American Journal of Chemistry

p-ISSN: 2165-8749    e-ISSN: 2165-8781

2024;  14(5): 55-62

doi:10.5923/j.chemistry.20241405.02

Received: Nov. 29, 2024; Accepted: Dec. 26, 2024; Published: Dec. 28, 2024

 

Antiradical and Antidiabetic Potential of Newbouldia laevis (P. Beauv.) ex Bureau Leaf Extracts: Inhibition of α-Glucosidase Activity

Rawendé Sédégo1, Bakouan Youssoufou1, Téeda Hamidou Ganamé2, Jules Yoda3, Benjamin Ouédraogo2, 3, Bintou Sessouma1, Karifa Bayo1

1Laboratory of Molecular and Materials Chemistry (LC2M), University Joseph KI-ZERBO, Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso

2Laboratory of Environmental and Bio-Organic Analytical Chemistry (LCAEBiO) University Joseph KI-ZERBO, Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso

3Department of Traditional Medicine, Pharmacopoeia – Pharmacy (MEPHATRA-PH), Research Institute for Health Sciences (IRSS /CNRST), Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso

Correspondence to: Bintou Sessouma, Laboratory of Molecular and Materials Chemistry (LC2M), University Joseph KI-ZERBO, Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso.

Email:

Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Scientific & Academic Publishing.

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY).
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Abstract

This study aimed to evaluate the therapeutic potential of extracts from the leaves of Newbouldia laevis (P. Beauv.) ex Bureau, a plant used in the management of diabetes. In this study, the different analyses focused on the anti-radical and anti-diabetic activities of selected extracts. Antidiabetic activity was studied by monitoring the inhibitory effect of the fractions on α-glucosidase, using the in vitro model. Anti-radical activities were evaluated by DPPH and ABTS methods. Ethyl acetate and butanol fractions showed better inhibitory effects against 𝛂-glucosidase enzymatic activity, with IC50 values estimated at 2.33 ± 0.13 µg/mL and 2.57 ± 0.18 µg/mL, respectively, compared to acarbose, whose IC50 is estimated at 0.57 ± 0.02 mg/mL. For free radical scavenging activity, the same fractions showed the highest DPPH radical scavenging with IC50 values of 4.164 ± 0.085 and 11.454 ± 0.13 μg/mL, respectively. For the cationic ABTS●+ radical, the IC50 values are 2.61 ± 0.071 and 5.465 ± 0.022 μg/mL, respectively. These results suggest that Newbouldialaevis leaf extracts have significant anti-diabetic properties.

Keywords: Newbouldia laevis, α-glucosidase, Antiradical, Anti-diabetic activity

Cite this paper: Rawendé Sédégo, Bakouan Youssoufou, Téeda Hamidou Ganamé, Jules Yoda, Benjamin Ouédraogo, Bintou Sessouma, Karifa Bayo, Antiradical and Antidiabetic Potential of Newbouldia laevis (P. Beauv.) ex Bureau Leaf Extracts: Inhibition of α-Glucosidase Activity, American Journal of Chemistry, Vol. 14 No. 5, 2024, pp. 55-62. doi: 10.5923/j.chemistry.20241405.02.

1. Introduction

Diabetes is a chronic condition in which blood sugar levels are very high because the body cannot longer produce enough insulin or use it effectively [1]. There are three (03) main types of diabetes, including gestational diabetes, insulin-dependent diabetes (type 1 diabetes) and non-insulin-dependent diabetes (type 2 diabetes or diabetes mellitus). The latter is the most common, accounting for an estimated 90% of diabetes cases [2]. Many studies have shown that oxidative stress is a contributing factor in the development and progression of many diseases, including diabetes [3]. These studies have investigated the effect of oxidative stress on the onset and development of diabetic disorders via the formation of free radicals, which are likely to prevent the normal functioning of insulin and thus induce the onset or progression of diabetes mellitus [4-6]. The precariousness of diabetes care, the severity of the disease and its socio-economic impact make it a major public health problem in African countries, particularly in Burkina Faso [7]. Studies show that approximately 80% of the population in these countries rely on traditional herbal medicine for primary health care [8-10]. Medicinal plants are therefore of great interest as a potential source for the development of phytomedicines for many diseases in low-income populations. Many recipes derived from medicinal plants are proposed by phytotherapists for the treatment of diabetes, for their pharmacological properties in the regulation of oxidative stress and in the management of diabetes. Such is the case with Newbouldia laevis (P. Beauv.) ex Bureau, known as African hyssop, which is traditionally used in the treatment of diabetes. Studies have shown that it contains compounds of biological interest such as phenolic derivatives, flavonoids and steroids with anti-free radical properties [11-12]. Other studies have highlighted the contribution of these compounds to anti-diabetic activity, and their presence inhibits α-glucosidase, which is responsible for the hydrolysis of polysaccharides [13]. The aim of this study is to evaluate the in vitro antiradical and anti-diabetic activities of Newbouldia laevis leaf extracts.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Plant Material

