Luiza Tagayeva1, Shermat Jabborov2, Kunduz Normurodova1
1Department of Biotechnology and Microbiology, Faculty of Biology and Ekology, National University of Uzbekistan, Tashkent, Uzbekistan
2Scientific Research Institute of Livestock and Poultry, Tashkent, Uzbekistan
Correspondence to: Luiza Tagayeva, Department of Biotechnology and Microbiology, Faculty of Biology and Ekology, National University of Uzbekistan, Tashkent, Uzbekistan.
Email: |  |
Copyright © 2025 The Author(s). Published by Scientific & Academic Publishing.
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY).
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Abstract
The cultural-morphological properties and enzyme-forming ability of endophytic bacterial isolate isolated from the medicinal plant Kalanchoe degremania were studied. In this case, glucoamylase activity was 6.2 units/ml and protein activity 1.2 units/mg, cellulose activity 1.5 units/ml and protein activity 0.4 units/mg, xylanase activity 0.6 units/ml and protein activity 0.32 units/mg. It has shown high antagonistic properties to the pathogenic fungus Candida albicans, pathogenic bacteria such as Escherichia coli, Bacillus subtilis, Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Sensitivity to various antibiotics was also tested. The selected active isolate was identified by 16C RNA and registered in GenBank under the number OQ349559 and named Bacillus amyloliquefaciens-UzMU 22. The culture fluid of the strain Bacillus amyloliquefaciens-UzMU 22 was tested orally and on the skin of rats, the cumulative effect and acute toxicological properties of the local pathogen in mice were studied. It was established that this bacterial strain is non-toxic.
Keywords:
Microorganism, Bacillus subtilis, Strain, Bacteria, Cumulative, Toxicology, Culture liquid, Enzyme, Probiotic, Protein
Cite this paper: Luiza Tagayeva, Shermat Jabborov, Kunduz Normurodova, Study of General for Clinical Toxicology Strains Bacteria Bacillus Amyloliquefaciens-UzMU 22, International Journal of Genetic Engineering, Vol. 13 No. 9, 2025, pp. 190-192. doi: 10.5923/j.ijge.20251309.05.
1. Introduction
In recent years, large-scale studies have been actively conducted aimed at isolating endophytic bacteria from medicinal plants and studying their probiotic properties. These bacteria are considered as a promising direction for use as additional components in the production of feed enriched with probiotics. Their use helps maintain normal microflora in the digestive system of farm animals, which, in turn, can improve digestion, increase resistance to diseases and contribute to the overall health of animals [1-6].Probiotics are preparations made from live microorganisms that, when introduced into the human or animal body, have a positive effect on the physiological, biochemical and immune responses of the host organism by normalizing the composition of the intestinal microflora [2,5-6]. Due to these properties, probiotics are widely used in medicine and veterinary science as an alternative or supplement to antibiotic therapy, as well as for the prevention and treatment of gastrointestinal diseases. The growing need for more effective, stable and broad-spectrum antagonist biopreparations has led to the development of second-generation probiotics [9-11]. Second generation probiotics are produced primarily on the basis of spore-forming bacteria of the genera Bacillus, Clostridium and Brevibacillus, which are highly resistant to adverse environmental conditions and remain viable during storage and transportation [5,9]. These probiotics demonstrate high antagonistic activity against pathogenic and opportunistic microorganisms, stimulate the growth of beneficial microflora and improve the overall health of the body. In this regard, active research is being conducted on their use not only for therapeutic purposes, but also as part of enriched feed for farm animals. Previously, we studied the probiotic properties of the bacterium strain Bacillus amyloliquefaciens-UzMU 22 [6].The aim of this work is to study the general toxicology of the bacterial strain Bacillus amyloliquefaciens-UzMU 22.The objectives of the study included: 1. Determination of acute toxicity upon oral and cutaneous administration. 2. Study of cumulative action (subacute toxicity) on mice. 3. Determination of local irritant action.
