Food and Public Health

p-ISSN: 2162-9412    e-ISSN: 2162-8440

2016;  6(5): 130-139

doi:10.5923/j.fph.20160605.04

 

Surveillance of the Microbial Quality of Soybean Products Sold within Markets in Port Harcourt Metropolis, Rivers State, Nigeria

Agwa O. K.1, Ossai-Chidi L. N.2

1Department of Microbiology, Faculty of Sciences, University of Port Harcourt, Port Harcourt, Nigeria

2Department of Microbiology Technology, School of Science Laboratory Technology, University of Port Harcourt, Port Harcourt, Nigeria

Correspondence to: Agwa O. K., Department of Microbiology, Faculty of Sciences, University of Port Harcourt, Port Harcourt, Nigeria.

Email:

Copyright © 2016 Scientific & Academic Publishing. All Rights Reserved.

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY).
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Abstract

Considerable public health burden and challenge has been caused by foodborne pathogens. They cause illnesses to children, elderly and immune-compromised persons and this poses a great health risk. The microbial quality of locally and industrially soybean products sold within in Port Harcourt Metropolis, Nigeria was investigated. The results show significant higher bacteria and fungi counts [p < 0.05] in locally prepared samples compared to industrially prepared samples. Occurrences of the bacteria isolated from industrial samples include: Pseudomonassp. [37.5%], Bacillussp., Staphylococcussp. [25% each] and Streptococcussp. [12%], while Pseudomonassp. and Staphylococcussp. were the most frequent bacteria in locally processed samples [25% each]. Fungi isolated from industrially processed samples include: Rhizopussp., Aspergillussp. and Saccharomycessp. [33.3% each]. The most frequent fungus in locally produced samples is Rhizopussp. [40%] followed by Saccharomycessp. and Aspergillussp. [30% each]. 50% of the isolates were resistant to ampicillin and ofloxacin, while about 70% were sensitive to erythromycin and augmentin. The results revealed that locally made soy products would most likely cause food-borne illnesses, stressing the need for local vendors to be enlightened on the practice of good hygiene and observing Hazard analysis and critical control points during processing and packaging of these products for consumption. Most of the isolates are spoilage microorganisms but several of them invaded the product through poor handling and processing routes employed.

Keywords: Antibiotic Sensitivity, Port Harcourt Metropolis, Public Health, Soybean beverages, Soy milk

Cite this paper: Agwa O. K., Ossai-Chidi L. N., Surveillance of the Microbial Quality of Soybean Products Sold within Markets in Port Harcourt Metropolis, Rivers State, Nigeria, Food and Public Health, Vol. 6 No. 5, 2016, pp. 130-139. doi: 10.5923/j.fph.20160605.04.

