Electrical and Electronic Engineering
p-ISSN: 2162-9455 e-ISSN: 2162-8459
2012; 2(2): 23-30
doi: 10.5923/j.eee.20120202.05
D. Mondal 1, A. Sengupta 2, A. Chakrabarti 2
1Department of Electronics and Instrumentation Engineering, Haldia Institute of Technology, Haldia, 721657, India
2Department of Electrical Engineering, Bengal Engineering and Science University, Howrah, 711103, India
Correspondence to: D. Mondal , Department of Electronics and Instrumentation Engineering, Haldia Institute of Technology, Haldia, 721657, India.
| Email: | ![]() |
Copyright © 2012 Scientific & Academic Publishing. All Rights Reserved.
This paper proposes a Linear Matrix Inequality (LMI) based
robust controller design method for enhancement of damping of inter-area oscillations in a multimachine power system network. A Four-input, Single-output (FISO)
controller is designed for a Thyristor Controlled Series compensator (TCSC) employing Wide Area Measurement (WAM) based stabilizing signals as generator speed. The major concern of signal transmission delay in wide area measurement is overcome here using the novel concept of Synchronized Speed Phasor Measurement (SSPM) with Global Position Satellite System (GPS) technology. The controller design has been carried out based on the mixed-sensitivity formulation in a LMI framework with pole-placement constraint. The small signal stability performance of the controller has been examined employing eigenvalue as well as time domain analysis for different operating scenarios of a 14-area real power system comprising of 24 numbers of generators, 203 buses and 266 lines. The designed controller has been found to be robust against varying generation and load power demand as well as for transmission line outage.
Keywords:
Robust Controller, Inter-area Oscillations, Linear Matrix Inequality, Small Signal Stability, Thyristor Controlled Series Compensator, Wide Area Measurement
![]() | (1) |
![]() | (2) |
![]() | (3) |
![]() | (4) |
contains machine states and the state corresponding to PSS.With the installations of a TCSC device (Figure. 1), the TCSC power flow equations are to be additionally included in the network equation (4). This basic model of the TCSC utilizes the concept of a variable series reactance (
) which can be adjusted through appropriate variation of the firing angle (
) in order to allow the specified amount of active power flow across the series compensated line. The linearized TCSC equivalent reactance can be obtained by the following relationship[17] ![]() | (5) |
![]() | Figure 1. TCSC module between node s and t |
![]() | (6) |
![]() | (7) |
![]() | (8) |
from (1-(3), the overall system matrix for an m-machine system can be obtained as ![]() | (9) |
,
and
with
and
.Therefore, linearized state-space model of the multimachine system with TCSC controller can be expressed as![]() | (10) |
![]() | (11) |
![]() | Figure 2. Part of the 14 area, 24 machine and 203 bus study system with TCSC controller |
![]() | Figure 3. Synchronized Speed Phasor Measurement Unit (SSPMU) |
![]() | Figure 4. Configuration of proximity sensor |
![]() | (12) |
), and output signal is the deviation in thyristor conduction angle (
).The state space description of the augmented plant is represented by[20]![]() | (13) |
![]() | (14) |
![]() | (15) |
is the state vector of the plant G(s), u is the plant input, y is the measured signal modulated by the disturbance input d and z is the controlled output. The controller K(s) can be realized by the following state space equations![]() | (16) |
![]() | (17) |
![]() | (18) |
![]() | (19) |
![]() | Figure 5. The closed-loop system with mixed-sensitivity based H∞ controller |
,
;
;
;
. Without loss of generality, Dp22 can be set to zero to make the derivation simpler and the plant becomes strictly proper. The transfer function between ‘d’ to ‘z’ can be described as![]() | (20) |
![]() | (21) |
such that the bounded real lema[22] given by ![]() | (22) |
![]() | (23) |
![]() | (24) |

![]() | Figure 6. LMI region of closed loop poles |
;
;
where 

and
The new controller variables are then defined as![]() | (25) |
![]() | (26) |
![]() | (27) |
![]() | (28) |
,
,
and
are solved form the LMIs employing interior-point optimization methods[25]. Once
,
,
and
are obtained the controller variables
,
,
and
are recovered by solving (25)-(28).
) from four different remote locations (Figure. 2). The original system has a total of 193 states including one state for the TCSC delay. The corresponding LMI based controller would be of a higher order than this. The plant model is hence reduced to a 10-th order equivalent using square-root balanced truncation technique[21]. Following the standard guidelines of mixed-sensitivity design, weights W1(s) and W2 (s) are chosen as low and high pass filters, respectively.The weights W1(s) and W2 (s) are worked out to be:
;
The multiobjective H∞ synthesis program for disturbance rejection and control effort optimization feature of LMI was accessed by suitably chosen arguments of the function hinfmix of the LMI Toolbox in MATLAB. The pole placement objective in LMI has been achieved by defining the conical sector with
, which provides a desired minimum damping
for all the closed-loop poles. The order of the controller obtained from the LMI solution was equal to the reduced plant order plus the order of the weights, which was quite high posing difficulty in practical implementation. Therefore, the controller was reduced to a seventh-order one by the balanced truncation without significantly affecting the frequency response. The state variable representation of the three-input, one-output controller for the TCSC is given in the Appendix A.2. This reduced-order controller has been tested on the full order system against varying generation, load power change and transmission line outage.
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() | Figure 7. Large disturbance dynamic response of machine # 20 (a) Load increase (b) Generation drop (c) Line outage |
![]() | Figure 8. Configuration of WAM based feedback control scheme |
(Gain) = 10;
(Lead time) = 0.4 sec;
(Lag time) = 0.15 sec; XL (TCSC) = 0.000526 pu;XC (TCSC) = 0.00526 pu; XTCSC = ̶ 0.0130 pu ;Firing angle (
) = 155 deg.;
(TCSC delay) =17 ms.





