American Journal of Economics

p-ISSN: 2166-4951    e-ISSN: 2166-496X

2016;  6(1): 27-31

doi:10.5923/j.economics.20160601.04

 

Analysis of Chinese Student Values and Implications for the Global Economy

Ziying Cao1, Verl Anderson2

1Wuhan University, Wuhan, China

2Dixie State University, St George, Utah, USA

Correspondence to: Verl Anderson, Dixie State University, St George, Utah, USA.

Email:

Copyright © 2016 Scientific & Academic Publishing. All Rights Reserved.

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY).
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Abstract

Although the importance of understanding the culture and values of other nations has been well documented for many years, much of the research is aging and needs to be updated to include the values and beliefs of tomorrow’s leaders and managers. This paper presents findings from a values study with Chinese university business students, and provides valuable insights with regards to the values of tomorrow’s Chinese leaders and employees.

Keywords: Chinese economic impact, Chinese values, Values research, Chinese university students

Cite this paper: Ziying Cao, Verl Anderson, Analysis of Chinese Student Values and Implications for the Global Economy, American Journal of Economics, Vol. 6 No. 1, 2016, pp. 27-31. doi: 10.5923/j.economics.20160601.04.

1. Introduction

In a world that has become increasingly global, competitive, and even chaotic the ability to relate to others across cultures has become a requisite skill for those who wish to be successful in international competition and collaboration (Steers, Nardon & Sanchez-Runde, 2013). Values, core beliefs, and paradigms about management are profoundly different from culture to culture and even among people within the same cultures (Covey, 2004). As business leaders struggle to manage the international corporation across cultures, understanding the key differences between the underlying normative beliefs of those with whom they work can profoundly impact their ability to win the trust, commitment, and engagement of their employees.
Values that were held in high esteem in an older generation my not be the primary values of the younger generation. Understanding the nuances of different cultures can greatly enhance the ability to successfully impliment corporate strategies in a global environment. Whereas the failure to grasp key concepts in a culture can profoundly negatively affect the success a corporation can have in the introduction of products and services into a new environment.
Chinese values have been studied for a half century by highly regarded scholars (Hofstede, 2001), but limited research has been done to examine the values of the upcoming generation who will be the employees, managers, and leaders in the Chinese business world in the next few decades (Zupan, 2015). Understanding of these values can be a critical element in successful business dealings (Trompenaars & Hampden-Turner, 2012). Thus, examining the values of future business professionals has great worth, not only for Chinese managers, but also for others doing business with Chinese companies.
Although studies of differences in organizational culture have been conducted at the macro-level by several other scholars, we propose that this study adds important incremental insights about the beliefs, attitudes, and values that exist among a key group of individuals who will soon become tomorrow’s knowledge workers in the international business community.
The purpose of this paper is to evaluatekey values of Chinese university students as found in an elective survey and present insights about the attitudes and core beliefs of business students in China.
Further, the purpose of this paper is to compare similarities and differences of the young men and women in China that make up this cohort group and to suggest implications about those values for those who will employ them in organizations and collaborate with them in an increasingly complex world. By understanding these differences and similarities of the new generation of youth, leaders in businesses can maximize their effectiveness in the creation of their strategies, protocols, systems, marketing, and corporate structures in this global economy.

