International Journal of Agriculture and Forestry

p-ISSN: 2165-882X    e-ISSN: 2165-8846

2014;  4(5): 408-413

doi:10.5923/j.ijaf.20140405.10

Association of Xanthomonas sp. with Apple Trunk Canker Disease in an Apple Orchard from Iran

Nadjmieh Shaki1, Nader Hasanzadeh1, Mansoureh Keshavarsi2, Eisa Nazerian3

1Department of Plant Pathology, Faculty of Agriculture and Natural Resources, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran

2Seed and Plant Improvement Institute, Karaj, Iran

3Plant Protection Department, National Research Station of Ornamental Plants, Mahallat, Iran

Correspondence to: Nadjmieh Shaki, Department of Plant Pathology, Faculty of Agriculture and Natural Resources, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.

Email:

Copyright © 2014 Scientific & Academic Publishing. All Rights Reserved.

Abstract

During a survey of fruit orchards in northern part of Iran, some apple trees with trunk canker symptoms were observed. The infected trees lacked any visible symptoms on leaves and fruits. On NA and YDC media a Gram-negative, yellow-pigmented bacteria were consistently isolated. Based on pathogenicity, biochemical and molecular tests and fatty acid analysis, the bacterial agent was identified as Xanthomonas sp. The isolates were pathogenic on apple cv. prime gold detached leaves in laboratory conditions and in one-year old seedlings of cv. golden delicious in glasshouse condition. A typical canker symptoms were observed in apple trunks after seven months from artificial inoculation and the agent was re-isolated and Koch's hypothesis were fulfilled. DNA sequences were matched with Xanthomonas sp. sequence deposited in to NCBI GenBank. The bacterium could only survive and infect in high relative humidity and at temperature ranging 26-28°C. This is the first report of naturally occurring Xanthomonas sp. from apple canker disease symptoms.

Keywords: Trunk canker, Apple, Xanthomonas sp

Cite this paper: Nadjmieh Shaki, Nader Hasanzadeh, Mansoureh Keshavarsi, Eisa Nazerian, Association of Xanthomonas sp. with Apple Trunk Canker Disease in an Apple Orchard from Iran, International Journal of Agriculture and Forestry, Vol. 4 No. 5, 2014, pp. 408-413. doi: 10.5923/j.ijaf.20140405.10.

1. Introduction

Apple (Malus domestica Borkh) is the third horticulture products in Iran, accounting 1662430 tons fruit product per year. Also, Iran is the 8th apple producer in the world (FAOSTAT, 2010). Many common bacterial diseases such as fire blight, blister spot, crown gall and hairy roothave been reported on apple worldwide (Vanneste, 2000 and Bradley et al., 2010) but natural association of apple trunk canker with Xanthomonas sp. has not been yet reported. Only a rare occurrence of an unusual Xanthomonas campestris strain with apple was observed on symptomatically apple tissue in vitro (Mass et al., 1985).
Xanthomonas is a genus of Gammaproteobacteria that includes numerous phytopathogenic species, each characterized by a narrow host range. However, as a whole, the genus members are able to infect a broad range of plants, distributed over 124 monocotyledonous and 268 dicotyledonous plant species (Albuquerque et al., 2011). Some of the Xanthomonads could cause severe damage on economically important crops. Most of these pathogens have a well-defined and narrow plant host range (Maes, 1993). The genus also includes strains which may be associated with plant material but are not pathogenic (Brenner et al., 2005).
In this study, bacterial isolates associated with natural trunk cankers on apples were isolated and investigated using some standard techniques.

2. Material and Methods

2.1. Isolation and Preliminary Characterization of Bacterial Isolates

During spring and summer 2010, an orchard located in the northern part of Iran was surveyed and about 30 canker samples on local apple cultivars were collected. Small pieces of trunk and branches were cut and immersed in 5 ml saline solution (0.80% NaCl) for 20 min and 30µl of suspension was cultured on nutrient agar (NA) and incubated at 26°C for 3-5 days. Yellow pigment colonies were purified and subjected to key physiological and biochemical tests including gram reaction (Suslow et al., 1982), fluorescent pigment production (King et al., 1954), growth at 25°C, 27°C and 37°C, oxidase (Kovacs, 1956), catalase (Bradbury, 1986), Oxidative ⁄ Fermentative (O/F) (Hugh and Leifson, 1953), levan production from sucrose (Lelliott and Stead, 1987), gelatin and starch hydrolyses (Fahy and Persley, 1983), nitrate reduction, production of arginine dihydrolase, ability to produce acid from carbohydrates (arabinose, glucose and mannose), growth in presence of 5% NaCl, proteolytic, lipolytic and amylolytic capability, aesculin hydrolysis (Schaad et al., 2001), Xanthomonadin production (Starr et al., 1981) and viscosity test (Klement, 1990) and all key biochemical tests were done in dual cultures (Gracelin et al., 2012). A dendrogram based on these results was constructed using the NTSYS-pc.

