Energy and Power

p-ISSN: 2163-159X    e-ISSN: 2163-1603

2013;  3(1): 1-6

doi:10.5923/j.ep.20130301.01

Cost Effective, Low Capacity, Biomass Fired Power Plant

Rajaram Swaminathan

Department of Mechanical Engineering, Polytechnic of Namibia, Windhoek, Namibia

Correspondence to: Rajaram Swaminathan , Department of Mechanical Engineering, Polytechnic of Namibia, Windhoek, Namibia.

Email:

Copyright © 2012 Scientific & Academic Publishing. All Rights Reserved.

Abstract

In view of the growing energy scarcity in rural areas of developing economies, it is necessary to explore alternate means of electric power generation. In this context distributed power generation becomes significant. Stirling engine based system is an attractive option for distributed power generation. Biomass, especially bush waste which is abundantly available in Namibia, can be gainfully used as a fuel for the Stirling engine. Briquetting the bio-mass and firing it externally in a furnace or stove will provide the necessary heat source for the engine. A conventional electric power generator can be coupled to the engine. Units of rating 1-5kW will cater to the power needs of individual or group of dwellings. The expected cost of generation is 0.233 N$/kWh which compares well with other modes of power generation. This paper explains the basic concepts and the design aspects of biomass fired Stirling engine system.

Keywords: Stirling Engine Based, Low Capacity ,Biomass Fired Power Plant

Cite this paper: Rajaram Swaminathan , Cost Effective, Low Capacity, Biomass Fired Power Plant, Energy and Power, Vol. 3 No. 1, 2013, pp. 1-6. doi: 10.5923/j.ep.20130301.01.

1. Introduction

In view of the growing energy scarcity in rural areas, it is necessary to explore alternate means. In this context distributed power generation becomes significant[1]. Distributed power generation is basically decentralized generation connected to the local distribution network[2]. The locally available energy sources can be used for distributed power generation. In rural areas of Africa biomass is a viable source of energy. Considerable proportions of Namibia’s natural rangelands are encroached by a biomass called invader bush, which presents a unique opportunity for distributed power generation[3].
Heat generated by burning the biomass like invader bush can be utilised in a Stirling engine to power a generator. Stirling engine based system is an attractive option for distributed power generation[4]. In a Stirling engine, heat is transferred through the hot-end cylinder walls to a confined working fluid which is then converted to mechanical work via the Stirling thermodynamic cycle. This differs from an internal combustion engine, which relies on the ignition of fuel within the engine cylinder to force the piston down with large amounts of heat rejected in the exhaust gas.
In general, Stirling engines have relatively high thermodynamic efficiencies. Because they require only heat, Stirling engines also permit high fuel-flexibility and allow for better control of emissions. Stirling engine is positioned as a potential competitor to other on-site power generation technologies, like IC engine and fuel cells[4].
Since the Stirling cycle uses an external heat source, it can be run on whatever is available that makes heat — anything from biomass to solar energy.

2. Stirling Engine Principle

The Stirling engine is based on a closed cycle, where the working gas (normally pressurised He, H2, N2 or air) alternately is compressed in a cold cylinder volume and expanded in a hot cylinder volume. The heat input from the combustion of fuel is transferred from the outside to the working gas at a high temperature (typically 700°C - 750℃). The heat, which is not converted into work on the shaft, is rejected to the cooling water at 40-85℃.
The figure below shows the basic principle of the Stirling cycle[5]. The steps in the diagram are explained below. The shown engine has two pistons in one cylinder, which is the simplest one.
Figure 1. Stirling engine principle
A Stirling engine can use a wide variety of heat sources because the heat is produced externally. Typically the hot side of a Stirling engine is placed above the heat source to transfer heat through the walls of the cylinder. The cold side of the engine is placed away from heat source. Heat exchangers on the hot and cold side are used in to transfer the heat instead of placing the hot side of the engine directly on the heat source. Similarly heat exchangers on the cold side facilitate effective cooling.
Most Stirling engines use a component called a regenerator. A regenerator in its simplest form is a wire mesh that is used to temporarily store heat when air is moving from the hot side to the cold side. The large surface area of the wire allows the heat to be absorbed quickly when air is moving to the cold side, and also to release quickly when air is moving to the hot side, thus increasing efficiency.
Pressurizing the gas in the engine raises the amount of energy that can be transferred. However heavier, more robust materials must be used and gas must constantly be added to maintain pressure due to losses through the seals. Atmospheric pressure Stirling engines are simple and maintenance-free.
Most Stirling engines are not self starting and require some sort of starting device to begin the Stirling cycle. A hand crank is normally used for starting small engines.

