International Journal of Electromagnetics and Applications

p-ISSN: 2168-5037    e-ISSN: 2168-5045

2021;  11(1): 1-9

doi:10.5923/j.ijea.20211101.01

Received: Oct. 15, 2021; Accepted: Oct. 29, 2021; Published: Nov. 2, 2021

 

Impact of Electromagnetic Radiation (EMR) Produced by Mobile Phones and Networks on Human Health and Eyes

Krishiv Bhatia

Monta Vista High School, Cupertino, CA, USA

Correspondence to: Krishiv Bhatia, Monta Vista High School, Cupertino, CA, USA.

Email:

Copyright © 2021 The Author(s). Published by Scientific & Academic Publishing.

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY).
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Abstract

Mobile phones are used everywhere. People in all countries and continents use cell phones and smartphones for whatever they require. 3G and 4G mobile networks have already been deployed in many places in the world. Smartphones, social media, and video streaming are leading to more and more use of mobile networks. Mobile phones emit Radio Frequency Radiation (RFR). Short-term RFR exposure from 3G and 4G mobile phones have no material effects on human health and eyes. Long-term exposure can cause a risk of thermal damage and health problems. The use of 5G mobile phone devices is expanding in the US. 5G networks can connect more devices and provide faster service for smart devices, driverless cars, gaming, social media, industrial robotics, and video streaming. 5G needs to transfer data using millimeter waves (MMWs) to achieve fast transmission speeds to make it possible. Since MMWs are short-range and are obscured by walls, hundreds of thousands of new cell antennas must be installed every 100-200m. This is expected to significantly increase exposure to RFR and MMW radiation. In this article, we review the research carried out on the overall impact of the Electromagnetic Field (EMFs) generated by 3G, 4G, and 5G mobile phones and networks on human health and eyes, in addition to statistics and critical information to take away.

Keywords: Mobile phones, Electromagnetic Radiation (EMR), Millimeter Waves (MMWs), Radio Frequency Radiations (RFR), 3G, 4G, 5G, Specific Absorption Rate (SAR), Exposure, Eye, Health, Electromagnetic Hypersensitivity (EHS)

Cite this paper: Krishiv Bhatia, Impact of Electromagnetic Radiation (EMR) Produced by Mobile Phones and Networks on Human Health and Eyes, International Journal of Electromagnetics and Applications, Vol. 11 No. 1, 2021, pp. 1-9. doi: 10.5923/j.ijea.20211101.01.

1. Introduction

Mobile phones are used everywhere in the world. This is evident from the fact that almost 62% of the global population uses mobile phones, while 48.20% own a smartphone (see figures 1 and 2).
Figure 1. Percent of the global population owning a mobile phone [1]
Figure 2. Percent of the global population owning a smartphone [1]
In the US, almost 97% of people use mobile phones (see figure 3). Please see Figure 3 below for percent of adults owning a cell phone or smartphone.
Figure 3. Percent of US adults owning a cellphone and smartphone [2]
The use of mobile phones is tightly integrated into human life. It is difficult to imagine life without them. Day by day, the percentage of people using smartphones increases. In addition to being used for voice communications, smartphones are used for various tasks like emails, text messaging, internet surfing, pictures, gaming, social media, and other tasks. Since mobile phone use is ubiquitous, it leads to cell phone addiction and psychological and physiological effects in adolescents [3].
Mobile phones work by transmitting Radio Frequency (RF) waves through antennas installed at the base stations. The RF waves are associated with Radio Frequency Radiations (RFR), which do not break chemical bonds [4]. RFR is a type of EMF in the 100 kHz - 300 GHz frequency range and is carcinogenic [5].
Dr. Robert O’Becker has classified EMFs as the most significant pollutant in the earth’s environment due to the vast radiation emissions. EMFs can be split into two categories: ELF (Extremely Low Frequency) from 3 Hz-3 kHz and RF-EMF (3 kHz - 300 GHz) [6].
This review article focused on the associated health effects of EMRs emitted by mobile phones and networks.

