Journal of Mechanical Engineering and Automation
p-ISSN: 2163-2405 e-ISSN: 2163-2413
2012; 2(4): 53-57
doi: 10.5923/j.jmea.20120204.01
Salau T. A. O. , Ajide O. O.
Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Ibadan, Nigeria
Correspondence to: Ajide O. O. , Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Ibadan, Nigeria.
| Email: | ![]() |
Copyright © 2012 Scientific & Academic Publishing. All Rights Reserved.
This study utilised optimum fractal disk dimension algorithms to characterize the evolved strange attractor (Poincare section) when adaptive time steps Runge-Kutta fourth and fifth order algorithms are employed to compute simultaneously multiple trajectories of a harmonically excited Duffing oscillator from very close initial conditions. The challenges of insufficient literature that explore chaos diagrams as visual aids in dynamics characterization strongly motivate this study. The object of this study is to enable visual comparison of the chaos diagrams in the excitation amplitude versus frequency plane. The chaos diagrams obtained at two different damp coefficient levels conforms generally in trend to literature results[1] and qualitatively the same for all algorithms. The chances of chaotic behaviour are higher for combined higher excitation frequencies and amplitudes in addition to smaller damp coefficient. Fourth and fifth order Runge-Kutta algorithms indicates respectively 62.3% and 53.3% probability of chaotic behaviour at 0.168 damp coefficient and respectively 77.9% and 78.9% at 0.0168 damp coefficient. The chaos diagrams obtained by fourth order algorithms is accepted to be more reliable than its fifth order counterpart, its utility as tool for searching possible regions of parameter space where chaotic behaviour/motion exist may require additional dynamic behaviour tests.
Keywords: Chaos diagram, Runge-Kutta, Fractal Disk Dimension, Duffing Oscillator and Damp Coefficient
![]() | (1) |
,
and
represents respectively displacement, velocity and acceleration of the Duffing oscillator about a set datum. The damping coefficient is
. Amplitude strength of harmonic excitation, excitation frequency and time are respectively
,
and
.[1,13,14] proposed that combination of
= 0.168,
= 0.21, and
= 1 .0 or
= 0.0168,
= 0.09 and
= 1.0 parameters leads to chaotic behaviour of a harmonically excited Duffing oscillator. This study investigated the evolution of 1000 trajectories that started very close to each other and over five (5) excitation periods using adaptive Runge-Kutta algorithms with a start time step (
). The resulting strange attractor[15] at the end of five (5) excitation periods in addition to other selected parameters combination are characterized with fractal disk dimension estimate based on optimum disk count algorithms.
cases was studied in the plane of excitation frequencies versus amplitudes at two different damp coefficient levels (
= 0.168 and
= 0.0168). Excitation frequency and amplitude range are
and
respectively. Common parameters to all cases includes initial displacement range (
), Zero initial velocity (
) and random number generating seed value of 9876
) in this study is given by (2) and (3) respectively. The tolerance (
) was fixed at
for all computation steps while the error (
) compares predicted results taking two half-steps with taking a full step. Equation (2) is used when
and equation (3) used when
.![]() | (2) |
![]() | (3) |
(10201) case points in the plane of excitation frequencies versus amplitudes. The collection of case points with estimated fractal disk dimension greater than one (1.0) at different damp level forms the chaos diagrams shown in figures 2(a), 2(b), 3(a) and 3(b).Figures 2(a) and 2(b) are qualitatively alike and likewise figures 3(a) and 3(b). Each figure took average of seventeen and half hours to compute on Toshiba laptop Intel (R) Pentium (R) Dual CPU T3400 at 2.16GHz with 2.00GB Ram and 32-bit operating system. There are respectively 6356 (62.3%), 5435 (53.3%), 7943 (77.9%) and 8046 (78.9%) out of 10201 tested parameter points that drives Duffing oscillator chaotically in figures 2(a) and 2(b) 3(a) and 3(b). In addition ,[18] suggests respectively reliability of chaos diagrams 2(a) and 3(a) than 2(b) and 3(b) because of shorter average computation time step associated with Runge-Kutta fourth order algorithms in comparison with its fifth order counterpart. Probability of chaotic behaviour is non-uniform on the plane (
)by visual assessments of figures 2 and 3. However, chaotic behaviour is highly probable below the diagonal line of the excitation frequencies versus amplitudes plane (
) than above and neighbourhood of the diagonal for all studied cases.![]() | Figure 1. Computed strange attractors of Duffing Oscillator at two different damp coefficients based on one thousand trajectories at the end of five excitation periods |
![]() | Figure 2(a). Chaos diagrams at 0.168 damp coefficients computed by Runge-Kutta fourth order algorithms ( ) |
![]() | Figure 2(b). Chaos diagrams at 0.168 damp coefficients computed by Runge-Kutta fifth order algorithms ( ) |
![]() | Figure 3(a). Chaos diagrams at 0.0168 damp coefficients computed by Runge-Kutta fourth order algorithms ( ) |
![]() | Figure 3(b). Chaos diagrams at 0.0168 damp coefficients computed by Runge-Kutta fifth order algorithms ( ) |