3. Stirling Engine Configurations

Several Stirling engine designs have been developed over the years that employ the basic thermodynamic concept. These Stirling engine designs can be classified by their mechanical configurations. For example, they can have kinematic or free-piston arrangements:
Kinematic engines have a crankshaft and a mechanical linkage to the power piston. Electricity is generated with a rotating synchronous induction generator. The amplitude of the power-piston motion is constrained by mechanical linkages. Kinematic machines are generally mechanically complex, but relatively simple to analyze.
Free-piston engines typically generate electric power with a linear alternator formed by the oscillatory travel of the power piston in a magnetic field. The displacer and power piston typically move as tuned spring-mass-damper system in response to pressure differences. Free-piston machines are mechanically simple but dynamically andthermodynamically complex.
Stirling engines can also have alpha, beta, or gamma arrangements [6] as explained below.
Alpha engines have two or more separate pistons mechanically linked to oscillate with constant phase lag. The working gas passes through a cooler, a regenerator, and a heater as it moves back and forth between the cylinders. Each piston requires its own seals to contain the working gas. All alpha engines are kinematic engines. The engine has a very high power-to-volume ratio, but has many technical problems due to the high temperature of the piston and its seals.
Beta engines have a displacer-piston arrangement in which the displacer and the power piston are in line with each other(Figure1). The displacer moves the working gas back and forth between the hot and cold ends of the engine. The hot end is the expansion space, and the cold end is the compression space. As the working gas moves back and forth, it passes through a cooler, regenerator, and heater. Beta engines can be either kinematic or free-piston engines. The engine can achieve high compression ratios because the piston and displacer can overlap in motion.
Gamma engines have a displacer-piston arrangement where the displacer and power pistons are in separate cylinders. The displacer moves the working gas back and forth between the hot and cold ends of the engine. The cold end space includes the cold side of the displacer as well as the power piston. As the working gas moves back and forth, it passes through a cooler, a regenerator, and a heater. Gamma engines can be either kinematic or free-piston type, however the configuration produces a lower compression ratio.

4. Biomass Fired Stirling Engine

The following are the key points[7,8,9]:
• For bio-mass firing kinematic design is preferred over the free piston design.
• Beta configuration is chosen due to its simplicity and high compression ratio.
• For improved efficiency regenerator is always included.
• Low speed engines are preferred from operation and maintenance point of view.
• It is preferable to have both heat and power production to get the maximum benefit
• Preferred size for residential combined heat and power is 1-5kWe
A typical commercially available bio-mass fired Stirling engine arrangement is given in reference[10]:

4.1. System Concepts

Direct firing of biomass or firing after gasification of bio-mass are the two basic concepts adopted .Direct firing is preferred since it does not involve multiple equipments and is relatively more maintenance friendly. In both cases, it is advantageous to make briquettes out of bio-mass. This will enable compacting the fuel and storage in minimum space. The briquettes are to be fired in a suitable combustor for giving the needed heat source for the engine(Figure2).
The following are some of the concepts for firing the briquettes[11]:
i) Furnace firing: In this concept proposed by Helsinki University of Technology[12], the briquettes are fed into the furnace by a screw feeder. Cold primary air and hot secondary air are supplied through separate fans. The heat exchanger for the Stirling engine is located in the furnace. The furnace is equipped with air preheater and water heater. Hot water from the Stirling engine is further heated in the furnace outlet for heat recovery. The system yields hot water and electric power. The scheme is as shown.
Figure 2. System concept
Figure 3. Furnace firing
ii) Fluidized bed furnace: The concept is similar to furnace firing[13].
Fluidized bed firing is advantageous over furnace firing due to the following reasons:
Low combustion temperature can be adopted.If the biomass contains alkaline materials fouling can occur in the furnace at high temperatures encountered in the furnace firing concept. Further high combustion efficiency can be achieved with fluidized bed firing. This concept is recommended for high capacity units (>1kW).
iii) Pellet fired stove: Simple home heating stove can be used in this concept[14]. Here pellet feeding is by gravity and a single cold air fan supplies the combustion air. The heat recovery will not be very effective. However the system is very simple and cost effective. It can be adopted for lower capacity units (<1kW) for individual dwellings.
A typical 4.7 kW pellet stove is shown below[15]. It is basically a small natural draft cross flow gasifier coupled to a gas burner[15,16]. The primary air enters the hot fuel bed on one side and the gas leaves from the opposite side.
Figure 4. Fluidized bed firing
Figure 5. Pellet fired stove
Figure 6. 4.7Kw Pellet stove

4.2. Briquetting Machine

Various designs are available. The preferred type is shown below. It is simple and easy to build[17,18].
Figure 7. Mechanised pelletiser
A manual lever press, shown below, has been constructed as part of a student project. This can be adopted for soft bio-mass. It is simple and maintenance free.
Figure 8. Manual lever press