The plant material consists of leaves of Newbouldia laevis (P. Beauv.) ex Bureau, harvested in August 2022 in the city of Ouagadougou. The plant was identified at the Laboratory of Plant Biology and Ecology of the University Joseph KI-ZERBO. A specimen was deposited in the university herbarium with identification number 18017. The harvested leaves were thoroughly washed and dried in an airy room, away from sunlight and dust (for 2 weeks), then ground to powder using a blade grinder.

2.2. Extraction

The plant was extracted according to the protocol described by Karanga et al. with some modifications [14]. In fact, 100 g of the plant powder was degreased with hexane to remove chlorophyll and wax. After filtration, the pomace was dried, and 50 g were macerated for 72 hours in 500 mL of a hydroalcoholic solvent (ethanol-water 80/20 v/v). After filtration, the filtrate obtained was concentrated with a rotary evaporator to a minimum volume and then lyophilized to obtain a dry crude extract. 9 g of this crude extract was redissolved in 150 mL of distilled water, followed by liquid-liquid extraction by successive exhaustions with solvents of increasing polarity, such as dichloromethane (DCM), ethyl acetate (AcOET) and n-butanol (BuOH). All partitions were repeated in triplicate and the different fractions obtained were concentrated to dryness and stored appropriately for further analysis.

2.3. Antioxidant Potential of Selective Extracts

2.3.1. DPPH Method
The DPPH° test measures the free radical scavenging capacity of pure molecules or plant extracts in a model system (organic solvent, room temperature) according to the method of Rodríguez et al. with some modifications [15]. It measures the ability of an antioxidant (RH, usually phenolic compounds) to reduce the chemical radical DPPH° by hydrogen transfer. DPPH°, which is initially violet in color, is converted to DPPH-H, which is pale yellow in color (Figure 1). The DPPH method is performed as follows 1 mL of extract (appropriately diluted) is mixed with 4 mL of freshly prepared methanolic DPPH solution. After incubation for 10 min, the absorbance is measured at 517 nm using a microplate spectrophotometer. The radical scavenging activity (IC50) is expressed in µg/mL.
Figure 1. Reduction of DPPH by an antioxidant
2.3.2. FRAP Method
The FRAP assay was performed according to the method of Piljac-Zegarac J. et al. with some modifications [16]. To prepare the FRAP reagent, 0.312 g of detripyridyltriazine (TPTZ) is dissolved in 100 mL of 40 mM HCl solution. This results in a solution with a final TPTZ concentration of 10 mM. At the same time, prepare a sodium acetate buffer solution. Dissolve 2.56 g sodium acetate in 5.36 mL acetic acid (80% pure) and make up to 250 mL with distilled water. Prepare a 20 mM ferric chloride (FeCl3; 6H2O) solution by dissolving 0.54 g FeCl3 in 100 mL of distilled water. Finally, the TPTZ-acetate buffer-FeCl3 solutions are mixed at a ratio of 1/10/1 (v/v/v) to obtain the FRAP reagent ready for use in the assays. Read the absorbance at 595 nm.
2.3.3. ABTS Radical Reduction Method
This test is based on the redox mechanism of ABTS (ammonium salt of 2,2-azino-bis-(3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulfonic acid). In this test, the ABTS salt loses an electron to form a dark-colored cation radical (ABTS.+) in solution. In the presence of the antioxidant, this radical is reduced to the ABTS+ cation, resulting in a discoloration of the solution (Figure 2). The method used is that described by Arts (2004), RE et al. (1999) [17-18]. 19.2 mg of ABTS was dissolved in 5 mL of distilled water. 3.312 mg potassium persulfate was added and the mixture was kept in the dark at room temperature for 12 to 16 hours. 4.5 mL of this mixture was then diluted in 220 mL of analytical methanol. A series of twelve (12) successive dilutions is made starting from the parent solution concentration of the samples (1 mg/mL).
Figure 2. ABTS oxidation-reduction mechanism
2.3.4. Determination of Compounds with Antioxidant Potential
The content of phenolic compounds in a crude extract is measured by the Folin-Ciocalteu method [19-20]. The principle is to oxidize all phenolic compounds with the Folin-Ciocalteu reagent, using gallic acid as a calibration standard. The total phenolic compound (TCP) content of different fractions of Newbouldia laevis leaves was measured using a colorimetric method with slight modifications of the Folin-Ciocalteu method. 1 mL of extract or gallic acid was mixed with 1 mL of diluted Folin-Ciocalteu reagent. After eight minutes at room temperature in a cube, 2 mL of a saturated solution of sodium carbonate (7.5% in water) was added to the mixture. After thirty minutes in the dark at 37°C, the absorbance of the blue solution obtained was measured using a UV-visible spectrophotometer at 760 nm. The results are obtained by plotting the absorbance readings against a previously established calibration curve using gallic acid as a reference and are expressed as µg gallic acid equivalent (GAE) per milligram of crude extract (µg GAE/mg extract).
T = Content in µg Gallic Acid Equivalent per mg extract
C = Sample concentration read from standard curve
D = Dilution factor of the sample to be assayed
Ci = initial concentration of the sample solution to be assayed.

