Frontiers in Science
p-ISSN: 2166-6083 e-ISSN: 2166-6113
2012; 2(6): 159-168
doi: 10.5923/j.fs.20120206.05
Wladimir Belayev
Center for Relativity and Astrophysics, 185 Box, 194358, Saint-Petersburg, Russia
Correspondence to: Wladimir Belayev, Center for Relativity and Astrophysics, 185 Box, 194358, Saint-Petersburg, Russia.
| Email: | ![]() |
Copyright © 2012 Scientific & Academic Publishing. All Rights Reserved.
A time-like geodesic motion in rotating 5D space is studied in framework of Kaluza-Klein theory and astrophysical applications are proposed. For example of such space-time in 4D spherical coordinates with the space-like fifth dimension a transition to the cylindrical frame is implemented. After this transformation a space is divided into two parts that is interpreted physically as pair of the universe and anti-universe. The rotation in 5D space-time exhibits itself in 4D as action of extra force, which reveals itself with observed radial motion of the material particle. Also it is considered similar (3+2)D space-time in which additional dimension is time-like and a motion of space is hyperbolic. For these space-times it is found geodesics with constant radius in 4D spherical coordinates and studied their small deviations in cylindrical frames. It is shown that model with space-like fifth coordinate conforms to the basic properties of the Pioneer-effect, namely, a) constant additional acceleration of apparatus on distance from 20 to 50 a.e., b) its increase from 5 to 20 a.e., c) observed absence of one in motion of planets.
Keywords: Time-Like Geodesics, Kaluza-Klein Theory, Pioneer-Effect
Cite this paper: Wladimir Belayev, "Central Field in Rotating Spherical Space in 5D", Frontiers in Science, Vol. 2 No. 6, 2012, pp. 159-168. doi: 10.5923/j.fs.20120206.05.
, where
are spherical space coordinates and
, where
is light velocity constant and
is time. Rotating space-time with space-like fifth dimension[25] is described by metric ![]() | (1) |
is continuously increasing and it is taken
. For the domain under review it is assumed ![]() | (2) |
is constant.Transition to five-dimensional cylindrical coordinates
for
is performed by transformation ![]() | (3) |
![]() | (4) |
are components of five-velocity vector and
are 5D Christoffel symbols of second kind. In spherical coordinates for metric (1) these equations, with ![]() | (5) |
![]() | (6) |
![]() | (7) |
![]() | (8) |
![]() | (9) |
![]() | (10) |
![]() | (11) |
![]() | (12) |
is
. We name corresponding solutions as a solution of type I with
and as a solution of type II with
.When particles move along geodesics, which are arcs of circle: ![]() | (13) |
![]() | (14) |
![]() | (15) |
is
.Change of passage of time is defined as relation between intervals of proper time
and coordinate time
.For geodesic of type I for solution (14) chosen
we have ![]() | (16) |
![]() | (17) |
![]() | (18) |
![]() | (19) |
![]() | (20) |
![]() | (21) |
![]() | (22) |
![]() | (23) |
![]() | (24) |
and
are found by differentiation of transformations (3) and will be![]() | (25) |
![]() | (26) |
(13)-(15) are rewritten in coordinate frame
as ![]() | (27) |
![]() | (28) |
![]() | (29) |
![]() | (30) |
they correspond with stationary in 4D particle.For motion in the neighborhood of point
with
geodesic equations are reduced to![]() | (31) |
![]() | (32) |
![]() | (33) |
![]() | (34) |
![]() | (35) |
![]() | (36) |
having hyperbolic motion is described by metric ![]() | (37) |
is assumed to be time-like and
is constant. This metric can be obtained from (1) for (2), (5) by substitution
and addition of (˘) in the notation of other coordinates.The geodesics equations for a particle motion along time-like path are ![]() | (38) |
![]() | (39) |
![]() | (40) |
![]() | (41) |
![]() | (42) |
![]() | (43) |
![]() | (44) |
corresponding five-velocity vectors have non-zero components ![]() | (45) |
![]() | (46) |
![]() | (47) |
![]() | (48) |
is realized by transformation ![]() | (49) |
![]() | (50) |
![]() | (51) |
![]() | (52) |
and addition of (˘) in the notation of other coordinates in (19).Geodesics equations for motion of particle having rest mass are written as![]() | (53) |
![]() | (54) |
![]() | (55) |
![]() | (56) |
![]() | (57) |
![]() | (58) |
![]() | (59) |
![]() | (60) |
![]() | (61) |
![]() | (62) |
with
local solution is found from reduced Eqs. (53)-(57), which turned out to ![]() | (63) |
![]() | (64) |
![]() | (65) |
![]() | (66) |
![]() | (67) |