2. Main Body

Studies of the varying cultures across the world have been a subject of notable interest for decades (Hofstede, 1987; Kluchohn, 1961; Hall, 2000). Business leaders have acknowledged the reality that differences in normative values and assumptions impact how people think, how people work as individuals and members of groups, and the most effective ways to achieve organizational goals while meeting individual and societal needs (Trompenaars, 2012).
Over the past 63 years, 14 major research studies have been conducted in regards to cultural values of individuals within nations. The most well-known of these studies was conducted from 1967-73 by the world’s foremost cross-culture expert, Geert Hodfstede. This study included a survey administered to 117,000 IBM workers across 40 countries. He defines culture as “the collective programming of the mind which distinguishes the memers of one group or category of people from another.” (Hofstede, 1997: p.5).
Hofstede identified four dimensions that he claimed summarized different cultures—power distance, uncertainty avoidance, individualism versus collectivism, and masculinity versus feminity. Bond (2010, 2004, 1988) researched the Chinese Value Survey, added another dimension, and named the fifth dimension “Confucian Work Dynamism”, which is associated with Confucian values and the teachings of Confucius. Hofstede, in his later work,stated this Confucian dynamism captures attitudes toward time, persistence, ordering by status, protection of face, respect for tradition, and reciprocation of gifts and favors (2001, 1988).
A sixth dimension on culture was added by Minkov (2007) as he developed a World Values Survey. This value was the degree to which members of a society try to control their desires and impulses. It also explored Long-verses Short-Term Orientation (LTO) captured values gathered from the World Values Survey.
Hofstede and Bond (1988) noted that traditional values of Confucianism were being modified by individuals focusing on pursuing economic prosperity. They reported findings of deemphasizing the importance of protecting face; respect for tradition; reciprocation of greetings, favors, and gifts; and a reliance on personal steadiness and stability. These traditional factors have been viewed as in conflict with the need for economic initiative, risk-taking, and entrepreneurship which have been key to China’s economic growth (Hofstede & Bond, 1988, p. 9-18).
These changing of values have been influenced with globalization, advances in communication technologies, available transportation, the increase of presence of global corporations (e.g. Microsoft, Apple, Coca Cola, McDonalds, Levi Strauss, etc.), and products and operations that can be found world wide (e.g. iPads, iPods, MTV). All these are creating conditions for the merging of cultures (Inglehart, 2000; Bian, 2002).
Because understanding values can be a critical element in successful business dealings (Trompenaars, 2012), examining the values of future business professionals has value not only for Chinese managers but also for others doing business with Chinese companies.

3. Methodology

A survey instrument was constructed from identified values from eleven research studies (Kluchohn, 1961; Hofstede, 1997; Hall, 2000; Trompenaars, 2012; Schwartz, 1994; House, 2004; Steers, 2013; Bond, 1988; Hitlin, 2004; Yang, 1990;). In addition, included in the survey instrument were values from the recent announcement by Chinese President Xi (Xi, 2015), of twelve values or virtues that he advocated be adopted by Chinese society. The purpose of this announcement was to encourage youth to embrace those core values in the quest for long-term Chinese economic prosperity. The values emphasized by Xi bridged traditional Confucian values of harmony and equality but also emphasized patriotism, being prosperous and strong, being just in dealings with others, being governed by law, and being diligent in one’s work.
A focus group of Chinese university students was then conducted to identify additional values deemed important to Chinese youth and that input was incorporated into the list of values created for this study. Those additional values included the preeminence of the national interest, a tranquil moral conscience, physical fitness, healthy life, fair competition, integrity, guanxi, quality of life, happy children, economic prosperity, equality between husband and wife, love and respect of my spouse’s family, access to health care, and a sense of destiny. A total of 110 values were included in the final survey instrument, narrowed from an original listing of 143 values from scholar studies.
This survey was administered at a Tier 1 university and a Tier III university in twomajor cities in Central China. Anonymously, participants in the survey were asked to identify the relative importance of each factor on a five-point Likert-type scale with a score of one meaning that the value factor was Not Important and a score of five meaning that the factor was Extremely Important. The survey instrument was divided into five different categories of the value system (Country and World, Personal Quality, Career, Family and Relations, and Life and Religion). Within each category, participants were then asked to identify the two most important values to them personally in each category. Respondents were also asked to indicate their gender.