2.4. Determination of α-Glucosidase Inhibitory Activity

The inhibition of the fractions on α-glucosidase activity was assessed using the chromogenic method reported by Ranilla et al. (2010) [21] with slight modifications. For this purpose, a mixture containing 20 µL of α-glucosidase (1 unit/mL), 120 µL of 0.1 M phosphate buffer pH 6.9 and 10 µL of each plant fraction at different concentrations is introduced. Each solution obtained is pre-incubated in 96-well microplates at 37°C for 15 minutes. After incubation, the enzymatic reaction is initiated by adding 20 µL of 5 mM p-nitrophenyl-α-D-glucopyranoside in 0.1 M phosphate buffer (pH 6.9) and mixing. The reaction mixture is incubated at 37°C for a further 15 minutes. Stop the reaction by adding 80 µL of 0.2 M sodium carbonate solution. Read the absorbance at 405 nm on a spectrophotometer. The reaction system without plant extracts is used as a control and the system without α-glucoside is used as a blank to correct for background absorbance. Acarbose is used as a positive control. The rate of α-glucosidase inhibition is calculated using the following formula:
% H = Percentage of inhibition
AC = Control absorbance
AE = Absorbance of sample

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Antioxidant Activity

3.1.1. DPPH and FRAP Methods
The antioxidant activity was assessed using the different fractions. The analysis combined the DPPH and FRAP methods. The results of the estimation of antioxidant activity by these two methods are presented in histogram form and expressed in µg TE/mg extract (Figure 3).
Figure 3. Histogram of antioxidant content of fractions by DPPH and FRAP methods
Histogram analysis shows that the different fractions of Newbouldia laevis leaves all possess reducing activity using the DPPH and FRAP methods. The best antioxidant activities were obtained in the AcOET and BuOH fractions, with trolox equivalents (TE) estimated at 278.675 ± 0.518 and 229.561 ± 1.815 µg TE/mg extract by the DPPH method, on the one hand, and that the same fractions have better free radical reducing properties, with values estimated at 634.276 ± 4.905 µg TE/mg and 616.723 ± 4.424 µg TE/mg by the FRAP method, on the other hand. These results can be explained by the chemical profile of the two extracts. Indeed, ethyl acetate and butanol extracts are rich in polar compounds such as tannins, flavonoids, phenolic acids, etc., which are generally antioxidant compounds. The DCM and H2O fractions showed non-negligible antioxidant activities due to the nature of the different components present. These results are consistent with the levels of total phenolic compounds found in leaf extracts and with the literature [22-23].
3.1.2. Anti-Free Radical Activity
To substantiate the antioxidant properties of the different fractions, their free radical scavenging properties were assessed using the DPPH and ABTS methods. For this purpose, the 50% inhibition concentrations (IC50) of the different fractions were determined and the results are shown in the table below (Table 1).
Table 1. Anti-free radical activity of standard and fractions
     
