International Journal of Agriculture and Forestry
p-ISSN: 2165-882X e-ISSN: 2165-8846
2012; 2(4): 150-156
doi: 10.5923/j.ijaf.20120204.03
Anupama Chembath 1, Balasundaran M 1, Sujanapal P 2
1Forest Genetics and Biotechnology Division, Kerala Forest Research Institute, Peechi, Thrissur, Kerala, 680653, India
2Sustainable Forest Management Division, Kerala Forest Research Institute, Peechi, Thrissur, Kerala, 680653, India
Correspondence to: Balasundaran M , Forest Genetics and Biotechnology Division, Kerala Forest Research Institute, Peechi, Thrissur, Kerala, 680653, India.
Email: |
Copyright © 2012 Scientific & Academic Publishing. All Rights Reserved.
The East Indian sandalwood, Santalum album, valued for its fragrant oil yielding heartwood is a major ingredient in indigenous medicines and perfumes. Scarcity of sandal has led to illegal felling of sandal trees, and adulteration of sandalwood and oil. This study represents the first molecular phylogeny of S. album and its adulterant species Osyris wightiana, Erythroxylum monogynum, Buxus sempervirens, Ximenia americana, Osyris lanceolata, and Chukrasia tabularis through 18S and 26S rDNA sequencing. In the Maximum Parsimony (MP) tree for 18S and 26S rDNA data sets, moderate to high bootstrap support was obtained for the nodes. For 18S rDNA data sets, the tree had B. sempervirens and X. Americana as the upper branch, with E. monogynum branched separately to the cluster. The lower branch had S. album and O. wightiana with O. lanceolata joining separately to both clades of the tree. In the MP tree for 26S rDNA datasets, S. album and O. wightiana formed the major cluster with X. americana clustering separate and B. sempervirens and O. wightiana as the lower branch with C. tabularis clustering separate to the tree. The molecular data presented here provided useful information for resolving the phylogenetic relationship of these plants. Inferences from this study are in accordance with Cronquist’s system of classification of flowering plants where all the species originate from a single phylogenetic tree of Rosidae.
Keywords: Santalum Album, Adulterants, Gene Sequencing, Sequence Comparison, Molecular Phylogeny
|
|
Figure 1. Bootstrap consensus tree (MP) of 18S rDNA dataset. Numbers above nodes are bootstrap percentages (1000 replicates) |
Figure 2. Bootstrap consensus tree (MP) of 26S rDNA dataset. Numbers above nodes are bootstrap percentages (1000 replicates) |
|
[1] | Sanjaya, Ananthapadmanabha H S, Ravishankar Rai, V, “In vitro shoot multiplication from the mature tree of Santalum album L.” in Sandal and Its Products, ACIAR Proceedings No. 84. ACIAR, Canberra, Australia, pp. 60-65, 1998. |
[2] | IUCN., IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2009.1, www.iucnredlist.org, 2009. |
[3] | Rao R V, Hemavathi T R, Sujatha M, Chauhan L, Raturi R, “Stemwood and rootwood anatomy of Santalum album L. and the problem of wood adulteration”, in Sandal and Its Products, ACIAR Proceedings No. 84. ACIAR, Canberra, Australia, pp. 93-102, 1998. |
[4] | Sasidharan N, “Study on the flora of Chinnar Wildlife Sanctury”, KFRI Research Report No. 167. Kerala Forest Research Institute, Peechi, Trichur, Kerala, India, pp. 24-62, 1999. |
[5] | Mathew K M, “Materials for a flora of the Tamil Nadu Carnatic”, The Ranipet Herbarium, St. Joseph’s college, Tiruchirapalli, India, pp. 326, 1981. |
[6] | Pullaiah T, Prabhakar C, Raviprasad R B, http://www.ars-grin.gov/cgi-bin/npgs/html/taxon.pl?414291, 1998. |
[7] | Gilman E F, “Buxus sempervirens - Fact Sheet FPS-80”, Environmental Horticulture Department, Florida Cooperative Extension Service, Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, University of Florida, http://edis.ifas.ufl.edu, 1999. |
[8] | Adewunmi C O, Sofowora E A, “Preliminary screening of some plants extracts for molluscicidal activity”, Planta Medica, vol.39, pp. 57-65, 1980. |
[9] | Mabberley D J, Pannell C M, Sing A M, http://www.hear.org/Pier/species/chukrasia_tabularis.htm, 1995. |
[10] | Nickrent D L, Malécot V, “A Molecular Phylogeny of Santalales”, in Fer A, Thalouarn P, Joel D M, Musselman L J, Parker C, Verkleij J A C, eds. Proceedings of the 7th International Parasitic Weed Symposium, Nantes, France, pp. 69-74, 2001. |