1. Introduction

In recent years, legumes have been identified as sources of high nutritional value which could aid in addressing related dietary issues worldwide. Soybean [Glycine max] is recognized as one of these legumes with a huge protein potential [Kolapo and Oladimeji, 2008]. Its edible products including; soymilk, soy bean flour and other soy based products. They are food items consumed on purchase from vendor, hawkers and consumed immediately without any further preparation. Some of them are snacks which are also vended along highways linking several geographical areas in the country [Oranusi and Braide, 2012]. But most of them are found in public places including markets, motor parks, and streets, outside schools, hospitals and even express way [Izah et al., 2015].
Soymilk is rich in protein, carbohydrate and oil, made by soaking the soybeans in water before grinding and straining, the milk produced resembles cow milk in both appearance and constituency. They could be used as a potential substitute to cow milk in terms of quality and nutritive properties [Soya.be, 2006; Adebayo-Tayo et al., 2008].
Soy flour is normally manufactured with different fat levels: raw soy flour doesn’t require the roasting step; defatted soy flour is obtained from- solvent- extracted- flakes, and contains less than 1% oil and natural or full-fat soy flour made from un-extracted, de-hulled beans with about 18% - 20% oil. The quality of the flour and storage condition after milling is very important in the shelf life and hygienic quality of the flour. Although flour is generally regarded as a safe product due to its low water activity, it has been reported that a variety of pathogenic and non-pathogenic microorganisms can contaminate it during processing [Berghofer et al., 2003]. Low-moisture foods and ingredients have not been discussed traditionally in terms of food safety, primarily because these products do not offer welcoming environments for microorganism growth [Akissoe et al., 2001]. Food borne outbreaks has been sometimes associated with consumption of flour, although most flour-based products reportedly undergo a validated kill step at the point of production (e.g. baking or cooking), other products may be at risk [Ndife et al., 2011]. Emphasis on the improvements of microbiological safety of foods have been attributed to response to disease outbreaks; with these improvements been implemented by international standards and legislation, considered to have had an impact on diarrheal incidence as reflected in trends reported worldwide [Nawal et al., 2013].
Health benefits of soybean and related products include low lactose and cholesterol, reduced bone loss, prevention and reduction of heart diseases [Adebayo-Tayo et al., 2008]. However, in developed countries, the quality of soymilk is limited by factors including biological and storage factors [Kolapo and Oladimeji, 2008]. Despite these arrays of benefits derivable from soybean products, previous studies have reported that it can easily be a route for transmitting food borne illnesses. Bacterial pathogens identified with food poisoning, gastroenteritis and enteric fever can be harbored in un-hygienically prepared soymilk [Adebayo-Tayo et al., 2008]. Mycetomas in human have been caused by some potential pathogenic contaminants of dairy food [Cheesbrough, 2005]. Foodborne or waterborne microbial pathogens cause diarrheal diseases, which is a leading causes of illness and death in less developed countries, killing an estimated 1.9 million people annually at the global level [Nawal et al., 2013]. Aspergillus flavus is involved in allergic aspergillosis [pulmonary aspergillosis] and also produces aflatoxin that is highly carcinogenic [Prescott et al., 2005] This study was carried out to assess the microbiological quality of locally produced and industrially processed soybean products sold in Port Harcourt and its environs, Nigeria.

2. Materials and Methods

The study Area
The study area chosen falls within Port Harcourt city and Obio-Akpor Local Government Area of Port Harcourt, the capital of Rivers State, Nigeria. They are the biggest cities in River state which has an estimated population of 5,185,400, making it the sixth-most populous state in the country; its geographical coordinates are 4° 47' 21" North, 6° 59' 55" East. It is economically significant as the center of Nigeria's oil industry city with over a million people, made up of people from different ethnic groups.
Sample Collection
A total of forty [40] samples were collected for analysis: Ten [10] samples of locally produced soybean beverage and soymilk each were collected from Alakahia, Rumuokoro, Choba, Mile II, Rumuosi, University of Port Harcourt Teaching Hospital [UPTH], Agrey Road, Mile III, Mile I and Emenike markets in the Port Harcourt metropolis, Nigeria. Ten samples each of industrially processed soybean beverage and soymilk were purchased at the Everyday Emporium and Next time supermarkets in Port Harcourt, Rivers state, Nigeria. Two homemade samples were used as control for the soy bean beverage and milk. The samples were transported to the Microbiology Laboratory of the University of Port Harcourt, Nigeria for immediate microbiological examination.
Enumeration of Microorganisms
The samples collected were serial diluted and plated using the pour plate method. Enumeration of total viable count was done using plate count agar [Oxoid, CM325, Harrigan and McCane, 1976]. Coliform counts were done using Violet red bile agar Oxoid [1985]. Yeast and mould counts were done on Sabouraud dextrose agar [Oxoid]. The plates were incubated at 37°C for 24-48 h for bacteria and at 25°C for 3 - 5 days for fungi. After incubation, distinct colonies that developed were enumerated in CFU/g or ml for each sample. The resultant microbial colonies were isolated into pure cultures and preserved in slants for further analysis.
Characterization and identification of microbial isolates
Growth representative of colonies were sub-cultured on nutrient agar medium and incubated for 24 h at 37°C. The colonial characteristics on agar plates were taken into consideration. The characterization and identification of isolated bacteria were carried out using the procedures of [Cowan and Steel, 1985; Holt et al., 1994]. The chemical and biochemical tests carried out include: Gram’s staining, coagulase reaction, oxidase reaction, motility, catalase, urease, citrate utilization and sugar fermentation. Resultant characteristics reaction of the isolates in this study were compared with those of known taxa using scheme of Cheesbrough [2004] and Bergey’s Manual of Determinative Bacteriology by Holt et al. [1994]. For fungi, a wet mount preparation of the mycelial growth of each isolate was made using lactophenol cotton blue staining technique and observed under the microscope. The microscopic morphology was determined using the scheme of Pepper and Gerba [2005] and Ellis et al. [2007]. The identification of the fungi was based on the examination of the conidial heads, philiades, conidiophore and the presence of foot cells or rhizoids. The resultant morphology viewed microscopically and compared with the scheme provided by Samson and Varga (2007) and Watanabe (2010).
Antibiotic Sensitivity of Isolated Bacteria
The antibiotic sensitivity testing was carried out using the disc diffusion method on Mueller-Hinton agar as described by Bauer et al., [1966] and was interpreted according to the guidelines [CLSI, 2002]. The antibiotics used were Ampiclox, Amoxicillin, Ciprofloxacin, Streptomycin, Erythromycin, Streptomycin, Chloramphenicol, Rifampicin, Levofloxacin and Norfloxacin.
Statistical Analysis
The Statistical Package for the Social Sciences version 18 [SPSS Inc., USA] was used to calculate the mean and Standard Deviation [SD]. The Student’s T-test and Analysis of Variance [ANOVA] test was used to test for the significant difference at p-values < 0.05 within the groups measured at 95% confidence level.