Analysis of the different results in the table shows that the ethyl acetate and butanol fractions have more pronounced anti-free radical activities than the dichloromethane and aqueous (residual) fractions. The butanol and ethyl acetate fractions recorded the lowest IC50 values, indicating that the leaf extracts are endowed with anti-free radical properties. These results can be explained by the high phenolic content of the acetate and butanol fractions. The ethyl acetate fraction seems to be the most active, given the low value of its IC50, estimated at 4.164 ± 0.085 µg/ml by the DPPH method. The anti-free radical activity assessed by the ABTS method also showed that the ethyl acetate fraction of Newbouldia laevis leaves was the most active, with an IC50 value of 2.61 ± 0.071 µg/mL. As the ethyl acetate and butanol fractions showed very high antioxidant activity, the radical scavenging effect was greater in these fractions. Thus, the more antioxidants a fraction contains, the better its anti-free radical activity.
3.1.3. Phenolic Compounds Content of Extracts
The results obtained by evaluating the total phenolic compound (TPC) content of the leaf fractions of the studied plant are presented in Table 2, expressed as µg EAG/mg extract.
Table 2. Phenolic compounds content of extracts
     
Analysis of the TPC assay results shows that the phenolic compound content of the different Newbouldia laevis fractions ranges from 96.346 ± 0.708 µg EAG/mg to 444.828 ± 5.081 µg EAG/mg. These results show that the ethyl acetate and butanol fractions contain the highest levels of total phenolic compounds, with estimated values of 444.828 ± 5.081 and 282.375 ± 0.952 µg EAG/mg, respectively. However, the lowest levels were observed in the dichloromethane and residual (aqueous) fractions. These results may be related, on the one hand, to the fractionation, which allowed the distribution of TPC in all fractions, with the highest concentration in the ACoET and BuOH fractions. On the other hand, the high polyphenol content in the ethyl acetate and butanol fractions is related to the high solubility of phenols in polar solvents [24]. These phenolic contents show that Newbouldia laevis is a phenolic rich plant and are comparable to results obtained in the literature [25]. These results also explain the antioxidant and anti-free radical activity of the two extracts, BuOH and ACoEt, which are the richest in phenolic compounds.

3.2. Inhibitory Activity of α-Glucosidase

The anti-diabetic activity of the leaf extracts was tested using the different fractions. The figures below show the results obtained for α-glucosidase inhibition (Figures 4-6). They also show the evolution of the percentage of inhibition as a function of the concentration of the different selective extracts.
Figure 4. Inhibitory activities of AcOET and BuOH extract fractions against α-glucosidase
Figure 5. Inhibitory activity of DCM and H2O extract fractions against α-glucosidase
Figure 6. Inhibitory activity of acarbose against α-glucosidase
As show in the figures, the percentage of α-glucosidase inhibition is dependent on the extract concentration. A general analysis of the figures shows that the percentage of inhibition increases as the concentration of the different fractions increases. Closer examination shows that α-glucosidase inhibition reaches about 100% at a concentration of 5.88 mg/ml for the AcOET and BuOH fractions. As for the DCM fraction, it reaches an inhibition percentage of about 70% at a concentration of 5.88 mg/mL. These results indicate that the different fractions analyzed from Newbouldia laevis leaves have anti-diabetic properties. Indeed, we observe that the AcOET and BuOH fractions show the best inhibitory effects compared to the DCM and H2O fractions. With the anti-diabetic reference substrate acarbose, at the same concentration of 5.88 mg/ml, the percentage of inhibition did not reach 100%, showing that the leaf extracts have more pronounced anti-diabetic activities than the reference substrate (acarbose). To confirm these results, we determined the IC50 values of the different fractions studied and the results obtained are shown in Table 3.
Table 3. Anti-free radical activity of Acarbose standard and Newbouldia. laevis fractions
     
