Waheed Atilade Adegbiji 1, Dr. Shuaib Kayode Aremu 2, Kayode Rasaq Adewoye 3
1ENT Department, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ekiti State University Teaching Hospital, Ado-Ekiti, Nigeria
2ENT Department, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Afe Babalola University, Ado-Ekiti, Ekiti State, Nigeria
3Department of Community Medicine Federal Teaching Hospital, Ido Ekiti / Afe Babalola University, Ado-Ekiti, Nigeria
Correspondence to: Dr. Shuaib Kayode Aremu , ENT Department, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, Afe Babalola University, Ado-Ekiti, Ekiti State, Nigeria.
Email: | |
Copyright © 2021 The Author(s). Published by Scientific & Academic Publishing.
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY).
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Abstract
Background: Nasal polyps are common sinonasal diseases with scarce literature in developing countries. This study aimed at determining the prevalence, sociodemographic features, clinical characteristics, radiological investigation and management of nasal polyps in our center. Materials and Methods: This was a retrospective study of all the patients with nasal polyps who had surgery in ear, nose and throat department of Ekiti state university teaching hospital. The study was carried out from July 2009 to June 2019. Detailed data on the patients were retrieved from our out patients clinic register, emergency ward register, theatre register and hospital medical record and documented. All the data obtained were collated and analysed by using SPSS version 18.0. Results: Prevalence of nasal polyps was 1.2%. There was 69.5% male with male to female ratio of 2.3:1. Urban dwellers accounted for 62.7%. Nasal polyps were 57.6% bilateral, 25.4% left sided and 13.6% right sided. First episode occurred in 88.1% and recurrent cases in 11.9%. Chronic cases (>3|12) was commoner than acute cases (<3|12) in 89.8% and 10.2% respectively. There were multiple grapelike nasal polyps in 64.4% and single nasal polyps in 35.6%. There were ethmoid (simple) polyps in 81.4% followed by nasal cavity polyps in 15.3% and antrochoanal polyps in 3.4%. Main clinical features were nasal masses 91.5%, nasal blockage 86.4%, nasal discharge 54.2%, hyposmia/anosmia 45.8%, bout of sneezing 30.5% and headache 20.3%. Nasal polyps extension were 81.4% Intranasal/paranasal sinuses, 28.8% orbital extension, 6.8% pharyngeal extension and 5.1% intracranial. Associated comorbid illnesses were allergic rhinitis, infective rhinosinusitis and asthma in 44.1%, 37.3% and 25.4% respectively. All patients were managed by surgically as intranasal polypectomy 76.3%, Caldwell Luc procedures 13.6% and external frontoethmoidectomy 10.2%. Postoperative steroid therapy was offered to 66.1%. Conclusion: Nasal polyps are idiopathic common sinonasal chronic disorder. There is associated late presentation with longstanding progressive nasal obstructions. All patients had surgery and medical treatment.
Keywords:
Nasal polyps, Sinonasal surgery, Steroid, Developing countries, Nigeria
Cite this paper: Waheed Atilade Adegbiji , Dr. Shuaib Kayode Aremu , Kayode Rasaq Adewoye , Clinicoepidemiological Features and Management of Nasal Polyps - A Developing Country Experience, International Journal of Internal Medicine, Vol. 10 No. 3, 2021, pp. 35-39. doi: 10.5923/j.ijim.20211003.01.
