[1] | Kahler, Miles (1999). “Evolution, Choice, and International Change,” in David A. Lake and Robert Powell (eds), Strategic Choice and International Relations. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press, 165-196. |
[2] | Friedman, Daniel (1991). “Evolutionary Games in Economics,” Econometrica 59 (3): 637- 666; Friedman, Daniel (1998). “On Economic Applications of Evolutionary Game Theory,” Journal of Evolutionary Economics 8 (1): 15-43. |
[3] | Maynard-Smith, John (1982). Evolution and the Theory of Games. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. |
[4] | Osborne, Martin J. (2004). An Introduction to Game Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press. |
[5] | Samuelson, Larry (1997). Evolutionary Games and Equilibrium Selection. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press. |
[6] | Waltz, Kenneth N. (1979). Theory of International Politics. Reading, Massachusetts: Addison-Wesley, p. 118. |
[7] | Waltz, Kenneth N. (1993). “The Emerging Structure of International Politics,” International Security 18 (2): 44-79; Waltz, Kenneth N. (2000). “Structural Realism After the Cold War,” International Security 25 (1): 5-41. |
[8] | Layne, Christopher (1993). “The Unipolar Illusion: Why New Great Powers Will Rise,” International Security 17 (4): 5-51; Layne, Christopher (2006). “The Unipolar Illusion Revisited: The Coming End of the United States’ Unipolar Moment,” International Security 31 (2): 7-41. |
[9] | Waltz, Kenneth N. (1979), p. 126. |
[10] | Walt, Stephen (1988). “Testing Theories of Alliance Formation,” International Organization 43 (2): 275-316; Walt, Stephen (1987). The Origins of Alliances (Ithaca: New York, Cornell University Press. |
[11] | Boulding, Kenneth E. (1961). Conflict and Defense. Boston: Harper and Row. |
[12] | Quester, George H. (1977). Offense and Defense in the International System. New York: Wiley. |
[13] | Walt, Stephen (2009). “Alliances in a Unipolar World,” World Politics 61 (1): 86-120. |
[14] | Jervis, Robert (2009). “Unipolarity: A Structural Perspective,” World Politics 61 (1): 188-213. |
[15] | Wohlforth, William C. (1999). “The Stability of a Unipolar World,” International Security 24 (1): 5-41, p.25. |
[16] | Nye, Joseph S. (2002). The Paradox of American Power: Why the World’s Only Superpower Can’t Go It Alone, New York: Oxford University Press. |
[17] | kenberry, John G. (1998/99). “Institutions, Strategic Restraint, and the Persistence of Postwar Order,” International Security 23 (3): 43-78. |
[18] | Ikenberry, John G. (2003) “Strategic Reactions to American Preeminence: Great Power Politics in the Age of Unipolarity,” report to the National Intelligence Council. |
[19] | Posen, Barry R. and Andrew L. Ross (1996/97). “Competing Visions for U.S. Grand Strategy,” International Security 21 (3): 5-53, p.6. |
[20] | Posen, Barry R. and Andrew L. Ross (1996/97), p.33. |
[21] | Lieber, Keir A. and Gerard Alexander (2005). “Waiting for Balancing: Why the World is Not Pushing Back,” International Security 30 (1): 109-139, p.133. |
[22] | Simes, Dimitri (2003). “America’s Imperial Dilemma,” Foreign Affairs 82 (6): 91-102, p.95. |
[23] | Pape, Robert A. (2005) “Soft-Balancing against the United States,” International Security 30 (1): 7-45, p.10. |
[24] | Pape, Robert A. (2005), p.35. |
[25] | Lieber, Keir A. and Gerard Alexander (2005). “Waiting for Balancing: Why the World is Not Pushing Back,” International Security 30 (1): 109-139, p.125. |
[26] | Brooks, Stephen G. and William C. Wohlforth (2005). “Hard Times for Soft Balancing,” International Security 30 (1): 72-108, p.76. |
[27] | Powell, Robert (1999) In the Shadow of Power: States and Strategies in International Politics. Princeton: Princeton University Press, pp.23-39. |
[28] | Aumann, Robert J. (1997). “Rationality and Bounded Rationality,” Games and Economic Behavior 21 (1): 2-14, 3. |
[29] | Niebuhr, Reinhold (1941). The Nature and the Destiny of Man: A Christian Interpretation. New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons, p.189. |
[30] | Morgenthau, Hans J. (1960). Politics among Nations, 3rd edition. New York: Knopf, pp.10-12. |
[31] | Waltz, Kenneth N. (1979), pp. 91-92. |
[32] | Wohlforth William C. (2009). “Unipolarity, Status Competition, and Great Power War,” World Politics 61 (1): 28-57. |
[33] | Krauthammer, Charles (2002). “The Unipolar Moment is Revisited,” The National Interest 70 (1): 5-17, p.8. |
[34] | Pape, Robert A. (2006) “Soft-Balancing and the Consequences of Serial Preventive War,” unpublished manuscript, p.14. |
[35] | Waltz, Kenneth N. (1979), p.105. |
[36] | Powell, Robert (1991). “Absolute and Relative Gains in International Relations Theory,” American Political Science Review 85 (4): 1303-1320. |
[37] | Powell, Robert (1994). “Anarchy in International Relations Theory: the Neorealist-Neoliberal Debate,” International Organization 48 (2): 335-338. |
[38] | Elman, Colin (2003). “Appraising Balance of Power Theory,” in John A. Vasquez and Colin Elman (eds), Realism and Balancing of Power. New Jersey: Prentice Hall: 1-22, p.8 |
[39] | Morrow, James D. (1991). “Alliances and Asymmetry: An Alternative to the Capability Aggregation Model of Alliances,” American Journal of Political Science 35 (4): 904-933, p.909, 913. |