Analysis of the IC50 of the different fractions presented in Table 3 shows that the ethyl acetate and butanolic fractions have the best IC50 with values of 2.33 ± 0.13µg/mL and 2.57 ± 0.18µg/mL respectively. However, these fractions remain less active than acarbose (standard) with an IC50 of 0.57±0.02µg/mL, even though they contain polar phytocompounds such as phenolic compounds, which are known to be bioactive and recognized for their anti-diabetic activities [26]. To confirm our findings, we plotted a correlation between total phenolic compounds and anti-diabetic activity (Figure 7).
Figure 7. Correlation between phenolic compounds and anti-diabetic activity
Analysis of Figure 7 shows a perfect correlation between total phenolic content and anti-diabetic properties. These results are consistent with the data from the correlation study on the possible effects of flavonoids on α-glucosidase activity [26-27]. On the basis of the correlation coefficients (R2) obtained above, we can assume that the anti-diabetic properties are due to the presence of phenolic compounds, especially flavonoids. In fact, the phenolic content of Newbouldia laevis leaves accounts for 84.83% of its anti-diabetic activity. Similar studies also report a correlation between the anti-diabetic properties of plant extracts and their phenolic compound content, particularly total flavonoid content [28-30]. Analysis of these results suggests that the ethyl acetate and butanol fractions of Newbouldia laevis leaves could be used in the management of diabetic patients.

4. Conclusions

This study focused on the antioxidant potential and anti-diabetic activity of Newbouldia laevis leaf extracts. To determine the anti-diabetic activity, the inhibitory effects of the fractionated extracts on the enzyme α-glucosidase were examined. The results of the analyses showed that the AcOET and BuOH fractions were of interest, with better antioxidant and anti-diabetic activities. The antioxidant and anti-diabetic activity studies highlighted the inhibitory effect against α-glucosidase and the considerable anti-free radical activity of Newbouldia laevis leaves. These results provide a scientific support for the traditional use of this plant in the treatment of diabetes and could serve as a prerequisite for the development of phytomedicines.