2.2. Hypersensitive Reaction (HR)

The bacterial suspensions were prepared from pure cultures on NA medium and their optical density was adjusted spectrophotometerically to 107 cfu /ml. Using a hypodermic syringe, each bacterial suspension was injected into fully expanded tobacco cv. White Burley and geranium cv. Pelargonium Xhontorum Bailey leaves and visible necrosis symptoms in the inoculated areas were recorded from 24-48 hours post inoculation (Fahy & Persley, 1983).

2.3. PCR Amplification and Sequencing of 16S rDNA

Bacterial DNAs of five strains of apple (Xn1, Xn2, Xn3, Xn4 and Xn6) and Xanthomonas campestris pv. vesicatoria (Xcv) were extracted by alkaline lysis method. Colonies on agar plates were suspended in 10 µl of lysis buffer (100 µl of 0.05 M NaOH was added to 10 μl of cell suspension and incubated at 95°C for 15 min). The bacterial suspensions were centrifuged for 2 min at 14,000 rpm. 1 µl from each culture supernatant was used for each PCR reaction. DNA segments were then amplified with reverse primer of 8/27 (5′-AGAGTTTGATCITGGCTCAG-3′) and forward primer of 461/477 (5′-AAGGATCGGGTATTAAC-3′) (Maes, 1993; Palacio-Bielsa et al., 2009) and the products were sequenced and compared with sequences available in the NCBI GenBank databases (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov).

2.4. Pathogenicity Tests

2.4.1. Detached Shoot Test
Young shoots of apple cv. prime gold were surface sterilized and inoculated with all 17 bacterial suspensions of Xanthomonas sp. and Xcv (as well as an authentic culture of X. vesicatoria). Each treatment was replicated three times. The inoculated shoots were kept standing in sterile water covered with polythene bags for 48 hours. All treated shoots were incubated in a growth chamber at 26°C for 7-10 days. The development of any visible symptoms were compared and recorded (Lelliott and Stead, 1987).
2.4.2. Greenhouse Test
The five strains of Xn1, Xn2, Xn3, Xn4 and Xn6 with potential pathogenic traits were chosen for this confirmatory test. The trunks of two-years-old seedlings of apple cv. Golden delicious in four replicates were inoculated with above-mentioned bacterial suspensions. The wounds were covered with moist cotton and a strip of parafilm for 48 hours. The treated seedlings were maintained in a greenhouse at 25-27°C and 95% relative humidity. The reaction of the seedlings was observed weekly for about 8 months (Santi et al., 2004).

2.5. Fatty Acid Analysis

Whole cell fatty acids were analyzed using GC-Mass (Massomo et al., 2003, Sasser, 2001 and Vauterin et al., 1996). Bacteria were streaked on tryptic soy broth agar and grown at 26°C for 48 h. A loopful of bacteria was added to a 13×100 mm screw-cap tube. One ml of reagent 1 (45g sodium hydroxide, 150 ml methanol in 150 ml distilled water) was added to each tube containing bacterial cells. The tubes were then securely sealed with teflon lined caps, vortexed briefly and heated in a boiling water bath for 5 minutes. This was repeated once more and heat treatment was completed in 30 minutes. The samples were cooled to room temperature and methylated with 2ml of reagent 2 (325ml 6.0M hydrochloric acid and 275 ml methyl alcohol, pH<1.5). The tubes were capped and heated for 10 ± 1minutes at 80°C and cooled to room temperature. Fatty acid methyl esters were extracted by adding 1.25ml of reagent 3 (200ml hexane and 200ml methyl tert-butyl ether) to the cooled tubes followed by recapping and gentle tumbling on a clinical rotator for 10 minutes. The aqueous (lower) phase was pipetted out and discarded. Samples were washed by mixing 3ml of the reagent 4 (10.8g sodium hydroxide dissolved in 900 ml distilled water). The organic top phase was taken into tubes, recapped and tumbled for 5 minutes. About 2/3 of the organic phase was pipette into a GC vial and capped for analysis. GC analyses were carried out using a Hewlett Packard (HP) series 6840 gas chromatograph, equipped with 30-m-long capillary column and a mass-selective detector (model HP 5973).

