International Journal of Hydraulic Engineering
p-ISSN: 2169-9771 e-ISSN: 2169-9801
2013; 2(5): 101-114
doi:10.5923/j.ijhe.20130205.04
Elham Nasiri Dehsorkhi1, Hossein Afzalimehr1, Jacques Gallichand2, Alain N Rousseau3
1Department of Water Engineering, Isfahan University of Technology, Isfahan, Iran
2Department des sols et de génie agroalimentaire, Pavillon Paul-Comtois, Université Laval, St-Foy, QC, Canada
3Institut National de la Recherche Scientifique, Centre Eau Terre Environnement, Québec City, QC, Canada, G1K 9A9
Correspondence to: Elham Nasiri Dehsorkhi, Department of Water Engineering, Isfahan University of Technology, Isfahan, Iran.
| Email: | ![]() |
Copyright © 2012 Scientific & Academic Publishing. All Rights Reserved.
This paper primarily presents velocities, Reynolds stresses and turbulence intensities of flow over a series of two-dimensional asymmetric sharp-crested, gravel bedforms. The bedforms have a mean wavelength of 0.96 m, a mean height of 0.08 m, and a width of 0.4 m (equal to the flume width) and a lee slope of 28. The results show that extrapolating spatially-averaged log-law velocity profiles provided the best estimate of bed shear stress for bedforms. Maximum values of the root-mean-squared velocity over the sharp-crested gravel bedforms were located farther away from the bed when compared to those for sand dunes. The Reynolds stresses were zero or negative near the water surface over sand dunes, whilst they were positive over sharp-crested gravel bedforms. The length of the separation zone of gravel dunes was less than that for sand dunes, showing a faster reattachment over a gravel bed in comparison to that of a sand bed. Quadrant analysis showed that near the bed the contributions of sweep and ejection events changed with an oscillatory pattern along the sharp-crested gravel bedforms, however, such a pattern was not observed close to the water surface.
Keywords: Gravel Bedforms, Turbulence, Flow Separation, Reynolds Stress, Quadrant Analysis
Cite this paper: Elham Nasiri Dehsorkhi, Hossein Afzalimehr, Jacques Gallichand, Alain N Rousseau, Turbulence Measurements above Sharp-crested Gravel Bedforms, International Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, Vol. 2 No. 5, 2013, pp. 101-114. doi: 10.5923/j.ijhe.20130205.04.
![]() | Figure 1. Experimental Set up |
) were less than unity (0.18 at the crest and 0.12 at the stoss), indicating subcritical flow.The time-averaged stream-wise velocity,
, spanwise mean velocity,
, vertical mean velocity,
, stream-wise turbulence intensity,
, spanwise turbulence intensity,
, and vertical turbulence intensity,
, were defined as:![]() | (1) |
![]() | (2) |
![]() | (3) |
![]() | (4) |
|
from each quadrant leaving the smaller u' and w' corresponding to more quiescent periods, a hole size parameter H is introduced[17]. The hyperbolic hole region is determined by the curve
. Hence, a clear distinction was possible between strong events and weak events for a small-size hole and by taking into account only strong events for a large-size hole. The turbulent events were defined by the four quadrants as outward interactions (i = 1; u' > 0; w' > 0), ejections (i =2; u' < 0; w' > 0), inward interactions (i = 3; u' < 0; w' < 0), and sweeps (i =4; u' > 0; w' < 0). The hole size H = 0 implicated that all u' and w' were included. The quadrant analysis revealed the fractional contributions to
from bursting events. At any point in a stationary flow, the contribution to the total Reynolds stress from quadrant i, excluding a hyperbolic hole region of size H, is![]() | (5) |
obeys:![]() | (6) |
value. The stress fraction of the ith quadrant was defined as:![]() | (7) |
when i=2 and 4 (Q2 and Q4), and
when i=1 and 3 (Q1 and Q3). Hence, at a point, the sum of contributions from different bursting events was unity, showing that
.To show a measure of relative dominance of sweeping and ejection events, the following relation was introduced:![]() | (8) |
![]() | Figure 2. Non-dimensional velocity profiles (u/u*) (a) in sharp-crested gravel bedforms and (b) using Bennett and Best’s data over one bed form wavelength, λ |