2. Research

In this study, recent scientific literature was reviewed to study the possible exposure levels to EM radiations, the 3G, 4G, and 5G mobile network technologies, and their impact on human health and eyes. A summary of the research is provided below.

2.1. The Electromagnetic Spectrum

The range of frequencies of Electromagnetic Radiations (EMR) is called the electromagnetic spectrum. It ranges from the low frequencies of radio waves to the high frequencies of Gamma Rays [7].

2.2. Ionizing and Non-ionizing Radiations

As seen in Figure 4, the part to the left of UV radiations is non-ionizing. This includes RF, Microwave, Infrared (IR), and Visible Light. Non-ionizing radiation does not cause damage to the DNA inside cells as their energy is lower than the threshold to cause changes at atomic levels [6,8,9].
To the right of visible light in figure 4 are ionizing radiations. These can cause damage to cells and genetic material as they have sufficient energy to break molecular bonds and induce chemical reactions [10].
Figure 4. The Electromagnetic Spectrum [8]

2.3. Electromagnetic Waves

Changing electric and magnetic fields produce electromagnetic waves. The electromagnetic waves include X-rays, microwaves, visible light, and radio waves. The electromagnetic waves do not require any medium to exist and can travel through a vacuum, air, and solid materials. All EMR travel at the speed of light c, which in a vacuum is given by the following equation [11]:
(1)
The speed of the different electromagnetic waves is the same c. Since c is related to wavelength ƛ and frequency f by the following equation [11]:
(2)
So, the different electromagnetic waves differ in wavelength and frequency [10]. Gamma rays have the highest frequency and the lowest wavelengths. Similarly, radio waves have the lowest frequency and highest wavelengths.
Energy is related to the wavelength and frequency by the following equation:
(3)
where ℏ is the Planck’s constant. Since gamma rays have high frequencies, they have high energy. Similarly, since radio waves have low frequencies, they have low energy [7].

2.4. Mobile Phone Communications with Cell Tower

Mobile phones both transmit and receive radio frequency signals. When a person talks, his voice is converted into an electric signal. The mobile phone’s circuits convert the electric signal into radio signals which are then transmitted to the nearby cell tower or base station via Radio Frequency (RF) radiations at the speed of light c [12,13].
The RF radiations are then received at the cell tower or base station via antennas. The radio signals will be then transmitted through the network to the antenna of the other phone. The phone circuits will then convert the radio signals into electrical signals and then into sound which can be understood by the other party [12,13].
A cell phone receives radio waves or signals from the cell tower. The strength of the received signals is shown by the number of “bars” in the mobile phone. When the number of bars is high or maximum, the received signal strength is high since the cell tower is closer. So the mobile phone needs to expend less power in transmitting the radio signals thereby conserving battery life. However, when the number of bars is low, the cell tower is farther away. In this case, mobile phones need to expend more power to transmit stronger signals which drain the battery [12,13].

2.5. EMRs Emitted by Mobile Phones Devices and Networks

Mobile phones have antennas that emit radiation in the RF frequency range of the electromagnetic spectrum. RF is a form of non-ionizing radiation that does not damage DNA inside cells, causing cancer [9].
Table 1 shows the differences between the features of 1G, 2G, 3G, 4G, and 5G mobile networks. 3Gs emit RF in the range 1.6-2GHz and 4Gs emit in the range 2-8 GHz [14].
Table 1. Difference between the features of 1G, 2G, 3G, 4G, and 5G mobile networks [14]
     
5Gs are expected to provide very high performance, fast speeds of 20 Gbps, very low latency, and high reliability. [15]. To achieve this, they will emit radiation in the Millimeter Wave (MMW) range up to 300 GHz, which is concerning to health as these waves are very compacted and small [16].
Cell towers or cellular base stations, which are part of mobile networks, have antennas that are used for receiving and transmitting cell phone signals using RF frequencies. Generally, they are placed 400 m to 2 miles apart in areas depending on population density. They emit a lot of RF waves, which can be damaging [17].

