International Journal of Composite Materials

p-ISSN: 2166-479X    e-ISSN: 2166-4919

2017;  7(2): 72-76

doi:10.5923/j.cmaterials.20170702.04

 

Tensile and Water Absorption Properties of Jute and Pineapple Fabric Reinforced Polyester Composite

Md. Reazuddin Repon 1, 2, K. Z. M. Abdul Motaleb 1, M. Tauhidul Islam 1, 2, Rajib Al Mamun 1, Md. Mizanur Rahman Mithu 3

1Department of Textile Engineering, Khwaja Yunus Ali University, Sirajgonj, Bangladesh

2Department of Textile Engineering, Mawlana Bhashani Science and Technology University, Tangail, Bangladesh

3Department of Mechanical Engineering, Khwaja Yunus Ali University, Sirajgonj, Bangladesh

Correspondence to: Md. Reazuddin Repon , Department of Textile Engineering, Khwaja Yunus Ali University, Sirajgonj, Bangladesh.

Email:

Copyright © 2017 Scientific & Academic Publishing. All Rights Reserved.

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY).
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Abstract

The role of natural fibers reinforced hybrid composite materials is growing at an increasing rate in the field of engineering and technology due to their considerable properties. The objective of this study is to examine the tensile strength, elongation percentage, Young’s modulus and water absorption percentage of jute and pineapple fabric reinforced polyester composite. Unsaturated polyester resin was used as matrix material. The properties of manufactured composite were evaluated experimentally using computerized UTM machine according to ASTM standards. The results revealed that the tensile properties were increased with the increase of composite thickness. The values of tensile strength and Young’s modulus of pineapple fabric composite were exhibited higher than the jute composite and the quite opposite trend were observed in case of elongation and water absorption percentage.

Keywords: Tensile properties, Water absorption, Jute fabric, Pineapple fabric, Polyester resin, Composite

Cite this paper: Md. Reazuddin Repon , K. Z. M. Abdul Motaleb , M. Tauhidul Islam , Rajib Al Mamun , Md. Mizanur Rahman Mithu , Tensile and Water Absorption Properties of Jute and Pineapple Fabric Reinforced Polyester Composite, International Journal of Composite Materials, Vol. 7 No. 2, 2017, pp. 72-76. doi: 10.5923/j.cmaterials.20170702.04.

1. Introduction

Composites are a versatile and valuable family of materials that can solve problems of different applications and facilitate the introduction of new properties in materials [1]. In recent years, there has been an increasing interest in finding new applications of natural fibre reinforced composites. Natural fibres appear to be the outstanding materials which come as the viable and abundant substitute for the expensive and nonrenewable synthetic fibre. Natural fibre is promising reinforcement for use in composites on account of its low cost, low density, stiffness, high specific strength and modulus, no health risk, easy and safe handling, light weight, easy availability, renewability, non-abrasiveness, easy processing, non-toxicity, high flexibility, acoustic insulation and much lower energy requirement for processing [1, 2]. Natural fibers like sisal, banana, jute, oil palm, pineapple, kenaf and coir have been used as reinforcement in composite [3]. Natural fibre based composites are under intensive study due to their eco-friendly nature and peculiar properties such as acceptable specific properties, ease of separation, enhanced energy recovery, CO2 neutrality, biodegradability, and recyclable nature [4].
Among all of these natural fibres, Pineapple leaf fibres (PALF) have admirable mechanical properties. PALF is removed from the leaves of the plant Ananus cosmos. PALF is dominatingly comprised of cellulose (70–82%), lignin (5–12%) and ash (1.1%). The higher mechanical properties of pineapple fibre are associated with its high cellulose content and comparatively low micro-fibrillar angle [5].
Another natural fibre, Jute performs comparatively better among the rice straw fibre, bagasse, stramineous fibre, cocos fibre, hemp, flax, ramie, banana, cotton, coir, sisal, etc., due to the inexpensive and commercial availability in a required form [6]. It can also be substituted for conventional fibres in many applications and has been applied as reinforcement to eco-composites and bio-composites [5]. Jute is an important bast fiber and comprises of bundled ultimate cells, each containing spirally oriented micro- fibrils bound together. Therefore, jute composites may exhibits outstanding mechanical properties and could be an ideal solution for wood substitution [1, 5].
Many researchers have investigated the various mechanical, thermal and physical properties of pineapple and jute fibre reinforced composites [7-20]. Different matrix materials were used in different research. Among them, the commonly used matrixes are polyester resin [7, 10, 13, 17, 18, 19, 21], natural rubber [9], polypropylene [11, 13, 15], polyethylene [22-24], polycarbonate [25], epoxy resin [14, 23, 26], phenol formaldehyde [27].
It has been found that the mechanical and physical properties of jute and pineapple composites are highly inconsistent and depend on geographic origin of fibres, climatic growth conditions and processing techniques.
The objective of this research work is to study the mechanical properties of jute and pineapple fabric by incorporating them into polyester resin matrix to prepare the composites at various volumes. The composites were tested to evaluate the tensile properties such as tensile strength, elongation percentage and Young’s modulus. Water absorption percentages were also investigated.
Figure 1. (a1) Jute plant (b1) Jute fibre (c1) Jute yarn (d1) Jute fabric
Figure 2. (a2) Pineapple plant (b2) Pineapple fibre (c2) Pineapple yarn (d2) Pineapple fabric

