American Journal of Materials Science

p-ISSN: 2162-9382    e-ISSN: 2162-8424

2017;  7(4): 71-77

doi:10.5923/j.materials.20170704.01

 

EPR Characterization of Ferroelectric Ceramics (Sb, Cu)-Doped BaTiO3

Said Daoudi1, Lahcen Bejjit1, Mustapha Haddad1, El Mostapha Yahiaoui1, Lahcen Bih2, Faouzi Bensamka3, Ahmed Outzourhit3

1Laboratoire de Spectrométrie des Matériaux et Archéomatériaux (LASMAR - URAC11), Faculté des Sciences, Université Moulay Ismail, B.P. Zitoune, Meknès, Morocco

2Equipe physico-chimie de la matière condensée, Faculté des Sciences, Université Moulay Ismail, B.P. Zitoune, Meknès, Morocco

3Laboratoire des Sciences des Matériaux, Faculté des Sciences Semlalia, BP, Université Cadi Ayyad, Marrakech, Morocco

Correspondence to: Said Daoudi, Laboratoire de Spectrométrie des Matériaux et Archéomatériaux (LASMAR - URAC11), Faculté des Sciences, Université Moulay Ismail, B.P. Zitoune, Meknès, Morocco.

Email:

Copyright © 2017 Scientific & Academic Publishing. All Rights Reserved.

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY).
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Abstract

This work presents the results of an EPR study of BaTiO3 (BTO) ferroelectric ceramics pure and doped with antimony and copper. This study revealed the nature of the defects created in pure BTO and those generated by the effect of dopant. The computer simulation of the EPR spectra showed that these spectra are composed of several signals related with the presence of the paramagnetic centers in the doped and undoped BTO structure. These centers are identified, by determining their EPR parameters, as defects and Ba.

Keywords: Ceramics, Electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR), Structural defects

Cite this paper: Said Daoudi, Lahcen Bejjit, Mustapha Haddad, El Mostapha Yahiaoui, Lahcen Bih, Faouzi Bensamka, Ahmed Outzourhit, EPR Characterization of Ferroelectric Ceramics (Sb, Cu)-Doped BaTiO3, American Journal of Materials Science, Vol. 7 No. 4, 2017, pp. 71-77. doi: 10.5923/j.materials.20170704.01.

1. Introduction

Perovskite-type BaTiO3 ceramics have many applications in various domains, especially in electronics and telecommunications because of their piezoelectric, pyroelectric and ferroelectric properties [1-7]. To improve the properties of these materials and adapt them to specific applications, several doping elements have been added to BaTiO3 structure [8-17]. The obtained ferroelectric ceramics have been characterized by different method [18-20].
In last years, many works have focused on the defects created by doped BTO using electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR), a powerful tool for identifying paramagnetic elements and crystalline defects. Kolodiazhnyi and Petric [21], Dunbar et al. [22] and Castro et al. [23] have associated EPR singlet, with g values between 1.973 and 1.974, to the singly ionized barium vacancy , and room temperature investigations [21] revealed the same signal in both of doped and undoped BaTiO3, after oxidation of reduced ceramics in air. The g = 2.004 EPR signal has been attributed to the titanium vacancy with unpaired electron spin, i.e. or . Recently, Lu et al. [16, 17] have identified several paramagnetic point defects in Pr-doped BaTiO3 and La, Tb co-doped BaTiO3 ceramics. In the first material the authors have associated EPR singlet, with g = 2.002 to the singly ionized Ti-vacancy defects, the signal at g= 1.932 to Ti3+ (3d1) and the signal at g= 1.974 to Ba vacancies. In the second material the EPR signals at g = 2.004 and g=1.974 have been attributed to V(Ti) and V(Ba) defects respectively.
In this paper, we have studied the effect of antimony and copper dopants on the BaTiO3 (BTO) composition. Using EPR technique, we tried to identify ionized barium, titanium and oxygen vacancies produced in doped BaTiO3 lattice by Sb and Cu elements.

2. Experimental Procedures

2.1. Samples Preparation

Perovskite ceramics of BaTiO3 type were prepared by the hydrothermal method [24]; Barium hydroxide Ba(OH)2 is prepared by dissolving barium oxide BaO in distilled water. A mixture of Ba(OH)2, TiO2, Sb5+ or Cu2+ aqueous solution was introduced in an autoclave. The media is rendered alkaline by adding sodium hydroxide NaOH. Then, it is heated to 140°C and maintained at this temperature for 14 hours. The obtained product is filtered, washed to eliminate Na+ ions and dried at 100°C.