3. Result and Discussion

3.1. Isolation and Preliminary Characterization

In total 17 bacterial strains with small, yellow and mucoid colonies were isolated. Five strains (Xn1, Xn2, Xn3, Xn4 and Xn6) with typical morphological characteristics were further characterized by phenotypic and molecular methods. Results of the key biochemical tests were summarized in Table 1 and converted into dendrogram using NTSYS (Figure 1). All five isolates were shown a peak at 420-450 nm characteristic of xanthomonadin pigment.
Figure 1. UPGMA dendrogram showing the phenotypic similarities of 17 apple strains and isolate of X. vesicatoria (Xcv). Alomost all apple strains (Xn1-4 and Xn5-8) plus Xcv were located in cluster 1
Table 1. Physiological and Biochemical Characteristics of Five Apple Isolates Compared with Authentic Culture X. vesicatoria (Xcv)
     

3.2. Determination of the 16S rDNA gene Sequences

All 5 Xanthomonas strains including Xcv produced a single sharp 480-bp fragment (Figure 2). This result was coincided with initial PCR results (Maes, 1993) and also in accordance with known phenotypic characteristics of Xanthomonads.
The phylogenetic affiliation of the five strains were also determined. Sequence analysis of strains were indicating these were belonged to the genus Xanthomonas. 16S rDNA gene sequence of the isolate Xn1 has been deposited to GenBank with accession number of JF920121.
Figure 2. A PCR amplification product of 480bp specific for five strains of Xanthomonas sp. and isolate Xcv(X. vesicatoria). Lane 1-5 from left were belonged to strains Xn1, Xn2, xn3, Xn4, Xn6, Xcv. Molecular weight mark at right side of the gel is 100 bp ladder (Gene Ruler 100 bp plus DNA ladder)

3.3. The Hypersensitive Reaction

Typical necrosis was developed in inoculated sites of geranium but not on tobacco leaves 48 h after inoculation (Figure 3).
Figure 3. Positive hypersensitive reaction symptoms on geranium (left) but not on tobacco leaves (right)

3.4. Pathogenicity Tests

Wilting and dieback symptoms were observed within 7 days on treated young detached apple shoots. In greenhouse assay the treated seedlings undergone gradual bark discoloration and wilted in eight-month period. The control seedlings were remained healthy (Figure 4).
Figure 4. Wilting of detached apple shoot (left) and bark discoloration and wilting of entire seedling (right) in greenhouse condition
Considering this fact, different pathogenicity tests were carried out and some direct and intermediate virulence reactions were recorded. As mentioned earlier, hypersensitive test on tobacco plants was negative for all strains but on geranium these were induced typical HR. All 5 strains (Xn1, Xn2, xn3, Xn4, Xn6) produced large lesions followed by dieback symptoms when the base of leafy young shoots were plunged into water. But this was not fulfilled with vacuum in filtration method using cut-leaf apples controlled growing conditions of temperature, light and humidity (Barker, 2002). When the trunks of apple seedlings cv. Golden delicious were injected with turbid suspensions of the strains an elongated brown bark discoloration was appeared at the end of third season. This latent symptom development did not alter population density of the bacterium when interval samplings were made. This is an agreement with this statement of Santi et al., 2004 that the canker agents need to have an incubation period on the host for the disease.

3.5. Fatty Acid Analysis

No satisfactory result was obtained from fatty acid analysis. However, few fatty acids characteristic of the genus Xanthomonas were detected in two tested strains. Composition of fatty acids for representative apple strain (Xn1) was 10:0, 15:0, 16:1 9cis, 16:1 anteiso, 18:0 and 18:1 9cis. This was 14:1, 15: 0, 14: 0, 16:1 9cis, 16:1 anteiso and 24:0 for authentic culture of Xcv.