| [1] | Kundur P., Power System Stability and Control. McGraw- Hill: New York, 1994 |
| [2] | Kundur P, Klein M, and Rogers G.j., and Zywno M. S., 1989, Application of power system stabilizers for enhancement of overall system stability, IEEE Trans. on Power Systems, 4(2), 614-626 |
| [3] | Pandey R. K, and Singha N. K., 2009, UPFC control parameter identification for effective power oscillation damping, International Journal of Electrical Power and Energy Systems 31(6), 269-276 |
| [4] | Hingorani N. G, and Gyugyi L., Understanding FACTS: Concepts and Technology of Flexible AC Transmission System. IEEE Press: 2000 |
| [5] | Hassan M. O., Zakaria Z. A, and Cheng S. J., 2009, Impact of TCSC on enhancing power system stability, IEEE Power and Energy Conference, APPEEC, 1-6 |
| [6] | Pal B. C., Coonick A. A., Jaimoukha I. M., and El-Zobaidi H. A, 2000, Linear matrix inequality approach to robust damping control design in power systems with superconducting magnetic energy storage device, IEEE Transactions on power systems, 15(1), 356-362 |
| [7] | Chaudhuri B., and Pal B. C., 2004, Robust damping of multiple swing modes employing global stabilizing signals with a TCSC, IEEE Transactions on power systems, 19(1), 499-506 |
| [8] | Majumder R, Chaudhuri B, Pal B. C., 2007, Implementation and test results of a wide-area measurement-based controller for damping interarea oscillations considering signal-transmission delay, IET Gener. Transm. Distrib., 1(1), 1-7 |
| [9] | Ray S., and Venayagamoorthy G. K., 2008, Real-time implementation of a measurement-based adaptive wide-area control system considering communication delays, IET Gener. Transm. Distrib, 2(1), 62–70 |
| [10] | Juanjuan W., Chuang Fu, and Yao Z., 2011, Design of WAMS based multiple HVDC damping control system, IEEE Transactions on smart grid, 2 (2), 363-374 |
| [11] | Kamwa I., Grondin R., and Hebert Y., 2001, Wide-area measurement based stabilizing control of large power systems—A decentralized/hierarchical approach. IEEE Trans. Power Syst., 16(1), 136–153 |
| [12] | Ree La J. D., Centeno V., Thorp J. S., and Phadke A. G., 2011, Synchronized phasor measurement applications in power systems, IEEE Transactions on smart grid, 1(1), 20-27 |
| [13] | Heydt G., Liu C., Phadke A., and Vittal V., 2001, Solutions for the crisis in electric power supply, IEEE Comput. Appl. Power, 14(3), 22–30 |
| [14] | Okou F, Dessaint L. A., and Akhrif O., 2005, Power system stability enhancement using a wide-area signals based hierarchical controller. IEEE Trans. on Power System, 20(3), 1465-1477 |
| [15] | Cvetkovic M, and Ilic M., 2011, PMU based transient stabilization using FACTS, IEEE Power Systems Conference and Expositions (PSCE), Phoenix, AZ, 1-6 |
| [16] | Sauer P. W., and Pai M. A., Power System Dynamics and Stability. Pearson Education Pte. Ltd.: Singapore, 1998 |
| [17] | Fuerte-Esquivel C. R., Acha E., and Ambriz-Pe'rez H., 2000, A thyristor controlled series compensator model for the power flow solution of practical power networks, IEEE Trans. on power systems, 15(1), 58-64 |
| [18] | Phadke A. G., and Thorp J. S., Synchronized Phasor Measurements and Their Applications, Springer: New York, 2008 |
| [19] | Bose A., 2010, Smart transmission grid applications and their supporting infrastructure, IEEE Transactions on smart grid, 1(1), 10-19 |
| [20] | Skogestad S., and Postlethwaite I., Multivariale Feedback Control Analysis and Design. John Wiley and Sons: 1996 |
| [21] | Zhou K., Doyle J., and Glover K., Robust and Optimal Control. Prentice Hall: 1995 |
| [22] | Gahinet P., and Apkarian P. A., 1994, Linear matrix inequality approach to H∞ control. International Journal Robust Nonlinear Control, 4(4), 421–448 |
| [23] | Chilali M., and Gahinet P., 1996, H∞ design with pole placement constraints: An LMI approach, IEEE Transaction on Automatic Control, 41(3), 358-367 |
| [24] | Scherer C., Gahinet P., and Chilali M., 1997, Multiobjective output-feedback control via LMI optimization, IEEE Trans. on Automatic Control, 42(7), 896-911 |
| [25] | Nesterov Y., and Nemirovski A., Interior Point Polynomial Methods in Convex Programming; Theory and Applications. PA, SIAM: Philadelphia, 1994 |