International Journal of Clinical Psychiatry

p-ISSN: 2332-8355    e-ISSN: 2332-8371

2018;  6(3): 57-61

doi:10.5923/j.ijcp.20180603.03

 

Prevalence and Comparison of Problematic Cell Phone Use amongst University Students in Western U.P Region in India: Correlates with Stress and Anxiety

Prerana Gupta, Jigar Haria, Swati Singh

Teerthanker Mahaveer Medical College, U.P. India

Correspondence to: Prerana Gupta, Teerthanker Mahaveer Medical College, U.P. India.

Email:

Copyright © 2018 The Author(s). Published by Scientific & Academic Publishing.

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY).
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Abstract

Introduction: Since their introduction 12 years ago, there has been a wide proliferation of uptake of cell phone usage in India. Studies acknowledging excessive and problematic use of cell phone have also been reported from various parts of world. Systematic studies from India are still sparse. Aims: The present study aims to target the young cohort of university students pursuing education in a prominent deemed university of Northern India and to find the prevalence of cell phone addiction in the various groups of students belonging to various streams of education. Materials and methods: 50 students with age groups ranging from 18-24 were selected on a random basis by lucky draw method. They were explained the nature of study and its purpose and a 24 item self report questionnaire prepared on lines from ICD-X and CAGE questionnaire was administered to them after taking a informed consent. They were also administered Perceived Stress Scale and Hamiltons Anxiety Rating Scale to measure stress and anxiety. Results: Female students scored significantly higher on the dependence criteria. Female students scored significantly higher on the dependence criteria. Stream of study, type of family and monthly allowance of the students had no major role in the development of cell phone dependence in the sample. There was no significant correlation between the perceived stress of the students and the development of cell phone dependence. There was a significant relation between anxiety and high level of cell phone dependence Conclusion: Increasing cell phone usage among young students to the levels of cell phone dependence is a cause of much concern for the society especially when seen in conjunction with the higher levels of anxiety seen in this group.

Keywords: Problematic Cell Phone use, Cell phone dependence, Anxiety, Stress

Cite this paper: Prerana Gupta, Jigar Haria, Swati Singh, Prevalence and Comparison of Problematic Cell Phone Use amongst University Students in Western U.P Region in India: Correlates with Stress and Anxiety, International Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, Vol. 6 No. 3, 2018, pp. 57-61. doi: 10.5923/j.ijcp.20180603.03.

1. Introduction

Since their introduction 12 years ago, there has been a wide proliferation of uptake of cell phone usage in India [1]. According to the statistics, India has the second largest cell phone customer base, after China and this base is expanding fast. There are currently 929.37 million users (74.71% of total population) in India [1]. Telecom subscription data from TRAI indicate 8.35 million new additions monthly [1]. There are a number of reasons for this prolific popularity of this communication technology. Decreasing costs, good network coverage, multiple uses of the cell phone and availability of non-communication purposes have increased the user potential.
Negative effects of cell phone use like lowered concentration, headache and insomnia due to night time use are widely documented [2-6]. Studies acknowledging excessive and problematic use of cell phone have also been reported from various parts of world [7-11].
Systematic studies from Indi are still sparse and have mainly focussed on the dependence potential of internet [12]. Cell phone dependence study amongst resident doctors, 39.6% met 3 or more of ICD-X diagnostic criteria for substance dependence [13].
Cell phones are integral to the social functioning of young individuals today as having cell phones allows them to be contactable by their friends aiding in the formation and maintenance of social groups [14, 15]. This young population has shown a steep rise in cell phone use in terms of frequency and harmfulness [16]. Recent ACMA Report has shown that young people have reported that they are heavily dependent on their cell phones and could not imagine living without it. Some have said that they cannot turn their phone off and they feel anxiety when they are unable to use their phone [17, 18].
The term behavioural addiction has been applied to describe a wide range of behaviours which are excessive and harmful to the user, including eating [19], exercise [20], Internet use [21-23], sex [24], shopping [25]. Technological addictions are defined as non-substance addictions involving excessive human computer interactions and are finding a place in the subset of behavioural addictions [21, 26], though they are still to find a place in the current diagnostic manuals.
Despite the differences in literature, excessive or addictive technological use is related to an expected reduction in difficult states such as loneliness and benefits from use such as social inclusions [21]. High interpersonal anxiety has been seen in excessive cellphone use [27] and individuals suffering from clinical anxiety are likely to exhibit heavy cell phone use [28].