![]() | (68) |
and
are coordinates and metrical tensor of 4D space-time,
and
are scalar and vector potential. Metrical coefficients and potentials are functions of
and y. Constant
equals 1 for time-like fifth coordinate y and -1, when it is space-like.In this form metrics (19) and (52) are represented by line-element of 4D space-time ![]() | (69) |
![]() | (70) |
.If 4D metric satisfies cylindrical conditions
ratio of electric charge to mass in 4D is written as![]() | (71) |
![]() | (72) |
and
is not identical[4], but value
also corresponds to
.For considering space-time after substituting components of the found five-velocity vectors of the type I (27) and (59) we obtain ![]() | (73) |
![]() | (74) |
![]() | (75) |
![]() | (76) |
from metric (1) is chosen so that its meaning is continuously increasing in intervals
for integer
. Since value
is inadmissible in cylindrical frame we must assume that function
has discontinuity on the endpoints of
, which prescribes singularity. It can be avoided if model of binary world consisting of the universe - anti-universe pair[26-28] is considered under the assumption that it possesses a large number of copies[29, 30], in which a physical laws are identical. In bulk a space-time half
put into accordance with packet of 4D anti-universes. With condition (5) the intervals
,
contain values of additional coordinate
. Rotation of one particle with transition to cylindrical coordinates should be interpreted as motion of particle and anti-particle through opposite packets of branes, which conforms to CPT-symmetry of the universe and anti-universe. Thus a birth of the pair particle-antiparticle is assumed to occur in points
, after which they move through opposite packets of branes and annihilate, when
.
cm s
at dictances 15-45 AU directed to the Sun[33]. We will analyze how much studying models of rotating space conform to this data. Motion of the spacecrafts and the planets will be considered in the frame of the Sun.For this analysis we must use geodesics of the type I because, as it was shown in Sec. 5, for geodesics with constant radial coordinate they correspond to the neutrally charged particles. Their proper time coincides with coordinate time for trajectories, which are the arcs of circle (16) or hyperbola (47). Also motion of light is assumed to correspond with equation (75), i.e. a light shift along the fifth coordinate is absent.In the Sun's gravity field motion of the particle with rest mass is described approximately by equations![]() | (77) |
is Schwarzschild-like force vector and left terms correspond to Eqs. (20)-(24) or (53)-(57). Denoting acceleration
we divide it into
, where vector
conforms in case
,
in the neighborhood of point
to equations ![]() | (78) |
![]() | (79) |
![]() | (80) |
![]() | (81) |
![]() | (82) |
correspond to Eqs. (31)-(33) or (63)-(65).By using analogy with motion of particle in central gravity field in 4D, we take
and
for
in spherical coordinates or
and
for
in hyperbolic coordinates as radial velocity and acceleration observed in 4D surface of five-dimensional space-time.
Eqs. (31)-(33) correspond to system (6)-(10) reduced to ![]() | (83) |
![]() | (84) |
![]() | (85) |
![]() | (86) |
![]() | (87) |
![]() | (88) |
are functions of coordinates. Substitution of
in (83)-(85) yields ![]() | (89) |
![]() | (90) |
![]() | (91) |
![]() | (92) |
and assume
on the surface
. First and second equations of system (89)-(91) reduce to ![]() | (93) |
![]() | (94) |
![]() | (95) |
is constant. Substituting this expression into Eq. (94) and choosing
we obtain ![]() | (96) |
km s
(See diagram in[24]) and for approximation
it approximately corresponds to
. Therefore this equation turns out to be ![]() | (97) |
yields
cm
. For this value and made choice of
, Eq. (95) conforms to (92) without small higher-order terms.Additional acceleration of Pioneer 11 and its predicted magnitude are contained in Table 1 .
|
is gravity constant,
is the Sun's mass,
is its semimajor axis,
is eccentricity,
is unperturbed Keplerian mean motion,
is orbital period and
is eccentric anomaly.![]() | (98) |
![]() | (99) |
![]() | (100) |
![]() | (101) |
![]() | (102) |
![]() | (103) |
for the planets, corresponding them Pioneer-like acceleration ![]() | (104) |
, obtained from observations are in Table 2 . Predicted additional radial acceleration for Yupiter, Saturn, Uranus is within the observation error and for asteroid Icarus it is close to upper limit of
.