1. Introduction
Nasal polyps is sinonasal disorder with a pedunculated oedematous mucosa that arises from the mucosa of the nasal and paranasal sinuses [1,2]. Nasal polyps is a form of chronic rhinosinusitis of the sinonasal mucosa [3]. Nasal Polyps are common sinonasal disorder affecting 1-4% of adult population worldwide [2]. It is commoner in male and adult also very uncommon in children under 10 years. The aetiology of nasal polyps is multifactorial or unknown (idiopathic) [4,5]. They can be associated with other respiratory diseases like allergy, asthma or aspirin sensitivity [6]. Patients with Samnter’s Triad have polyposis, asthma, and aspirin hypersensitivity. Nasal polyps appear as smooth, round, semi-translucent, single or multiple grapelike masses that are most commonly found in the middle meatus and ethmoid sinuses. Nasal Polyps may be clinically silent [7]. It may present clinically with nasal obstruction, congestion, mouth breathing, hyposmia, rhinorrhea, postnasal drip, headaches, snoring and sleep apnoea. On sinonasal examination, nasal polyps more commonly appear bilaterally but may also present unilaterally. CT scan is essential if surgical treatment is required it will show the extent of nasal polyps and anatomical variations [8]. Plain X-rays are insensitive and MRI scan may aid in the diagnosis of neoplasia [9]. Histological examination is required for definite diagnosis and to rule out malignancy.The management of nasal polyps can be either medical or surgical or both depending on the nature. In failed medical therapy or large-sized nasal polyps, polypectomy is performed [10,11]. Topical corticosteroids are used to reduce the size of the polyps, improve nasal breathing and prevent recurrence. Despite treatment there has been high recurrence rate of nasal polyps also a challenges to otorhinolaryngologist.In developing countries there have been fewer studies in literature on clinicoepidemiological and surgical management of nasal polyps particularly in Nigeria. Due to paucity of information this study aimed at determining the prevalence, sociodemographic features, clinical characteristics, radiological investigation and management of nasal polyps in our center to control this disorder.
2. Materials and Methods
This was a retrospective study of all the patients with nasal polyps who had surgery in ear, nose and throat department of Ekiti state university teaching hospital. The study was carried out over a period of ten years (from July 2009 to June 2019). Data were retrieved from our out patients clinic register, emergency ward register, theatre register and hospital medical record. Data on sociodemographic features such as age, sex, religion, marital status, education and occupation were retrieved. Detailed information on presenting complaint, duration of symptoms, associated condition on symptoms of nasal polyps (bilateral or unilateral) which includes nasal obstruction, rhinorrhea, facial pain, headache, epistaxis, snoring, mouth breathing, voice changes, ear problems, eye problems and facial deformity due to polyposis were retrieved. Social and family history such as asthma, allergy, allergic rhinitis, cystic fibrosis and previous medical or surgical treatments were further obtained. Findings from otolaryngological physical examination were obtained. Investigations including CT Scan findings and diagnosis were also retrieved. Informed consent was obtained from each patient enrolled in the study.The procedures performed on nasal polyps included simple Intranasal polypectomy and functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS) while extranasal approach were Caldwell-Luc procedure and external frontoethmoidectomy. All histological diagnoses of the nasal polyps were retrieved and documented.All the data obtained were collated and analysed by using SPSS version 18.0 computer software. Descriptive statistics analysis by frequency table, percentage with pie and bar charts figures were used to express our findings.