4. Findings and Insights

A total of 1,032 surveys were administered, of which 984 were complete and usable for the study. Mean rating scores of all 110 value factors, range from 4.84 for the factor National Security in the Country and World category to 2.64 for the factor Relationship with God in the category of Life and Religion. These responses are consistent with Chinese historical and cultural characteristics. Confucianism views a secure and stable society as essential to maintain order and harmony, which would account for the high factor level of National Security. In regards to the low factor level of the relationship with God, the historically dominating influences of Communism discouraged commitment to religion, which would lead to that factor not as so important as other survey items.
For each category, Table 1 lists the top five value factors chosen by the respondents in each of the five major sections of the survey—listed by combined total, then by gender.
Table 1. Top five selected most important value factors of each category
The Chinese students surveyed considered health as one of the most important values in their lives. Personal fitness and economic prosperity are also high. This affirms that Chinese are facing a conflict between the pursuit of economic prosperity and maintaining a quality of healthy life. Strategically business leaders in China need to be able to communicate to employees how the corporation will balance employee health and environmental quality with that of economic prosperity. Hosmer suggests that such an explanationis critical for earning employee trust long-term (Maurer, 2010).
Findings indicate that Family Relationships are important values, as the relationships with spouses, parents, and their children are among the most important values of the Chinese university students. Confucianism’s high regard for family is still a significant value to these students and future business leaders. The importance of this finding indicate that those who manage tomorrow’s Chinese employees must realize the commitment their employees have toward their families. Although Bond (1988) purports that traditionally the extended family has been a fundamental element of Chinese culture, the increasing number of women in the work force will put more pressure on maintaining this relationship, which management will need to understand and commit to. Self-respect and self-esteem were among the highest of important values by females.
Along with China’s growth, the Chinese students see a strong need to address the smog and pollution in many of China’s largest cities. According to a recent report by Worldwatch Institute (2015), China is home to sixteen of the world’s twenty most polluted cities. The China government focus on healthcare has increased an awareness among the students, making it a high profile topic in China (LeDeu, 2012). The survey showed that health concerns must be balanced with the commitment to economic growth.
Both male and female students place personal fitness as their top value in the Personal Quality category, which echos a national fitness program China has encouraged for years.
The findings that both male and female students rated China’s economic prosperity as a high value indicates a high commitment to China’s role as a predominant world economic power and also suggests an integration with western entrepreneurism.

5. Contributions of this Paper

Much has been written about differences in the cultures of countries, including many articles unique to the Chinese culture. This paper makes several significant contributions to the academic literature.
1) Most of the studies of Chinese culture are dated. Relevant information in these prior papers has changed somewhat with the rising generation of youth in China. This paper provides current information for tomorrow’s business leaders.
2) This study has combined research from scholars from the past 50 years into one current survey instrument.
3) This study has gathered information of both males and females in the Chinese university student community, offering insights of differences and similarities between the genders.
4) This paper combines the assessment of traditional Chinese cultural values, with Confucianism, and the current values of today’s youth.

6. Conclusions

China has a new role as the world’s largest economy. It is essential that the global business environment understand and adapt to the values held high by future Chinese leaders and managers of tomorrow. In a world that is increasingly smaller and interconnected, due to travel, Internet, communications, and blending of cultures, the understanding of the influence of values is paramount to success in the global economy. This group is likely to be representative of many business employees and future business leaders in China over the next several decades, even though their values may change somewhat over time.