4. Conclusions

Based on certain criteria such as biochemical tests, xanthomonadin and fatty acid analysis and a molecular method, the five representative strains of a plant-associated xanthomonad were tentatively identified as Xanthomonas sp. Blast analysis with the sequences of strain Xn1 confirmed that this novel bacterium was belonged to the Xanthomonas group of the γ-Proteobacteria with highest similarity 98% with the genus Xanthomonas. No significant differences could be found among the strains of the cluster 1 accommodating all five pathogenic strains of Xanthomonas sp.
To the best of our knowledge no pathogenic Xanthomonas sp. has been yet reported on apple trees under natural field condition. The only record in this area is the association of unusual strain of X. campestris with damaged apple explants in tissue culture materials (Mass et al., 1985). In the latter, they failed to find any relationship between Xanthomonas campestris and apple host plants and all their attempts to fulfill the pathogenicity tests on plants such as tomato, tobacco, cassava, peach and grape were disappointed. In fact only a limited number of plant pathogenic bacteria were found causing diseases on apple trees (Bradley et al., 2010).
Results of pathogenicity tests and variation in symptom developments were indicated that this novel bacterium is capable to survive, multiply and infect apple trunk in natural condition for a prolonged periods of time. But neither of strains could survive on leaf/bud surfaces.
The techniques used for characterization of this bacterium did not precisely identify the isolates at species level. To achieve this, more confirmatory screening tests particularly more molecular methods, fatty acid profiles and cultivar reactions to single/mixed cultures of the isolates were required.

