American Journal of Economics
p-ISSN: 2166-4951 e-ISSN: 2166-496X
2017; 7(5): 201-210
doi:10.5923/j.economics.20170705.01

Abdullahi Ahmed Mohammed 1, Sagiru Mati 2, Mustapha Hussaini 3
1Department of Economics, Northwest University, Kano, Nigeria
2Department of Economics, Northwest University, Kano, Nigeria.
3School of Preliminary Studies, Sule Lamido University, Jigawa, Nigeria
Correspondence to: Abdullahi Ahmed Mohammed , Department of Economics, Northwest University, Kano, Nigeria.
| Email: | ![]() |
Copyright © 2017 Scientific & Academic Publishing. All Rights Reserved.
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY).
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

This study examines the degree and extent of exchange rate pass through into domestic consumer price inflation in the Nigerian economy between 1986Q1 and 2013Q1 using structural vector auto regression (SVAR) methodology. The results from impulse response analysis show that the exchange rate pass through to consumer prices is incomplete, higher in the early decades of the sample and relatively low in the subsequent decades of the sample and below the average range. Yielding a dynamic exchange rate pass through elasticity coefficient of 0.33. Therefore, there seems to be positive relationship between ERPT and inflation for the Nigerian economy: As inflation declines (rises) overtime the ERPT becomes lower (higher). This vindicates a strong evidence that is consistent with Taylor’s (2000) proposition that high or average pass through is associated with high inflation and vice versa. Overall, the results offer supportive evidence in favour of the exchange rate channel, and monetary policy rate to be conceivable track for monetary policy transmission mechanism in the Nigerian economy.
Keywords: Exchange Rate Pass Through, Inflation, Taylor’s hypothesis, Structural VAR, Nigeria
Cite this paper: Abdullahi Ahmed Mohammed , Sagiru Mati , Mustapha Hussaini , Exchange Rate Pass-Through Elasticity to Domestic Consumer Prices in Nigeria and Taylor’s Hypothesis: A Structural Vector Auto Regression Analysis, American Journal of Economics, Vol. 7 No. 5, 2017, pp. 201-210. doi: 10.5923/j.economics.20170705.01.
![]() | Figure 1. Nominal Exchange Rate (Nigerian Naira per US Dollar) and Inflation Developments 1986-2012 |
![]() | (1) |
are (nxn) and
is an (nx1) matrices. To normalize the vector appearing on the LHS of this equation, we need to multiply the equation by the inverse of the matrix B. The multiplication by B inverse allows us to obtain VAR in standard form (unstructured VAR)7 as follows:![]() | (2) |
![]() | (3) |
= [Δy Δm2 Δmpr Δneer Δcpı] is a 5×1 row vector of the endogenous variables observed at time t, where Δy is log nominal output, Δm2 denotes the log of a monetary aggregate such as m2, and Δmpr gives the monetary policy rate, Δneer represents the log of nominal effective exchange rate, Δcpı is the log Consumer price index.Hence equation (2) and (3) are equal![]() | (4) |
,
,
. Therefore, the vector
of the reduced form errors is related to the vector
of innovations by the following system of structural8 equations: ![]() | (5) |
We obtain here a 5×1 row vector of error terms, they are assumed to be serially independent moreover, the structural shock (εt) i.e. the innovations are also assumed to be independently and normally distributed with mean zero and variance-covariance matrix i.e.
. The
innovation could be called “shocks” and they are economically identifiable (i.e., can be output shocks, money supply shocks, monetary policy rate shocks, exchange rate shocks, and consumer price inflation shocks). Therefore, the structural shocks vector is represented by:
Where:
For
represent the output, broad money, monetary policy rate, and nominal exchange rate and consumer price index shocks respectively. Once we identify and impose restrictions on
matrix in a recursive order.
is transform to a triangular matrix form thus:
As such
is assumed to have zero mean, constant variances, and are serially uncorrelated, but because of the matrix
there has to be contemporaneous correlation between innovations. SVAR model is useful in identifying shocks and trace them out by employing impulse response analysis and forecast error variance decomposition (FEVD) by imposing restrictions on the matrices A and/or B. SVAR model is a structural model, it departs from a reduced form standard VAR model and only restrictions for A and B can be added. It should be noted that the reduced form residuals can be retrieved from a SVAR model by
and its variance-covariance matrix is thus; 
Since
is symmetric, it is important to note that without some restrictions, the parameters in the SVAR are not identified. We assume that the model contains n variables (excluding the constant term). For identification purposes, at least n2 independent restrictions on parameters of the structural form are needed to exactly identify the system. Structural shocks are supposed to be mutually uncorrelated; therefore the variance-covariance matrix of the structural shocks is required to be diagonal. Without loss of generality, assuming all structural shocks are mutually independent, the standard deviations of the structural shocks are normalized to one. That is, the variance-covariance matrix of the structural shocks is set to the identity matrix, which yields n(n +1)/2 restrictions. Consequently, it is clear that we need n2_n(n+1)/2=n(n−1)/2 restrictions are needed9. These restrictions can now be impose either on the contemporaneous or on the short run properties of the system.
. Similarly, this suggests that shocks in the entire equations have contemporaneous correlation in the system12 and thus, the unrestricted VAR model would have neglected the contemporaneous correlation among the variables.13
The numerator is the percentage change in the level of the consumer prices inflation between period zero, when the initial exchange rate shock strikes, and at time t. The denominator is the percentage change in the nominal effective exchange rate at time 0.
|
![]() | Figure 2a. Response of CPI to Exchange Rate and Exchange Rate |
![]() | Figure 2b. Dynamic Exchange Rate Pass through Elasticity |