3. Results and Discussion

Table 1 shows the mean heterotrophic count recorded in the soybean flour samples. The total heterotrophic bacteria count recorded in industrially processed soybean flour ranged from 2.1 – 2.8 x 104 CFU/g, while in locally produced soybean flour ranged from 2.3 - 4.8 X 104 CFU/g, with a significant statistical difference [p < 0.05] between heterotrophic counts of both groups but that of the control sample was 1.9 x 104 CFU/g [Table 1]. Heterotrophic count of locally processed soymilk ranged from 2.7 - 3.8 x 104 CFU/ml, while in industrially processed soy milk ranged from 2.5 – 3.4 x 104 CFU/ml, with a significant difference [p < 0.05] between both groups of soy milk and the control sample had a heterotrophic count of 2.4 x 104 CFU/ml as presented in table 1. The results are in agreement with studies by Odu and Egbo, [2012]; Nazim et al., [2013] which reported significant differences [p < 0.05] between heterotrophic bacteria count of industrially processed and locally processed soy products. Likewise significant lower heterotrophic bacteria counts were seen in industrially processed products. This may be due to proper handling, preparation and processing of these products during industrial production, indicating a significant level of adherence to hazard analysis and critical control points [HACCP] during industrial processing of these products [Adebayo-Tayo et al., 2008; Agboke et al., 2011]. While the high level heterotrophic bacteria count in locally processed products could be an indication of poor handling during processing, inadequate equipment and poor sanitary conditions which could lead to bacterial contamination of the products from processing to storage and ultimate consumption of these products. The relatively low occurrence of potentially harmful bacteria and fungi in industrially processed soy flour is attributed to the chemical treatment of flour in a sterile environment during production [Esho et al., 2013; Gbolagade et al., 2011]. This treatment will ultimately reduce the occurrence of these potentially harmful organisms and increase the shelf life of the products.
Table 1. Total Heterotrophic bacteria count (THC) of the industrial and local soybean products
     
