International Journal of Ecosystem

p-ISSN: 2165-8889    e-ISSN: 2165-8919

2014;  4(4): 184-189

doi:10.5923/j.ije.20140404.04

The Influence of Peacock-eye Disease and Fruit-fly Infection on Olive Oil ∆7 Stigmasterol in Northern West Bank

Orwa Jaber Housheya1, Mohamad AbuEid2, Odayy Zaid2, Motasem Zaid2, Omaya Hamad2, Majed Yasin Jeneedi2

1Arab American University, Department of Chemistry, P.O. Box 240, Jenin, Palestine

2Ministry of Agriculture, National Agricultural research Center (NARC), Jenin, Palestine

Correspondence to: Orwa Jaber Housheya, Arab American University, Department of Chemistry, P.O. Box 240, Jenin, Palestine.

Email:

Copyright © 2014 Scientific & Academic Publishing. All Rights Reserved.

Abstract

The purpose of the study was to evaluate the effects of the peacock-eye disease and the fruit-fly infection on the quality of olive oil, and measure how these diseases might influence the concentration of ∆7 Stigmasterol content in the oil. The study was begun by collecting Nabali-Baladi variety of olives from the northern governorates of Palestine (85% of olive trees in the north is Nabali-Baladi). The olives picked had a specific percentage of infection from peacock and fruit-fly. Olives were collected from the 2011 and the 2012 seasons. Olive samples were pressed using a two cycle olive oil mill to extract the oil. The unsoapenifable ∆7 Stigmasterol was isolated from the olive oil taken from the samples within the study area. Then, the concentration of the ∆7 Stigmasterol was evaluated using a GC-MS instrument. Area under the peak of ∆7 Stigmasterol was compared to that of a standard GC trace and the concentration was calculated from the calibration curve. The unsoapenifable Δ7 Stigmasterol was isolated from the olive oil taken from the samples within the study area. Then, the concentration of the Δ7 Stigmasterol was evaluated using a GC-MS instrument and correlated with the diseases. The level of Δ-7- Stigmasterol contained in olive oil was within the IOC limits. The Δ7 Stigmasterol concentration ranged from 0.015 to 0.47 with average of 0.28 for all samples.

Keywords: Palestine olive oil, Peacock eye, Fruit fly, Δ-7-Stigmasterol

Cite this paper: Orwa Jaber Housheya, Mohamad AbuEid, Odayy Zaid, Motasem Zaid, Omaya Hamad, Majed Yasin Jeneedi, The Influence of Peacock-eye Disease and Fruit-fly Infection on Olive Oil ∆7 Stigmasterol in Northern West Bank, International Journal of Ecosystem, Vol. 4 No. 4, 2014, pp. 184-189. doi: 10.5923/j.ije.20140404.04.