Eqs. (63)-(65) correspond to system (38)-(42) reduced to ![]() | (105) |
![]() | (106) |
![]() | (107) |
![]() | (108) |
![]() | (109) |
![]() | (110) |
are functions of coordinates. Substitution of
in (105)-(107) yields ![]() | (111) |
![]() | (112) |
![]() | (113) |
![]() | (114) |
and assume
on the surface
. Equations (111), (112) reduce to ![]() | (115) |
![]() | (116) |
![]() | (117) |
is constant. Substituting this expression into Eq. (116) we obtain ![]() | (118) |
in point
from Eq. (64) we obtain ![]() | (119) |
, this equation conforms to unmodeled acceleration of Pioneer 10/11 on distance 20-50 a.e., but gives the same acceleration for Pioneer 11 on distance less than 20 a.e. and for planets of the Sun system that contradicts data of observations (Tables 1,2).| [1] | G. Nordstrom, “Uber die Moglichkeit, das Electromagnetishe Feld und das Gravitation Feld zu Vereinigen”, Phyz. Zeitschr., Vol. 15, 504-506, 1914. |
| [2] | T. Kaluza, “Zum Unitatsproblem der Physik”, Sitz. Preuss. Akad. Wiss. Phys. Math. K, Vol. 1, pp. 966-972, 1921. |
| [3] | O. Klein, “Quantentheorie und funfdimensionale Relativitatstheorie”, Z. Phys., Vol. 37, pp. 895-906, 1926. |
| [4] | J. M. Overduin and P.S. Wesson, “Kaluza-Klein Gravity”, Phys. Rept., Vol. 283, NoNo. 3-4, pp. 303-380, 1997, gr-qc/9805018. |
| [5] | J. Ponce de Leon, “Does force from an extra dimension contradict physics in 4D?” Phys. Lett. B, Vol. 523, NoNo. 3-4, 311-316, 2001, gr-qc/0110063. |
| [6] | A. Herrera-Aguilar and O. V. Kechkin, “Bosonic string - Kaluza Klein theory exact solutions using 5D-6D dualities”, Mod. Phys. Lett. A, Vol. 16, No. 1, pp. 29-39, 2001, gr-qc/0101007. |
| [7] | J. Ponce de Leon, “Equivalence Between Space-Time-Matter and Brane-World Theories”, Mod. Phys. Lett. A, Vol. 16, No. 35, pp. 2291-2303, 2001, gr-qc/0111011. |
| [8] | D.Yu.Tsipenyuk, V.A. Andreev, “5-dimensional extended space model”, Presented at 13th General Conference of the European Physical Society: Beyond Einstein - Physics of the 21st Century (EPS-13), Bern, Switzerland, 11-15 Jul 2005. |
| [9] | D.Yu.Tsipenyuk, “Field transformation in the extended space model: Prediction and experimental test”., Gravitation and Cosmology, Vol. 7, No. 4(28), pp. 336-338, 2001. |
| [10] | W. B. Belayev, “Cosmological model with movement in fifth dimension”, Space-time and Substance, Vol. 2, No. 2(7), pp. 63-65, 2001, gr-qc/0110099. |
| [11] | K. Koyama, “The cosmological constant and dark energy in braneworlds”, Gen. Rel. Grav. Vol. 40, NoNo. 2-3, pp. 421-450, 2008, arXiv:0706.1557. |
| [12] | T. Kobayashi and Y. Takamizu, “Hybrid compactifications and brane gravity in six dimensions”, Class. Quant. Grav., Vol.25, No. 1, 015007, 2008, arXiv:0707.0894. |
| [13] | F. Arroja, T. Kobayashi, K. Koyama and T. Shiromizu, “Low energy effective theory on a regularized brane in 6D gauged chiral supergravity”, JCAP, Vol. 2007, No. 12, 006, 2007, arXiv:0710.2539. |
| [14] | N. Arkani-Hamed, S. Dimopoulos, G. Dvali, “The Hierarchy Problem and New Dimensions at a Millimeter”, Phys. Lett. B, Vol.429, NoNo. 3-4, pp. 263-272,1998, hep-ph/9803315. |
| [15] | I. Bars, S.-H. Chen, G. Quelin, “Dual Field Theories In (d-1)+1 Emergent Spacetimes From A Unifying Field Theory In d+2 Spacetime”, Phys. Rev. D, Vol. 76, No. 6, 065016, 2007, arXiv:0705.2834. |
| [16] | I. Bars, S.-H. Chen, “Geometry and Symmetry Structures in 2T Gravity”, Phys. Rev. D, Vol. 79, No. 8, 085021, 2009, arXiv:0811.2510. |
