International Journal of Control Science and Engineering
p-ISSN: 2168-4952 e-ISSN: 2168-4960
2019; 9(1): 1-8
doi:10.5923/j.control.20190901.01

Augustine B. Makokha1, Lawrence K. Letting2
1Department of Energy Engineering, Moi University, Eldoret, Kenya
2Department of Electrical & Communications Engineering, Moi University, Eldoret, Kenya
Correspondence to: Augustine B. Makokha, Department of Energy Engineering, Moi University, Eldoret, Kenya.
| Email: | ![]() |
Copyright © 2019 The Author(s). Published by Scientific & Academic Publishing.
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY).
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

This paper presents a dynamic model of mill temperature that could be used alongside mill conventional control systems to provide indications of changes in mill slurry solids concentration and by extension the slurry holdup and mill mixing behaviour based on in-mill temperature profile. The model combines information of energy and mass balance, material breakage mechanisms, fundamental material properties and the milling conditions in a simple and clear representation of the physics and thermodynamics of the wet milling process. Model tests at steady state conditions using industrial mill data show a closer match between measured and predicted temperatures. The test results depicting the dynamic response of the model show clear sensitivity of in-mill temperature to perturbations in the mill slurry solids concentration and solids feed rate. The trends in the milling data from the model simulations corroborate long held believe that mixing is better at lower slurry solids concentration. Overall, the results are indicative of the available potential to improve the accuracy of the conventional mill monitoring and control schemes based on information extracted from in-mill temperature profile.
Keywords: Dynamic modelling, Ball mill, Mill control, Temperature, Energy
Cite this paper: Augustine B. Makokha, Lawrence K. Letting, Dynamic Modelling of Temperature in a Wet Ball Mill Based on Integrated Energy-Mass-Size Balance Approach, International Journal of Control Science and Engineering, Vol. 9 No. 1, 2019, pp. 1-8. doi: 10.5923/j.control.20190901.01.
![]() | Figure 1. Representation of mass and energy streams around the mill |
![]() | Figure 2. Depiction of mass and energy streams in a mill represented by 4 equally sized and fully mixed segments with back-mixing |
![]() | (1) |
![]() | (2) |
![]() | (3) |
. It is worth to note that mill power can easily be measured using mill supervisory and data acquisition (SCADA) system and is expected to vary with changes in mill filling, feed size distribution and slurry properties.The rate of energy loss from the mill through water vapour is a function of in-mill temperature, the humidity of the air overlaying the mill load and the slurry-air interfacial area where the latter is related to the size of the slurry pool. Thus, QLoss can be estimated by the following relation.![]() | (4) |
![]() | (5) |
The residence time (τ) has been correlated to the feed percent solids in the form, (τ = K1χf + K2J), [11]. Here, K1 and K2 are constants to be determined by regression while J is the fraction of mill filling. Performing an energy balance around the mill system represented by n-mixers (Figure 2), yields equations that describe the temperature variation with time inside the mill. The symbols
and
represent the length and residence time of a single mixer respectively while (φb) is the back-mixing coefficient which is related to the axial dispersion coefficient.Mixer 1:![]() | (6a) |
![]() | (6b) |
![]() | (6c) |
![]() | (7) |
The parameters b and S are the breakage distribution function and the selection function respectively that can be obtained using equations proposed by Austin et al [1], while Fm, χm and χf denote the mass flow rate through the mill and the slurry solids fraction inside the mill and in the feed stream respectively. The rest of the parameters retain their earlier definitions. For a well-mixed mill, the size of particles inside the mill would be equal to the mill product size (li = ypi) and the average residence time would be given by the relation, (τ = M/Fm).The population balance equation presented in Literature [1, 6] for determining the selection function characterizes particles only by their sizes. However, it is well recognized that the mechanical properties of brittle materials such as mineral bearing ore rocks strongly depend on deformation rate and strain rate. Therefore in population balance modelling of particle breakage process, the selection function should allow for particles to be characterized simultaneously by their size and fracture energy. The function should comprise the probability of a particle being selected for breakage and the probability of the energies generated by the impacts being sufficient to break the particles.According to the work by Crespo [2], the probability of the energy applied being sufficient to break the particle is related to the fraction of the absorbed impact energies in a given time interval that are higher than the fracture energy. Similar observations were made by Tugcan and Rajamani [20] in a separate study using ultra-fast load cell data, who further indicated the dependence of this probability on particle size and material specific properties. For instance, a material with a higher hardness index would store more strain energy during deformation hence depending on the level of applied strain, it may require repeated impacts to fracture a hard material. This observation is supported by the data from Discrete Element Method (DEM) [4, 15], which shows that the impact frequency inside the mill depends on the level of energy applied. Due to lack of appropriate data on fracture energies of various mineral ore rocks, the size dependent rate of particle fracture shall be adopted in our model. From equation 7, the dynamic mass-size balance model can be written as follows:![]() | (8) |
![]() | (9) |
![]() | (10a) |
![]() | (10b) |
![]() | (10c) |
.It is expected that the variation in slurry solids concentration between mill cells (m1, mk and mn) would be marginal due to back-mixing effect. Performing the solids balance around the n mixers, we obtain the following equations representing the dynamic variation of solids concentration in each respective mixer.Mixer 1:![]() | (11a) |
![]() | (11b) |
![]() | (11c) |
![]() | Figure 3. Trends of mill temperature change and slurry solids concentration for 14 surveys conducted on an industrial mill |
![]() | Figure 4. Trends of mill power draw and product size (P80) for 14 surveys conducted on an industrial mill |
![]() | Figure 5. Comparison of measured versus model predictions of mill temperature changes for 14 surveys conducted on an industrial mill |
![]() | Figure 6. Simulated particle size distribution of the mill product after 30 minutes of milling |
![]() | Figure 7. Simulated in-mill temperatures for 30 minutes of milling at different levels of slurry solids concentration |
|
|
![]() | Figure 8(a, b, c). Profile of mill temperature change with variations in feed solids concentration and mill dilution water |