2.6. Mobile Phone Devices and Specific Absorption Rate (SAR)

Exposure to mobile phones and networks depends on multiple factors, including the amount of time a mobile phone is used and the device model. Usage of headsets and hands-free devices reduced exposure compared to holding it close to the head. Proximity to cell phone towers is also important since the farther the person is, the more energy the mobile phone will use to get a good signal increasing the amount of radiation. Hence, exposure is directly proportional to the energy used by a mobile device to get a signal. Being in a high-traffic area is also a factor. The more mobile phones being used in an area, the more energy the device will have to use to get a good signal [19,20].
The amount of RF radiation absorbed by the body is called Specific Absorption Rate (SAR). SAR is a metric that measures the RF exposure of devices for safety guidelines. The FCC limit for SAR for RF radiation from mobile phone devices is 1.6 W/Kg [20]. The SAR just shows the limit that should not be exceeded. The specific RF radiation exposures depend on many other factors, including location and operational power [19].
Figure 5 provides the head and body SAR values for Samsung mobile phones. Figure 6 provides the same for Apple iPhones. Figures 7 and 8 provide the phones emitting the most and least radiation respectively.
Figure 5. Samsung mobile phone SAR Values [21]
Figure 6. Apple iPhone SAR Values [21]
Figure 7. The phones emitting the most radiation [22]
Figure 8. The phones emitting the least radiation [23]

2.7. 3G, 4G, and 5G Mobile Network Technologies

5G networks provide services that can be 100 times faster than 4G networks. That helps to provide high performance needed for gaming, social networks, IoT, driverless cars, and video streaming. To provide the faster service, they will emit RF in the range 3-30 GHz and go into the MMW (millimeter wave) frequency range from 30-300 GHz [5,14]. This requires the deployment of more base stations and millions of new small antennas on lamp posts and buildings as MMW does not travel through walls [17,18].
Figure 9 below shows the general architecture of 5G mobile networks. 5Gs employ MMWs, which are obscured by walls. Since users spend most of their time indoors and a small amount of time outdoors, the penetration loss of MMWs will be avoided by using Distributed Antenna System (DAS) and massive Multiple-Input Multiple-Output (MIMO) antenna arrays. Millions of new short-range antennas called “small cells” will be deployed to increase bandwidth and performance. These will be installed in homes, schools, lamp posts, and other buildings. As such, there will be an increased risk of radiation hazards [17,24].
Figure 9. General 5G mobile network architecture [25]

2.8. Impact of EMR on Eyes

Exposure to EMR can cause damage to the retina. Photothermal damage can occur due to long exposures to EMR and a resultant rise in the temperature (> 10°C) of the retina. Photochemical damage causes retinal cell damage and even cell death due to exposure to visible light. Photomechanical injuries are caused by high irradiance exposures, for example, to lasers leading to damaged tissues [26,27,28].
Both low-power and high-power microwave radiation are carcinogenic, which can damage lens tissues due to non-thermal effects [29]. RF causes effects on the retina and cornea, including both animals and humans [20,30]. But no effects were observed in the eyes of monkeys, animals that are very similar to humans, which is interesting, but it easily could be because of our different eye structures or inaccurate testing [31].