| [17] | I. Bars, “Gauge Symmetry in Phase Space, Consequences for Physics and Spacetime”, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A, Vol. 25, No. 29, pp. 5235-5252, 2010, arXiv:1004.0688. |
| [18] | K. Trencevski, “Time dependent gravitational potential in the universe and some consequences, Gen. Rel. Grav., Vol. 37, No. 3, pp. 507-519, 2005. |
| [19] | W. B., Belayev, “Cosmological model in 5D, stationarity, yes or no”, gr-qc/9903016. |
| [20] | S. G. Turyshev and V. T. Toth, “The Pioneer Anomaly”, Living Rev. Rel., Vol. 13, No. 4, 2010, arXiv:1001.3686. |
| [21] | J. D. Anderson, P. A. Laing, E. L. Lau, A. S. Liu, M. M. Nieto and S. G. Turyshev, “Study of anomalous acceleration of Pioneer 10 and 11”, Phys. Rev. D, Vol. 65, No. 8, 082004, 2002, gr-qc/0104064. |
| [22] | L. Iorio, “Can the Pioneer anomaly be of gravitational origin? A phenomenological answer”, Found. Phys., Vol. 37, No. 6, pp. 897-918, 2007, gr-qc/0610050. |
| [23] | D. Grumiller, “Model for gravity at large distances”, Phys. Rev. Lett., Vol. 105, No. 21, 211303, 2010, arXiv:1011.3625. |
| [24] | L. Iorio, “Solar system constraints on a Rindler-type extra-acceleration from modified gravity at large distances”, JCAP, Vol. 2011, No. 5, 019, 2011, arXiv:1012.0226. |
| [25] | W .B. Belayev, D.Yu. Tsipenyuk, “Gravi-electromagnetism in five dimensions and moving bodies in galaxy area”, Space-time and Substance Vol. 5, No. 2(22), pp. 49-52, 2004, gr-qc/0409056. |
| [26] | A. Linde, “Inflation, Quantum Cosmology and the Anthropic Principle”, in "Science and Ultimate Reality: From Quantum to Cosmos", honoring John Wheeler's 90th birthday. J. D. Barrow, P. C. W. Davies, C. L. Harper eds. Cambridge University Press, 2003, hep-th/0211048. |
| [27] | S. L. Dubovsky, S. M. Sibiryakov, “Domain walls in noncommutative gauge theories, folded D branes, and communication with mirror world”, Nucl. Phys. B, Vol. 691, NoNo. 1-2, pp. 91-110, 2004, hep-th/0401046. |
| [28] | M. Sarrazin, F. Petit, “Equivalence between domain-walls and "noncommutative" two-sheeted spacetimes: Model-independent matter swapping between branes”, Phys. Rev. D, Vol. 81, No. 3, 035014, 2010, arXiv:0903.2498. |
| [29] | N. Arkani-Hamed, S. Dimopoulos, G. Dvali, N. Kaloper, “Manyfold Universe”, JHEP, Vol. 2000, No. 12, 010, 2000, hep-ph/9911386. |
| [30] | G. Dvali, I. Sawicki, A. Vikman, “Dark Matter via Many Copies of the Standard Model”, JCAP, Vol. 2009, No. 8, 009, 2009, arXiv:0903.0660. |
| [31] | J. D. Anderson, P. A. Laing, E. L. Lau, A. S. Liu, M. M. Nieto and S. G. Turyshev, “Indication from Pioneer 10/11, Galileo, and Ulysses data, of an apparent anomalous, weak, long-range acceleration”, Phys. Rev. Lett., Vol. 81, No. 14, pp. 2858-2861, 1998, gr-qc/9808081. |
| [32] | J. D. Anderson and M. M. Nieto, “Search for a Solution of the Pioneer Anomaly”, Contemp. Phys., Vol. 48, No. 1, pp. 41-54, 2007, arXiv:0709.3866. |
| [33] | S. G. Turyshev, M. M. Nieto, J. D. Anderson, “A Route to Understanding of the Pioneer Anomaly”, The XXII Texas Symposium on Relativistic Astrophysics, Stanford U, December 13-17, 2004, edited by P. Chen, E. Bloom, G. Madejski, and V. Petrosian, gr-qc/0503021. |
| [34] | R. H. Sanders, “Solar system constraints on multi-field theories of modified dynamics”, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc., Vol. 370, No. 3, pp. 1519-1528, 2006, astro-ph/0602161. |