American Journal of Chemistry
p-ISSN: 2165-8749 e-ISSN: 2165-8781
2016; 6(5): 119-125
doi:10.5923/j.chemistry.20160605.02

Padma Sikarwar, Sapna Tomar, A. P. Singh
Department of Chemistry, F.E.T., R.B.S. College, Bichpuri (Campus) Agra, India
Correspondence to: Padma Sikarwar, Department of Chemistry, F.E.T., R.B.S. College, Bichpuri (Campus) Agra, India.
| Email: | ![]() |
Copyright © 2016 Scientific & Academic Publishing. All Rights Reserved.
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY).
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

In the present study a new series of Copper(II), Nickel(II) Cobalt(II) and Zinc(II) complexes with two newly synthesized Schiff base ligands N-[(E)-(5-Methylfuran-2-yl)methylidene]-ethane-1,2-diamine (MFMEDA) and N-p-hydroxybenzalidine-2-aminopyridine (HBAPy) have been prepared. The Schiff bases MFMEDA and HBAPy ligands were synthesized by the condensation of 5-methyl furfural with ethylene-1,2-diamine and p-hydroxybenzaldehyde with 2-aminopyridine respectively. The ligands and their metal complexes have been characterized by FT-IR, Mass, 1H NMR, UV–Vis., elemental analysis and Thermal gravimetric analysis. The Schiff base and their metal complexes were tested for antimicrobial activity against gram positive bacteria Staphylococcusaureus and gram negative bacteria Escherichiacoli,Salmonellatyphimurium and fungus Aspergillusnidulence,Candidaalbicansand Saccharomycescerevisiae using Broth Dilution Method.
Keywords: Synthesis, Characterization, Antimicrobial studies, Schiff base, Mixed ligand metal complex, Antimicrobial activity
Cite this paper: Padma Sikarwar, Sapna Tomar, A. P. Singh, Synthesis, Spectral Characterization and Antimicrobial Activity of Schiff Bases and Their Mixed Ligand Metal Complexes of Co(II), Ni(II), Cu(II) and Zn(II), American Journal of Chemistry, Vol. 6 No. 5, 2016, pp. 119-125. doi: 10.5923/j.chemistry.20160605.02.
![]() | Figure 1. Showing zone of inhabitation against S. aureus, and E. coli |
|
|
|
|
|
N–), is readily assigned by comparison with the infrared spectra of substituted aldehydes and substituted amines. The intense band at 1618-1616 cm−1 for the ligands are assigned to the –C
N– stretching frequency and is characterized for the azomethine moiety of most Schiff base compounds. In the infrared spectrum of the HBAPy and MFMEDA ligands, the absorption band of the C
O group in the substituted aromatic aldehydes disappeared, which indicates that the condensation has occurred. The IR spectrum of the ligand shows a broad band at 3400–3350 cm−1 due to the stretching vibration of phenolic hydroxyl group, the broadness is due to intermolecular hydrogen bonding between the phenolic groups and the azomethine groups [32].1H NMR spectra:The 1H NMR spectra of ligands were recorded in DMSO-d6. The proton NMR spectrum of one of the ligands is shown in fig. 2. The signal due to methyl protons appeared as singlet in the range δ 2.36–2.51 ppm, whereas signals due to methoxy protons (HBAPy ligand) appeared as singlet at δ 3.35 ppm. In the aromatic region, a few doublets and in few cases some overlapping doublets/multiplets are observed in the range δ 6.40–8.35 ppm. Another singlet corresponding to phenolic proton is observed at δ 12.91 ppm [33].![]() | Figure 2. 1H NMR spectra of ligand HBAPy |
![]() | Figure 3a. Mass spectra of ligand HBAPY |
![]() | Figure 3b. Mass spectra of ligand MFMEDA |