2.2. EPR and XRD Measurements

The EPR spectra X-band (9.5 GHz) were recorded at room temperature on powder samples, using a Bruker spectrometer. The numerical simulation of the experimental spectra was carried out by developing a computational program well adapted to the nature of the paramagnetic centers studied in this work.
The X-ray diffraction (XRD) studies were performed in a set-up equipped with a Siemens M386-X-A3 goniometer using the CuKα radiation.

3. Results and Discussions

3.1. Structural Properties

Barium titanate (BaTiO3) ceramics were analyzed by X-ray diffraction (XRD) [24]. Figure 1 shows typical XRD diagrams of the dried BaTiO3 powders prepared at two different reactor temperatures at 120 and 140°C. Theses diagrams show the presence of the characteristic peaks of the cubic phase of BaTiO3. A secondary phase identified as anatase TiO2 is also observed. One can notice that the amount of these impurity phase decreases as the reactor temperature is increased from 120 to 140°C.
Figure 1. XRD patterns of untreated BaTiO3 powders prepared at: (a) 120°C; and (b) 140°C
We can conclude, from these results, that BaTiO3 starts to form at low temperature 120°C. The crystallinity of the obtained BaTiO3 improves when the reaction temperature is increased to 140°C since the corresponding XRD peaks became more intense and narrower.

3.2. EPR Results

For each sample we give the experimental and the calculated spectrum. The numerical simulation of the experimental spectra was carried out using a spin Hamiltonian composed of electronic Zeeman and hyperfine terms:
Ĥ =βSgH + SAI
H is the magnetic field strength, A is the hyperfine constant, S and I are electronic and magnetic spin respectively. g is the gyromagnetic factor calculated by the relationship hν0=gβH, where h is the plank constant (6,626 × 10-34 J s), ν0 is the microwave frequency and β is the Bohr magnetron (9.262× 10 −24 J/T).
3.2.1. BaTiO3 Undoped
The EPR spectrum from the undoped BaTiO3 sample is shown in figure 2. The calculated spectrum allowed us to identify several types of paramagnetic centers (Table 1). The hyperfine structure with six lines is due to Mn2+ (3d5, 6S5/2) and the signal with g = 2,000 (relatively high intensity) is attributed to the Fe3+ (3d5, 6S5/2), both of these elements are the main impurities associated with titanium in the BaTiO3 [11, 16, 21, 23]. The low intensity signals at g = 2.004 and g =1.974 are attributed respectively to titanium vacancies [9] and barium vacancies [16, 21, 23]. The low intensities of these signals can be associated with small quantities of and in the undoped BaTiO3 ceramics [21, 25].
Table 1. EPR parameters deducted from BaTiO3 spectrum simulations
     
Figure 2. Experimental and calculated EPR spectrum of BaTiO3
3.2.2. EPR Spectrum of Sb-doped BaTiO3
Figure 3 shows an experimental and calculated EPR spectrum of BaTiO3 doped with 0.3% antimony. In addition to signals previously detected in the non-doped BaTiO3 spectrum (Table 1), we observe a hyperfine structure with 4 lines around g//=2.38 and g=2.063 [26]. This hyperfine structure corresponds probably to the Ba+ center (Ba2+ + 1e- →Ba+) which is a reduced ion by the electrons coming from oxygen vacancies according to the following equation [26, 27]:
As it is well known, barium has two isotopes, 135Ba and 137Ba, which have the same nuclear spin (I = 3/2), and with natural abundances of 6.59% and 11.32%, respectively. This is what justifies that the EPR spectra show a hyperfine structure with 4 lines which are not clearly distinguished. On the other hand, comparing the spectra from undoped BaTiO3 and Sb-doped BaTiO3, the signal related to the barium vacancies increases significantly. This could be give information about the site occupied by antimony. In fact, the increasing intensity of this signal indicates that the sites associated to barium vacancies are created with Sb-doping of BTO. This could be explained by the fact that the antimony ion introduces the BTO network by occupying the Ti4+ site. Indeed, according to the ionic radius of the elements existing in the structure (Table 2), we see that the antimony Sb5 + can occupy the Ti4 + site. The mechanism of the formation of these barium vacancies is represented by the following equations [23]:
Figure 3. Experimental and calculated EPR spectrum of 0.3% Sb-doped BaTiO3
Table 2. Radius values of some ionic elements
     