Locally processed soy had fungal counts ranging from [2.5 – 4.5 x104 CFU/g] were significantly higher [p < 0.05] than fungal counts of industrially processed flour <10, according to serial dilution examined [0 – 3.1 x 104 CFU/g]. Locally processed soy milk samples also had fungal counts ranging between 1.9 – 3.4 x 104 CFU/ml when compared to fungal counts recorded in industrially processed soy milk [1.9 – 3.1 x 104 CFU/ml] [Table 2] with no significant difference observed [p > 0.05]. The results are similar to studies by [Adebayo-Tayo et al., 2008; Nazim et al., 2013], which reported significantly higher fungal counts in locally processed soy products when compared to fungal counts in industrial products. The relatively higher fungal counts in locally produced flour and milk may indicate a contamination of the products during processing. This could cause the growth of potentially harmful fungi in these products, and may also lead to certain ill health when consumed [Adelekan et al., 2013].
Table 2. Total Fungal count (TFC) of the industrial and local soybean products
     
The occurrence of bacteria isolated from locally and industrially processed soymilk is shown in Figure 1. Bacteria isolated include: Proteus sp., Pseudomonas sp., Micrococcus sp., Bacillus sp., Staphylococcus sp. and Escherichia sp. The most occurring bacteria in the locally produced soymilk were Micrococcus sp. and Staphylococcus sp. [22.2% each], while the least occurring bacteria were Pseudomonas sp. and Escherichia sp. [11.1% each]. Proteus sp. was the most occurring bacterium in industrially processed soymilk [27.2%], while Micrococcus sp. and Pseudomonas sp. were the least occurring bacteria in industrially processed products [9.09% each]. The isolated bacteria from soybean flour include Bacillus sp., Pseudomonas sp., Staphylococcus sp., Streptococcus sp. and Micrococcus sp. Pseudomonas sp. and Staphylococcus sp. were the most occurring bacteria [26.7% each] in locally produced soybean flour, while Pseudomonas sp. was also the most occurring isolate [37.5%] in industrially processed soybean flour as shown in Figure 2. The presence of some potentially pathogenic bacteria shows relatively high frequencies in locally or industrially processing products which may be attributed to the unhygienic processing environment. Results indicate that faecal contamination of soymilk is due to the presence of coliforms such as Escherichia sp. in the products [Adebayo-Tayo et al., 2008]. The presence of Pseudomonas sp. and other bacteria may be as a result of the composition of the soymilk and the handling processes during manufacturing and storage [Osho et al., 2010]. Potentially harmful bacteria such as Staphylococcus sp., Pseudomonas sp. and Streptococcus sp. presence in these products may cause diseases in the individuals that consume them. They may cause foodborne illnesses and quick spoilage of the food products leading to not only a public health risk but also an economic loss to producers and retailers. The presence of Staphylococcus sp. Escherichia sp. and Salmonella sp. in high frequencies is associated with food spoilage, food borne illnesses and food poisoning leading to diarrhea, fever and other complications in individuals [Adelekan et al., 2013; Nawal et al., 2013].
Figure 1. Frequency of Occurrences of isolated Bacteria from soymilk samples
Figure 2. Frequencies of Occurrences of isolated bacteria from soybean flour samples
Fungi isolates from locally and industrially processed soymilk include: Mucor sp., Rhizopus sp., Saccharomyces sp. and Aspergillus sp. were shown in Figure 3. Rhizopus sp. was the most occurring fungi in both local and industrial soymilk products [42.8% and 44.4% respectively]. Saccharomyces sp. was the least occurring fungi [14.3%] in locally processed soymilk. The least occurring fungus in the industrially processed soymilk was Aspergillus sp. [11.1%]. Figure 4 shows that Rhizopus sp. was the most occurring fungal isolate in both locally processed soybean flour [40%], while the least occurring isolates in locally processed soybean flour were Saccharomyces sp. and Aspergillus sp. [30%]. But in the industrially processed products, all the isolates had an equal occurrence rate [33.3%]. The frequencies of occurrence of Aspergillus sp. in industrially