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials

Jute and pineapple fabrics having plain weave structures were collected from Bangladesh Jute Research Institute, Dhaka, Bangladesh. Unsaturated polyester resin and methyl ethyl ketone peroxide (MEKP) were purchased from Nasim Plastic Industries Limited, Dhaka, Bangladesh. MEKP was used as a catalyst.
Table 1. Fabric specification
     
Figure 3. Molecular structure of methyl ethyl ketone peroxide

2.2. Methods

2.2.1. Sampling
Thicknesses of samples were recorded by digital slide calipers. Average results of three readings from different place along the sample have taken for measuring the each thickness. Different samples are identified as mentioned table 2.
Table 2. Sample Identification
     
2.2.2. Fabrication of Composites
Jute and Pineapple fabric reinforced polyester composites were prepared by hand layup technique [28]. Jute and Pineapple fabric were cut with a dimension of 30cm ×30 cm. A glass plate of the dimension 40cm ×40 cm was placed on a suitable place. A mylot paper with similar dimension to the glass plate was cut and placed on the glass plate. According to fabric weight, polyester resin was taken in a beaker and 2% MEKP was added. These two chemicals were mixed vigorously with an agitator. Half of the mixture was poured on to the mylot paper and spread over the area similar to the fabric with a plastic spreader. Then jute fabric was placed on to the polyester resin mixture and rolled with hand roller machine. Then rest of the mixture was poured on to the fabric and rolled. After it was covered with another mylot paper and rolled with the hand rolling machine to remove unwanted air bubbles and another glass plate was placed upon it. A dead weight of 15 kg was loaded on the arrangement for 4 hours. Finally the dead weight was unloaded and two layer of the mylot paper were separated from the composite. Thus, jute fabric reinforced polyester composite was obtained. Same process was followed to produce pineapple fabric composite. The amounts of polyester resin were varied for producing composite of different thicknesses.
Figure 4. Photographs of composite samples
2.2.3. Testing of Samples
The tensile properties such as tensile strength (TS), elongation at break percentage (EB%) and Young’s modulus (Y) of the prepared composites were evaluated by a universal testing machine (UTM) (Model: H50KS-0404, HOUNSFIELD, series S, UK) at Institute of Radiation and Polymer Technology Laboratory, Bangladesh Atomic Energy Commission, Dhaka, Bangladesh. The specimens were prepared according to ASTM D638 standard. Crosshead speed of 10 mm/min and a gauge length 50 mm were maintained. Equation 1, 2 and 3 were used for measuring the tensile strength, elongation at break percentage and Young’s modulus respectively [28].
(1)
Where, Fmax= Maximum load applied to the sample and
A= Cross-sectional area of the sample.
Percentage of elongation-at-break was obtained by the following relation:
(2)
Where, ΔLb = Extension at break point and L0= Original length of the sample.
(3)
Where, dσ = Stress at yield point and dε = Strain at yield point
For the measurement of water absorption percentage, the cut samples were kept in a oven at 80°C for 24 hr. It was taken out from the oven and immediately weighed. Then, composite samples were immersed in a static water bath at 25°C for time interval of 10 minutes (up to 60 minutes). After certain periods of time, samples were taken out from the bath and wiped by tissue paper, then weighed. Water uptake percentage was determined by using the equation 4.
(4)
Where, Wi= Initial weight (oven dry weight) and Wf= Final weight (after immerse in water).