2. Objectives of Study

The present study aims to target the young cohort of university students pursuing education in a prominent deemed university of Northern India and to find the prevalence of cell phone addiction in the various groups of students belonging to various streams of education. It also aims to compare these groups in term of their Problematic Smartphone use and also to find correlates between stress and Problematic Smartphone use and presence of psychiatric co morbidity of Anxiety amongst the various groups.

3. Study Design and Participants

50 students with age groups ranging from 18-24 were selected on a random basis from the university premises by lucky draw method. The students belonged to the Medical college, Nursing college, Dental college and engineering college of the University which is located in Moradabad, Uttar Pradesh India. 95% of the sample resided in hostels and were from various parts of India and rest 5% were residing in or around Uttar Pradesh. They were explained the nature of study and its purpose and a 24 item self report questionnaire prepared on lines from ICD-X [29] and CAGE [30] questionnaire would be administered to them after taking a informed consent. They were also administered Perceived Stress Scale and Hamiltons Anxiety Rating Scale to measure stress and Anxiety.
Inclusion Criteria:
1. Possessing atleast one Smartphone for the last 1 month
2. Using their Smartphone atleast once a day
Exclusion Criteria:
1. Those suffering from any psychiatric disorder and taking treatment for it in the last one month.
Tools:
1. Self designed performa containing sociodemographic details,
2. Cell phone dependence Questionnaire containing 27 items. First 4 items enquiring about duration and reasons for cell phone use, next three items focussing on finances spent on usage of cell phone and the other items corresponding to ICD-X research criteria for substance dependence and CAGE questionnaire. The last item enquired about other substances used by the cohort.
3. Perceived Stress Scale
4. Hamiltons Anxiety Rating Scale
Statistical Analysis:
The frequencies and percentages were calculated from data. Comparisons were done by using Chi Square tests. Associations between various variables were computed using Pearsons co-relation coefficient.

4. Results

Table 1. Sociodemographic Variables of the Sample
     
100% of our sample possessed a smart phone. Mean age of our sample was 22.5 years with 62% males and 38% females. 72% of the sample was single. 92.5% had a cell phone for 3 years or more. 95% of the sample was residing in the various hostels in the university campus itself. Majority of the sample was Hindu in religion that is 82% and 16% were Muslim. 65% of the sample was from Medical college, 8% from dental college, 10% from engineering College and rest were from various other colleges of the University. Thus the ubiquitous nature of cell phone use is demonstrated in the sample. Even students from rural background possessed a cell phone which depicts the rise in usage of cell phone.
Table 2. Cell Phone Dependence (High v/s Low) amongst Various Streams of Students
     
The cell phone dependence in terms of scoring was positive on various items of the questionnaire was equally distributed among the various faculties of colleges. The stream of study did not dictate the higher number of cell phone usage and dependence. Thus all streams had an equal pre-ponderence of use and dependence. Even streams which pose a higher stress of studies like medicine did not have much influence on the use of cell phones.
Table 3. Cell Phone Dependence (High v/s Low) v/s Religion of Students
     
Muslim students scored significantly higher on the items of Cell phone dependence in comparison to Hindu students. Muslim religion students had a significantly higher number of cell phone dependence which could be due to the fact that the majority of population belonged to thus religion which could have biased the result and secondly due to religious reasons most of the muslim students do indulge in other addictions which are banned in their religion. These student smight be indulging in problematic cell phone use because of lack of other avenues.
Table 4. Cell Phone Dependence (High v/s Low) v/s Sex of Students
     
Female scored significantly higher in comparison to males and scored higher on items of questionnaire. Female students could be relying on more cell phone use because of the less usage of other addictive behaviours which are a social taboo in Indian culture.
Table 5. Cell Phone Dependence (High v/s Low) v/s Family Type of Students
     
There was no difference in the sample in terms of the type of family in which they resided. Tyoe of family had no bearing on problematic cell phone use. Joint family acts as a buffer in many stressful; situations but in the case of cell phone dependence it seemed to provide no protective role.
Table 6. Cell Phone Dependence v/s Monthly Allowance of Students
     
There was no difference in the sample in terms of the amount of monthly allowance they received. Irrespective of the allowances all the students showed and equal preponderance of cell phone use.
Table 7. Correlation of Perceived Stress with Cell Phone Dependence
     
There was no co-relation between the amount of dependence and perceived stress. Astonishingly, the level of stress which the students perceived had no bearing on their cell phone usage.
Table 8. Correlation of Anxiety Rating Score With Cell Phone Dependence
     
There was a significant co-relation between patients scoring high on Anxiety scores and cell phone dependence. The anxiety largely determined the increased amount of cell phone usage. Higher the score on anxiety higher was the chance of increasing cell phone dependence.

