International Journal of Agriculture and Forestry

p-ISSN: 2165-882X    e-ISSN: 2165-8846

2016;  6(1): 54-57

doi:10.5923/j.ijaf.20160601.06

 

Evaluation of Some Local Sorghum Genotypes in North Kordofan of Sudan Semi-Arid Agro-Ecological Environment

Awad A. Ahmed, Mohamed S. M. Hassan, Ahmed M. El Naim

Department of Crop Sciences, Faculty of Natural Resources and Environmental Studies, University of Kordofan, Elobied, Sudan

Correspondence to: Ahmed M. El Naim, Department of Crop Sciences, Faculty of Natural Resources and Environmental Studies, University of Kordofan, Elobied, Sudan.

Email:

Copyright © 2016 Scientific & Academic Publishing. All Rights Reserved.

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY).
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted during seasons (2011/2012) in semi-arid zone at North Kordofan, Sudan to evaluate local sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L. Moench) genotypes for early flowering and yielding. 19 early flowered and high yielding ability genotypes were selected from the previous experiment. Randomized complete block design (RCBD) with four replications was used. Selection was done visually based on early flowering and bigger panicle size plants. Morphological, yield and yield component traits were estimated. Statistical analyses revealed significant differences among all the studied traits. Duncan Multiple Range Test organized and ranked the significances among the trait means. Results of the experiment disclosed that the highest amount of grain yield per area produced by the following genotypes: Tagat 4 (2.3), Tagat 7B (1.9), Tagat 10 (2.2), Tagat 14 (2.7) and Tagat 19 (1.9 ton h-1).

Keywords: Sorghum, Cereals, Seed yield, Sudan

Cite this paper: Awad A. Ahmed, Mohamed S. M. Hassan, Ahmed M. El Naim, Evaluation of Some Local Sorghum Genotypes in North Kordofan of Sudan Semi-Arid Agro-Ecological Environment, International Journal of Agriculture and Forestry, Vol. 6 No. 1, 2016, pp. 54-57. doi: 10.5923/j.ijaf.20160601.06.

1. Introduction

Sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L. Moench) is one of the most important staple food and fodder crops in the semi–arid regions of the world [1], [2]. It is considered more tolerant to many stresses, drought, salinity, heat and flooding [3], [4]. The crop grown in rain fed areas is highly effected by drought stress [5]. Because of its tolerance to drought and heat stress, sorghum is cultivated in areas considered to be too dry and hot for other cereals [6]. Sorghum is fourth important cereal crops of the world after wheat, rice and maize [7]. It is widely grown in Africa, China, USA, Mexico and India. Sorghum (Sorghum bicolor) is a multipurpose crop grown for food, animal feed and industrial purposes [11].
Grain sorghum has so many local names among these: Durra, Egyptian millet, Feterita, Daza, Sorgo, Gonia corn, Jowar, Kaffir corn, Milo, Shallo and Sudan grass [8].
Sorghum in Sudan is the main staple food crop that grown in both traditional and semi-mechanized rain-fed areas [9]. However, Sudan’s sorghum productivity is low compared with other sorghum producing countries. Sorghum productivity in Sudan ranged between 104- 200 kg/ feddan [8], [20]. It represents about 14%, 15% and 16% of that of Argentina, USA and China, respectively [10].
The rain-fed sorghum areas exceed 90% of the total cultivated sorghum areas [20]. Therefore, some reasons behind low productivity could be attributed to fluctuation in rain-fall, short rainy season and low amount of precipitation per season. For these, selection for moisture stress resistant among genotypes could be of great importance for sustainability of sorghum production. The objective of this study are to: Studying the yield components and estimating of yielding ability of selected local genotypes of grain sorghum in semi-arid environment in North Kordofan of Sudan.

2. Materials and Methods

A field experiment was conducted in rainy seasons (2011/2012) at the Farm of Crop Sciences Department, Faculty of Natural Resources and Environmental Studies, University of Kordofan, Sudan. Latitude (11-15°N) and longitude (27-32°E). The climate of the area is arid and semi arid. The soil is sandy, annual rain fall ranges between 350-450 mm (Ahmed, 2009). Average maximum daily temperature ranges between 30-50°C throughout the year.