[40] | Altfeld, Michael F. (1984). “The Decision to Ally: A Theory and Test,” The Western Political Quarterly 37 (4): 523-544, p.526. |
[41] | Reus-Smit, Christian (2006). “Unipolarity and Legitimacy,” unpublished manuscript, 2006, pp.2-6. |
[42] | Kupchan, Charles A. (1998). “After Pax Americana: Benign Power, Regional Integration, and the Sources of a Stable Multipolarity,” International Security 23 (2): 40-79, pp.42-47. |
[43] | Layne, Christopher (1993). “The Unipolar Illusion: Why New Great Powers Will Rise,” International Security 17 (4): 5-51, p.7 |
[44] | Mastanduno, Michael and Ethan B. Kapstein (1999). “Realism and State Strategies after the Cold War,” in Ethan A. Kapstein and Michael Mastanduno (eds), Unipolar Politics: Realism and State Strategies After the Cold War New York: Columbia University Press, 1-27. |
[45] | Fearon, James D. (1998) “Domestic Politics, Foreign Policy, and Theories of International Relations,” Annual Review of Political Science 1 (1): 289-313, p.296. |
[46] | Allison, Graham T. (1971). Essence of Decision: Explaining the Cuban Missile Crisis. Boston: Little, Brown. |
[47] | Bendor Jonathan and Thomas H. Hammond (1992). “Rethinking Allison’s Models,” The American Political Science Review 86 (2): 301-322. |
[48] | Jervis, Robert (1976). Perception and Misperception in International Politics. Princeton: Princeton University Press. |
[49] | Bueno de Mesquita, Bruce and Lalman, David (1992). War and Reason: Domestic and International Imperatives. New Haven: Yale University Press. |
[50] | Levy, Jack S. (1994). “Learning and Foreign Policy: Sweeping a Conceptual Minefield,” International Organization 48 (2): 279-312. |
[51] | Hamilton, William D. (1964) “The Genetical Evolution of Social Behavior,” Journal of Theoretical Biology 7 (1): 1-16. |
[52] | Osborne, Martin J. (2004). An Introduction to Game Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press, p.406. |
[53] | Samuelson, Larry (1997). Evolutionary Games and Equilibrium Selection. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press, p.41. |
[54] | Hargreaves Heap, Shaun P. and Yanis Varoufakis (1995). Game Theory: A Critical Introduction. New York: Routledge, p.200. |
[55] | Levy, Jack S. (1985). “Theories of General War,” World Politics 37 (3): 344-374, p.348. |
[56] | Keohane, Robert O. (1984). After Hegemony: Compliance and Discord in the World Political Economy. Princeton: Princeton University Press, p.32. |
[57] | Gilpin, Robert (1981) War and Change in World Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, p.29. |
[58] | Hart, Jeffrey (1976). “Three Approaches to the Measurement of Power in International Relations,” International Organization 30 (2): 289-305. |
[59] | Keohane, Robert O. (1984). After Hegemony: Compliance and Discord in the World Political Economy. Princeton: Princeton University Press, p.45. |
[60] | Ikenberry John G. and Charles A. Kupchan (1990). “Socialization and Hegemonic Power,” International Organization 44 (3): 283-315, p.57. |
[61] | Schweller, Randall L. (1996). “Neorealism’s Status Quo Bias: What Security Dilemma?” in Benjamin Frankel (ed), Realism: Restatements and Renewal. London: Frank Cass, 90-121; Elman, Colin and Miriam F. Elman (1995). “History vs. Neorealism: A Second Look,” International Security 20 (1): 182-193, p.185. |
[62] | Modelski, George and Kazimierz Poznanski (1996). “Evolutionary Paradigms in the Social Sciences,” International Studies Quarterly 40 (3): 315-319, p.319. |
[63] | Kahler, Miles (1999). “Evolution, Choice, and International Change,” in David A. Lake and Robert Powell (eds), Strategic Choice and International Relations. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press, 165-196, p.181. |
[64] | Waltz, Kenneth N. (1979), pp.74-77. |
[65] | Moravcsik, Andrew (1997). “Taking Preferences Seriously: A Liberal Theory of International Politics,” International Organization 51 (4): 513-53. |
[66] | Ikenberry John G. and Charles A. Kupchan (1990). “Socialization and Hegemonic Power,” International Organization 44 (3): 283-315, p.289. |
[67] | Ikenberry John G. and Charles A. Kupchan (1990), p.284, 290. |
[68] | Fearon, James D. (1998) “Domestic Politics, Foreign Policy, and Theories of International Relations,” Annual Review of Political Science 1 (1): 289-313, p.298-301. |
[69] | Zürn, Michael and Jeffrey T. Checkel (2005). “Getting Socialized to Build Bridges: Constructivism and Rationalism, Europe and the Nation-State,” International Organization 59 (4): 1045-1079. |
[70] | Finnemore, Martha and Kathryn Sikkink (1998). “International Norm Dynamics and Political Change,” International Organization 52 (4): 887-917, p.914. |
[71] | Wendt, Alexander (1992). “Anarchy is What States Make of It: the Social Construction of Power Politics,” International Organization 46 (2): 391-425. |
[72] | Sugden, Robert (1989). “Spontaneous Order,” Journal of Economic Perspectives 3 (4): 85-97. |
[73] | Wendt, Alexander (1992). |
[74] | Wendt, Alexander (1987). “The Agent-Structure Problem in International relations Theory,” International Organization 41 (3): 335-370. |
[75] | Holsti, Kalevi J. (1970). “National Role Conceptions in the Study of Foreign Policy,” International Studies Quarterly 14 (3): 233-309. |