References

[1]  Albuquerque, P., Caridade, C. M. R., Marcal, A. R. S., Cruz, J., Cruz, L., Santos, C. L., Mendes, M. V., and Tavares, F. 2011. Identification of Xanthomonas fragariae, Xanthomonas axonopodis pv. phaseoli, and Xanthomonas fuscans subsp. fuscans with novel markers and using a Dot Blot Platform Coupled with automatic data analysis. Applied and environmental microbiology. 77 (16). 5619-5628.
[2]  Barker, A. 2002. Method for inoculating rice with Xanthomonas. Plant Pathology Laboratory Iowa State University. 11 pp.
[3]  Bradbury, J. F. 1986. Guide to Plant Pathogenic Bacteria. CAB, International, Farnham House, Farnham Royal, UK, 332 p.
[4]  Bradley, F. M., Ellis, B. W., and Martin, D. L. (eds). 2010. The Organic Gardener's Handbook of Natural Pest and Disease Control: A Complete Guide to Maintaining a Healthy Garden and Yard the Earth-Friendly Way. Rodale Press. 416 pp.
[5]  Don, J., Brenner, N. R., Krieg, J. T., Staley and Garrity, G. M. (Eds.). 2005. Bergey's Manual of Systematic Bacteriology: Volume 2: The Proteobacteria, Part B: The Gammaproteobacteria. 2nd edition. Springer-Verlag. 1136 pages.
[6]  Bull, C. T., De Boer, S. H., Denny, T. P., Firrao, G., Fischer-Le Saux, M., Saddler, G. S., Scortichini, M., Stead, D. E., and Takikawa, Y. 2010. Letter to the Editor: Comprehensive List OF Names OF Plant Pathogenic Bacteria, 1980-2007. Journal of Plant Pathology. 92 (3). 551-592.
[7]  Changa, J. S., Choua, C. L., Linb, G. H., Sheu, S. Y., Chen, W. M. Pseudoxanthomonas kaohsiungensis, sp. nov., a novel bacterium isolated from oil-polluted site produces extracellular surface activity. Systematic and Applied Microbiology. 28. 137–144.
[8]  Christakis, G. B., Perlorentzou, S. P., Chalkiopoulou, I., Athanasiou, A., Legakis, N. J. 2005. Chryseobacterium indologenes non-catheterrelated bacteria in a patient with a solid tumor. Journal Clin. Microbiology. 43. 2021–2023.
[9]  Fahy, P. C., Persley, G. J. 1983. Plant Bacterial Disease. A Diagnostic Guide. Sydney, NSW, Australia, Academic Press. 393 pp.
[10]  Figen Donmez, M., Karlidag, H., Esitken, A. 2009. Identification of resistance to bacterial canker (Pseudomonas syringae pv. syringae) disease on apricot genotypes grown in Turkey. European Journal Plant Pathology. DOI 10.1007/s10658-009-9536-x.
[11]  Giblot, D., Marefat, A., Gillings, M. R., Parkinson, N. M., Bowman, J. P., Ophel-Keller, K., Facelli, C., Scott, E. S. 2009. Proposal of Xanthomonas translucens pv. pistaciae pv. nov., pathogenic to pistachio (Pistacia vera). Systematic and Applied Microbiology. 32. 549–557.
[12]  Gracelin, D. H., Britto, A. J., and Pathna Kumar, P. B. 2012. Detection and identification of Xanthomonas campestris pv. centellae on leaves of Centella asiatica collected in Tamil Nadu. Asian Journal of Pharmaceutical and Clinical Research. 5. 111-113.
[13]  Hugh. R. and Leifson, E. 1953. The taxonomic significance of fermentative versus oxidative metabolism of carbohydrates by various Gram-negative bacteria. Journal of Bacteriology. 80. 24-26.
[14]  Hu, X-F., Ying, F-X., He, Y-B. 2008. Characterization of Pectobacterium carotovorum sub.sp. carotovorum causing soft-rot disease on Pinellia ternate in China. European Journal Plant Pathology. 120. 305–310.
[15]  King, E. O., Ward, M. K., Raney, D. E. 1954. Two simple media for the demonstration of pyocyanin and fluorescein. Journal Laboratory and Clinical Medicine. 44. 301– 307.
[16]  Klement, Z., Rudolph, K., and Sands, D. C. 1990. Methods in Phytobacteriology. Akadémiai Kiaďo, Budapest. 563 pages.
[17]  Kovacs N. 1956. Identification of Pseudomonas pyocyanea by the oxidase reaction. Nature. 178. 703.
[18]  Leite, J. R., Rui.,Minsavage, Gerald V., Bonas, U., Stall, Robert E. 1994. Detection and identification of phytopathogenic Xanthomonas strains by amplification of DNA sequences related to the hrp genes of Xanthomonas campestris pv. vesicatoria. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 60. 1068-1077.
[19]  Lelliott, R. A, Stead, D. E. 1987. Methods for the Diagnosis of Bacterial Diseases of Plants. Blackwell. 216 pp.
[20]  Mass, J. M., Finney, M. M., Civerolo, E. L., and Sasser, M. 1985. Association of an unusual strain of Xanthomonas campestris with apple. Phytopathology. 73. 438-445.
[21]  Maes, M. 1993. Fast classification of plant-associated bacteria in the Xanthomonas genus. Federation of European Microbiological Societies Microbiology Letters 113. 161-166.
[22]  Massomo, S. M. S., Nielsen, H., Mabagala, R. B., Mansfeld-Giese, K., Hukenhull, J., and Mortensen, C. N. 2003. Identification and characterisation of Xanthomonas campestris pv. campestris strains from Tanzania by pathogenicity tests, Biolog, rep-PCR and fatty acid methyl ester analysis. European Journal of Plant Pathology. 109. 775-789.
[23]  Mikicinski, A., Sobiczewski, P., Sulikowska, M., PuŁawska, J. and Treder, J. 2009. Pectolyticbacteria associated with soft rot of Calla Lily (Zantedeschia spp.) tubers. Journal of Phytopathology. 158 (4). 201-209.
[24]  Palacio-Bielsa, A., Cambra, M. A., Lopez, M. M. 2009. PCR detection and identification of plant-pathogenic bacteria: updated review of protocols (1989-2007). Journal of Plant Pathology. 91 (2): 249-297.
[25]  Santi, F., Russell, K., Menard, M., Dufourd, J. 2004. Screening wild cherry (Prunus avium) for resistance to bacterial canker by laboratory and field tests. Forest Pathology. 34 (6). 349-362.
[26]  Sasser, M. J. 2001. Identification of bacteria by gas chromatography of cellular fatty acids. Technical note#101 MIDI, 115 Barksdale Professional Center, New York. DE 19711.
[27]  Schaad, N.W., Jones, J. B. and Chun, W. 2001. Laboratory Guide for Identification of Plant Pathogenic Bacteria. Third Edition. APS Press. 373 pp.
[28]  Schaad, N. W. 1998. Laboratory Guide for Identification of Plant Pathogenic Bacteria Second Edition. APS Press. 158 pp.
[29]  Starr, M. P., Stolp, H., Trüper, H. G., Balows, A., and Schlegel, H. G. (Eds.). 1981. The Prokaryotes: A HandBook on Habitats, Isolation, and Identification of Bacteria. Berlin, Germany: Springer Verlag.
[30]  Suslow, T. V., Schroth M. N., Isaka, M. 1982. Application of a rapid method for gram differentiation of plant pathogenic and saprophytic bacteria without staining. Phytopathology. 72. 917–918.
[31]  Vauterin, L., Yang, P., Swings, J. 1996. Utilization of Fatty acid methyl esters for the differentiation of new Xanthomonas species. International Journal of Systematic Bacteriology. 46. 298-304.
[32]  Young, J. M. 2008. An overview of bacterial nomenclature with special reference to plant pathogens. Systematic and Applied Microbiology. 31. 405-424.