2.1. Field Experiment

Nineteen sorghum genotypes were selected from the 39 genotypes (tested in season 2010/2011) based on early flowering and high yielding-ability for further investigation in second field experiment conducted in 2011/2012. Randomized Complete Block Design (RCBD) with four replicates was used. The experimental unit area was 3m X 10m. Inter and intra row spacing was 50cm apart. Sowing was done in 25th July, 2011. Five seeds were placed in each hole. The re-sowing was done after two weeks from sowing. The first weeding after a week from re-sowing. The second one after a month from the first weeding, all the seedlings were thinned to two per hole, prior flowering all sorghum plants in the experiment were labeled by tags. names, flowering and maturity date were written on these tags. All plants were covered by clothes bags to protect heads from crossing and bird attack. Observations were taken from sowing up to maturity.

2.2. Phenological Attributes

1. Days to 50% flowering: were recorded as the number of days from the effective sowing date to the day on which 50% of the plants in a plot reached anthesis at least halfway down the panicle.
2. Days to physiological maturity: the number of days from effective sowing date to the day on which 95% of the panicles in a plot reached physiological maturity as monitored by the appearance of black glumes.
3. Grain filling period

2.3. Vegetative Growth Parameters

In each plot, four plants were selected at random from the middle row to measure the following characters:
1. Plant height (cm): measured from soil surface to the tip of the main head, just before harvesting.
2. Stem diameter (cm): measured by using a vernier (caliper) at the third node.
3. Number of leaves per plant

2.4. Yield Attributes

1. Grain yield per plant (g)
2. 100 grains weight (g): 100 seeds will be weighted (four times) from each sample and weighed.
3. Grain yield (ton ha-1): panicles from each plot were harvested, sun dried, threshed, weighed and converted to ton/ha
4. Number of grains per panicle
5. Harvest index: Harvest index was determined by using the fallowing formula:-

3. Results and Discussion

Table1. Shows the results of morphological and yield components of 19 selected Sorghum genotypes.
Table 1. Means of some Morphological and yield components of 19 selected Sorghum genotypes (Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench) grown during season (2011/ 2012)

3.1. Growth Attributes

With regard to plant height, Tagat 4 and Tagat 9A were the shortest genotypes in the field experiment (51.25 and 43.25 cm, respectively). Therefore, they could be early. On the other hand, Tagat 14, Tagat 15 and Yourwasha were the tallest genotypes in the experiment (117.05, 117.08 and 122.55, respectively). Late in maturity most probably associated with high grain yield. Similar results were reported by El Naim et al. [11].
With respect to days to 50% flowering, Tagat 7B, Tagat 10 and Tagat 14 were the earliest flowering genotypes (74.75, 78.00 and 72.25, respectively). Therefore, they might be classified as drought escaper. Similar observations were reported by Seetharama [12]. On the other hand, the latest flowering genotypes in the field experiment were Arose-Elremal (89.17), Tagat 4 (89.17), Gadamballea (89.13), Geshaish (89.03) and Tagat 7A (89.05). Late flowering genotypes always produce high grain yield per plant, but they may require long rainy season. So, they are not suitable for cultivation in areas with low rain fall. The significant differences among sorghum genotypes in days to 50% flowering were reported by many Workers: Abdel-Rahman, [13], Abduli, [14], Emendwack, [15] and Ahmed, [8].
Yourwasha and Tagat 13 scored the highest estimates for stem diameter in field experiment (1.71 and 2.1 cm, respectively). These genotypes could be less susceptible to wind lodging. On the other hand, Tagat 9A recorded low estimates for stem diameter (0.91 cm). Therefore, it could be susceptible to lodging.
The highest number of leaves per plant in was shown by Tagat 10 and Tagat 5B (12.25). These genotypes also recorded high estimates of grain filling period. Thus, high metabolites deposition in long grain filling period would be expected from this genotype and consequently high grain yield. In contrast, Tagat 9A recorded the lowest number of leaves per plant (6.6) and showed low estimates of grain filling period. Therefore, low photosynthates in short grain filling period would be expected for developing grains and consequently low grain yield per plant. Ahmed [8] and Ismail [16] reported similar results. The earliest maturating genotypes Tagat 7A, it matured in 98.25 days. The early maturing genotype has a high potentiality to escape drought. Therefore, it is suitable to be grown in drought prone areas. The latest maturing genotypes was Tagat 10, it matured in 108.75 days. Hence, its maturity is dependent on moisture availability.
In grain filling period, Arose, Tagat 4, Gadamballia, Tagat 9A, Geshesh and Tagat 7A genotypes showed a short grain filling period in the field experiment (less than 17 days). These genotypes might escape drought via reducing their grain filling period. On the other hand, Tagat 20 and Tagat 7B recorded long grain filling period (25.00 and 24.25 days, respectively). Consequently, high100 grain weight would be expected.