2.9. Impact of EMR on Human Health

Although non-ionizing radiation does not cause damage to DNA in cells or tissues, it does produce thermal or heating effects. As such, long-term exposure from high-power non-ionizing radiation (e.g. broadcast transmitters) could have health effects including tumors, cancers, and neurobehavioral disorders [8,32].
In addition, the residents living near high-power lines have an increased risk of leukemia due to exposure to magnetic fields. The risk of leukemia decreases with increasing distance from the power lines [8,32].
Exposure to microwave radiation causes thermal effects and heating. This concept is used in microwave ovens to heat food. Long exposure to microwave radiation has been linked to Electromagnetic Hypersensitivity (EHS) which are common symptoms like irritability, headaches, depression, fatigue, memory loss, and sleep issues [8,32].
Exposure to high levels of RF radiation can lead to EHS, chronic headaches, and drowsiness due to the long-term impact of tissue heating [32]. Studies have shown it been linked to environmental intolerances and hypersensitivity to chemical agents [33]. It has also been linked to neurobehavioral dysfunctions and neurobiological effects. However, further studies are needed to clarify and confirm the effects [34]. Studies confirm that RF-EMF exposure does not lead to mitochondrial dysfunctions [35].
Exposure to visible light, Infrared (IR), and Ultraviolet (UV) radiations can cause injury to the retina and heating of the skin. Long exposures can even lead to cataracts, eye damage, and skin burns. In addition, long exposure to UV radiations can also lead to premature aging, skin damage (including wrinkles, keratosis, and solar elastosis), inflammation of the cornea, and even skin cancer (melanoma, basal cell, and squamous cell cancers) [8,29,32,36].
Long exposure to X-Rays and Gamma Rays (which are ionizing radiations) can cause leukemia, bone cancer, lung cancer, and other genetic mutations leading to cancers [8].

2.10. Effects of 3G and 4G Mobile Phones on Eyes

Cell phone usage has been linked to refraction defects due to the thermal effects of RF radiation. This is irrespective of which side of the head the cell phone is held. However, marginal vision defects were noted in the study [6,9].

2.11. Effects of 3G and 4G Mobile Networks and Phones on Human Health

Studies have not confirmed small or short-term EMR exposure from 3G and 4G mobile networks and phones to lead to harmful effects, including Electromagnetic Hypersensitivity (EHS). However, long-term exposure leads to cellular stress, an impact on the general well-being of humans, and cancer risk [6].
Since the RF radiation from cell phones is non-ionizing, a little exposure to it does not damage DNA in any way. In addition, although long exposures to non-ionizing radiation can cause thermal damage and health problems like sunburn and melanoma, it is not a significant risk [6].
Studies of EMRs emitted from 3G mobile phones found no significant impact in the blood and eye tissues of rats [6]. Studies have also not been shown to link brain tumor, glioma, or meningioma to RF-EMF, but studies should be carried out on long-term impacts of more than 15 years. RF-EMF has been classified as possibly carcinogenic by the International Agency for Research on Cancer [4].

2.12. Possible Health Effects of 5G Mobile Networks and Mobile Phones

5Gs will emit MMW range frequencies in the range of 30-300 GHz. For RF frequencies higher than 6 Hz, a public concern arises [5,18,24].
Some experiments have reported increases in indicators of DNA damage, DNA double-strand breaks, a decrease in the levels of Protein kinase C, chromosomal changes, asynchronous centromere replications, enhanced and inhibited rates of cell proliferation, increase in cell diameter, inhibition of cell growth, reduction in viable cancer cells and changes in structural cell morphology. But many of those experiments were either done with low animal numbers, had inadequate dosimetry and temperature control, or had a specific absorption rate (SAR) above the limit [16].
No confirmed evidence of DNA damage has been found in the skin cells due to MMWs. Additionally, no confirmed evidence of biological effects relevant to human health as well as genotoxic damage in epithelial and skin cells can be attributed to MMWs [16]. However, there is a high risk of EHS in the long term due to 5G [17].

2.13. Protection from Mobile Phone and Network Radiations

Since cell phones have become a big part of our life, we probably can’t stop using them. The exposure can be minimized by taking many steps. Time spent on cell phone usage can be limited. Speakers, earbuds, headsets, or other hands-free accessories can be used to keep the phone far away from the body. Texting instead of talking can be done (if applicable) to keep the cell phone at a distance from the body. The phone can be used in an area with good reception, transmitting signals at a lower frequency. Avoid talking when the cell phone signal is weak as the cell phone increases the transmission frequency [37,38,39].

