International Journal of Theoretical and Mathematical Physics
p-ISSN: 2167-6844 e-ISSN: 2167-6852
2019; 9(4): 97-102
doi:10.5923/j.ijtmp.20190904.01

Greg Poole
Industrial Tests, Inc. Rocklin, CA, USA
Correspondence to: Greg Poole , Industrial Tests, Inc. Rocklin, CA, USA.
| Email: | ![]() |
Copyright © 2019 The Author(s). Published by Scientific & Academic Publishing.
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY).
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Based on new data pertaining to the covalent bond length of H2 a new theory on the origin of Newtons Constant is proposed. This paper intends to answer the question of the mechanism in nature that creates Newton Constant and how information about this number is transmitted throughout the universe. The aim is to redefine Newton Constant from an intrinsic constant to an actual constant based on imperial measurement. Using updated data sets from the Cambridge Crystallographic Data base a comparison is made to dated bond lengths of Hydrogen. The bond length of hydrogen over the decades is then averaged to obtain an average length, which is then compared to the known value of Newtons Constant. The results of this comparison are less than 1% error. It is concluded, that since the universe is made up of 71% hydrogen, that Newtons Constant is in actuality a universal radio transmission based on a reoccurring wavelength created by an unlimited number of H2 bonds. It is also concluded that H2 is just one molecule of a hydrogen Fibonacci sequence that extends to H377, a primary molecular bond needed in elemental protein, a building block of life in the universe.
Keywords: Atomic radius, Bond length, H2, Newton’s Constant, Resonant frequency
Cite this paper: Greg Poole , H2 Universal Gravitational Field Theory, International Journal of Theoretical and Mathematical Physics, Vol. 9 No. 4, 2019, pp. 97-102. doi: 10.5923/j.ijtmp.20190904.01.
[7]The Schiehallion experiment, reported in 1778, was the first successful measurement of the mean density of the Earth, and suggested a density of 4.5 g/cm3 (41⁄2 times the density of water), about 20% below the modern value. The outcome of this test produced a result equivalent to
[8].Henry Cavendish performed the first direct measurement of gravitational attraction between two bodies in the laboratory in 1798. Using a torsion balance invented by the geologist Rev. John Michell (1753), he determined a value for G implicitly. Cavendish laboratory equipment used a horizontal torsion beam with lead balls whose inertia (in relation to the torsion constant) could be timed by the beam’s oscillation. Their very small attraction to other balls placed alongside the beam was detectable by measuring the slight deflection. Cavendish determined the average density of the Earth and Earth’s mass. His result,
, corresponds to value of
. It is surprisingly accurate, about 1% above the modern value (comparable to the claimed standard uncertainty of 0.6%) [9].
|
![]() | Figure 1. A covalent bond forming H2 (right) where two hydrogen atoms share the two electrons |
. Different radii for single, double or triple bond relationships are not exact because the size of an atom is not constant. Often the polar covalent bonds are shorter than would be expected on the basis of the sum of covalent radii. Tables listing covalent radii are either average or idealized values, which nevertheless show a certain transferability between different situations, which makes them useful, but not exact.The bond lengths R(AB) are typically measured by X-ray diffraction. Rotational spectroscopy has also been used to give accurate values of bond lengths. For homonuclear A–A bonds, Pauling took the covalent radius to be half the single-bond length in the element, e.g.
so
. [22]It is customary to obtain an average value from a variety of covalent compounds. The differences are usually quite small. Sanderson has published a recent set of non-polar covalent radii for the main-group elements [23], but the availability of large collections of bond lengths, comes from the Cambridge Crystallographic Database [24] [25]. As of 2018, the Cambridge Structural Database which contains 426,000 crystal structures and more than 228,000 experimental bond length reports the actual radius of hydrogen to be 31.5 pm. [26] This results in a bond length of 63 pm. In a separate test of 400 samples the stated radius is reported as 32 pm, which results in a bond length of 64 pm [27]. In 1967, JC Slater reported Hydrogen radius to be 25 pm (accuracy of about 5 pm) [28] In the same year Enrico Clementi stated that the radius of Hydrogen is 53 pm [29]. If we discount the 1967 result which are dated, we have three fairly recent numbers from which to average.Hydrogen Average Radius
Calculate Average Bond Length of H2
Or,
My result indicates that the average bond length of H2 is nearly that of Newton’s Constant (6.674 x 10-11), accurate to within 1%.
(where h is Planck's constant). A fundamental vibration is excited when one such quantum of energy is absorbed by the molecule in its ground state. When two quanta are absorbed the first overtone is excited, and so on to higher overtones. According to Waech and Bernstein (J. Chem Phys. 46, 4905 (1967) - as cited in Koonin’s Computational Physics (1986)) there are 16 known, experimentally-determined, vibrational energies for H2 [30]. The first few are:
Covalent bond energies and lengths depend on many factors: electron affinity, sizes of atoms involved in the bond, the overall structure of the molecule and differences in their electronegativity. In general, the shorter the bond length, the higher the bond energy. The energy trend for H2 is shown on the graph below.![]() | Figure 2. H2 Potential Energy |

Where, 
I calculate the following:
and,
and
The period of H2 covalent bond distance divided by 1.414 is near equivalent to the charge of an electron, which equals
. The RMS represents the hypotenuse of a triangle with two electrons at right angles or 45 degree (.707) out of phase. The H2 molecule shares two electrons. It is theorized that the electron of H2 can be used as a doorway to quantum theory.
I now calculate Sun to Earth gravity using a string of H2 molecules
The electrostatic force of H2 is not adequate to account for Sun to Earth gravity (3.52e22). Adding the Vibratory Force of k =576 N/m and the distance of Sun to Earth will not make up the difference. H2 force is a weak contributor to planetary gravity but not insignificant.