5. Discussion

Technological Addictions are on the rise in today’s developing world.
Almost 100% of our sample possessed a cell phone. Mean age of our sample was 22.5 years with 62% males and 38% females. 72% of the sample was single. 92.5% had a cell phone for 3 years or more. 95% of the sample was residing in the various hostels in the university campus itself. Most of the sample was Hindu which were 82% of thge sample. (Table 1)
88% of the sample reported the main use of the cell phone to communicate with family and friends while the remaining sample attributed the main use of internet usage. 92% of the sample had an average daily use of 2 hours or more. 68% of the sample met 4 or more criteria for dependence. 42% of the sample met 10 or more criteria for dependence.
Female students scored significantly higher on the dependence criteria (table 4). This is in accordance with the previous studies [29], where various reasons have been attributed to more significance of cell phones in females who use it majorly to remain in touch with family and friends.
Female students scored significantly higher on the dependence criteria (table 3). This is the first study to find the impact of religion in development of technological addiction. Religiosity, in general has been found to have a negative factor in the development of alcohol and nicotine addictions [29]. Higher levels of personal devotion amongst Muslims could be one of the reasons for higher levels of cell phone dependence amongst this group though this finding needs to be evaluated further by conducting larger sample and matched studies.
Stream of study, type of family and monthly allowance of the students had no major role in the development of cell phone dependence in the sample. This is an interesting finding as the cost of cell phone bills seem to have no influence on the development of cell phone dependence in the sample. (table 2, 5 & 6)
There was no significant correlation between the perceived stress of the students and the development of cell phone dependence (Table 7). This is not in accordance with the previous studies which have shown a higher amount of stress in individuals having higher level of dependence on their cell phones (ref). This could be attributed to the fact that cell phone usage has become ubiquitous in the current generation and on the contrary more cell phone usage could lead to lower the levels of stress in the sample by producing meaningful social interactions.
There was a significant relation between anxiety and high level of cell phone dependence (Table 8). This is in accordance with the previous studies [27, 28] which have concluded that higher levels of anxiety lead to more heavy cell phone usage in the sample.

6. Conclusions

The young adults of a population are the major contributors in the development of the nation. Professionals form the major workforce of any nation. Increasing problematic smart phone use among this workforce to the levels of cell phone dependence is a cause of much concern for the society especially when seen in conjunction with the higher levels of anxiety seen in this group. There is an increased risk of Problematic Smart Phone use in females and this carries social implications and also the fact that females are more prone to stress and anxiety related disorders and thus explaining their higher problematic use, it could also highlight the fact that Smart phone addictions might be looked upon as more socially acceptable ways of gratifying oneself in a largely patriarchal society. The same social acceptibilty can be the reason for the higher number of Problematic Smart Phone Use seen in Muslim population because of strict religious restrictions on alcohol and nicotine. Further studies on this new behavioural addiction are the need of the hour as this might represent a growing plethora of new age addictions and psychiatry needs to address this problem in a more pro-active way in terms of new additions in classification of current substance dependence disorders.