3. Results

Exposure to light or EMR can cause photothermal, photomechanical, or photochemical damage to the eyes. While photothermal eye damage is caused by longer wavelengths (near IR), photochemical damage is caused by shorter wavelengths (near UV) having high energy [24].
Cell phones emit RF radiation in the EMR spectrum. RF radiation from mobile phones is non-ionizing and can cause thermal damage. 3Gs and 4Gs emit radiation in the range 1.6-8 GHz. The thermal effects of RF radiation from cell phones have been linked to refraction defects in human eyes [6,9].
While small RF-EMF radiation from mobile devices does not damage health and does not cause much harm, long exposures can cause thermal damage, cellular stress, headaches, fatigue, cancer risk, and health problems [6,9].
But the situation with 5G networks is different. They emit RF in the range of 3-30 GHz and go into the MMW range from 30-300 GHz. They also provide faster service for driverless cars, gaming, and IoT. Although no confirmed impacts of MMWs have been found on health and skin cells, studies are still being carried out to ascertain the impact. Some possible risks are DNA damage, chromosomal changes, inhibited cell growth, and changes in cell structural morphology [16].
It is essential to choose suitable quality mobile phone devices with low SAR as they reduce the impact of RF radiations. It is also recommended to minimize talking time and use a headset or hands-free devices [37,38,39].

4. Conclusions

Short-term exposure to the non-ionizing RF radiations from 3G and 4G mobile phones and networks has been confirmed to have no significant impact on human health [9]. But cell phone usage has been linked to refraction defects in human eyes. Although risks are present of long-term exposure like EHS and brain tumors, studies have not been able to provide a confirmation [6,9].
The risk of radiation exposure from mobile phones can be reduced by minimizing talking time on the phone, using hands-free technologies, using models with low SAR and consuming less energy to get a good signal, and using it outside closed buildings [37,38,39].
However, the exposures from the 5G mobile phones and network frequencies are a concern and overall do damage health a little bit, even if not damaging as much as one would expect [16]. Since the technologies are new, further studies are still being carried out to ascertain the risks.
The 5G Appeal, endorsed by 400+ scientists and doctors, requests that all 5G networks be suspended until further research is done, and this logically does make a lot of sense [16].

5. Future Research Direction

Future research should focus on learning the bioeffects at the specific frequencies of 5G networks in the range of 3–30 GHz and across the MMW band (frequencies higher than 30 GHz). Temperature controls could be researched to avoid the heating effects of electromagnetic radiation [15].
Studies should be done to ascertain the long-term impact of RF-EMF on brain tumors for more than 15 years. Further, studies of the long-term impact of RF-EMF on children and adolescents should also be done [4].
Additionally, further research should be done to gauge the impact of RF-EMR on the human brain and the neurobiological effects [34].