2. Materials and Methods
Bacillus amyloliquefaciens-UzMU 22 bacteria was transferred from the National University of Uzbekistan to the testing laboratory for quality control and circulation of veterinary drugs and feed additives at the “State Scientific Center for Quality Control and Circulation of Veterinary Drugs and Feed Additives” for preclinical studies of general toxicology.The general effect and “acute” toxicity of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens-UzMU 22 were determined on 10 white outbred mice and rats of both sexes weighing 19-21±2 and 200-280±10 g after a single oral administration. The Litchfield and Wilcoxon method [7-8] was used to determine the parameters of “acute” toxicity, and the Noakes and Sanderson method for cutaneous application was used with 10 animals per group [8]. The study of the accumulation of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens-UzMU 22 was carried out using the Lim,a et al. method on 10 mice [8]. The local irritant effect of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens-UzMU 22 was assessed by the effect of the bacteria on the skin of 10 rats and the mucous membrane of the eye of 6 rabbits [8].The Litchfield and Wilcoxon method was used to determine the parameters of "acute" toxicity upon oral administration. Each dose of the substance was tested on 6 animals. Observation was carried out for 14 days. Bacillus amyloliquefaciens-UzMU 22 was administered orally at doses of 2000, 4000, 5000, 6000, 8000 and 10000 mg/kg.A study of the general action of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens-UzMU 22 showed that at doses of 4000-6000 mg/kg, the behavior of mice and rats did not differ from intact animals. At doses of 5000 and 10000 mg/kg, animal inhibition was noted for 120-180 minutes. No animal deaths were observed for 14 days. At single, skin application cultural liquid (CL) of bacteria treated on the cut-off site of skin of rats’ back and sides of 35 cm2, to mice of 3,5 cm2 after single putting solutions in a dose of 10 ml/kg of animals placed in separate cages, a skin site with the studied substance left open, supervision was conducted hourly in day of introduction, by 3 times a day for 2-3 days and once a day in the next 7-10 days of experience.General behavior, skin condition at the site of application of the liquid, presence of redness, fur condition, motor activity and death of rats were taken into account. Observation was carried out for 14 days. If substances for external use do not exhibit toxic effects when studying acute toxicity at a dose of 10 ml/kg, then such agents are considered non-toxic.Thus, the study of the general action and “acute” toxicity of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens-UzMU 22 showed that this bacterial strain belongs to class V of practically non-toxic compounds. LD50 - more than 10,000 mg/kg oral administration in mice and rats does not cause death of animals at a dose of 10 ml/kg when applied topically.The study of the accumulation of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens-UzMU 22 was conducted using the method of Lim, a and others, which allows us to evaluate not only accumulation, but also habituation. The objective of the study was to identify the possible cumulative property of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens-UzMU 22. The experiments were conducted on 10 mice of both sexes weighing 19-21±2 g. The CL was administered orally according to the following scheme (Table 1).Table 1. Data on administered doses and animal mortality in determining subacute toxicity (cumulation) of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens-UzMU 22  |
| |
|
Total dose for 24 days = 10 LD50, maximum duration of the experiment is 20±4 days. Kk = LD50n/ LD501, where Kk = cumulation coefficient, LD50n is the average lethal dose with n-fold administration, LD501 is the average lethal dose with a single administration. Kk ≥1 habituation; Kk ≤1 cumulation.After the baiting, the animals were euthanized under sodium ethaminal anesthesia. Macroscopic examination of the slaughtered animals revealed the correct arrangement of the internal organs, there was no "free" fluid in the pleural and abdominal cavities. The oral mucosa is clean, moist, of a characteristic color, no edema or hemorrhage was detected. The tissues of the lungs, stomach and intestines are also of a characteristic color, without signs of edema, hemorrhage or ulceration. The pancreas, kidneys and adrenal glands are unchanged (Table 2). | Table 2. Average values of internal organ weights in mice after oral administration of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens-UzMU 22 (M±m; n=10; P> 0.05) |
