International Journal of Genetic Engineering
p-ISSN: 2167-7239 e-ISSN: 2167-7220
2026; 14(1): 17-27
doi:10.5923/j.ijge.20261401.04
Received: Jan. 6, 2026; Accepted: Jan. 25, 2026; Published: Feb. 4, 2026

K. U. Rozumbetov1, 2, G. D. Shirliyeva2, A. T. Esimbetov1
1Department of Veterinary Diagnostics and Food Safety, Nukus Branch of the Samarkand State University of Veterinary Medicine, Livestock and Biotechnologies, Uzbekistan
2Department of Physiology, Karakalpak State University, Uzbekistan
Correspondence to: K. U. Rozumbetov, Department of Veterinary Diagnostics and Food Safety, Nukus Branch of the Samarkand State University of Veterinary Medicine, Livestock and Biotechnologies, Uzbekistan.
| Email: | ![]() |
Copyright © 2026 The Author(s). Published by Scientific & Academic Publishing.
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY).
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

The aim of this study was to investigate the physical development indicators, cardiovascular and respiratory system status, and responses to physical load in 19-20-year-old female athletes practicing various sports in the Republic of Karakalpakstan. A total of 149 female athletes from different sports disciplines underwent morphofunctional and physiological assessments. The results revealed statistically significant differences in anthropometric parameters such as body weight, knee joint width, chest circumference, upper-arm circumference, and calf circumference among athletes of different sports. At the same time, the results of the Shtange and Genchi tests were often below normative values, highlighting the need to further develop the functional capacities of the cardiorespiratory system. The Robinson index and Ruffier test showed partial differences in cardiovascular system function depending on the sport type. The functional changes index indicated the highest values in track and field athletes, confirming the well-developed general adaptive potential of their cardiorespiratory system. The study results emphasize the importance of considering sport type, training load intensity, and individual functional capacities when planning sports training.
Keywords: Female athletes, Physical development, Cardiorespiratory system, Sport type, Functional tests
Cite this paper: K. U. Rozumbetov, G. D. Shirliyeva, A. T. Esimbetov, Study of Physical Development Indicators and Characteristics of the Cardiorespiratory System in Female Athletes Engaged in Various Sports, International Journal of Genetic Engineering, Vol. 14 No. 1, 2026, pp. 17-27. doi: 10.5923/j.ijge.20261401.04.
|
![]() | Figure 1. Location of the Republic of Karakalpakstan in Uzbekistan [16] |
Here, HR – heart rate (beats/min); SBP – systolic blood pressure (mmHg).The higher these indicators during physical exertion, the greater the functional capacity of the heart muscles. The index is used to evaluate the level of metabolic and energy processes occurring in the body. The results of the index are interpreted as follows: ≤69 conditional units – excellent; 70-84 – good; 85-94 – average; 95-110 – poor; ≥111 – very poor [23].Ruffier Functional Test is used to assess the cardiovascular system’s adaptation to physical exertion and also serves as a simple and indirect method for determining physical fitness. It is based on quantitatively evaluating the HR response and recovery speed after performing 30 sit-ups in 45 seconds [22,24].The Ruffier index is calculated using the formula:
Here, P1 – HR measured over 15 seconds at rest; P2 – HR measured over the first 15 seconds after performing 30 sit-ups; P3 – HR measured during the last 15 seconds of the first minute of the recovery period; 200 – triple sum of the average HR in adults; 10 – used to simplify comparison.The resulting index is then evaluated according to the following scale: 15 – unsatisfactory result, poor heart function, possibly severe heart failure; 10-15 – poor result, weak heart function, or moderate heart failure; 6-9 – satisfactory result, average performance, no insufficiency; 3-5 (normal) – good result, good performance; 0-3 (normal) – excellent result, very good heart function [22,24].Functional Changes Index (Adaptation Potential). The functional changes index reflects the adaptive capacity of the circulatory system (CS). The functional state of the CS was evaluated using the following formula:
Here: HR – heart rate at rest (beats/min), SBP – systolic arterial pressure (mmHg), DBP – diastolic arterial pressure (mmHg), A – age (years), BW – body weight (kg), BL – body length (cm).Evaluation of adaptation potential values: 0-2.6 – CS is functioning satisfactorily; 2.6-3.1 – functional stress is present; 3.1-3.5 – functional state is unsatisfactory; 3.5 and above – dysfunction is present in the CS [25].![]() | Table 2. Anthropometric indicators and their comparison in the studied groups |
![]() | Table 3. Comparison of the results of physiological parameters and functional tests in the studied groups |
![]() | Figure 2. Robinson index results (%) among female athletes practicing different sports |
![]() | Figure 3. Assessment of the physical working capacity of female athletes using the Ruffier test (%) |
![]() | Figure 4. Functional Changes Index results (%) in the studied groups |