1. Introduction

This Olive oil plays an essential part of the Mediterranean diet. This oil has several complex chemical components. The composition of olive oil can give valuable information in understanding their functional, quality and nutritional properties. It also can be used as a fingerprint for reliable identification and classification of olive oils according to the olive variety and the geographic origin. Several studies have correlated the chemical components of olive oil geographic origin [1-6] frequently determined by chromatographic methods. Among the most interesting healthy constituents in olive oil is the sterols class. The level of this type of sterol, especially the D-7 stigma sterol has been the subject of a recent paper that reported a slight increase of Δ-7-Stigmasterol in Palestinian oil [7]. Therefore, the aim of our research study the influence of peacock eye disease and fly-infection on Δ-7-Stigmasterol Palestinian olive oil. The origin, cultivar, extraction technology, condition of ripening of the fruit, climatic conditions, and rainfall all influence biosynthesis within the fruit which can influence the composition and quality of the oil.
Olive oil is an integral part of the Palestinian economy. About 95% of the olives picked in the Palestinian territories is converted to olive oil, most of which is exported internationally. However, there are several obstacles facing olive oil exports. One of which is the compliance with international standards that deal with oil composition and quality. Olive oil chemical content can be divided into two main categories: major components and minor components.
The major component of olive oil is called glycerides that account for 98.5 to 99.5% of the oil. These glycerides are distributed among three types: Triaceylglycerol, 97-98%, Diaceylglycerols 2-3%, and Monoacyglycerols 0.1-0.2%.
The minor components represent a range of 0.5 to 1.5% of the olive oil. The minor components can be described as Squalene, Alcohols, Sterols, Phenols, Tocopehrols, Phospholipids, Pigments, and other volatile compounds. Sterols account for about 80 to 260 milligram per 100 gram of oil contents. Of the total sterols, β-sitosterol represents 65-97%, Δ-5-Avenasterol represents 5-31%, Camperstrol represents 2-4% and finally Δ-7-Stigmasterol can range from 0.0-0.8%. The Sterols have high molecular weight and contains a number of aromatic rings. It is considered non saponifiable material that have elevated melting point, and is considered one of the most important materials non-saponification in vegetable oils, fats and grease which are of different crystalline forms.
Olive oil has to adhere to these international standards, otherwise it could be judged as an adulterated oil especially if the levels of D-7 stigmasterol is higher than 0.5 %. Most of the studies on Δ-7-Stigmasterol showed a wide range of fluctuation of the Δ-7-Stigmasterol concentration in olive oil produced due to a number of factors. [7, 13] the aim of this study was to evaluate low incidence from peacock eye disease and olive fruit fly infections on Δ-7-Stigmasterol concentration. The peacock eye disease is fungal olive leaf pathogen, which causes of the disease of olive peacock spot, also known as olive leaf spot and bird's eye spot as shown in top part of picture 1. The olive fruit infections comes from the fly that is called Bactrocera oleae, which lays its eggs inside the fruit. Its larvae results in damaging the olive fruits as shown the middle af bottom parts of picture 1.
Picture 1. Illustration of the peacock eye disease and the fruit fly infection

2. Methodology

The study focused on peacock eye disease and fly-infection parameters that might have influence on the concentration of D-7 stigmasterol in olive oil. The project was initiated by collecting “Nabali Baladi” olive fruits from three different governorates in Palestine for comparison purposes: Jenin, Qalqiliya and Salfit. A total of 13 samples were collected during the harvest season. Each sample was about 20 kilograms of fresh olive fruits picked from specific trees. Each of those samples were converted into olive oil after pressing using two cycle oil press.
To obtain the sterols from the seed oil, we saponified 2.5 g of sample for the SPE method and 5.0 g of sample for the TLC method, in accordance with AOCS official method Ca 6a-40. The sample was weighed into a 250 mL Erlenmeyer flask, and 30 mL of 95% ethyl alcohol and 5 mL of 26.73 M aqueous potassium hydroxide (60 g of potassium hydroxide in 40 mL of water) were added to the flask along with boiling chips. The mixture was refluxed for 1 h, cooled to room temperature, and transferred to an extraction cylinder. The flask was washed into the cylinder with two 10-mL portions of hot distilled water and two 10-mL portions of room-temperature distilled water until we collected 80 mL. The 80-mL mixture was transferred to a 250-mL separatory funnel and extracted five times with 50-mL portions of petroleum ether. Each 50-mL portion was collected into a 500-mL separatory funnel. The combined extracts were washed with four 30-mL portions of a 10% ethyl alcohol solution. The washed ether extract was transferred to a 250-mL flat bottomed boiling flask, and the ether was evaporated on a steam bath under a fume hood. In preparation for the TLC method, the ether was reduced to approximately 1 mL.
Isolation and recovery of the sterols by TLC: We washed the ether sterol extract with a 10% ethyl alcohol solution and then evaporated it on a steam bath until approximately 1 mL of solution was left. Throughout the tests, we used commercially prepared, 20 cm 3 20 cm, 60-Å pore diameter, Whatman K6 silica gel TLC plates (Whatman Inc., Clifton, New Jersey) with a 250-mm layer thickness. We placed two 50- mL spots of a 100 g/L cholesterol solution in chloroform 10 mm from the left-hand and right-hand edges of the plate. The unsaponifiable compounds were spotted on the plate in a continuous line of 50-µL spots between the two cholesterol reference spots. We placed the plate in a developing tank containing chloroform as the developing solvent. The plate was left in the tank until the solvent reached a point of 10 mm from the upper edge. Then we removed the plate and allowed it to dry. The sterol fraction was identified by the two cholesterol reference spots on each edge. The sterols were scraped from the plate into a 25-mL conical flask. To extract the sterols, we placed 5 mL of ethyl ether in the flask and refluxed it gently for 15 min. The ether was filtered through 9.0-cm circles of Whatman number 5 paper into another 25-mL conical flask. The original flask then was washed by the addition of another 5 mL of ether and refluxing. This process was repeated three times. The solvent was removed from the combined filtrates under a stream of nitrogen. The sterol crystals were dissolved in a minimal amount of acetone (approximately 300 mL) and injected into the gas chromatograph for sterol composition analysis. Then, the sterols were analyzed by GC-MS according to the following procedure:
Chromatographic conditions.—Analyze standards and samples according to the instrumental conditions: Column.—Capillary column, split mode (25 m × 0.32 mm) cross-linked 5% phenylmethyl silicone or methyl silicone gum; film thickness: 0.17 μm. Detector.—Hydrogen FID. Temperatures.—Column: 190°C, hold 2 min; increase 20°C/min to 230°C, hold 3 min; increase 40°C/min to 255°C, hold 25 min; injector: 250°C; detector: 300°C. Flow rates.—Carrier: 2 mL/min, split vent ca 15 mL/min, purge vent ca 3 mL/min helium (split ratio should be ∼7); makeup: 20 mL/min helium; hydrogen: 35 mL/min; air: 280 mL/min. Injection volume.—1 μL. Finally, the percent by mass of each sterol from the total sterol was calculated. A standard calibration curve is generated by using the ratio of the analyte area vs the area of the IS for each concentration level. A calibration curve is produced for each analyte. Dilute high-level test solutions to fall within the standard range 3.