[11] | Nickrent D L, Franchina C R, “Phylogenetic relationships of the Santalales and relatives”, Journal of Molecular Evolution., vol 31, pp. 294-301, 1990. |
[12] | Soltis D E, Soltis P S, Nickrent D L, Johnson L A, Hahn W J, Hoot S B, Sweere J A, Kuzoff R K, Kron K A, Chase M W, Swensen S M, Zimmer E A, Chaw S. M, Gillespie L J, Kress W J, Sytsma K J, “Angiosperm phylogeny inferred from 18S ribosomal DNA sequences”,Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden, vol 84,pp. 1–49, 1997. |
[13] | Kuzoff R K, Sweere J A, Soltis D E, Soltis P S, Zimmer E A, “The phylogenetic potential of entire 26S rDNA sequences in plants”, Molecular Biology and Evolution, vol 15, pp. 251–263, 1998. |
[14] | Anupama C, Balasundaran M, “Molecular detection of sandalwood adulteration”, in Conservation, Improvement, Cultivation and Management of sandal (Santalum album L.), Proceedings of National seminar, Institute of Wood Science and Technology (ICFRE), Bangalore, pp. 172-178, 2008. |
[15] | Tamura K, Dudley J, Nei M, Kumar S, “MEGA4: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis (MEGA) software version 4.0”, Molecular Biology and Evolution, vol 24, pp.1596-1599, 2007. |
[16] | Eck RV, Dayhoff M O, “Atlas of Protein Sequence and Structure”, National Biomedical Research Foundation, Silver Springs, Maryland, USA, 1966. |
[17] | Nei M, Kumar S, “Molecular Evolution and Phylogenetics”, Oxford University Press, New York, pp. 333, 2000. |
[18] | Tajima F, “Simple methods for testing molecular clock hypothesis”, Genetics, vol 135, pp.599-607, 1993. |
[19] | Felsenstein J, “Confidence limits on phylogenies: An approach using the bootstrap”, Evolution, vol 39, pp. 783-791, 1985. |
[20] | Bentham G, Hooker J D, “Genera Plantarum” L. Reeve and Co, London, 1862-1883. |
[21] | Brummitt KR, Powell C E, “Authors of Plant Names”, Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, 1992. |
[22] | Takhtajan A, “Diversity and Classification of Flowering Plants”, Columbia University Press, New York, pp. 643, 1997. |
[23] | Kuijt J, “Mutual affinities of Santalalean families”, Brittonia, vol 20, pp.136– 147, 1968. |
[24] | Der P J, Nickrent D L, “A molecular phylogeny of Santalaceae (Santalales)”, Systematic Botany, vol 33, pp. 107-116, 2008. |
[25] | Kim S, Soltis D E, Soltis P S, Zanis M J, Suh Y, “Phylogenetic relationships among early-diverging eudicots based on four genes: were the eudicots ancestrally woody?”,Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, vol 31, pp.16–30, 2004. |
[26] | Nickrent D L, Malecot V, Vidal-Russell R, Der P J, “A revised classification of Santalales”, Taxon, vol 59(2), pp. 538-558, 2010. |
[27] | Soltis D E, Smith S A, Cellinese N, Wurdack K J, Tank D C, Brockington S F, Rrfulio-Rodriguez, Walker J B, Moore M J, Carlsward B S, Bell C D, Latvis M, Crawley S, Black C, Diouf D, Xi Z, Rushworth C A, Gitzendanner M A, Sytsma K J, Qiu Y L, Hilu K W, Davis C C, Sanderson M J, Beaman R S, Olmstead R G, Judd W S, Donoghue M J, Soltis P S, “Angiosperm phylogeny: 17 Genes, 640 Taxa”, American Journal of Botany, vol 98(4), pp.704-730, 2011. |
[28] | Qiu Y L, Li L, Wang B, Xue J Y, Hendry T A, Li R Q, Brown J W, Liu Y, Hudson G T, Chen Z D, “Angiosperm phylogeny inferred from sequences of four mitochondrial genes”, Journal of systematics and evolution, vol 48(6), pp.391-425, 2010. |
[29] | Barniske A M, Borsch T, Muller K, Krug M, Worberg A, Neinhuis C, Quandt D, “Phylogenetics of early branching eudicots: Comparing phylogenetic signal across plastid introns, spacers, and genes”, Journal of systematics and evolution, vol 50(2), pp. 85-108, 2012. |
[30] | Moore M J, Soltis P S, Bell C D, Burleigh J G, Soltis D E, “Phylogenetic analysis of 83 plastid genes further resolves the early diversification of eudicots”, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol 107(10), pp 4623-4628, 2010. |
[31] | Cronquist A, “The Evolution and Classification of Flowering Plants” (Second edition), The New York Botanical Garden, New York, p. 643, 1988. |