processed samples were higher than those isolated from locally produced samples [Figure 3]. The isolates reported are naturally occurring fungi in soybean products, however, the occurrence of Aspergillus sp. is a cause for concern as it can produce potentially harmful aflatoxins in the products when they are consumed [Adebayo –Tayo et al., 2008]. Mycotoxins in food are not always beneficial, for instances some species of Aspergillus in food products could lead to food poisoning probably due to their ability to produce toxic substances [Odom et al., 2012]. Some of the mycotoxins produced by Aspergillus species include aflatoxins, ochratoxins and sterigmatocystine [Hashem, 2011]. Other health problems associated with aflatoxin include carcinogenicity, teratogenicity, toxigenicity, immunotoxigenicity and mutagenicity [Pratiwi et al., 2015; Wild and Gong, 2010 & Akinyemi et al., 2011], Zygomycosis [mucrormycosis] caused by some species of Rhizopus.
Figure 3. Frequency of occurrence of fungal Isolates soymilk
Figure 4. Frequency of Occurrence of fungal isolates from soybean flour samples
Most of the organisms found in soy products are known to cause several diseases in human. For instance, bacteria such as Pseudomonas, Streptococcus and Bacillus sp. are pathogenic and are major health concern to man [Akhigbemidu et al., 2015]. Coliforms are known to cause varying degree of gastroenteritis depending on the strain. Micrococcus sp., which is a saprophytic bacterium, its occurrence may be from the skin of human and animals [Seiyaboh et al., 2013]. Enteric fever, food poisoning and bacillary dysentery are some of the potential diseases that may be caused by bacteria found in soy products. Some species of Bacillus can cause bacteremia /septicemia, endocarditis and gastrointestinal tract diseases [Izah et al., 2015; Orutugu et al., 2015; Turnbull, 1996]. Food poisoning syndrome such as rapid and slower onset emetic syndrome [Turnbull, 1996], bacteremia are caused by some species of Pseudomonas [Bush and Perez, 2014], and toxic shock are caused by S. aureus [Orutugu 2015]. Consumption of food contaminated by strains of S. aureus toxins may lead to Staphylococcal gastroenteritis [Akhigbemidu et al., 2015] and staphyloxanthin a carotenoid pigment that act as virulent factor [Akhigbemidu et al., 2015]. Typically, the intensity of the disease symptoms produced may depend on the quantity of contaminated food ingested and susceptibility of the individuals to the toxin [Odu and Imaku, 2013].
Table 3 shows the antibiotic sensitivity of bacteria isolated from locally made soybean flour. Bacillus sp. was resistant to tested antibiotics expect for ciprofloxacillin and Ofloxacin. Pseudomonas sp., Micrococcus sp. and Streptococcus sp. followed the same trend and were resistant to all tested antibiotics expect for ciprofloxacillin, while Staphylococcus sp. was sensitive to all tested antibiotics expect for ceftazimidine and ciprofloxacillin [Table 3]. Table 4 shows the antibiotic sensitivity pattern of the bacteria isolated from the industrial products, the most sensitive antibiotics were gentamycin and ofloxacin [75%] each, while ceftazimidine was the least sensitive antibiotic (25%), the most sensitive isolate was Bacillus sp. [62.5%] while other isolates had a sensitivity of 50% each. This finding is supported by the works of [Daniyan and Ajibo, 2011] which reported that S. aureus was resistant to pefloxacin but susceptible to streptomycin, ciprofloxacin, ceftriaxone and cefuroxime. A study by [Srinu et al., 2012] also reported that S. aureus was sensitive to streptomycin, cotrimoxazole and ciprofloxacin. B. cereus was susceptible to erythromycin, ciprofloxacin and streptomycin but resistant to ampiclox. In a similar study [Agwa et al., 2012] although the findings of this study showed that B. cereus was resistant to erythromycin and ampiclox. However Srinu et al. [2012] also reported that E. coli was sensitive to Streptomycin, cotrimoxazole and ciprofloxacin, the findings of this study shows that E. coli isolated was resistant to streptomycin. There is need for the vendors to practice good hygiene to reduce contamination of soy products with foodborne pathogens.
Table 3. Antibiotic sensitivity pattern of bacterial isolates from locally produced Soybean flour
     
