International Journal of Energy Engineering
p-ISSN: 2163-1891 e-ISSN: 2163-1905
2012; 2(4): 131-137
doi: 10.5923/j.ijee.20120204.04
Mehdi Taleshian , Hasan Rastegar , Hossein Askarian Abyaneh
Electrical Engineering Department, Amirkabir University of Technology, Iran
Correspondence to: Mehdi Taleshian , Electrical Engineering Department, Amirkabir University of Technology, Iran.
| Email: | ![]() |
Copyright © 2012 Scientific & Academic Publishing. All Rights Reserved.
Nowadays, the energy crisis has forced the need to recover the energy which is normally wasted in industrial processes. Gas pressure reducing process in city or power plant gas stations is one of these processes in which the energy is wasted. This work is done by turbo-expanders in parallel with gas regulating valves. In electrical industry, these devices drive generators to produce electrical power from the main process. In this paper a model for turbo-expander is presented. This model which utilizes an online calculation method is more efficient and simpler than the older offline model which surmounts the need for making complicated lookup tables prior to calculation. Because of instantaneous varying of domestic consumptions, environment temperature and other effective parameters, turbo-expander inlet gas pressure and mass flow-rate vary with time and consequently the extracted power has time variant specification and causes some power quality issues such as voltage flicker, voltage sag, etc. So, this system is simulated and power quality issues are investigated for a fault occurring at the point of common coupling (PCC). Then, the flicker in electrical waveforms due to change in input pressure or mass flow rate is investigated. Since the power quality problems due to disturbances are considerable, a D-STATCOM is designed and connected at PCC and it is shown that the STATCOM has improved the power quality problems of the system.
Keywords: Turbo-Expander, Power Quality, D-STATCOM
![]() | Figure 1. Schematic representation of gas regulating station and turbo-expander installation topology[11] |
is computed, then the efficiency variation that is caused by inlet mass flow-rate and pressure deviation from their nominal values is considered and the net power delivered to the shaft,
, is calculated. And finally,
is the delivered torque to the generator shaft.![]() | (1) |
is mass flow-rate in kg/s,
and
are inlet and outlet specific enthalpies in kJ/kg and
is the power of expanded fluid (gas) in kw.To calculate the enthalpies, there is a need of a thermodynamic software and then, forming some lookup tables from input pressure and temperature and enthalpies according to figure 2[9, 10, 13].![]() | Figure 2. Schematic diagram for enthalpies computation from inlet gas specifications |
[2,11,14].![]() | (2) |
![]() | Figure 3. The block diagram of modular model of turbo-expander-generator |
![]() | (3) |
![]() | (4) |
![]() | (5) |
is the nominal pressure,
is the gas inlet pressure,
is the turbine nominal mass flow-rate,
is the turbine inlet mass flow-rate, and O.C. is the abbreviation of operation condition. Also,
is the turbine lower band efficiency,
is the turbine upper band efficiency, and finally
is the turbine overall efficiency regarding operation condition.
, in relation (5) is the delivered power from the turbo-expander to the turbine shaft. The block diagram of the proposed system is presented in figure 3.![]() | Figure 4. A vessel indicated by its volume, inlet and outlet mass flow-rates |
(m3), inlet mass flow-rate
(kg/s) and outlet mass flow-rate
(kg/s), it can be written [9, 10, 15]:![]() | (6) |
![]() | (7) |
![]() | (8) |
![]() | Figure 5. Schematic representation of study system |
![]() | Figure 6. Comparison of power calculating for expander in two methods |
is defined for a 10 min time interval.
indicates irritation limit of the human eye and the
values are eye sensible light fluctuations[17]. It should be mentioned that flicker studies is done in steady-state conditions[7]. International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) standard flicker meter is used for the short-term flicker-severity index computation. This tool is developed in the MATLAB environment based on IEC 61000-415 standard requirements[18, 19]. On the basis of these standard recommendations, the short-term flicker severity
, that is computed by this flicker meter should be in range (0.95-1.05) when a square wave signal modulates power signal. Block diagram of the designed flicker meter is shown in figure 7. The square wave signal variations and related results are given in table 2.
|
![]() | Figure 8. The inlet mass flow-rate has 10% and inlet pressure has 5% variation with respect to their mean values |
values at the PCC with the above considerations are as figure 9. In this figure, the network parameters are constant (
= 90MVA, X/R= 7). With increase of mass flow-rate variance from its average value, the amount of flicker at the PCC increases seriously. ![]() | Figure 9. Flicker at the PCC versus mass flow-rate variances from its average value of 20 kg/s |
at PCC. ![]() | Figure 7. Block diagram of the developed flicker meter in the MATLAB environment |
![]() | Figure 10. Flicker at the PCC versus various average mass flow-rate values |
![]() | Figure 11. Voltage of PCC during and after fault5. Power Quality Improvement Using D-STATCOM |
and
, an outer voltage regulation PI controller with
,
and a DC voltage controller. The overall diagram is shown in figure 12.