References

[1]  http://trai.gov.in/WriteReadData/PressRelease/Document/PR-TSD-Aug12.
[2]  Hardell L, Carlberg M. Mobile phones, cordless phones and the risk of brain tumours. Int J Oncology 2009; 35(1): 15-17.
[3]  http://www.iarc.fr/en/media-centre/pr/2011/pdfs/pr208_E.pdf.
[4]  Szyjkowska A, Bortkiewicz A, Szymczak W, Makowiec-Dabrowska T. Subjective symptoms related to mobile phone use-a pilot study. Polski Merkuriusz Lekarski 2005; 19:529-32.
[5]  Khan MM. Adverse effects of excessive mobile phone use. Int J Occup Med Environ Health 2008; 21:289-93.
[6]  Thomee S, Harenstam A, Hagberg M. Mobile phone use and stress, sleep disturbances, and symptoms of depression among young adults - a prospective cohort study. BMC Public Health 2011; 11:66-76.
[7]  Dimonte M, Ricchiuto G. Mobile phone and young people. A survey pilot study to explore the controversial aspects of a new social phenomenon. Minerva Pediatr 2006; 58: 357-63.
[8]  Beranuy M, Ursula O, Carbonell X, Chammaro A. Problematic Internet and Mobile phone use and clinical symptoms in college students: the role of emotional intelligence. Computers in Human Behavior 2009; 25(5): 1182-1187.
[9]  Rutland JB, Sheets T, Young T. Development of a scale to measure problem use of short message service: The SMS problem use diagnostic questionnaire. Cyberpsychol Behav 2007; 10: 841-843.
[10]  Toda M, Monden K, Kubo K, Morimoto K. Mobile phone dependence and health-related life-style of university students. Soc Behav Pers 2006; 34:1277–84.
[11]  Sanchez-Carbonell X, Beranuy M, Castellana M, Chamarro A, Oberst U. Internet and cell phone addiction: passing fad or disorder? Adicciones 2008; 20:149-59.
[12]  Chakraborty K, Basu D, Vijaya Kumar KG. Internet Addiction: Consensus, controversies, and the way ahead. East Asian Arch Psychiatry 2010; 20:123-132.
[13]  Aggarwal M, Grover S, Basu D. Mobile phone use by resident doctors: Tendency to Addiction like behaviour. German Journal of Psychiatry 2012; 15(2): 50-55.
[14]  Campbell SW, Russo TC. The social construction of mobile telephony: An application of the social influence model to perceptions and uses of mobile phone within personal communication networks. Communication Monographs 2003; 70(4): 317-334.
[15]  Carroll J, Howard S, Peck J, Murphy J. A field study of perceptions and use of mobile telephones in 16 to 22 year olds. Journal of Information Technology Theory and Application 2002; 4(2): 49-61.
[16]  Peters O, Almekinders J, Buren R, Snippers R, Wessels J. Motives for SMS use. In: 53rd Annual Conference of International Communication Association 2003.
[17]  Srivastava L. Mobile Phones and the evolution of Social Behavior. Behavior and Information Technology 2005; 24(2): 111-129.
[18]  Wilska T. Mobile phone use as part of Young Peoples Consumption Styles. Journal of Consumer Policy 2003; 26: 441.
[19]  Davis C, Claridge G. The Eating disorders as Addiction. A psychobiological perspective. Addictive Behaviors 1998; 24(3): 463-475.
[20]  Veale C. Exercise Dependence. British Journal of Addictions 1978; 82: 735-740.
[21]  Griffiths M. Internet Addiction: Fact or Fiction. The Psychologist 1999; 12(5): 246-250.
[22]  Yang SC, Tunj CJ. Comparison of Internet addicts and non-addicts in Taiwanese High School. Computers in Human Behavior 2007; 23(1): 79-96.
[23]  Young KS. Internet Addiction: the Emergence of a New Clinical disorder. CyberPsychology and Behavior 2009; 1(3): 237-244.
[24]  Goodman A. Is Sex really addictive? Review of Sexual Addiction: An Integrated Approach. Contemporary Psychology 1999; 44: 154-156.
[25]  Dittmar H. Compulsive Buying: A growing concern? An examination of gender, age and endorsement of materialistic values as predictors. British Journal of Psychology 2005; 96(4): 467-491.
[26]  Shaffer HJ. Understanding the means and objects of Addiction: Technology, the Internet and Gambling. Journal of Gambling Studies 1996; 12(4): 461-469.
[27]  Ha JH, Chin B, Park DH, Ryu SH, Yu J. Characteristics of excessive cellular phone use in Korean adolescents. CyberPsychology and Behavior 2008; 11(6): 783-784.
[28]  Jenaro C, Flores N, Gomez-Vela M, Gonzalez-Gil F, Caballo C. Problematic internet and cell phone use: Psychological, behavioural and health correlates. Addiction Research and Theory 2007; 15(3): 309-320.
[29]  World Health Organization. The ICD-10 Classification of Mental and Behavioural Disorders: Clinical Descriptions and Diagnostic Guidelines. Geneva: World Health Organization, 1992. Available from: http://www.who.int/substance_abuse/terminology/ICD10ClinicalDiagnosis.pdf.
[30]  Ewing JA. Detecting alcoholism: the CAGE questionnaire. JAMA. 1984; 252(14): 1905-1907.
[31]  Kendler KS, Gardner CO, Prescott CA. Religion, psychopathology and substance use and abuse: A multimeasure, genetic-epidemiologic study. American Journal of Psychiatry 1997; 154(3): 322-9.