/u*2) at different stream-wise distances along the downstream direction. Figure 7a indicates that the Reynolds shear stress distribution had features similar to those reported by Bennett and Best[1] (Figure 7b), and Nelson et al.[14], regardless of the magnitude of the bedform lee slope. Ihis shows that the shear stresses at the near-bed surface were smaller than those in the shear layer region. In addition, this figure reveals that the Reynolds stress distribution over much of the bedform is governed by turbulence generated in the free shear layer (outer region) downstream of the separation point at the bedform crest. Nelson et al.[14] found that the maximum values of the Reynolds stress (
) over two-dimensional bedforms typically occurred at and just downstream of the reattachment zone, along the shear layer. Reynolds stresses near the bed were somewhat larger than those in the decaying wake above but they were significantly smaller (by nearly an order of magnitude) than those observed in the wake zone over the separation zone.The present study failed to observe this pattern, in all likelihood because the ADV could not accurately collect data in the internal boundary layer (IBL) region. Figure 8a, which contains a contour map of the spatial variation in Reynolds stress, shows that the maximum τ values (up to 1.37 Pa) occurred both at and just downstream of the reattachment point (y=30mm) as well as along the shear layer extending from the crest level to approximately 0.5L (similar to the results of Bennett and Best (1995), Figure 8b). Additionally, over the lee slope Reynolds stress profiles exhibited a change in slope near the bed (see Figure 7). However, such a change disappeared when the flow moved over the stoss side of the bedform. Furthermore, it was observed that the maximum stresses were located along the shear layer below the crest level (similar to those reported by Bennett and Best,[1]). Zero and slightly negative τ values near the water surface reflected very low shear in this region and the influence of the free-water surface. Nelson et al.[14] observed similar zero and negative τ values and suggested that exact equilibrium flow over the fixed bed forms was not achieved. The shear stress in the layer near the free surface was the lowest and apparently the bedform geometry did not considerably affect this layer.The high Reynolds stresses confirm that turbulence had greatest values in the separation zone, at the reattachment point and along the shear layer. Although previous studies observed these high turbulence intensities[14], none quantified the magnitude of this turbulence nor did they delineate the morphology and downstream extent of this highly turbulent region.The weak peak in the shear stress profiles at the bedform crest was due to the development of a local internal boundary layer (IBL) that formed at the point of reattachment and extended up to the bedform crest. Nelson et al.[21] stated that the bed boundary condition induces a thin internal boundary layer that forces the flow by relatively large-scale structures which are ineffective for transporting momentum in the vertical direction. This means that in real flows, one should have the no-slip condition at the bed as a boundary condition. However, for the very rough flows that the authors are investigating there were large velocity fluctuations right down to the point where the mean velocity extrapolated to zero because of the eddies shed by the roughness elements (see Figures 5 and 6). Figure 8 indicates that the correlation coefficient between u' and w' became smaller (not necessarily zero) near the bed.Figures 3, 5, 6 and 8 show that the high turbulence intensity (Figures 5, 6) and high Reynolds stress (Figure 8) within the inner layer (near the bed) were characterized by low velocity in the recirculation region (Figure 3); whereas the region of outer flow was dominated by a high velocity, low Reynolds stress and turbulence intensity. Accordingly, sediment transport took place in the coherent flow structures characterized by high turbulence intensity and low velocity near the bed.![]() | Figure 7. Non-dimensional Reynolds shear stress profiles ( /u*2) (a) in sharp-crested gravel bedforms and (b) using Bennett and Best’s data (1995) over one bed form wavelength, λ |
![]() | Figure 9. Non-dimensional velocity profiles (u/u*) in three sections over one bed form wavelength,λ (or dune length L) |
![]() | Figure 10. Non-dimensional Reynolds shear stress profiles ( /u*2) in three sections over one bed form wavelength,λ (or dune length L) |
![]() | Figure 11. Variation of SH (H = 0, 2, 4) over one dune wavelength (5th and 6th) at six vertical heights |