3.2. Yield Attributes

Tagat 10, Tagat 14, Tagat 13, Tagat 19 and Tagat 7A genotypes showed the highest grain yield per plant (range between 17.0 and 23.0 g). While, the Aroselremal, Gadambalea and Tagat 15 were recorded the lowest estimate (5.0 -7.0 g).
7A genotypes scored the highest 100-grain weight (4.89 g). On the other hand, Tagat 9A scored the lowest estimate (1.81 g). This could be attributed to low grain filling period.
Tagat 9A Tagat 4 genotypes produced high estimates for number of grains per panicle in the field experiment. On the other hand, Tagat 10, Tagat 6A, Geshesh, Gadambalea, and Arose produced low estimates (between 155 and 176). The wide variation in the estimates of this trait among genotypes in field experiment could be attributed to the time of moisture stress onset since the genotypes differ in their flowering time [17].
The highest yields per square meter in the experiment were Tagat 13, Tagat 14. Tagat 4 and Tagat 7A (varied between 2.15 and 2.72 ton ha-1). In contrast, Tagat 15, Arose and Gadambalea were the lowest yield in the experiment (between 56 and 79 ton ha-1). Different genotypes under condition of severe drought decrease their yield in varying degree [18].
Tagat 9A genotype scored the highest harvest index in the field experiment. This genotype although it took only 71 days to reach 50% flowering date it produced the highest harvest index. High estimates of harvest index mean efficient metabolites conversion to the developing grains. This could be attributed to the nature of the genotype. On the other hand, the lowest estimates were recorded by Yourwasha in season field experiment. This findings was similar to that obtain by Blum et al. [19] who stated that late maturing genotypes of cereals have lower harvest index compared with early maturing ones.

4. Conclusions

The results revealed the presence of broad intra-specific variation among sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L. Moench) genotypes. This study proved that genotypes: Tagat 7B, Tagat 10, Tagat 13, Tagat 14 and Tagat 19 were the most high yielding over all genotypes studied. However these genotypes need further investigations in north kordofan environment.

