American Journal of Materials Science
p-ISSN: 2162-9382 e-ISSN: 2162-8424
2012; 2(3): 66-71
doi: 10.5923/j.materials.20120203.06
1Department of Physics, North Orissa University, Baripada 757003, India
2Department of Physics, Utkal University, Bhubaneswar 751004, India
Correspondence to: P. Mallick, Department of Physics, North Orissa University, Baripada 757003, India.
| Email: | ![]() |
Copyright © 2012 Scientific & Academic Publishing. All Rights Reserved.
We present a brief review on the evolution of structure, microstructure, electrical and magnetic properties of NiO with transition metal (TM) doping. The fcc structure of NiO is not affected with TM doping whereas the some of the TM ion influences the microstructure. The antiferromagnetic property of NiO is strongly modified with some of the TM (Fe, Mn, V) doping and the same is not much affected with some other TM (Co, Cr, Zn and Cu) doping. Not only the dopants but also the form of the material decides the magnetic order in the host matrix. Powder NiO exhibits room temperature ferromagnetism with Fe doping, superparamagnetism with Mn doping. NiO thin films on the other hand exhibit ferromagnetism with Fe, Mn and V doping. The ferromagnetic ordering in these cases was improved with Li co-doping. The increased ferromagnetism in these cases may be due to increase of hole concentration due to Li doping. Giant dielectric response has been observed for (Li, Fe) and (Li, V) doped NiO ceramics.
Keywords: Diluted Magnetic Semiconductors; Doping; Transition Metal Oxide; Nio
10-3)[17]. The values of δ for Fe1-δO, Mn1-δO and Co1-δO are 0.05-0.15, 0.001-0.15 and 0.001-0.05 respectively[17]. Due to the difference in non-stoichiometry, any of the ions like Fe, Co, Mn if used as dopant, is expected to govern the defect structure of NiO. The Fe1-δO in its wustite state is well known to produce the defect clusters, consisting of cation vacancies and iron interstitials[18-20]. The basic unit of these clusters, the so-called (4:1)-clusters, consists of four cation vacancies, tetrahedrally coordinating a trivalently charged iron interstitial ion. This gives rise to the generation of 5 holes around the defect structure. As in wustite, the 4:1 clusters can occur in the bunseniteNiO due to Fe doping. In this case a Fe3+ ion occupying interstitial site is coordinated to 4 Ni vacancies. Such a defect structure in Fe doped NiO was predicated by theoretical studies[17] and indicated by neutron scattering experiments[21]. Similar is the situation with Mn and Co doping, where the defect structure in MnO and CoO is expected to be reflected in the structure of NiO if doped by Mn or Co. The available literature on TM doped NiO indicates that only a few studies have been undertaken on the bulk samples[22-24]. Most of the studies on TM doped NiO are confined to nanostructure rather than bulk. In some cases, though attempts have been made to synthesize bulk phase samples, the segregation of secondary phases prevails and inclusion of nanoparticles of dopants in the host matrix occurs.The particle size of NiO increases on increasing annealing temperature[25,26] and annealing time[25]. Interestingly, the particle size of NiO has been shown to decrease with increasing TM doping concentration[13,15,27]. Similar type of observation has been reported for Mn doped (ZnAs)O also, where Mn was shown to be a potential catalyst for nano dot formation[28]. The exact role of TM ions in reducing the particle size is still elusive.Li is not a transition metal. However Li doping has been shown to influence the non-stoichiometry of NiO. Due to its valence state being different from that of Ni, its co-doping with another TM ion into NiO is expected to affect the defect structure as well as the physical properties of NiO. The Ni0.98-xFe0.02LixO samples show improved texturing along <111> with increasing Li concentration[29]. The texture evolution of NiO has been shown to be governed by crystallinity and grain size[30]. Increasing substrate temperature during the film growth by RF sputtering results into increased grain size and leads to suppression of texture along <111> and the evolution of the same along <200>. Therefore the enhanced texture along <111> indicates that Li doping suppresses the crystallinity and hence grain size. Like (Li, Fe) doped NiO case, 1 wt% Co doped NiO also showed the texturing along <111>[31], which may be due to the suppression of grain size. On the contrary, the grain size was found to remain unaffected with Co concentration in Co, Li co-doped NiO[32]. The grain size also remains unaffected in low doping concentration of Mn in NiO and the same decreased at higher Mn concentration[16].
), superparamagnetism (
spin glass behavior (D
10 nm)[51,52] and even core-shell like structure (4
D
22 nm)[53], where the core of NiO nanoparticle behaves like a ferrimagnet and the shell contains randomly oriented spins with low co-ordination. Thus depending upon the particle size, different anomalous magnetic properties emerge at the expense of antiferromagnetic property of the host NiO. NiO nanoparticles are shown to exhibit finite size effect, where 8-, 6-, or 4-sublattice spin configurations arise due to the reduced coordination of surface spins leading to anomalous magnetic properties like large moments and coercivity, and loop shifts[50]. These anomalous properties however emerge only when the particle size is less than a critical size (31.5nm)[50].The effect of TM iondoping on the magnetic properties of NiO is still not explored well. In recent years, TM ions such as Fe, Co, Mn etc. have been used as dopant for NiO. Fe doping in NiO leads to ferromagnetism in both nanoparticle and thin film form whereas Mn and V doped NiO exhibits ferromagnetism in thin film form. The TM iondoped materials which exhibit ferromagnetism is generally regarded as Diluted magnetic semiconductors (DMS) and are important class of materials due to their potential applications for spintronic devices[54,55]. The studies on the evolution of ferromagnetism in TM doped NiO are mostly confined either to nanoparticle powders or to thin films. Attempts have been made to synthesize bulk Fe doped NiO either by solid state reaction method[24] or by high temperature annealing of nanoparticles[25,26]. These studies however indicated phase segregation and precipitation of secondary impurity phase of doped ions, questioning the intrinsic nature of DMS. On the contrary, the Co doped NiO did not show any impurity phase. It also did not show any drastic change in magnetic property unlike Fe doping case. Though Li is not a TM ion, its doping into NiO has been shown to considerably influence the electrical as well as the magnetic properties[56-58]. We therefore discuss literatures on the evolution of magnetic properties on TM doping as well as on (Li, TM) doping in NiO.