4.3. Stirling Engine

Table 1. Commercial Engines
     

5. Techno-Economic Analysis

A techno economic analysis of power plant was made[19,20].The cost per kW of early Stirling engines was around 10000US$/kW. It is expected that as the technology matures, the cost will stabilize at a lower level. The installed cost of a bio-mass fired Stirling engine with auxiliaries is around 2600Euros/kW [21,22].
Using 1 kW plant as basis, the estimated investment in Namibian Dollars
Estimated Capital cost Euro2600=N$ 28964
Est. Installation costs (10% of capital costs)= N$ 2896
Estimated Total cost= N$ 31860
Est. Operating cost per year (2% of total costs) =N$ 637
Levelized Cost Calculation:
Capacity factor = 90%
Lifetime of plant = 20 years
Annual interest rate = 15%
Fixed costs FC = N$ 31860/1 = N$ 31860 / kW
Operating costs OC = N$ 637/1 = N$ 637 / kW
Total Energy output EO = 7884 hrs/yr*1 kW/yr*20 yrs = 157680 kWh
Capital recovery factor=F
Present value=PV
Therefore, Levelized cost
Comparison with Present Electricity tariff (source: Electricity Control Board –ECB)
Average cost per unit = N$0.426 / kWh
ECB levy = N$0.006 / kWh
Total average cost per unit = N$0.432 / kWh
Assuming a similar ECB levy, total average levelized cost for biomass power is N$0.23334/kWh (0.22734+0.006).The selling price can be comfortably fixed at N$ 0.432 / kWh (equal to present tariff).
Pay back period:
Investment cost= N$ 31860
Net electricity generation= 1kW
Hours of operation/year=7884
Net electricity generation /year= 7884x1=7884 kWh
Returns/year=N$ 7884 x 0.432= N$ 3405
Pay back period: Investment cost/Returns per year= 31860/ 7.663= 9.4 years
It can thus be concluded that whereas the initial cost of installation for the 1 kW unit is high, in the long run it will payback by itself.

6. Conclusions

A Beta type kinematic Stirling engine with means for external firing of bio-mass briquettes is a suitable alternative for local distributed power generation. A simple pellet fired home heating stove is adequate for units up to 1kW.For larger size unit furnace firing or fluidized bed firing can be adopted. The installed cost of a typical unit is 31860 N$/kW. The cost of power generation works out to 0.233N$/kWh and the pay back period is less

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

The author thanks the management of the Polytechnic of Namibia for the support and encouragement..

References

[1]  Increasing Energy Access in Developing Countries: The Role of Distributed Generation, USAID report, 2004.
[2]  National Renewable Energy Laboratory, “Distributed Energy Basics”, May 2012
[3]  New Era, “Invader bush turned into energy source”, Nov 2012
[4]  Emerging technologies & practices, ACEEE, 2004.
[5]  Koichi Hirata,”Stirling engine home page”,2005
[6]  Dr.IsraelUrieli,“Stirling cycle machine analysis” ,Ohio University.
[7]  American Stirling Company “Stirling engines for the third world”,2001
[8]  N.W.Lane & W.T.Beale, “A Bio-mass fired 1kWe Stirling Engine Generator and its Applications in South Africa”, 9th International, Stirling Engine Conference, South Africa 1999.
[9]  J.Obernberger et.al, “State of the art & future developments in small scale CHP systems”,International Nordic Bioenergy conference, 2003.
[10]  Stirling Denmark, “Stirling engines for biomass applications
[11]  Jaap Koppejan, “Key R&D issues in biomass combustion and co-firing”, Waste power generation Seminar, Tokyo, 2003.
[12]  Stirling-aided heat and power production from wood pellets, Evaluation of the Energy Research in Finland, University of Jyvaskyla, 2006.
[13]  IEA Bioenergy Task- 32 report, “Biomass combustion and co-firing an overview”2003
[14]  Bioenergiesystem Gmbh, Austria, “The current state of Austrian pellet boiler technology”,2008
[15]  Biomass-fired Gasifier Stove CGS3: Design, Construction and Operation Manual, Regional Energy Resources Information Center (RERIC), Asian Institute of Technology, Thailand, 2005.
[16]  Report on Portable Wood / Biomass Stoves, Indian Institute of Science, 2006.
[17]  Screw-press Briquetting Machines and Briquette-fired Stoves, Regional Energy Resources Information Center (RERIC), Asian Institute of Technology Thailand, 2005.
[18]  Royal Nepal Academy of Science and Technology , “Biomass briquetting project”, 2002
[19]  Dr.P.C.Sharma,“Power Plant Engineering”, Kataria&Sons, ISBN 81-89757-20-2,2010
[20]  MIT’s Open Courseware
[21]  Micro and small scale CHP from biomass, OPET network paper, 2002.
[22]  Stirling Engine Assessment, EPRI Report, 2002.