213-218. |
[6] | Nawani and Kapadnis. (2005). Diversity of Chitinases and their Industrial Potential.Current Perspectives and Potential Applications: 719-740. |
[7] | Kuster, E. and Williams,S.(1964).Selection of media for isolation of Streptomycetes. Nature, 202: 928-929. |
[8] | Domsch KW, Gams W, Anderson TH (1980). Compendium of soil fungi.Vol. 1, Academic Press, London, p. 589. |
[9] | Shirling EB, Gottlieb D. (1966). Methods for characterization ofStreptomycesspecies.Int J SystBacteriol. 16:313–40. |
[10] | Imoto T. and Yagishita K. (1971) .A simple activity measurement of lysozyme.Agri. Biol Chem. 35:1154–6. |
[11] | Wang SL, Yieh TC and Shih IL. (1999). Production of antifungal compounds byPseudomonas aeruginosaK-187 using shrimp and crab shell powder as a carbon source.Enzyme Microb Technol. 25:142–8. |
[12] | Laemmli, U. K. (1970). Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4. Nature 227, 680-685. |
[13] | Trudel, J. and A. Asselin. (1989). detection of chitinase activity after polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. Anal.Biochem.178: 362_366 |
[14] | Bradford, M. M. (1976) .A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal.Biochem.72, 248-254. |
[15] | Azevedo, J.L. and Arau´ jo, W.L. (2007).Diversity and applications of endophytic fungi isolated from tropical plants. In Fungi: Multifaceted Microbes ed. Ganguli, B.N. and |
[16] | Bhattacharya, D., Nagpure, A. and Gupta, R.K. (2007). Bacterial chitinases: properties and potential. Crit Rev Biotechnol 27, 21–28. |
[17] | El-Tarabilya, K. A. ; Solimana, M. H. ; Nassara, A. H. ; Al-Hassania, H. A.; Sivasithamparam C,, K. ; McKennad , F. and Hardy, G. E. St. J. (2000). Biological control of Sclerotinia minor using a chitinolytic bacterium and actinomycetes. Plant Pathology 49, 573±583 |
[18] | Crawford DI, Lynch JM, Whipps JM, Ousley MA (1993). Isolation and characterization of actinomycetes antagonists of fungal root pathogen. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 59: 3899-3905. |
[19] | Anitha, A. and Rabeeth, M. (2010).“Degradation of fungal cell walls of phytopathogenic fungi by lyticenzyme of Streptomyces griseus”, Afr. J. Plant Sci., 4, 61-66. |
[20] | Subramaniam1, S., Ravi1, V., Narayanan1, G.. (2012). Studies on Production of Enzyme Chitinase from Streptomyces sp. and its anti-fungal activity.Journal of Pharmacy Research 2012,5(3),1409-1413. |
[21] | Khamna S, Yokota A, Peberdy JF, Lumyong S (2009). Antifungal activity of Streptomyces spp. isolated from rhizosphere of Thai medicinal plants.; Int. Integr. Biol., 6(3): 143-147. |