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Tensile Properties

3.1.1. Tensile Strength
Figure 5 depicts the tensile strength of jute and pineapple fabric reinforced polyester composite. It is clearly evident from the figure 1 that with the increasing of the thickness, the tensile strength is increasing both for jute and pineapple fabric reinforced polyester composite. Regarding jute composite, the tensile strength of samples B and C were increased 35.28% and 52.92% respectively compared to the sample A. Concerning the tensile strength of pineapple fabric composite, the samples orders were found as D<E<F. The tensile strength was increased 2.48% for the sample E and 6.98% increased for the sample F compared to the sample D. The figure 1 also confirms that the tensile strength of pineapple fabric composite is higher than jute fabric composite. It is well known that composite strength mainly depends on fibre loading (%), fibre strength and interfacial strength between fibre and matrix. Tensile properties of composite give some indirect information about interfacial bonding between fibre and matrix.
Figure 5. Effect of tensile strength on jute and pineapple fabric reinforced polyester composite
3.1.2. Elongation at Break
The elongation percentages at break of jute and pineapple fabric reinforced polyester composite specimens are presented in figure 6. Regarding elongation% of jute fabric composite, the samples orders were found as A<B<C. The percentages of elongation at break were increased by 12.63% and 18.42% for the sample B and C correspondingly as compared to the sample A. Consequently, in pineapple fabric composite, the samples orders were found as D<E<F. The elongation% was increased 9.67% for the sample E and 62.91% increased for the sample F as compared to the sample D.
Figure 6. Elongation% of jute and pineapple fabric reinforced polyester composite
3.1.3. Young’s Modulus
Figure 7 illustrates the Young’s modulus of jute and pineapple fabric reinforced polyester composite. The samples orders of jute fabric composite were found as A<B<C depending on Young’s modulus. The Young’s modulus of the samples B and C were increased by 18.34% and 40.89% respectively as compared to the sample A. Conversely, the Young’s modulus of the samples E and F were increased by 8.07% and 15.58% correspondently as compared to the sample D. The fibres of jute and pineapple form an intimate bond with polyester resin.
Figure 7. Effect of Young’s modulus on jute and pineapple fabric reinforced polyester composite

3.2. Water Absorption

Water absorption test is very important for determining degradability of the material in moist condition. The water absorption percentages of jute and pineapple fabric reinforced polyester composite specimens are shown in figure 8 for different soaking time. The water absorption percentages were increased with the increasing soaking time. The samples of jute fabric composite were exhibited higher water absorption than pineapple composite. This behavior was expected because the moisture regain of jute fibre is higher than the pineapple fibre. Besides, water can reside in composite due to other three reasons. Those are the lumen, the cell wall and the gaps between fibre and resin in the case of weak interface adhesion. The maximum water absorption (4.19%) was observed for the sample C at 60 minutes soaking time. It is well known that natural fibres are good water permeable as well as their composites. Hence, the water absorption characteristics of natural fibre composite is mainly fiber-controlled than the matrix [29, 30].
Figure 8. Effect of soaking time on water absorption properties of jute and pineapple composite

4. Conclusions

In this study, tensile and water absorption properties of jute and pineapple fabric reinforced polyester composites were investigated. The tensile strengths as well as Young’s modulus of pineapple composite were exhibited better results than that of the jute fabric reinforced composites. Opposite scenario has observed for elongation percentage at break. The capacity of water absorption was noticed higher in jute fabric composite than pineapple. The jute and pineapple fabric reinforced composites has degradable behaviors and can be used as environmental friendly materials. Further investigation will be done to improve processing, to expand the application fields for jute and pineapple composites.