Table 4. Antibiotic sensitivity pattern of bacterial isolates from industrially processed soybean flour
     
Table 5 shows the antibiotic susceptibility pattern of the bacteria isolated from the locally produced soy milk samples, Ciprofloxacin was the most sensitive antibiotic [83.3%], while cefuroxine, nitrofloxacin and ampicillin were the least sensitive antibiotics [33.3%] each. Table 6 shows the antibiotic sensitivity pattern of the bacterial isolates in the industrially processed soy milk samples, Augmentine and gentamycin were the most sensitive antibiotics [66.7%], while cefuroxime and nitrofloxacin were the least sensitive [33.3%]. Antibiotic sensitivity patterns recorded in this study are in contrast to the findings of Adelekan et al., [2013] which reported an 80% sensitivity of isolates from industrially processed soybean products to augumentin and ciprofloxacin. These contrasting antibiotic susceptibility patterns may be due to the exposure of these products to different preservative chemicals or improper handling and storage of these products before it is sold to the final consumer [Agboke et al., 2011]. The varying antibiotic sensitivity patterns could lead to an occurrence of antibiotic resistant bacterial diseases that may be difficult and expensive to treat [Prescott et al., 2005].
Table 5. Antibiotic sensitivity pattern of bacterial isolates from locally produced soymilk
     
Table 6. Antibiotic Sensitivity Pattern of Bacterial Isolates from industrially processed soy milk
     

4. Conclusions

The microbial quality and safety of vending operations are a major source of concern for food control and health officers in developing countries. These finding shows varying public health concerns in both locally produced and industrially processed soybean products. The occurrence of organisms such as Escherichia sp., Streptococcus sp. and Aspergillus sp. are indications of various levels of contamination of these products. These organisms could cause foodborne diseases and serious public health concern for the consumers. Antibiotic sensitivity pattern of the bacterial isolates indicate an occurrence of antibiotic resistant bacteria most likely due to the exposure of these products to several preservatives and sometimes unhygienic processes of production. The study shows an unacceptable microbiological quality of these products and a dire need for the strict implementation HACCP protocols during production of these products to prevent the occurrence of food contamination, antibiotic resistant organisms and other serious public health concerns especially with locally processed products.