References

[1]  El Naim, A. M., Mohammed, K E, Ibrahim EA, Suleiman, N. N. 2012. Impact of salinity on seed germination and early seedling growth on three sorghum (Sorghum Bicolor L. Moench) cultivar. Science and Technology, 2 (2), 16-20.
[2]  El Naim, A. M., Baldu, M. A. M., Zaied, M. M. B. 2012. Effect of Tillage Depth and Pattern on Growth and Yield of Grain Sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L. Moench) under Rain-fed. Journal of Novel Applied Sciences, 1(3), 68-73.
[3]  Ali, M. A., A. Abbas, S. I. Awan, K. Jabran and S. D. A. Gardezi 2011. Correlated response of various morpho-physiological characters with grain yield in sorghum landraces at different growth phases. The J. Anim. Plant Sci. 21(4), 671-679.
[4]  Ejeta, G. and J. E. Knoll (2007). Marker-assisted selection in sorghum In: Varshney, R.K. and R. Tuberosa (ed.) Genomic-assisted crop improvement: Vol.2: Genomics applications in crops pp.187-205.
[5]  Kebede, H., P. K. Subudhi, D. T. Rosenow and H. T. Nguyen 2001. Quantitative trait loci influencing drought tolerance in grain sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L. moench). Theor. Appl. Genet. 103: 266-276.
[6]  Kenga, R. Tenkouano, A. Gupta, S.C., Alabi, S.O. 2006. Genetic and phenotypic association between yield components in hybrid sorghum (sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench) populations. Institute of Agricultural Research for Development (IRAD), Box 33 Maroua, Cameroon.
[7]  Pawar, K.N. 2007. Department of Crop Physiology College of Agriculture, Dharwad. University of Agricultural Sciences, Dharwad-580005. Doctor of Philisophy in Crop physiology. September, 2007.
[8]  Ahmed. A. A. 2009. Effectiveness of Screening and Hardening Methods for Drought Resistance in Sorghum Genotypes (Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench) Evaluated under Arid Conditions. Ph.D. thesis. Faculty of Agriculture, University of Gezira.
[9]  El Naim, A. M.; Ibrahim, I M; Abdel Rahman, M E; Ibrahim E A (2012). Evaluation of Some Local Sorghum (Sorghum Bicolor L. Moench) Genotypes in Rain-Fed. International Journal of Plant Research (USA). 2(1): 15-20.
[10]  Karrar A. B. Abbadi. Ahmed, A. E. 2006. Brief Overview of Sudan Economy and Future Prospects for Agricultural Development. Khartoum Food Aid Forum 6-8 June, 2006.
[11]  Ismaeil, F M, Abusuwar, AO, El Naim, A. M. 2012. Influence of Chicken Manure on Growth and Yield of Forage Sorghum (Sorghum Bicolor L. Moench). International Journal of Agriculture and Forestry. 2 (2), 56-60.
[12]  Seetharama, N. 1986. Crop physiology and rabi sorghum productivity. Paper presented at 16th Annual workshop, AICSIP, Rajendranagar, Hyderabad May 14-16.
[13]  Abdel- Rahman, M. E. 1980. Evaluation of some sorghum genotypes for drought tolerance. M. Sc. Theses Dep. of Agron. Fac. Of Agric. U. of K, Sudan.
[14]  Abdauli, A. L. (2005). Morphological and Physiological Responses of Sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L. Moench) to Different Patterns of Drought, Ph. D. Theses. Institute of Plant Nutrition, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Bonn.
[15]  Emendwack, Y. Y. (2007). Drought performance of Millet (Panicum miliaceum) and sorghum [Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench]. Ph.D. Thesis, Faculty of Agriculture, Humboldt University, Berlin, Germany.
[16]  Ismail, M, I. (2012). Integrated Effect of Tillage and Manure on Sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L. Moench). Ph.D Thesis, Department of Soil Sciences and Water, Faculty of Natural Resources and Environmental Studies, University of Kordofan.
[17]  Blum, A., Ramaia, S, Kanemasu, E. T., Paulsen, G.M. 1990. Recovery of wheat from drought stress at the tillering developmental stage. Field Crops Res. 24, 67-85.
[18]  Maiti, 1996. In Arnold, O.Y. 1959. The determination and significance of base temperature in a linear heat system. Proc. Am. Hortic. Sci. 74, 430-455.
[19]  Blum, A. Golan, G.; Mayer; Sinmena, B.; Obilanma, T. 1992. The comparative productivity and drought response of semitropical hybrids and open-pollinated varieties of sorghum. J. Agric. Sci. Camb. 118, 29-3.
[20]  MAF. 2010. Ministry of agriculture and forestry, Department of Agric Statistics. Retrieved on 1/11/1013 from www.nife.org/uploods%5cdownload%5cproductivity_%202010. doc.