3. Results
A total of 5,078 patients were managed over the studied period out of which 59 had nasal polyps with prevalence of 1.2%. Nasal polyps occurred in all the studied age groups and the peak prevalence of 24 (40.7%) at age group (31-40) years as showed in Table 1.Table 1. Age group distribution among the patients |
| |
|
Nasal polyps occurred in 41 (69.5%) male and 18 (30.5%) female with male to female ratio of 2.3:1. Urban dwellers in 37 (62.7%) were commoner than rural dwellers in 22 (37.3%). Christian faith in 43 (72.9%) were predominant over Muslim faith in 16 (27.1%). Education distribution among the patients were secondary, primary and nil formal education in 21 (35.6%), 17 (28.8%) and 12 (20.3%) respectively. 18 (30.5%) artisan was mostly affected followed by 16 (27.1%) civil servant and 14 (23.7%) farmers. Nasal polyps were common among married in 25 (42.4%), single in 19 (32.2%) and divorce in 10 (16.9%) as seen in Table 2. Table 2. Sociodemographic features among the patients |
| |
|
Nasal polyps were found to be 34 (57.6%) bilateral, 15 (25.4%) left sided and 8 (13.6%) right sided among the patients. It occurred as first episode in 52 (88.1%) and as recurrent cases in 7 (11.9%). Based on duration of illness prior to presentation, chronic cases (>3|12) was commoner than acute cases (<3|12) in 53 (89.8%) and 6 (10.2%) respectively. Multiple grapelike nasal polyps in 38 (64.4%) were commoner than single nasal polyps in 21 (35.6%) as illustrated in Table 3. Table 3. Clinical characteristics among patients |
| |
|
Commonest anatomical origin of nasal polyps was ethmoid (simple) polyps in 48 (81.4%) followed by nasal cavity polyps in 9 (15.3%) and antrochoanal polyps in 2 (3.4%) as illustrated in Figure 1. | Figure 1. Anatomical location among patients |
The main clinical features of nasal polyps were nasal masses 52 (91.5%), nasal blockage 51 (86.4%), nasal discharge 32 (54.2%), hyposmia/anosmia 27 (45.8%), bout of sneezing 18 (30.5%) and headache 12 (20.3%) as demonstrated in Table 4. Table 4. Clinical features among patients |
| |
|
Nasal polyps extension into surrounding organ were 48 (81.4%) Intranasal/paranasal sinuses, 17 (28.8%) orbital extension, 4 (6.8%) pharyngeal extension and 3 (5.1%) intracranial extension as showed in table 5. Table 5. CT Scan findings among patients |
| |
|
Associated comorbid illnesses among patients with nasal polyps were allergic rhinitis, infective rhinosinusitis and asthma in 26 (44.1%), 22 (37.3%) and 15 (25.4%) respectively as demonstrated in figure 2. | Figure 2. Associated co-morbid illnesses among patients |
In this study, all patients were managed by surgical interventions as intranasal polypectomy in 45 (76.3%), Caldwell Luc procedures in 8 (13.6%) and external frontoethmoidectomy in 6 (10.2%). Post operative steroid therapy were offered to 39 (66.1%) as in figure 3. | Figure 3. Management of nasal polyps among patients |
4. Discussion
In this study, prevalence of nasal polyps was 1.2%. This prevalence is low and this may be due to late presentation of our patients with sighted of protruding nasal masses and severe progressive nasal obstructions. In this part of the flu and stuffy nose are believed to be mild conditions and can be treated with home remedy or over the counter medication. Nasal polyps presentation affected all the studied age groups but peaked at middle-aged [12-14]. This may be due to chronic nature of this disorder with possible early pathology and late manifestation as observed in this study [15]. There was male dominance over female in this study as reported in other studies [16-18]. Female dominance was reported in other study [19]. Most of the patients were urban dwellers which may be due to industrial waste exposure, accessibility and affordability of health facilities. Nasal polyps are common among artisans, civil servants, farmers and businessmen due to their exposure in the course of daily activities [15]. This has profound effects on their work with associated inconvenience, absenteeism and discomfort [15]. Bilateral and unilateral nasal polyps with left nasal polyps commoner than right nasal polyps. Most of nasal polyps arises from ethmoid