References

[1]  Turner, A. (2021, August 1). How many people have smartphones Worldwide (Jun 2021). BankMyCell. https://www.bankmycell.com/blog/how-many-phones-are-in-the-world.
[2]  Pew Research Center. (2021, April 26). Demographics of mobile device ownership and adoption in the United States. Pew Research Center: Internet, Science & Tech. https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/fact-sheet/mobile/.
[3]  Shoukat, S. (2019, February 4). Cell phone addiction and psychological and physiological health in adolescents. EXCLI journal. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6449671/.
[4]  World Health Organization. (2014, October 8). Electromagnetic fields and public health: Mobile phones. World Health Organization. http://33h.co/9p1qx.
[5]  Butler, T. (2020, May 27). A Review of the Health Risks of Radiofrequency Radiation Employed in 5G Technology and the Implications for UK Policymaking. http://33h.co/9p1qg.
[6]  Singh, S., & Kapoor, N. (2014). Health Implications of Electromagnetic Fields, Mechanisms of Action, and Research Needs. Advances in Biology, 2014, 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/198609.
[7]  Berkeley Lab. “Electromagnetic Spectrum.” Electromagnetic Spectrum, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, https://www2.lbl.gov/MicroWorlds/ALSTool/EMSpec/EMSpec2.html.
[8]  Zamanian, Ali, and Cy Hardiman. Electromagnetic Radiation and Human Health: A Review of Sources and Effects, High Frequency Electronics, July 2005, https://www.highfrequencyelectronics.com/Jul05/HFE0705_Zamanian.pdf.
[9]  Demirel, S., Doganay, S., Turkoz, Y., Dogan, Z., Turan, B., & Firat, P. G. (2012). Effects of third-generation mobile phone-emitted electromagnetic radiation on oxidative stress parameters in eye tissue and blood of rats. Cutaneous and Ocular Toxicology, 31(2), 89–94. https://doi.org/10.3109/15569527.2012.657725.
[10]  Guilfoyle, Robert. What Is Ionising Radiation?, ARPANSA, 20 May 2019, https://www.arpansa.gov.au/understanding-radiation/what-is-radiation/ionising-radiation.
[11]  Halliday, David, Robert Resnick, and Jearl Walker. Fundamentals of Physics. New York: Wiley, 1997. Print.
[12]  Wang, Rong. “How Do Cell Phones Work?” How Do Cell Phones Work?, Pong Pulse, 20 Dec. 2014, https://pongcase.com/blog/cell-phones-work/.
[13]  Team, EFY. “How Do Mobile Phones Produce Electromagnetic Radiation?: Basics.” How Do Mobile Phones Produce Electromagnetic Radiation?, Electronics For You, 26 June 2020, http://33h.co/9p1q7.
[14]  Net Informations. (n.d.). 1G Vs. 2G Vs. 3G Vs. 4G Vs. 5G. Net-informations.com. http://net-informations.com/q/diff/generations.html.
[15]  Butler, T. (2020, May 27). A Review of the Health Risks of Radiofrequency Radiation Employed in 5G Technology and the Implications for UK Policymaking. http://33h.co/9p1q1.
[16]  Karipidis, K., Mate, R., Urban, D., Tinker, R., & Wood, A. (2021). 5G mobile networks and health—a state-of-the-science review of the research into low-level RF fields above 6 GHz. Journal of Exposure Science & Environmental Epidemiology, 31(4), 585–605. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41370-021-00297-6.
[17]  Nyberg, R., & Hardell, L. (2020, January). 5G Appeal. http://www.5gappeal.eu/.
[18]  Nasim, Imtiaz & Kim, Seungmo. (2017). Human Exposure to RF Fields in 5G Downlink. arXiv:1711.03683v1 [eess.SP].
[19]  “Cellular (Cell) Phones.” Cellular (Cell) Phones, American Cancer Society, 1 June 2020, https://www.cancer.org/cancer/cancer-causes/radiation-exposure/cellular-phones.html.
[20]  “Specific Absorption Rate (SAR) for Cell Phones: What It Means for You.” Specific Absorption Rate (SAR) For Cell Phones: What It Means For You, Federal Communications Commission, 21 Feb. 2020, http://33h.co/9p1sr. Elder, J. A. (2003).