References

[1]  R. I. G. Holt, Éd., Textbook of diabetes: free companion website, 4. ed. Oxford [u.a]: Wiley-Blackwell, 2010.
[2]  P. Salehi, B. Asghari, M. A. Esmaeili, H. Dehghan, et I. Ghazi, “α-Glucosidase and α-amylase inhibitory effect and antioxidant activity of ten plant extracts traditionally used in Iran for diabetes”. Vol. 7, n° 6, doi: 10.5897/JMPR11.1320.
[3]  J. W. Baynes, “Role of oxidative stress in development of complications in diabetes”, Diabetes, vol. 40, n° 4, p. 405-412, avr. 1991, doi: 10.2337/diab.40.4.405.
[4]  P. Rosen, P.P. Nawroth, G. King, W. Moller, H. J. Tristschler, L. Packer”Role of Oxidative Stress in Development of Complications in Diabetes | Diabetes | American Diabetes Association”, Diabetes Metabolism/ Research and reviews vol. 17, n° 3, Mai. 2001, doi: 10.1002/dmrr.196.
[5]  M. Valko, D. Leibfritz, J. Moncol, M. T. D. Cronin, M. Mazur, et J. Telser, “Free radicals and antioxidants in normal physiological functions and human disease”, Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol., vol. 39, n° 1, p. 44-84, janv. 2007, doi: 10.1016/j.biocel.2006.07.001.
[6]  Y. Ihara et S. Toyokuni, K. Uchida, H. Odaka, T. Tanaka, H. Ikeda, H. Hiai,Y. Seino,Y. Yamada., “Hyperglycemia causes oxidative stress in pancreatic beta-cells of GK rats, a model of type 2 diabetes”, Diabetes, vol. 48, n° 4, p. 927-932, avr. 1999, doi: 10.2337/diabetes.48.4.927.
[7]  K. D. Nemi, L. Djalogue, K. A. Djagadou, T. Tchamdja, Y. M. Tsevi, et A. Balaka, “Les modes de révélation du diabète sucré au CHU Sylvanus Olympio de Lomé”, Pan Afr. Med. J., vol. 34, p. 99, janv. 2019, doi: 10.11604/pamj.2019.34.99.20012.
[8]  World Health Organization. Programme on Traditional Medicine, “Stratégie de l’ OMS pour la médecine traditionnelle pour 2002-2005”, Organisation mondiale de la Santé, WHO/EDM/TRM/2002.1, 2002.
[9]  Comité régional de l’Afrique, “Promouvoir le rôle de la médecine traditionnelle dans les systèmes de santé: stratégie de la Région africaine”, AFR/RC50/R3, 2000.
[10]  M. Lompo, K. T. Traoré, S. Ouédraogo, N. Ouédraogo, L. Belemnaba, A. G. L. Boly, B. Ouédraogo, A. Traoré, S. Ouédraogo and I. G. Guissou “Vermicides activities of trunk barks and leaves of Khaya senegalensis A. Juss (Meliaceae)”, World Journal of Advanced Research and Reviews, vol. 05, N° 03, p. 064–073, doi:https://doi.org/10.30574/wjarr.2020.5.3.0057.
[11]  K. Rashed, “Phytochemical and Biological Effects of Newbouldia laevis: A Review”, Plantae Sci., vol. 4, p. 208‑213, sept. 2021, doi: 10.32439/ps. v4i5.208-213.
[12]  A. M. Ngombi, R. N. M. Abondo, J. Ngoupayo, B. N. Tchaleu, F.-V. Beyene “Standardization of Newbouldia Laevis Powdered Pulps», Health Sci. Dis., Vol 19, N° 4, 2018.
[13]  S. Gejalakshmi, N. Harikrishnan, S. A. Mohameid. “In-Vitro and In-Silico Alpha Glucucosidase Inhibitory activity of Oroxylum indicum”, Res. J. Pharmacogn. Phytochem., p. 119‑125, août 2021, doi: 10.52711/0975-4385.2021.00020.
[14]  Y. Karanga, O. Ilboudo, S. Bonzi, I. Tapsoba, I. Somda, Y.L. Bonzi. “Phytochemical and Antifungal Properties of Euphorbia hirta L against Fusarium moliniforme and Phoma sorghina», Nat Prod An Indian J.; 13(1):1-10. 2017.
[15]  B. A. Rodríguez, S. Mendoza, M. H. Iturriga, et E. Castaño-Tostado, “Quality Parameters and Antioxidant and Antibacterial Properties of Some Mexican Honeys”, J. Food Sci., vol. 77, n° 1, janv. 2012, doi: 10.1111/j.1750-3841.2011.02487.x.
[16]  J. Piljac-Žegarac, “Antioxidant properties and phenolic content of different floral origin honeys”, J. ApiProduct ApiMedical Sci., vol. 1, n° 2, p. 43-50, avr. 2009, doi: 10.3896/IBRA.4.01.2.04.
[17]  M. J. T. J. Arts, J. S. Dallinga, H.P. Voss, G. R. M. M. Haenen, A. Bast, “A new approach to assess the total antioxidant capacity using the TEAC assay”, Food Chem., vol. 88, n° 4, p. 567‑570, déc. 2004, doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2004.02.008.