|
![]() | Figure 12. Control loop of proposed D-STATCOM[23] |
![]() | Figure 13. Flicker level on PCC for mass flow rate varying from 5% to 40% of nominal value and 5% change in pressure |
![]() | Figure 14. Flicker level on PCC versus average mass flow rate |
![]() | Figure 15. Voltage restoration after a fault occurrence on PCC |
![]() | Figure 16. Frequency restoration after a fault occurrence on PCC |
| [1] | Pozivil J., “Use of expansion turbines in natural gas pressure reduction stations,” Acta Montanistica Slovakia, 2004; 9:258-260. |
| [2] | Rahman M.M, “Power generation from pressure reduction in the natural gas supply chain in Bangladesh,” Transaction of the Mech. Eng. Div., The Institution of Engineers, Bangladesh, Vol. ME 41, No. 2, December 2010. |
| [3] | Thomas R. J., Ghosh P., Kanchan Chowdhury K, “Exergy analysis of helium liquefaction systems based on modified Claude cycle with two-expanders,” Elsevier: Cryogenics, Volume 51, Issue 6, June 2011, Pages 287-294. |
| [4] | Thomas R. J., Ghosh P., Kanchan Chowdhury K, “Exergy based analysis on different expander arrangements in helium liquefiers,” Elsevier: International Journal of Refrigeration, In Press, Corrected Proof, Available online 23 November 2011. |
| [5] | Sharad W. Mohod, Mohan V. Aware, “A STATCOM-control scheme for grid connected wind energy system for power quality improvement,” IEEE systems journal, VOL. 4, NO. 3, september 2010. |
| [6] | M.J. Hossain, H.R. Pota, R.A. Ramos, “Robust STATCOM control for the stabilisation of fixed-speed wind turbines during low voltages,” Renewable Energy 36 (2011) 2897e2905. |
| [7] | Arrillaga J, Watson NR, Chen S., “Power System Quality Assessment,” Wiley: New York, 1st edition, 2000. |
| [8] | Jesse D. Maddaloni, Andrew M. Rowe, “Natural gas exergy recovery powering distributed hydrogen production,” Elsevier: International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 2007; 32(5):557–566. |
| [9] | Mehdi Babaei Turkemani, Hassan Rastegar, “Modular Modeling of Turbo-Expander Driven Generators for Power System Studies,” IEEJ Transactions on Electrical and Electronic Engineering, IEEJ Trans 2009; 4: 645–653. |
| [10] | Mehdi Babaei Turkemani, Hassan Rastegar, “Flicker Assessment of Turbo-Expander Driven Synchronous Generator in Power Distribution Network,” Journal of Iranian Association of Electrical and Electronics Engineers – Vol .7- No.1- Spring & Summer 2010. |
| [11] | Heinz P. Bloch, Claire Soares, “Turboexpanders and Process Applications,” Gulf Professional Publishing, JUN-2001. |
| [12] | R. Chacartegui, D. Sánchez, A. Muñoz, T. Sánchez, “Real time simulation of medium size gas turbines,” Elsevier: Energy Conversion and Management 52 (2011) 713–724. |
| [13] | Smith JM, Van Ness HC, Abbott MM, “Introduction to Chemical Engineering Thermodynamics,” McGraw-Hill: New York, 5th edition, 1996. |
| [14] | Ali Chaibakhsh, Ali Ghaffari, “Steam turbine model,” Elsevier: Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory 16 (2008) 1145–1162. |
| [15] | kundur P., “Power System Stability and Control,” McGraw -Hill professional: New York, repair edition, 1994. |
| [16] | Krouse PC, Wasynezuk O, Sudhoff SD, “Analysis of Electric Machinery,” IEEE press: New York, 2002. |
| [17] | Dugan RC, Mc Grangham M, “Electrical Power Systems Quality,” McGraw-Hill: New York, 2nd edition, 1996. |
| [18] | IEC 61000-4-15: Electromagnetic Compatibility (EMC) Part 4: Testing and measurement techniques Section 15: Flickermeter—functional and design specifications. |
| [19] | Bertola A, Lazaroiu GC, Roscia M, Zaninelli D. A, “Matlab-Simulink Flicker-meter model for power quality studies,” IEEE 11th International Conference on Harmonics and Quality of Power 2004, Lake Placid, Newyork, USA, 734-738. |
| [20] | Math H, Bollen J, “Understanding Power Quality Problems: Voltage Sags and Interruptions,” Wiley-IEEE press: New York, 1999. |
| [21] | H. Alasooly, “Comparison between optimal control strategies applied to a system with unified power flow controller, shunt converter and series converter,” Computers and Mathematics with Applications 60, pages 954_975, 2010. |
| [22] | A.R. Phadke, Manoj Fozdar, K.R. Niazi, “A new multi-objective fuzzy-GA formulation for optimal placement and sizing of shunt FACTS controller,” International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems, In Press, Corrected Proof, Available online 13 March 2012. |
| [23] | N. G. Hingorani, L. Gyugyi, "Understanding FACTS; Concepts and Technology of Flexible AC Transmission Systems," IEEE Press book, 2000. |