References

[1]  Bian, Y. 2002. Chinese social stratification and social mobility. Annual Review of Sociology, 28, 91-117.
[2]  Bond, M. H. 2010. Moving the scientific study of Chinese psychology into our twenty-first century: Some ways forward. in Bond, M. H., (Ed.) The Oxford Handbook of Chinese Psychology, New York: Oxford University Press.
[3]  Bond, M. H. 1988. Finding universal dimensions of individual variation in multicultural studies of values: The Rokeach and Chinese value surveys. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55(6), 1009-1015.
[4]  Bond, M. H., Leung, K., Tong, K. K, de Carrasquel, S., Murikami, F., Yamaguchi, S., et al. 2004. Culture-level dimensions of social axioms and their correlates across 41 cultures. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 35 (5), 548-570.
[5]  Caldwell, C., Licona, B., and Floyd, L. A. 2015. “Internal Marketing to Achieve Competitive Advantage.” International Business and Management, 10 (1), 1-8.
[6]  Chinese Culture Connection. 1987. Chinese values and the search for culture-free dimensions of culture. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 18(2), 143-164.
[7]  Covey, S. R. 2004. The 8th Habit: From Effectiveness to Greatness. New York: Free Press.
[8]  Hall, E.T. and Hall, M.R. 2000. Understanding Cultural Differences: Germans, French, and Americans. Yarmouth, ME: Intercultural Press.
[9]  Hitlin, S., and Piliavin, J.A. 2004. Values: Reviving a Dormant Concept. Annual Review of Sociology, (30), 359-393.
[10]  Hofstede, G. 1997. Cultures and Organizations: Software of the Mind. New York: McGraw Hill.
[11]  Hofstede, G. 1983. The Cultural Relativeity of Organizational Practices and Theories. Journal of International Business Studies, Fall, 75-89.
[12]  Hofstede, G. 2001. Culture’s Consequences: Comparing Values, Behaviors Institutions and Organizations Across Nations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
[13]  Hofstede, G. and M. H. Bond. 1988. The Confucius Connection. Organizational Dynamics, 16, (4), 5-12.
[14]  Hofstede, G. 1983. The Cultural Relativeity of Organizational Practices and Theories. Journal of International Business Studies, Fall, 75-89.
[15]  House, R.J., Hanges, P.I., Javidan, M., Dorfman, P.W., and Gupta, V. 2004. Culture, Leadership, and Organizations: The GLOBE Study of 62 Societies. Thousand Oaks, CA.
[16]  Inglehart, R. 2000. Globalization and Postmodern Values. The Washington Quarterly, Winter, 215-28.
[17]  Kluchohn, F. And Strodtbeck, F. 1961. Variations in Value Orientations. Evanston, IL: Row, Peterson.
[18]  Le Deu, F., Parekh, R., Zhang, F., & Zhou, G. 2012. Healthcare in China: entering uncharted waters. Mckinsey & Company, Shanghai.
[19]  Maurer, I. 2010. How to build trust in inter-organizational projects: The impact of project staffing and project rewards on the formation of trust, knowledge acquisition and product innovation. International Journal of Project Management, 28(7), 629-637.
[20]  Minkov, M., &Hofstede, G. 2010.Hofstede's fifth dimension: New evidence from the World Values Survey. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 20 (10), 1-12.
[21]  Minkov, M. 2007.What makes us different and similar: A new interpretation of the World Values Survey and other cross-cultural data. Sofia, Bulgaria: KlasikaiStil Publishing.
[22]  Peterson, R. A. 2001. On the Use of College Students in Social Science Research: Insights from a Second-Order Meta-Analysis. Journal of Consumer Research, 28 (3), 450-461.
[23]  Schwartz, S. 1994. Beyond Individualism/Collectivism: New Cultural Dimensions of Values. In Kim, U. Triandis, H.C., Kagitcibasi, C., Choi, S.C., and Yoon, G. (eds). Individualism and Collectivism: Theory, Methods, and Applications. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage,
[24]  Steers, R.M., Nardon, L., and Sanchez-Runde, C.J. 2013. Management Across Cultures: Developing Global Competencies. (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
[25]  Trompenaars, F., and Hampden-Turner, C. 2012. Riding the Waves of Culture: Understanding Diversity in Global Business. New York: McGraw-Hill.
[26]  Worldwatch Institute. 2015. State of the World 2015: Confronting Hidden Threats to Sustainability. Island Press.
[27]  Xi, J. 2015. Xi Jinping’s Greatest Challenge. The Diplomat. July 27.
[28]  Yang, K.S., and Bond, M.H. 1990. Exploring Implicit Personality Theories with Indigenous or Imported Constructs: The Chinese Case. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, (58) 6, 1087-1095.