Journal of Laboratory Chemical Education
2014; 2(5): 85-89
doi:10.5923/j.jlce.20140205.02
Nayef Ghasem
Department of Chemical and Petroleum Engineering, UAE University, Alain city, UAE
Correspondence to: Nayef Ghasem, Department of Chemical and Petroleum Engineering, UAE University, Alain city, UAE.
| Email: | ![]() |
Copyright © 2014 Scientific & Academic Publishing. All Rights Reserved.
Synthesis of hot melt adhesives from dicarboxylic fatty acid and ethylenediamine is presented for the undergraduate organic laboratory. The project fulfills the requirement of undergraduate chemistry and chemical engineering students. The experimental setup is utilized for the determination of polymerization reaction rate constants and reaction order. The apparatus also provides a safe method for observing polymer formation. In this experiment students prepare, react, and convert dicarboxylic fatty acid to hot melt adhesive. Students will find reaction order and specific reaction rate of stoichiometric proportions of ethylenediamine and dicarboxylic fatty acid to produce polyamide adhesives using batch reactor. The experiment will expose students to observe the steps of adhesive formation along with problems phasing polycondensation reactions due to foam formation.
Keywords: Curriculum, Second-Year Undergraduate, Laboratory Instruction, Organic Chemistry, Polymerization, Kinetic, Synthesis
Cite this paper: Nayef Ghasem, Polymerization of Hot Melt Adhesives from Dicarboxylic Fatty Acid for Introductory Organic Chemistry Laboratories, Journal of Laboratory Chemical Education, Vol. 2 No. 5, 2014, pp. 85-89. doi: 10.5923/j.jlce.20140205.02.
In the fatty polyamide industry, the water produced during the reaction is purged out to minimize the reverse reaction. Besides, the evaporation of ethylenediamine during the reaction is another important factor that needs to be considered. If the evaporation becomes too great, the loss of ethylenediamine will cause an imbalance in the acid and amine values and this will affect the final products. The kinetics of the reaction between ethylenediamine and dicarboxylic fatty acids in the melt phase within the temperature range 210–250℃ has been experimentally investigated. The produced water vapor and vaporized ethylenediamine was purged by nitrogen bubbling, the anaylsis revealed that the reaction was second order with activation energy of 76.44 kJ/mole for conversions up to 90%. For higher conversions, the reaction was third order overall with activation energy of 68.88 kJ/mol [7-10]. Another work carried out on the kinetics of the reaction between C36 dicarboxylic fatty acids and diethylenetriamine and triethylenetetramine in the temperatures range 147–192℃, disclosed that the reactions followed an overall second order kinetics and had activation energies of 60.8 and 51.7 kJ/mol, respectively [11]. These polyamides are known as reactive polyamides because they can be cross linked with other resins such as epoxy resins and they are not linear. Kinetic studies on the reaction between ethylenediamine and C36 dicarboxylic fatty acids using benzyl alcohol as a solvent was investigated. The reaction was performed in the temperature range 162–192℃ and the kinetics was determined from the change in acid values. The reaction was found to be third order overall and had activation energy of 128.9 kJ/mol [8]. The order of the reaction at conversions above 90% changed from 2nd to 3rd order. This phenomenon has been reported for many polycondensation polymerizations reactions such as with polyesters [12, 13]. The change in the order of reaction for fatty polyamides has been verified and its effect on the reverse reaction is evaluated. The reverse reaction at the end of the reaction is important in order to ascertain whether there is a need to apply a vacuum or nitrogen bubbling to complete the reaction. Nitrogen bubbling inside the reaction mass has been used and this causes the irreversibility of the reaction, where this differs from the work that the nitrogen was introduced from the top of the reactor and used to sweep the vapors (mainly water vapor and evaporated ethylenediamine) on the surface of the reaction mass. The kinetics of reaction up to 90% conversion was modeled [14]. In the present experiment, vacuum was used to sweep out water vapor and evaporated ethylenediamine. ![]() | Figure 1. Experimental setup of the polyamidation reaction |
![]() | Figure 2. Schematic diagram of the experimental setup |
where Vb is the volume in ml of KOH solution required for the titration, Nb is the normality of the KOH solution, and S is the specimen weight in grams. The value 56.1 is the molecular weight of KOH. For the amine values, 5 g of the polyamide sample weighed to 0.1 mg was weighed and transferred into a 250-ml flask, 50 ml of xylene and isopropanol (1/1: v/v) was boiled for 1 min to drive off any free ammonia that may be present, and the boiled mixture was added to the 250 ml flask. The solution was cooled to room temperature and five drops of bromophenol blue indicator was added to the solution and titrated while swirling with 0.2 N HCl to the yellow ends. The total amine value was calculated as follows:
where Va is the volume of HCl solution required for the titration in ml, Na is the normality of the HCl solution, and S is the specimen’s weight in grams. The number average molecular weight, Mn was calculated on the basis of the following equation.
where W is the weight of solid sample titrated;
,
,
, and
are the concentrations and actual volumes used from the standard solutions of the sodium hydroxide and the hydrochloric acid, respectively.
,
and
are the percentage concentrations of the monomers with one, two, and three functional groups (acid and amide) in the products. Where
is the acid value, and
is the amine value,
is the molecular weight of potassium hydroxide (MW = 56.1 g/mol). Rearrange the previous equations yields:
Glass transition temperature, melting points, and heat of fusion were measured using differential scanning Calorimetry (DSC) with heating rate of 20℃/min and under nitrogen atmosphere from room temperature to 200℃. Less than 1 gram of the produced polymer is melted on a glass slide as a film under vacuum for half an hour. The sample was kept at 120℃ in an oven for the removal of water. The sample was then cooled. The melting point of the prepared sample was obtained using DSC.
A plot of
versus
(see Figure 4) will give values of specific reaction rate constant,
, at different reaction temperatures. Using the Excel software package, values of specific reaction rate constant at different reaction temperatures are shown in Table 2. The data of reaction rate constant
vs. temperature were found to fit the Arrhenius equation,
, 
![]() | Figure 3. Acid concentrations various reaction times at different reaction temperatures |
![]() | Figure 4. Reaction rate constant at different reaction temperatures |
|
|
versus
as shown in Figure 5 gives the slope of 7399.2 K:
,
, 
![]() | Figure 5. Forward specific reaction rate constant versus inverse of reaction temperatures |