References

[1]  Adebayo-Tayo, BC, Adegoke AA, Akinjogunla OJ (2008). Microbial and physicochemical quality of powdered soymilk samples in Akwa Ibom, South Southern Nigeria. Afr. J Biotechnol. 8 (13):3066-3071.
[2]  Adelekan AO, Adediran EA, Ngozi UA, Yetunde OA, Abidemi SD (2013). Nutritional, microbiological and sensory characteristics of malted soy-kunu zaki: An improved traditional beverage. Adv. Microbiol., 3:389-397.
[3]  Agboke AA, Uduma EO, Christian CO, Emmanuel CI (2011). Evaluation of microbiology quality of some soybean milk products consumed in Nigeria. Prime Res. Med. 1(2): 025-030.
[4]  Agwa OK, Uzoigwe CI, Wokoma EC (2012). Incidence and antibiotic sensitivity of B. cereus isolated from ready to eat foods sold in some markets in Port Harcourt, River State. Asian J. Microbiol. Biotech. Env. Sc. 14(1): 13 – 18.
[5]  Akhigbemidu W, Musa A, Kuforji O (2015). Assessment of the microbial qualities of noodles and the accompanying seasonings. Nig. Food J. 33: 48 – 53.
[6]  Akinyemi AA, Adejola AQ, Obasa SO, Ezeri GNO (2011). Aflatoxins in Smoked‐dried Fish sold in Abeokuta, Ogun State, South‐west Nigeria. Proceedings of the Environmental Management Conference, Federal University of Agriculture, Abeokuta, Nigeria. pp. 478 – 487.
[7]  Akissoe NH, Hounhouigan JD, Bricas N, Vernier P, Nago MC, Olorunda OA (2001). Physical, chemical and sensory evaluation of dried yam (Discorea rotundata) tubers, flour and Amala a flour derived product. Trop. Sci. 41: 151-156.
[8]  Bauer AW, Kirby WM, Sherris JC, Truck M (1966). Antibiotic susceptibility testing by a standardized single disc method Am. J. Clin. Pathol. 45(4): 493- 496.
[9]  Berghofer LK, Hocking AD, Miskelly D, Jansson E (2003) Microbiology of wheat and Flour Milling in Australia. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 85:137-49.
[10]  Bush LM, Perez MT (2014). Pseudomonas and Related Infections. The Merck manual, Professional Edition. http://www.merckmanuals.com/professional/infectious_diseases/gram-negative_bacilli/pseudomonas_and_related _infections. html.
[11]  Cheesbrough M (2004). District Laboratory Practice in Tropical Countries. Low price Edition part 2. Cambridge press, England.
[12]  Cheesbrough M (2005). District Laboratory Practice in Tropical Countries, Part 1. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK. pp. 137-150.
[13]  CLSI (2002). Performance standards for antimicrobial; susceptibility testing. 12th Informational Supplement. CLSI Document Wayne, PA: CLSI.
[14]  Cowan and Steel (1985) Manual for the Identification of Bacteria. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
[15]  Daniyan SY, Ajibo CQ (2011). Microbiological Examination of sliced fruits sold in Minna Metropolis. Int. Res. J. Pharm. 2 (7): 124 -129.
[16]  Ellis, D., Davis, S., Alexiou, H., Handke, R., Bartley, R. (2007). Descriptions of Medical Fungi. Second Edition. Printed in Adelaide by Nexus Print Solutions, Underdale, South Australia.
[17]  Esho FK, Budbazar E, Akiko K, Keiko K (2013). Microbial Assessment and Prevalence of Foodborne Pathogens in Natural Cheeses in Japan. BioMed. Res. Int. 3:101-105.
[18]  Gbolagade J, Ibironke A, Omitade Y (2011). Nutritional Compositions, Fungi and Aflatoxins Detection in Stored ‘Gbodo’ (fermented Dioscorea rotundata) and ‘elubo ogede’ (fermented Musa parasidiaca) from South western Nigeria. Afr. J. Food Sci. 5(2):105-110.
[19]  Harrigan, M.G. and McCane, M.E. (1976) Laboratory Methods in Food and Dairy Microbiology. Academic Press, London.
[20]  Hashem M (2011). Isolation of Mycotoxin-producing Fungi from Fishes Growing in Aquacultures. Res. J. Microb. 6: 862-872.
[21]  Holt JG, Krieg NR, Seath PHA, Satley JT, Williams ST (1994). Bergey’s Manual of Determinative Bacteriology. 9th Ed., Williams and Wilkins, Baltimore, 804.