As can be seen from the data presented in Table 2, the cumulative properties of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens-UzMU 22 have not been established, since the administered doses did not cause death of the animals.Bacillus amyloliquefaciens-UzMU 22 does not have a cumulative property. The conjunctival test is a very sensitive test. In some cases, it even allows you to identify the reaction of animals to an allergen with weak allergenization and negative skin tests. The experiments were conducted on 10 rabbits weighing 1,9-2,0 kg, in which 0,1 ml of 0,5 and 5.0% solutions of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens-UzMU 22 were instilled into the left eye, and 0,1 ml of distilled water was introduced into the second eye (control). The reaction was recorded after 15 minutes (rapid reaction) and after 24-48 hours (delayed hypersensitivity) and assessed according to the following scale (in points):- slight redness of the lacrimal duct; - redness of the lacrimal duct and sclera towards the cornea; - redness of the entire conjunctiva and sclera.In addition, the degree of hyperemia, swelling, and lacrimation were taken into account. The results of observations showed that 0.5 and 5.0% of the culture liquid Bacillus amyloliquefaciens-UzMU 22 did not cause even slight redness either after 15 minutes or after 24 and 48 hours. Based on this, it can be concluded that Bacillus amyloliquefaciens-UzMU 22 does not have an irritating effect on the conjunctiva of the rabbit's eye.The local irritant effect of the base liniment and the CL Bacillus amyloliquefaciens-UzMU 22 on the skin was studied on 10 rats weighing 220-250±10g. The animals had their fur cut on both sides of the spinal column measuring 2x2cm. The rats were given 0.5 ml, 0.5 and 5% solutions of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens-UzMU 22 on 2 cut areas of the back on the left side. The CL was applied for 10 days. The control was the clipped areas, to which distilled water was applied in the same volume. Observation was carried out for 14 days. The skin reaction was recorded daily on a scale of skin tests in points. The conducted studies have shown that Bacillus amyloliquefaciens-UzMU 22 does not cause irritation, redness, swelling or other visible changes on the skin and the effect of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens-UzMU 22 is rated at 0 points.The obtained results allow us to conclude that Bacillus amyloliquefaciens-UzMU 22 does not have an irritating effect on the skin and conjunctiva of the eyes of animals.
3. Conclusions
Thus, the studied strain Bacillus amyloliquefaciens-UzMU 22 is a non-toxic strain that can be recommended for feed additives in livestock farming.
References
[1] | De Vrese M., Schrezenmeir J. Probiotics, prebiotics, and synbiotics // Adv. Biochem. Eng./Biotechnol. – 2008. – V. 111. – P. 1–66. – doi: 10.1007/10_2008_097. |
[2] | Hong H.A., Ducle L.H., Cutting S.M. The use of bacterial spore formers as probiotics. FEMS Microbiol. Rev., 2005, vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 813–835. doi: 10.1016/j.femsre.2004.12.001. |
[3] | M. A. Morozova, A. V. Gorovtsov, E. V. Prazdnova, V. M. Basankina, V. A. Chistyakov, А. Pepoyan, Sh. Miralimova, V. A. Grigoryev. Bacteria of genus Bacillus as antagonists of pathogens in aquaculture. Vestnik of Astrakhan State Technical University. Series: Fishing Industry. 2023. N. 1. Р. 89 – 97. |
[4] | Patel R., DuPont H.L. New approaches for bacteriotherapy: Prebiotics, new generation probiotics, and synbiotics // Clin. Infect. Dis. – 2015. – V. 60, Suppl. 2. – P. S108–S121. – doi: 10.1093/cid/civ177. |
[5] | Sánchez B., Delgado S., Blanco-Míquez A., Lourenço A., Gueimonde M., Margolles A. Probiocitcs, gut microbiota, and their influence on host health and disease // Mol. Nutr. Food Res. – 2017. – V. 61, No 1. – doi: 10.1002/mnfr.201600240. |
[6] | Tagayeva L.X., Shoxiddinova M.N., Tojiev B.B., Elova N.A., Normurodova K.T. Determination of probiotic characteristics of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens - NUUz 22 strain isolated from medicinal plants. Journal of UzMU. - Tashkent, 2024. №. 3/2/1. - P. 108-111. |
[7] | Kablucheyeva - Pashnik T.I., Koshchaev A.G. Pharmacological justification for the use of probiotics in poultry farming. - Krasnodar: Publishing house of KubSAU, 2016. - 270 p. |
[8] | Mironov A.N. Methodical recommendations for preclinical study of general toxic action of drugs. / Guidelines for conducting preclinical studies of drugs. Part one. P.13-23 // - M. - 2012. - p. 944. |
[9] | Pokhilenko V.D., Perelygin V.V. Probiotics based on spore-forming bacteria and their safety // Chemical and biological safety. - 2007. - No. 2-3. - P. 20-41. |
[10] | Tikhomirov, V.A. et al. Modern aspects of the use of probiotics. // Bulletin of biotechnology. - 2021. - V. 3. - P. 45-52. |
[11] | Elova N.A., Normurodova K.T., Faizullaev O.A., Berdikulova G.S. Metabolic activity of local strains of lactobacilli producing exopolysaccharides // International scientific journal of science and innovation, 2022, 1 (7): 339-348. (Impact Factor – 8.2). |