3. Results and Discussion

Sterols, such as Δ-7-Stigmasterol, are alcohols with the cyclopentanophenanthrene ring system (atoms 1 through 17 in the structure Figure 1). This substructure is also found oils and fats. Δ-7-Stigmasterol is classified as an alcohol because it has a hydroxyl group (-OH) in position 3 of the ring system.
Figure 1. Structure of D-7- stigmasterol
Sterols of vegetable origin are called "phytosterols", such as stigmasterol from oil, that are of current interest because they lower blood cholesterol levels. Sterols that are fully saturated (no double bonds) are called "stanols". For example, stigmastanol has the same structure as stigmasterol, but without the double bonds. When fatty acids react with the hydroxyl at carbon 3 they form "sterol esters". [12]
The production of olive oil is a large commercial venture worth millions of Dollars that involves many sectors of the society, including farmers who cultivate oil-bearing olives, merchants, and a variety of industries that extract, process, store, and distribute the resulting oils. There is a constant controversy between manufacturers, consumers, special interest groups, and government regulatory agencies, each trying to advance their own agenda with respect to the olive quality.
Many organizations and advocacy groups have influenced official policy decisions about the classification of olive oil for marketing reasons. The newest criterion for oil quality is the testing of delta-7- stigmastenol (D-7-stigmastenol) contained in olive oil, which is particularly concerned with its purity and adulteration with other oils.
It is necessary to have the full range of IOC adulteration tests done on oils being exported to ensure they meet IOC standards. When exporting, sterol composition should also be tested. The recent discovery that the variety Barnea has naturally high levels of the sterol campesterol, exceeding the IOC level of 4 %, highlights the need to test for sterols [8]. In this project all pressed Nabali Baladi samples of olives were stored in Dark-Green glass bottles. Prior to GCMS analysis, the instrument was calibrated and conditioned with specific parameters. Figure 2 shows a GC trace of sterol samples that gives relative intensity on the y-axis and retention time on the x-axis. After inspecting area under the peak.
Figure 2. GC trace sterol in a sample
Figure 3. MS of the corresponding GC trace in figure 1 showing the m/z at 414 and its fragment ions
The corresponding mass spectrum is shown in Figure 3. This figure shows the mass spectrum of the delta-7 stigmasterol which has a mass of m/z=414, which corresponds to the molecular formula C29H50O with also possible structural isomers in Figure 1. The individual sterols reported here are calculated as a percentage by mass of the total sterols present. The equation (#1) used to calculate the individual sterol content (n) equal:
Equation 1:
where An is the area of the peak corresponding to sterol “n” and ΣA is the sum of the total sterol peak areas. The concentration of the sample was figured out by multiplying the integrated area under the peak for the sample by concentration of the standard divided by the integrated area under the peak for the standard.
Table 1 shows the code for each sample and the location at which each sample was collected. Table 2 summarizes the percent of infection in and the percent Δ-7-Stigmasterol in each sample. The Δ-7-Stigmasterol concentration was below 0.5% for each geographical location. The highest Δ-7-Stigmasterol value was 0.47 % of sample number 12 and the lowest was 0.02 % for sample number 7 as shown in Figure 6.
Table 1. Geographical area and the corresponding sample number
     