It is worth to note that the species produced by the double ionization of are paramagnetic [23].
In order to study the effect of doping content on the shape of the EPR spectrum and the created vacancies, the EPR spectra of the undoped, 0.3% Sb-doped and 1% Sb-doped BaTiO3 are presented together (Figure 4). By normalizing and comparing the spectra of 0.3% Sb and 1% Sb, we can observe two opposite effects when the concentration of the Sb increases: (i) the intensity of signals associated to and Ba+ centers decreases, (ii) the intensity of center increases. This means that the doping content has a significant effect on the nature of the created paramagnetic centers in the BaTiO3 structure. These results are in good agreement with the mechanism proposed by Castro et al. [23], to describe the creating defects in Sb-doped BaTiO3:
-For the low rate 0.3% Sb:
-For high rate 1% Sb:
Figure 4. EPR Spectra of undoped and Sb-doped BaTiO3
3.2.3. EPR Spectra Cu-doped BaTiO3
EPR spectra are recorded for 0.3% and 1% Cu-doped BaTiO3. All the identified EPR signals in undoped BTO are present in doped samples. However, the Cu-doping induces the appearance of new signals. The calculated spectrum for 1% Cu-doped (Figure 5) allowed us to distinguish several lines, three hyperfine structures around (g//=2.35 and g=2.096), (g//=2.3 et g=2.027) and (g//=2.38 and g=2.063); the two first hyperfine structures are attributed to Cu2+ ions in two different sites [28] and the third one is attributed to Ba+ ions. The weak line at g = 1.963 is attributed to oxygen vacancies [23].
Figure 5. Experimental and calculated EPR spectrum of 1% Cu-doped BaTiO3
We retain as result here that the Cu doping causes the creation of oxygen vacancies. Indeed, according to the table 1 and to the mechanism of defects established by Langhammer et al. [28], the copper can occupy titanium site. In the other hand, the comparison of EPR spectra from 0.3% and 1% Cu-doped BaTiO3 samples (Figure 6) revealed that as copper content increases, Cu2+ signals increase and the intensity of the signal (g = 1.963) associated with increases.
Figure 6. EPR spectra of undoped and Cu-doped BaTiO3
The creation of defects which can be described by the equation and the weakness of Mn2+ signal intensity could be explained by the process of oxidation-reduction of manganese present in BaTiO3 as impurity, according to the following reaction:

4. Conclusions

The Sb-BTO and Cu-BTO ceramics are prepared by the hydrothermal method and are studied by EPR. Their experimental and simulated spectra showed the presence of several paramagnetic centers, namely and Ba+. The defects identified depend on the nature of the dopant; those identified in Sb-BTO are and Ba+ and those contained in Cu-BTO are , Ba+ and Cu2+. It’s also found in Sb-BaTiO3 ceramics that the intensity of and Ba+ centers decreases and the intensity of center increases with Sb doping of BaTiO3.