References

[1]  Gon, D., Das, K., Paul, P. and Maity, S., 2012. Jute composites as wood substitute. International Journal of Textile Science, 1(6), pp.84-93.
[2]  Júnior, J.H.S.A., Júnior, H.L.O., Amico, S.C. and Amado, F.D.R., 2012. Study of hybrid intralaminate curaua/glass composites. Materials & Design, 42, pp.111-117.
[3]  Munirahmokhtar, A.R. and Hassan, A., 2007. Characterization and treatments of pineapple leaf fiber thermoplastic composite for construction applications. Research Vot No: 75147.
[4]  Abedin, M.Z., Beg, M.D.H., Pickering, K.L. and Khan, M.A., 2006. Study on the mechanical properties of jute/glass fiber-reinforced unsaturated polyester hybrid composites: effect of surface modification by ultraviolet radiation. Journal of Reinforced Plastics and Composites, 25(6), pp.575-588.
[5]  Reddy, M.I., Kumar, M.A. and Raju, C.R.B., 2016. Tensile and Flexural properties of Jute, Pineapple leaf and Glass Fiber Reinforced Polymer Matrix Hybrid Composites. International Conference on Processing of Materials, Minerals and Energy, pp.1-5.
[6]  Zeng, J., Zhang, C., Liang, C., Du, G., Liu, J., Zhang, C., Xing, S., Zhang, Y. and Xiao, J., Study on Processing and Properties of Jute fiber Reinforced Polymer Matrix Composites. Provider, 128, p.191.
[7]  Mishra, S., Misra, M., Tripathy, S.S., Nayak, S.K. and Mohanty, A.K., 2001. Potentiality of pineapple leaf fibre as reinforcement in PALF-polyester composite: Surface modification and mechanical performance. Journal of Reinforced Plastics and Composites, 20(4), pp.321-334.
[8]  Luo, S. and Netravali, A.N., 1999. Interfacial and mechanical properties of environment-friendly “green” composites made from pineapple fibers and poly (hydroxybutyrate-co-valerate) resin. Journal of Materials Science, 34(15), pp.3709-3719.
[9]  Lopattananon, N., Panawarangkul, K., Sahakaro, K. and Ellis, B., 2006. Performance of pineapple leaf fiber–natural rubber composites: the effect of fiber surface treatments. Journal of Applied Polymer Science, 102(2), pp.1974-1984.
[10]  Devi, L.U., Bhagawan, S.S. and Thomas, S., 2011. Dynamic mechanical properties of pineapple leaf fiber polyester composites. Polymer composites, 32(11), pp.1741-1750.
[11]  Arib, R.M.N., Sapuan, S.M., Ahmad, M.M.H.M., Paridah, M.T. and Zaman, H.K., 2006. Mechanical properties of pineapple leaf fibre reinforced polypropylene composites. Materials & Design, 27(5), pp.391-396.
[12]  Berhanu, T., Kumar, P., Singh, I., 2014. Mechanical Behaviour of Jute Fibre Reinforced Polypropylene Composites. 5th International & 26th All India Manufacturing Technology, Design and Research Conference (AIMTDR 2014) December 12th–14th.
[13]  Ahmed, K.S. and Vijayarangan, S., 2007. Experimental characterization of woven jute‐fabric‐reinforced isothalic polyester composites. Journal of Applied Polymer Science, 104(4), pp.2650-2662.
[14]  Prasad, B.D., Reddy, G.K. and Yadav, A.A., 2014. Mechanical Properties of Composite Material Reinforced by Jute and E-Glass Fibers. International Journal of Emerging Engineering Research and Technology, 2 (5), PP. 135-138.
[15]  Khan, J.A., Khan, M.A., Islam, R. and Gafur, A., 2010. Mechanical, thermal and interfacial properties of jute fabric-reinforced polypropylene composites: effect of potassium dichromate. Materials Sciences and Applications, 1(06), pp. 350-357.