Sample number 8 had the highest percent of olive fruit fly infection of 22.2%, and sample number 6 had the lowest percent of olive fruit fly infection of 1.6% as shown in figure 4 (and from table 2). Sample 4 and sample 8 had Δ-7-Stigmasterol of 0.28 and 0.31 respectively. Samples 5 and 6 had the highest percent of peacock eye disease of about 40% (see figure 5), and a corresponding value of Δ-7-Stigmasterol of 0.3 and 0.27% respectively.
Table 2. Delta-7 concentration in each sample
     
Figure 4. Percent olive fruit fly infection in each sample
Figure 5. Percent peacock-eye disease for each sample
Figure 6. Percent Δ-7-Stigmasterol in each sample
One of the interesting observation is that of the samples number 7 and 12. Although they are the extremities of the Δ-7-Stigmasterol concentration (0.02 and 0.47%), their percent olive fruit fly were 8% and 5%. The olive fruit fly infection appears to have insignificant effects on the Δ-7-Stigmasterol concentration. Another interesting observation is that for samples 5 and 7, in which the olive fruit fly infection was 8% for each sample, but looking at the peacock disease infection we see that sample 5 has 40% and sample 7 has 15%. The corresponding Δ-7-Stigmasterol for each sample is 0.02 and 0.3%. This poses the whether the peacock eye disease has any influence on the Δ-7-Stigmasterol. The answer might or might not. Because if we look at samples number 9, 10 and 13, we can see that they have similar peacock eye disease percent infections of about 20 %, and if we compare their Δ-7-Stigmasterol concentration (0.39, 0.30, and 0.37%) we see it almost close to each other. But in samples number 5 and 6, the peacock eye disease was double of that in samples 9, 10, and 13, and the observed Δ-7-Stigmasterol for samples 5 and 6 was 0.27 and 0.30 %. This seems to point out that really the peacock eye disease did not impact the Δ-7-Stigmasterol concentration in a significant manner.
Several studies have reported that the degree of fly infection is negatively correlated to phenolic content in the resulting olive oil due to autoxidation [14, 15]. However, others reported that the phenolic fraction of olive oil depends on several parameters and that a clear correlation does not exist between the degree of fly infestation and phenolic content. [16]. The researchers hypothesize that higher degree of olive fruit fly infections might have a negative impact on the acidy and the peroxide value of the oil due to the deteriorating of the oil. This issue is under investigation and any results will be published in the near future.