[21]  Mobile & Tablets. How Apple & Samsung Mobiles Stand on Specific Absorption Rates (SAR), IT Central Point, 9 Sept. 2019, http://www.itcentralpoint.com/how-apple-samsung-mobiles-stand-on-specific-absorption-rates-sar.
[22]  Armstrong, Martin, and Felix Richter. Infographic: The Phones Emitting the Most Radiation, Statista Infographics, 25 Nov. 2019, https://www.statista.com/chart/12797/the-phones-emitting-the-most-radiation/.
[23]  Armstrong, Martin, and Felix Richter. Infographic: The Phones Emitting the Least Radiation, Statista Infographics, 26 Aug. 2019, https://www.statista.com/chart/12841/the-phones-emitting-the-least-radiation/.
[24]  “What Is 5g: Everything You Need to Know About 5G: 5G FAQ.” Qualcomm, 13 May 2021, https://www.qualcomm.com/5g/what-is-5g.
[25]  Gupta, A., & Jha, R. K. (2015). A survey of 5g network: Architecture and emerging technologies. IEEE Access, 3, 1206–1232. https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2015.2461602.
[26]  Yoshinaga, P. D. (n.d.). The Eye and Electromagnetic Radiation. California Optometric Association. http://www.coavision.org/files/Eye%20and%20Electromagnetic_For%20Website(1).pdf.
[27]  Söderberg, P. G., Talebizadeh, N., Yu, Z., & Galichanin, K. (2016). Does infrared or ultraviolet light damage the lens? Eye, 30(2), 241–246. https://doi.org/10.1038/eye.2015.266.
[28]  Berkeley Lab (2018, June 7). Light and Infrared Radiation. Berkeley Lab EHS. http://33h.co/9p1s0.
[29]  Yu, Y., & Yao, K. (2010). Non-thermal Cellular Effects of Low-power Microwave Radiation on the Lens and Lens Epithelial Cells. Journal of International Medical Research, 38(3), 729–736. https://doi.org/10.1177/147323001003800301.
[30]  Adibzadeh, F., van Rhoon, G. C., Verduijn, G. M., Naus-Postema, N. C., & Paulides, M. M. (2016). Absence of acute ocular damage in humans after prolonged exposure to intense RF-EMF. Physics in Medicine and Biology, 61(2), 488–503. https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/61/2/488.
[31]  Elder, J. A. (2003). Ocular effects of radiofrequency energy. Bioelectromagnetics, 24(S6). https://doi.org/10.1002/bem.10117.
[32]  Carpenter DO. Human disease resulting from exposure to electromagnetic fields. Rev Environ Health. 2013; 28(4): 159-72. doi: 10.1515/reveh-2013-0016. PMID: 24280284.
[33]  American Cancer Society. “Ultraviolet (UV) Radiation.” Ultraviolet (UV) Radiation, American Cancer Society, 10 July 2019, https://www.cancer.org/cancer/cancer-causes/radiation-exposure/uv-radiation.html.
[34]  Kaszuba-Zwoińska J, Gremba J, Gałdzińska-Calik B, Wójcik-Piotrowicz K, Thor PJ. Electromagnetic field induced biological effects in humans. Przegl Lek. 2015; 72(11): 636-41. PMID: 27012122.
[35]  Hu, Cuicui, et al. “Effects of Radiofrequency Electromagnetic Radiation on Neurotransmitters in the Brain.” Frontiers in Public Health, Frontiers Media S.A., 17 Aug. 2021, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8415840/.
[36]  Xie, Wen, et al. “900 Mhz Radiofrequency Field Induces Mitochondrial Unfolded Protein Response in Mouse Bone Marrow Stem Cells.” Frontiers, Frontiers in Public Health, 1 Jan. 1AD, https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpubh.2021.724239/full.
[37]  ARPANSA. (2020, July 30). How to reduce exposure from mobile phones and other wireless devices. Australian Radiation Protection and Nuclear Safety Agency (ARPANSA). http://33h.co/9p1s6.
[38]  FDA (2020, October 2). Reducing radio-frequency exposure from cell phones. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. http://33h.co/9p152.
[39]  “Wireless Devices and Health Concerns.” Wireless Devices and Health Concerns, Federal Communications Commission, 4 Nov. 2020, https://www.fcc.gov/consumers/guides/wireless-devices-and-health-concerns.