Geosciences
p-ISSN: 2163-1697 e-ISSN: 2163-1719
2017; 7(2): 68-76
doi:10.5923/j.geo.20170702.03

1Udairampur Pallisree Sikshayatan (H.S.), Udairampur, P.O. Kanyanagar, Pin, India
2Department of Applied Mathematics, University of Calcutta, Calcutta, India
Correspondence to: Asish Karmakar, Udairampur Pallisree Sikshayatan (H.S.), Udairampur, P.O. Kanyanagar, Pin, India.
| Email: | ![]() |
Copyright © 2017 Scientific & Academic Publishing. All Rights Reserved.
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY).
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Modeling of earthquake processes is one of the main concern in the theoretical seismology. In most of the theoretical models, which incorporate the main features of lithosphere-asthenosphere system in seismically active regions, the medium is taken to be either single or a two layered half-space, elastic or viscoelastic. But the lithosphere-asthenosphere system has many inhomogeneties with respect to their elastic properties. In view of this we consider a medium which consist of two homogeneous elastic layers overlying an elastic half-space. A buried, vertical, long, strike-slip fault is considered in the second layer. The layers and the half-space are assumed to be in welded contact. The solutions for strains and stresses, are obtained for the first layer and second layer using suitable mathematical techniques such as Green’s functions, Correspondence principle. Numerical calculations has been done by MATLAB.
Keywords: Strike-slip fault, Green’s functions, Elastic layers, Lithosphere-asthenosphere system
Cite this paper: Asish Karmakar, Sanjay Sen, A Slipping and Buried Strike-Slip Fault in a Multi-Layered Elastic Model, Geosciences, Vol. 7 No. 2, 2017, pp. 68-76. doi: 10.5923/j.geo.20170702.03.
and second layer and half-space as
We consider a buried vertical strike-slip fault situated in the second layer and the length of the fault is very large compare to its width
The depth of the upper edge of the fault below the boundary of two layers is
and upper and lower edges of the fault are horizontal. We introduce a rectangular Cartesian co-ordinate system
with the plane free surface as the plane
is taken vertically downwards in the medium,
is taken along the strike of the fault on the free surface.The boundaries between two layers and second layers and half-space are given by
respectively. For convenience of analysis we introduce another set of Cartesian co-ordinate system
with the upper edge of the fault is taken as
and the plane of the fault is taken as the plane
so that the fault is given by
. The relations between two co-ordinate system are given by![]() | (1) |
and
respectively. The Figure 1 shows the section of the theoretical model by the plane
It is assumed that the length of the faults are large compared to their depths. So the displacements, stresses and strains are independent of
and depend only on
Then the components of displacement, stress and strain can be divided into two groups, one associated with strike-slip movement and another associated with dip-slip movement of the fault. Since in this model the strike-slip movement of the fault is considered, then the displacement, stress and strain components associated with long strike-slip fault for two layers and half-space are 
and
respectively.![]() | Figure 1. Section of the model by the plane ![]() |
![]() | (2) |
is the rigidity of the first elastic layer.For the second elastic layer, the stress-strain relation can be written in the following form:![]() | (3) |
is the rigidity of the second elastic layer.For half-space, the stress-strain relation can be written in the following form:![]() | (4) |
are rigidity of the half-space.The rigidities
of the elastic layers and half-space are assumed to be constant. ![]() | (5) |

![]() | (6) |

![]() | (7) |
From equation (2)-(7) we get![]() | (8) |
![]() | (9) |
![]() | (10) |
![]() | (11) |
are the values of
at time
and they satisfy all the relations stated above.![]() | (12) |
![]() | (13) |
![]() | (14) |
where
are the values of
at time
In the medium of lithosphere-asthenosphere the layers and half-space are in welded contact, same
has been taken for each layer and half-space, since strains are continuous at the boundaries of layers. From the major earthquakes it has been observed that the stresses release may be of the order of 400 bars. Keeping this in view, if we take
to be linearly increasing function of time t with
If we take
then the value of
should be of the order of 
![]() | (15) |
![]() | (16) |
![]() | (17) |
the accumulated stress will be released to some extent and the fault becomes locked again when the shear stress near the fault has sufficiently been released. The disturbance generated due to this sudden slip across the fault
will gradually die out within a short span of time. During this short period, the inertia terms can not be neglected, so that our basic equations are no longer valid. We leave out this short span of time from our consideration and consider the model afresh from a suitable instant when the aseismic state re-established in the model. We determine the displacements, stresses and strains after the fault movement with respect to new time origin
So that all the equations (2)-(14) are also valid.The sudden movement across
is characterized by the discontinuity of
across
is defined as![]() | (18) |
and
is a continuous function of
and U is constant, independent of
and
. All the other components
are continuous everywhere in the medium.We try to obtain the displacements stresses for
(with respect to new time origin) due to the movement across F in the following form:![]() | (19) |
satisfy all the equations (2)-(14) and continuous throughout the medium. While
satisfy all the relations (2)-(11) and also the dislocation condition (18) together with![]() | (20) |
are given by ![]() | (21) |
![]() | (22) |
![]() | (23) |
are the values of
respectively at
(i.e. new time origin).Now to solve the boundary value problem containing
we use Green’s function technique developed by Maruyama [15] and Rybicki [2, 3] as explained in Appendix. The required solutions are obtained as![]() | (24) |
![]() | (25) |
![]() | (26) |
and analytical form of
are given in Appendix.It is found that the displacements, stresses and strains will be finite and single valued any where in the model if the following conditions are satisfied(i)
and
are both continuous functions of
(ii) f(0) = 0, f(l) = 0 and
(iii) Either
is continuous in
or
is continuous in
except for a finite number of points of finite discontinuity in
is continuous in
except possibly for a finite number of points of finite discontinuity and for the end points of (0, l), there exist real constant m, n both < 1 such that
or a finite limit as
and
or to a finite limit as 