4. Conclusions

The GC-MS analysis has been performed on sample with fly infection and peacock disease. The results reveals that the concentration of delta 7 stigamsterol in the Nabali Baladi samples were less than 0.5%, provided the conditions of the experiments. Regardless of the geographical location, the D-7 concentration ranged from 0.02 to 0.47%, which are within the IOC suggestions. The peacock eye disease and the olive fruit fly infection did not seem to have a great impact on the Δ-7-Stigmasterol concentration. Further studies are underway to determine the Δ-7-Stigmasterol concentration in the event we have 100% infection from olive fruit fly and 100% infection the peacock eye disease.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

The researchers are grateful for the IAO who funded this project over the past two years.

References

[1]  Aparicio, R., Albi, T., Lanzon, A., & Navas, M. A. (1987). SEXIA, un sistema experto para la identificaci zonas olivareras. Grasas y Aceites, 38(1), 9–14.
[2]  Ferreiro, L., & Aparicio, R. (1992). Influencia de la altitud en la composici Ecuacione/8’s matem aticas de clasificacion. Grasas y Aceites, 43(3), 149–156.
[3]  Fiorino, P., & Nizzi, F. (1991). The spread of olive farming. Olivae, 44, 9.
[4]  Gigliotti, C., Daghetta, A., & Sidoli, A. (1993). Indagine conoscitiva sul contenuto triglyceridico di oli extra vergini di oliva di varia provenienza. Rivista Italiane delle Sostanza Grasse, LXX, 483–489.
[5]  Leardi, R., & Paganuzzi, V. (1987). Caratterizzazione dell’origine di oli di oliva extravergini mediante metodi chemiometrici applicati alla frazione sterolica. Rivista Italiane delle Sostanza Grasse, LXIV, 131–136.
[6]  Tsimidou, M., & Karakostas, K. X. (1993). Geographical classification of Greek virgin olive oil by non-parametric multivariate evaluation of fatty acid composition. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 62, 253–257.
[7]  K. Abu-Alruz, I.A. Afaneh, J.M. Quasem, M.A. Hmidat, J. Abbady and A.S. Mazahreh, Factors Affecting D-7-Stigmastenol in Palestinian Olive Oil, Journal of applied science, 11(5): 797-805, 2011.
[8]  Rod Mailer, Testing olive oil quality: chemical and sensory methods, NSW, primefacts, 2008.
[9]  Method Of Analysis Spectrophotometric Investigation In The Ultraviolet, International Olive Oil Council COI/T20/Doc. no. 19/Rev.1 2001.
[10]  Codex Standard For Olive Oils And Olive Pomace Oils Codex Stan 33-1981.
[11]  Codex Standard For Olive Oil, Virgin And Refined, And For Refined Olive-Pomace Oil Codex Stan 33-1981 (Rev. 1-1989).
[12]  Covas, M.I., V. Ruiz-Gutierrez, R. de la Torre, A. Kafatos and R.M. Lamuela-Raventos et al., 2006. Minor components of olive oil: Evidence to date of health benefits in humans. Nutr. Rev., 64: S20-S30.
[13]  Pehlivan, B. and E. Yılmaz, 2010. Comparison of oils originating from olive fruit by different production systems. J. Am. Oil. Chem. Soc., 87: 865-875.
[14]  Faten Mraicha, Mohieddine Ksantini, Olfa Zouch, Mohamed Ayadi, Sami Sayadi, Mohamed Bouaziz, “Effect of olive fruit fly infestation on the quality of olive oil from Chemlali cultivar during ripening” Volume 48, Issue 11, November 2010, Pages 3235–3241.
[15]  Abderezak Tamendjari, Franca Angerosa, Soraya Mettouchi, Mohand Mouloud Bellal, “The effect of fly attack (Bactrocera oleae) on the quality and phenolic content of Chemlal olive oil” 60 (5), 507-513, 2009.
[16]  Ana Maria Gómez-Caravaca , Lorenzo Cerretani, Alessandra Bendini, Antonio Segura-Carretero, Alberto Fernández- Gutiérrez †, Michele Del Carlo, Dario Compagnone , Angelo Cichelli “Effects of Fly Attack (Bactrocera oleae) on the Phenolic Profile and Selected Chemical Parameters of Olive Oil” J. Agric. Food Chem., 2008, 56 (12), pp 4577–4583.