[18]  R. Re, N. Pellagrini, A. Proteggente, A. Pannala, M. Yang, C. Rice-Evans, “Antioxidant activity applying an improved ABTS radical cation decolorization assay”, Free Radical Biology and Medicine vol. 26, issues 9-12, Mai. 1999, doi: 10.1016/S0891-5849(98)00315-3.
[19]  A. Noba, M. Koala, A. Hema, R. K. Bationo, C.M. Dabiré, E. Palé., M. Nacro «Carotenoids identification by HPTLC-MS and vitamin C content of fruits of Saba senegalensis (A. DC) Pichon”, African Journal of Pure and Applied Chemistry, Vol. 14, N° 3 p. 60-68, août 2020, doi: 10.5897/AJPAC2020.0832.
[20]  J. C.W. Ouédraogo, M. Koala, N. Ouédraogo F.B. Kini, P. Gerbaux, Y. Bonzi-Coulibaly., “Total Phenolics and Total Flavonoid Contents, Antioxidant Activity and Flavonoids Identification by High-Performance Liquid Chromatography-Tandem Mass Spectrometry of Odontonema strictum (Acanthaceae) Leaves”, Asian Journal of Plant Science and Research, vol. 7, N° 5, p. 54‑63, nov. 2017.
[21]  L. G. Ranilla, Y.-I. Kwon, E. Apostolidis, et K. Shetty, “Phenolic compounds, antioxidant activity and in vitro inhibitory potential against key enzymes relevant for hyperglycemia and hypertension of commonly used medicinal plants, herbs and spices in Latin America”, Bioresour. Technol., vol. 101, n° 12, p. 4676-4689, juin 2010, doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2010.01.093.
[22]  N. Bougandoura et N. Bendimerad, “Evaluation de l’activité antioxydante des extraits aqueux et méthanolique de Satureja calamintha ssp. Nepeta (L.) Briq.”, Rev. Nat. Technol., vol. 5, n° 2, p. 14-19, juin 2013.
[23]  P. Siddhuraju et K. Becker, “The antioxidant and free radical scavenging activities of processed cowpea (Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.) seed extracts”, Food Chem., vol. 101, n° 1, p. 10-19, janv. 2007, doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2006.01.004.
[24]  N. Ghedadba, H. Bousselsela, L. Hambaba, B. Souhila, et Y. Mouloud, “Evaluation of the antioxidant and antimicrobial activities of the leaves and flowered tops of Marrubium vulgare L.”, Phytotherapie, vol. 12, p. 15‑24, janv. 2014.
[25]  I. S. Mbagwu, P. A. Akah, A. A. Ajaghaku, O. C. Ugwu, et D. lotanna Ajaghaku, “Inhibition of oxidative stress and gastric emptying as additional mechanisms of antidiabetic activity of Newbouldia laevis, Phytomedicine Plus, vol. 1, n° 2, p. 100023, mai 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.phyplu.2021.100023.
[26]  W.-K. H. C. Nikiema, Y. Karanga, O. Ilboudo, T. H. Ganamé, et I. Tapsoba, “Inhibition of α-glucosidase activity by polyphenol compounds from C. occidentalis: Phytochemical screening and antidiabetic studies”, Asian J. Res. Chem., vol. 16, n° 4, p. 257-264, août 2023, doi: 10.52711/0974-4150.2023.00043.
[27]  P. Thayumanavan, “Inhibitory effect of Gymnema Montanum leaves on α-glucosidase activity and α-amylase activity and their relationship with polyphenolic content”, Med. Chem. Res., janv. 2010, doi: 10.1007/s00044-009-9241-5.
[28]  T. T. Mai, N. N. Thu, P. G. Tien, et N. Van Chuyen, “Alpha-glucosidase inhibitory and antioxidant activities of Vietnamese edible plants and their relationships with polyphenol contents”, J. Nutr. Sci. Vitaminol. (Tokyo), vol. 53, n° 3, p. 267‑276, juin 2007, doi: 10.3177/jnsv.53.267.
[29]  A. Bello, A. A. Aliero, Y. Saidu, et S. Muhammad, “Phytochemical Screening, Polyphenolic Content and Alpha-Glucosidase Inhibitory Potential of Leptadenia hastata (Pers.) Decne”, Niger. J. Basic Appl. Sci., vol. 19, janv. 2011.
[30]  H. T. Ganamé, Y. Karanga, O. Ilboudo, W.-K. H. C. Nikiema, R. W. Sawadogo, et I. Tapsoba, “α-Glucosidase Inhibitory and Antiradical Properties of Acacia macrostachya”, Eur. J. Med. Health Sci., vol. 2, n° 5, Art. no 5, sept. 2020, doi: 10.24018/ejmed.2020.2.5.465.