is the width of the fault 
. from free surface, representing the upper part of the lithosphere and upper part of the asrhenosphere.
We take
,
U = 40 cm, is the slip across F and for the function.It is assumed that due to some tectonic reason there is a slow but steady accumulation of shear strain at a distance far away from the fault. Keeping this in view we take g(t) to be linearly increasing with time and g(0) = 0. With this assumption, we take g(t) = kt. From major earthquakes it has been observed that the stress release may be of the order of 400 bars. So we assume
noting also that the observed rate of strain accumulation in seismically active regions during the aseismic period is of the order of
to
per year.The values of model parameters are taken from the book of Aki [16], Cathles [17], Bullen and Bolt [18] and research papers by Clift [19], Karato [20]. We now compute the following quantities(i)
The residual/ additional surface shear strain due to fault slip near the fault after restoration of aseismic state
(ii)
Change in shear stress in the first layer due to fault movement.
(ii)
Change in shear stress in the second layer due to fault movement.
The change in surface shear strain with
near fault after restoration of aseismic state is shown in Figure 2. The figure shows that the fault movement leads to release of the surface shear strain and the effect is symmetrical about the fault trace. The magnitude of this shear strain release is maximum near fault trace and then falls off rapidly as we move away from the fault and become very small for large value of 
![]() | Figure 2. Surface shear strain due to fault movement |
![]() | Figure 3. Contour map of shear stress in the first layer |
![]() | Figure 4. Contour map of shear stress in the second layer |
with new time origin after restoration of aseismic state followed by a sudden movement have been found in the form given by (19) where
are given by (21)-(23) and
satisfy (2)-(11), (18) and (20). This boundary value problem involving
can be solved by using modified Green’s function technique developed by Maruyama [15] and Rybicki [3] and correspondence principle. According to them we get,![]() | (A1) |
![]() | (A2) |
![]() | (A3) |
are the field points in the first layer, second layer and half-space respectively and
is any point on the fault F and
is the magnitude of discontinuity of
across the fault F. According to Rybicki [3], the values of 
are given below![]() | (A4) |
![]() | (A5) |
![]() | (A6) |
![]() | (A7) |
![]() | (A8) |
![]() | (A9) |
![]() | (A10) |
![]() | (A11) |
Now![]() | (A12) |
Now second part of (A12)
Now![]() | (A13) |
where
and
Therefore using the result of (A13), we get![]() | (A16) |

(Mondal and Sen [14]) and we can express
as an infinite geometric series and neglecting the higher order term and we get from (A16)
Now we assume 
in the above expressions and putting this value in (A6) and after integration we get![]() | (A17) |
![]() | (A18) |
![]() | (A19) |
is a point on the fault F with respect to the origin O and
is any point on F with respect to the origin
and a change of co-ordinate system from
is connected by the following relations 
Then on the fault
and 
The discontinuity in
is
Then from (A1), (A2), (A3) we get![]() | (A20) |
![]() | (A21) |
![]() | (A22) |

Putting it in (A18), (A17), (A19) and we get the new form of 
Using these new form of
in (A20), (A21), (A22), we get the following results![]() | (A23) |
![]() | (A24) |
![]() | (A25) |
![]() | (A26) |
![]() | (A27) |
![]() | (A28) |
![]() | (A29) |
![]() | (A30) |
![]() | (A31) |
![]() | (A32) |
![]() | (A33) |
![]() | (A34) |
![]() | (A35) |
![]() | (A36) |
![]() | (A37) |
![]() | (A38) |
![]() | (A39) |
![]() | (A40) |
![]() | (A41) |