References

[1]  H. Gong, X. Wang, S. Zhang and L. Li, Synergistic effect of rare-earth elements on the dielectric properties and reliability of BaTiO3-based ceramics for multilayer ceramic capacitors, Materials Research Bulletin, 73 (2016), 233-239.
[2]  Burcu Ertuğ, The Overview of The Electrical Properties of Barium Titanate, American Journal of Engineering Research (AJER), 02 (08) (2013) 01-07.
[3]  Y. Mizuno, T. Hagiwara and H. Kishi, Microstructural design of dielectrics for Ni-MLCC with ultra-thin active layers, J. of the Ceramic Society of Japan, 115 (2007) 360-364.
[4]  N. Sareecha, W.A. Shah, M.A. Rehman, M.L. Mirza , M.S. Awan, Electrical investigations of BaTiO3 ceramics with Ba/Ti contents under influence of temperature, Solid State Ionics, 303 (2017) 16–23.
[5]  G. Alvarez, A. Conde-Gallardo, H. Montiel, R. Zamorano, About room temperature ferromagnetic behavior in BaTiO3 perovskite, Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials 401 (2016) 196–199.
[6]  Sea-Fue Wang, Yung-Fu Hsu, Yu-Wen Hung and Yi-Xin Liu, Effect of Ta2O5 and Nb2O5 Dopants on the Stable Dielectric Properties of BaTiO3–(Bi0.5Na0.5)TiO3-Based Materials, Appl. Sci. 5 (2015), 1221-1234.
[7]  Mengying Liu, HuaHao, Weijin Chen, Dongdong Zhou, Millicent Appiah, Binzhi Liu, Minghe Cao, Zhonghua Yao, Hanxing Liu, Zishan Zhang, Preparation and dielectric properties of X9R core–shell BaTiO3 ceramics coated by BiAlO3–BaTiO3, Ceramics International 42 (2016) 379–387.
[8]  E. Brzozowskiand M.S. Castro, Grain growth control in Nb-doped BaTiO3, J. Mater. Process. Technol., 168 (2005) 464–470.
[9]  D.-Y. Lu and S-Z. Cui, Defects characterization of Dy-doped BaTiO3 ceramics via electron paramagnetic resonance, J. of the European Ceramic Society, 34(2014) 2217–2227.
[10]  F. Yang, S. Lin, L. Yang, J. Liao, Y. Chen and C.Z. Wang, First-principles investigation of metal-doped cubic BaTiO3, Materials Research Bulletin, Available online 14 March 2017, In Press, Corrected Proof.
[11]  D-Y.Lu, X-Y. Sun and M. Toda, A novel high-k‘Y5V’ barium titanate ceramics co-doped with lanthanum and cerium, Journal of Physics and Chemistry of Solids, 68 (2007) 650–664.
[12]  P. Murugaraj and T.R.N. Kutty, EPR studies on donor doped BaTiO3 grain boundary layer ceramic dielectrics, Mat. Res. Bull., 20 (1985) 1473-1482.
[13]  Xiang Wang, Min Gu, Bin Yang, Shining Zhu and Wenwu Cao, Hall effect and dielectric properties of Mn-doped barium titanate, Microelectronic Engineering, 66 (2003) 855–859.
[14]  E. Brzozowski and M.S. Castro, Influence of Nb5+ and Sb3+ dopants on the defect profile, PTCR effect and GBBL characteristic s of BaTiO3 ceramics, Journal of the European Ceramic Society, 24 (2004) 2499–2507.
[15]  M.M. Vijatovic, B.D. Stojanovic, J.D. Bobic, T. Ramoska and P. Bowen, Properties of lanthanum doped BaTiO3 produced from nanopowders, Ceramics International, 36 (2010) 1817–1824.
[16]  D.-Y. Lu, X.-Y. Sun, B. Liu, J.-L. Zhang and T. Ogata, Structural and dielectric properties, electron paramagnetic resonance, and defect chemistry of Pr-doped BaTiO3 ceramics, J. of Alloys and Compounds, 615(2014) 25–34.
[17]  D.-Y. Lu, Y.-Y. Peng, X.-Y.Yu, X.-Y.Sun, Dielectric properties and defect chemistry of La and Tb co-doped BaTiO3 ceramics, J. of Alloys and Compounds 681 (2016) 128-138.
[18]  F. Yang, S. Lin, L. Yang, J. Liao, Y. Chen and C.Z. Wang, First-principles investigation of metal-doped cubic BaTiO3, Materials Research Bulletin, Available online 14 March 2017, In Press, Corrected Proof.
[19]  W. Sakamoto, K. Noritake, H. Ichikawa, K. Hayashi, T. Yogo, Fabrication and properties of nonreducible lead-free piezoelectric Mn-doped (Ba,Ca)TiO3 ceramics, Ceramics International, 43, Supplement 1, (2017), S166-S171.
[20]  A. Elbasset, L. Mrharrab, S. Sayouri, Dielectric Properties of Ytterbium Yb2+ Substituted Barium Titanate Synthesized by Sol–gel Method, JMES, 8 (2) (2017), 520-525.
[21]  T. Kolodiazhnyi and A. Petric, Analysis of point defects in polycrystalline BaTiO3 by electron paramagnetic resonance, J. Phys. Chem. Solids, 64 (2003) 953–966.
[22]  T.D. Dunbar, W.L. Warren, B.A. Tuttle, C.A. Randall and Y. Tsur, Electron Paramagnetic Resonance Investigations of Lanthanide-Doped Barium Titanate: Dopant Site Occupancy, J. Phys. Chem. B 2004, 108, 908-917.
[23]  M.S. Castro, W. Salgueiro and A. Somoza, Electron paramagnetic resonance and positron annihilation study of the compensation mechanisms in donor-doped BaTiO3 ceramics, J. of Physics and Chemistry of Solids, 68 (2007) 1315–1323.
[24]  A. Outzourhit, M.A. El IdrissiRaghni, M.L. Hafid, F. Bensamkaand A.Outzourhit, Characterization of hydrothermally prepared BaTi1−xZrxO3, J. of Alloys and Compounds, (2002) 214–219.
[25]  N.H. Chan and D.M. Smyth, Defect chemistry of donor-doped BaTiO3, J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 67 (1984) 285–288.
[26]  Mi-Nyeong Lee and Yoon-Chang Park, Dielectric Properties and an EPR Study of Cu- or Zr- Doped BaTiO3 Ceramics, Bull. KoreanChem. Soc., 16 (1995) 908-911.
[27]  F.D. Morrison, A.M. Coats, D.C. Sinclair and A. West, Charge Compensation Mechanisms in La-Doped BaTiO3, J. Electroceramics. 6 (2001) 219–232.
[28]  H.T. Langhammer, T. Müller, R. Böttcher, V. Mueller and H.-P. Abicht, Crystal structure and related properties of copper-doped barium titanate ceramics, Solid State Sciences 5 (2003) 965–971.