[16]  Elbadry, E.A., Aly-Hassan, M.S. and Hamada, H., 2012. Mechanical properties of natural jute fabric/jute mat fiber reinforced polymer matrix hybrid composites. Advances in Mechanical Engineering, 4, p.354547.
[17]  Gowda, T.M., Naidu, A.C.B. and Chhaya, R., 1999. Some mechanical properties of untreated jute fabric-reinforced polyester composites. Composites Part A: applied science and manufacturing, 30(3), pp.277-284.
[18]  Saha, A.K., Das, S., Bhatta, D. and Mitra, B.C., 1999. Study of jute fiber reinforced polyester composites by dynamic mechanical analysis. Journal of applied polymer science, 71(9), pp.1505-1513.
[19]  Varma, I.K., Krishnan, S.A. and Krishnamoorthy, S., 1989. Composites of glass/modified jute fabric and unsaturated polyester resin. Composites, 20(4), pp.383-388.
[20]  Mohan, R., Shridhar, M.K. and Rao, R.M.V.G.K., 1983. Compressive strength of jute-glass hybrid fibre composites. Journal of Materials Science Letters, 2(3), pp.99-102.
[21]  Uma Devi, L., Joseph, K., Manikandan Nair, K.C. and Thomas, S., 2004. Ageing studies of pineapple leaf fiber–reinforced polyester composites. Journal of applied polymer science, 94(2), pp.503-510.
[22]  George, J., Bhagawan, S.S., Prabhakaran, N. and Thomas, S., 1995. Short pineapple‐ leaf‐ fiber‐ reinforced low‐density polyethylene composites. Journal of Applied Polymer Science, 57(7), pp.843-854.
[23]  Payae, Y. and Lopattananon, N., 2009. Adhesion of pineapple-leaf fiber to epoxy matrix: the role of surface treatments. Sonklanakarin Journal of Science and Technology, 31(2), pp.189-194.
[24]  Miah, M.J., Khan, M.A. and Khan, R.A., 2011. Fabrication and characterization of jute fiber reinforced low density polyethylene based composites: effects of chemical treatment. Journal of Scientific Research, 3(2), pp.249-259.
[25]  Threepopnatkul, P., Kaerkitcha, N. and Athipongarporn, N., 2009. Effect of surface treatment on performance of pineapple leaf fiber–polycarbonate composites. Composites Part B: Engineering, 40(7), pp.628-632.
[26]  Gassan, J. and Bledzki, A.K., 1999. Possibilities for improving the mechanical properties of jute/epoxy composites by alkali treatment of fibres. Composites Science and Technology, 59(9), pp.1303-1309.
[27]  Mangal, R., Saxena, N.S., Sreekala, M.S., Thomas, S. and Singh, K., 2003. Thermal properties of pineapple leaf fiber reinforced composites. Materials Science and Engineering: A, 339(1), pp.281-285.
[28]  Kafi, A. A., Abedin, M. Z., Beg, M. D. H., Pickering, K. L., Khan, M. A., 2006. Study on the mechanical properties of Jute/Glass fiber reinforced unsaturated polyester hybrid composites: Effect of surface modification by Ultraviolet radiation, Journal of Reinforced Plastics and Composites, 25(6) pp.575-588.
[29]  Dhakal, H.N., Zhang, Z.Y. and Richardson, M.O.W., 2007. Effect of water absorption on the mechanical properties of hemp fibre reinforced unsaturated polyester composites. Composites Science and Technology, 67(7), pp.1674-1683.
[30]  Adhikary, K.B., Pang, S. and Staiger, M.P., 2008. Long-term moisture absorption and thickness swelling behaviour of recycled thermoplastics reinforced with Pinus radiata sawdust. Chemical Engineering Journal, 142(2), pp.190-198.