sinuses with similar report by other studies [20]. First episode is commonest than recurrent cases due to chronic nature of the disorder and recurrence resulted from inability to address the main aetiology which is idiopathic [15,16]. Wrong assumptions by the patients that the feeling were due recalcitrant flu which does not respond to common drugs made most of the patients to present after 3 months up to 10 years in our findings [15]. Only complicated rhinosinusitis including allergic rhinitis were referred to otorhinolaryngologist in our practice. There is need for prompt referral of longstanding flu to the specialist for expert review and management [21]. Multiple grapelike polyps arises from multiple ethmoid air cell while solitary antrochoanal polyps was single tantrum [16]. Ethmoid (simple) polyps were commoner than antrochoanal and nasal cavity polyps in this study and concomitant with findings from previous study [20].Patients with nasal polyps usually presents with associated comorbid illnesses in our findings which were chronic rhinosinusitis, allergic rhinitis and asthma [21,22]. This is the commonest reasons for late presentation of nasal polyps because it was wrongly regarded as common or normal catarrh even in out patients' complaints. Commonest complaint of our patients with nasal polyps in this study was fleshy growth in the nose others were nasal obstruction, Nasal discharge (rhinorrhea), hyposmia / anosmia, bout of sneezing and headache [23,24]. Due to late presentation there were associated destruction of the surrounding bones with polyps extension into the contiguous organ such as orbit, intracranial structures and postnasal space (choanal).Our treatment plans was to relieve nasal blockage, restore nasal function/olfaction, improve sinus drainage and improve patients quality of life. Our treatment of nasal polyps was a combination of medical and surgical interventions [25,26]. All our patients had obstructing nasal polyps at presentation and surgical treatment were offered. Surgical approaches were simple polypectomies with or without ethmoidectomies and external frontoethmoidectomies for Intranasal polyps. Caldwell Luc surgery was done for the antrochoanal polyps. Medical treatment for nasal polyps by intranasal corticosteroids was offered to some of the patients postoperatively to induce remission and prevent recurrence [27]. Patients were monitored over two years. There was a case of recurrence in a patient with intranasal adhesion.
5. Conclusions
Nasal polyps are idiopathic common sinonasal chronic disorder. There is associated late presentation with longstanding progressive nasal obstructions. Longstanding progressive nasal obstructions should necessitate referral to otorhinolaryngologist. Follow up patients post treatment is advised for early detection of recurrence.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The authors are most grateful to Ekiti state university teaching hospital, the staff and all the patients who participated in this study.
Funding
There was no financial support. It is a self sponsored research study.
Competing Interests
All the authors declare that there was no competing interests.
Ethical Consideration
Ethical approval was obtained from the ethics and research committee of our institution.
References
[1] | Naclerio RM, Pinto J, Baroody F. Evidence-based approach to medical and surgical treatment of nasal polyposis. Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology. 2013; 132(6): 1461. |
[2] | Georgy MS, Peters AT. Chapter 7: Nasal polyps. Allergy Asthma. Proc 2012; 33(1): S22-3. |
[3] | Dietz de Loos DA, Hopkins C, Fokkens WJ. Symptoms in chronic rhinosinusitis with and without nasal polyps. Laryngoscope. 2013; 123(1): 57-63. |
[4] | Fokkens WJ, Lund VJ, Mullol J, Bachert C, Alobid I, Baroody F, et al. EPOS 2012: European position paper on rhinosinusitis and nasal polyps 2012. A summary for otorhinolaryngologists. Rhinology. 2012; 50: 1–12. |
[5] | Alobid I, Cardelus S, Benitez P, Guilemany JM, Roca-Ferrer J, Picado C, et al. Persistent asthma has an accumulative impact on the loss of smell in patients with nasal polyposis. Rhinology. 2011; 49: 519-24. |