[22]  Izah SC, Aseiba ER, Orutugu LA (2015). Microbial quality of polythene packaged sliced fruits sold in major markets of Yenagoa Metropolis, Nigeria. Point J. Bot. Micro. Res. 1(3): 30 – 36.
[23]  Kolapo AL, Oladimeji GR (2008). Production and quality evaluation of Soy-corn milk. J. Appl. Biosci. (2): 40 - 45.
[24]  Nawal A, Hassanain MA, Hassanain WM (2013). Public Health Importance of Foodborne Pathogens. World J. Med. Sci. 9(4):208-222.
[25]  Nazim MU, Mitra K, Rahman MM, Abdullah ATM, Parveen S (2013). Evaluation of the nutritional quality and microbiological analysis of newly developed soya cheese. Intl. Food Res. J. 20(6): 3373-3380.
[26]  Ndife J, Abdulraheem LO, Zakari UM (2011). Evaluation of the nutritional and sensory quality of functional breads produced from whole wheat and soya bean flour blends. Afr. J. Food Sci. 5(8):466- 472.
[27]  Odom TC, Udensi EA, Nwanekezi EC (2012). Microbiological qualities of hawked retted cassava fufu in Aba metropolis of Abia state. Nig. Food J. 30(1): 53 – 58.
[28]  Odu NN, and Egbo NN, (2012). Microbiological quality of soy milk produced from soybean using different methods. Nature and Science. 10(8): 85-92.
[29]  Odu NN, Imaku LN (2013). Assessment of the Microbiological Quality of Street-vended Ready-To-Eat Bole (roasted plantain) Fish (Trachurus trachurus) in Port Harcourt Metropolis, Nigeria. Researcher, 5(3): 9-18.
[30]  Oranusi US, Braide W (2012). A study of microbial safety of ready-to-eat foods vended on highways: Onitsha-Owerri, south east Nigeria. Int. Res. J. Micro. 3(2): 066-071.
[31]  Orutugu LA, Izah SC, Aseibai ER (2015). Microbiological quality of Kunu drink sold in some major markets of Yenagoa Metropolis, Nigeria. Continental J. Biomed. Sci. 9(1): 9 –16.
[32]  Osho, A., Mabekoje OO, Bello OO. (2010). Comparative study on the microbial load of Gari, Elubo-isu and Iru in Nigeria. African Journal of Food Science. 4(10): 646 – 649.
[33]  Oxiod (1985). Oxoid Manual of Dehydrated Culture Media, Ingredients and Other Laboratory Services. Oxoid, Basingstoke
[34]  Pepper, I.L. and Gerba, C.P. (2005). Environmental microbiology. A laboratory manual. Second edition. Elsevier Academic Press.
[35]  Pratiwi C, Rahayu WP, Lioe HN, Herawati D, Broto W, Ambarwati S (2015). The effect of temperature and relative humidity for Aspergillus flavus BIO 2237 growth and aflatoxin production on soybeans. Int. Food Res. J. 22(1): 82-87.
[36]  Prescott LM, Harley JP, Klein DA (2005). Microbiology (6th ed). McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., New York.
[37]  Salim-ur-Rehman, GH, Haq N, Muhammad MA, Sarfraz HM and Shahid HS, (2007). Physico-chemical and sensory evaluation of ready to drink soy-cow milk blend. Pak. J. Nutr. 6 (3): 283-285.
[38]  Samson RA, Varga J (2007). Aspergillus systematics in the genomic era. CBS Fungal Biodiversity Centre, Utrecht. 206.
[39]  Schmutz J, Cannon SB, Schlueter J, Ma J (2010). Genome sequence of the palaeopolyploid soybean Nature (Nature Publishing Group) 463 (7278): 178–83.
[40]  Seiyaboh EI, Oku IY, Odogbo OM (2013). Bacteriological spoilage of Zobo (A Nigerian Drink prepared from the cayces of Hibiscus sabdariffa L. (Malvaceae). The Int. J. Eng. Sci. 2(11): 46 – 51.
[41]  Soya.be (2006). Soya- information about Soy and Soya products. http://www.soya.be/soy-health.php.
[42]  Srinu B, Vijaya Kumar A, Kumar E, Madhava Rao T (2012). Antimicrobial resistance of bacterial foodborne pathogens. J. Chem. Pharm. Res. 4(7): 3734 – 3736.
[43]  Turnbull PCB (1996). Bacillus. In: Medical Medical Microbiology. Fourth Edition; 1996 [cited 2015 March 26]. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK7699/.
[44]  Wild CP and Gong YY (2010). Mycotoxins and human disease: a largely ignored global health issue. Carcinogenesis, 31: 71-82.
[45]  Watanabe T (2010). Pictorial atlas of soil and seed fungi: morphologies of cultured fungi and key species 3rd ed. CRC Press, USA.