[6] | Soltankhah MS, Majidi MR, Shabani SH. Medical treatment of nasal polyps: a review. Rev Clin Med. 2015; 2(1): 24-27. |
[7] | Alexiou A, Sourtzi P, Dimakopoulou K, Manolis E, Velonakis E. Nasal polyps: heredity, allergies, and environmental and occupational exposure. Journal of otolaryngology-head & neck surgery= Le Journal d'oto-rhino-laryngologie et de chirurgie cervico-faciale. 2011; 40(1): 58-63. |
[8] | Lund VJ, Mackay IS. Staging in rhinosinusitus. Rhinology. 1993; 31: 183-184. |
[9] | Hirshoren N, Hirschenbein A, Eliashar R. Risk stratification of severe acute rhinosinusitis unresponsive to oral antibiotics. Acta oto-laryngologica. 2010; 130(9): 1065-9. |
[10] | Settipane GA, Chafee FH. Jarvis D, Newson R, Lotvall J, Hastan D, et al. Asthma in adults and its association with chronic rhinosinusitis: The GA2LEN survey in Europe. Allergy. 2012; 67: 91–8. |
[11] | Zele TV, Gevaert P, Holtappels G, Beule A, Wormald PJ, Mayr S, et al. Oral steroids and doxycycline: two different approaches to treat nasal polyps. Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology. 2010; 125(5): 1069-76. |
[12] | Ullah N, Malik TL, Pal MB. Surgical management of massive nasal polyps. Annals KEMU. 2010; 16(1): 77-80. |
[13] | Jahromi AM, Pour AS. The Epidemiological and Clinical Aspects of Nasal Polyps that Require Surgery. Iran J Otorhinolaryngol. 2012; 24(67): 75–8. |
[14] | We J, Lee WH, Tan KL, Wee JH, Rhee CS, Lee CH, et al. Prevalence of nasal polyps and its risk factors: Korean National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2009-2011. American journal of rhinology & allergy. 2015; 29(1): e24-e28. |
[15] | Ogunleye AOA, Fasunla AJ. Nasal polyps - clinical profile and management in Ibadan, Nigeria. Nigerian journal of surgical research. 2005; 7(1-2): 164 -7. |
[16] | Mahmud K, Faruque MN, Faisal KA. The effect of preoperative short course of oral steroids followed by postoperative topical nasal steroids sprays on nasal polyp recurrence after endoscopic nasal polypectomy. J Dhaka National Med Coll Hos. 2011; 17(2): 40-3. |
[17] | Shaikh AA, Rafique M, Farrukh MS. An experience of steroid in recurrent ethmoidal nasal polyps at tertiary care hospital. J Liaquat Uni Med Health Sci. 2014; 13(1): 9-12. |
[18] | Haro JI, Gavioli F, Melo Junior V, Crespo CC. Clinical aspects of patients with nasal polyposis. Intl Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2009; 13(3): 259-63. |
[19] | Rajan JP, Wineinger NE, Stevenson DD, White AA. Prevalence of aspirin-exacerbated respiratory disease among asthmatic patients: a meta-analysis of the literature. Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology. 2015; 135(3): 676-81. e1. |
[20] | Hassan ZUI, Akbar F, Majeed MA. Epidemiology of Nasal Polyps at an Army Hospital in Pakistan. Pak Armed Forces Med J. 2018; 68(4): 1018-22. |
[21] | Chaaban MR, Walsh EM, Woodworth BA. Epidemiology and differential diagnosis of nasal polyps. American journal of rhinology & allergy. 2013; 27(6): 473-8. |
[22] | Chen HJ, Chen HS, Chang YL, Huang YC. Complete unilateral maxillary sinus opacity in computed tomography. Journal of the Formosan Medical Association. 2010; 109(10): 709-15. |
[23] | Naeimi M, Abdali N. Endoscopic and imaging prevalence of nasal mucosal contact point and association between contact point and sinunasal symptoms. Medical journal of Ahwaz Jondishapur University. 2009; 8(1): 117–53. |
[24] | Lathi AA, Devckar YP, Anand C, Choudhari VC. Study of clinical profile of nasal masses with special reference to clinical presentation. Int J App Basic Med Res 2015; 5(1): 409-13. |
[25] | Masterson L, Tanweer F, Bueser T, Leong P. Extensive endoscopic sinus surgery: does this reduce the revision rate for nasal polyposis? European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology. 2010; 267(10): 1557-61. |
[26] | Aouad RK, Chiu AG. State of the art treatment of nasal polyposis. American journal of rhinology & allergy. 2011; 25(5): 291-8. |
[27] | Weber SAT, Iyomasa RM, de Castro Corrêa C, Florentino WNM, Ferrari GF. Nasal polyposis in cystic fibrosis: follow-up of children and adolescents for a 3-year period. Brazilian journal of otorhinolaryngology. 2017; 83(6): 677-82. |