N–) group of the transition metal complexes to lower frequencies and lie in the range of 1605–1611 cm−1, compared with the free ligand bands at 1616 and 1618 cm−1, which may be due to the coordination of the two azomethine groups to metal ions. This lowering shift is not significant in most cases as expected and it is believed that, this is due to the interference with the deformation of the water molecules associated with the complexes. The second feature is the bands in the range of 3510-3440 cm−1 which can be assigned to the stretching frequencies of the ν(OH) of water molecules associated to the complexes which are also confirmed by the TG analysis. The third feature is the weak to medium bands in the two ranges 480–540 and 588–610 cm−1, which could be assigned to the stretching frequencies of the ν(M–O) and (M–N) bands, respectively, supporting that the bonding of the ligands to the metal ions is achieved by the phenolic oxygen, and azomethine nitrogen atoms of the ligands [35, 36]. Electronic spectra, magnetic moments and molar conductivity:The electronic spectra of the complexes showed several absorption bands, including absorption bands of the ligands and d–d transitions of the metal ions Table 3. The electronic spectrum of the ligands HBAPY and MFMEDA (10−3M in DMF), shows mainly three bands at 210, 242 and 370 nm due to (1La → 1A1) and (1Lb → 1A1) transitions of the phenyl ring and π–π∗ transition within the C
N group. In addition, a broad band at 410 nm is due to the n–π∗ transition which is overlapping with the intermolecular CT from the phenyl ring to the azomethine group. The electronic spectra of Co (II) complexes have multiple bands observed at 428 nm, 390–410 nm and 480–500 nm. These bands are ascribed to 4T1g(F) → 4T2g; 4T1g(F) → 4A2g and 4T1g(F) → 4T1g(P) transitions respectively, which is consistent with the octahedral geometry. The Ni(II) complexes have three spin allowed transitions at 250 nm, 462 nm, 520–581 nm and 735 nm. These bands are correlated to 3A2g → 3T2g; 3A2g → 3T1g(F) and 3A2g → 3T1g(P) transitions, respectively in an octahedral stereochemistry. The electronic spectra of Cu(II) complexes shows a band in the range 580–595 nm for2B1g → 2A1g in a square planar geometry [37, 38]. The magnetic moment value of the Cu(II) complexes 5 and 8 (1.70 B.M.) is very close to the spin value (1.73 B.M.) expected for one unpaired electron which offers the possibility of an octahedral geometry. The magnetic moment of Cu(II) complexes 11 and 14 show less value (1.48 B.M.). The larger variation in the magnetic moment values (2.9–3.4 B.M.) for a high-spin Ni(II) complex (2.83 B.M.) depends on the magnitude of the orbital contribution. The magnetic moment value (2.88 B.M.) in the present work is within the range expected for similar octahedral Ni(II) ions. The magnetic moment values for the Co(II) complexes have been used as criterion to determine the type of coordination around the metal ion. Due to the intrinsic orbital angular momentum in the ground state, there is consistently a considerable orbital contribution and the effective magnetic moment lies between 4.7 and 5.2 B.M. at room temperature. In the present complexes the magnetic moment value (4.74 B.M.) suggests an octahedral geometry for the Co(II) complex in the high-spin state. The magnetic moments of the complexes of Co11, Ni11 and Cu11 presented in table-1 indicate that all these complexes are high spin complexes supporting the octahedral geometry proposed to these complexes [39]. Antimicrobial activities: The Minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) against bacteria and fungi of Schiff base ligands and their metal complexes were compared with the MIC values of standard drugs (Table 4a and 4b). The MIC values of the ligands HBAPy (250 μg/ml) and MFMEDA (250 μg/ml) against Salmonella typhimurium are comparable to standard drug ampicillin. The ligand MFMEDA (100 μg/ml) show identical MIC value against E.Coli with reference to ampicillin. The MIC values of ligand MFMEDA (250 μg/ml) is half in comparison with standard drug greseofulvin against the fungi C. albicans, while the MIC value of ligand HBAPy (100 μg/ml) is comparable to standard nystatin against A.nidulence. The MIC values of Co(II)-HBAPy-MFMEDA metal complexes (250 μg/ml), Ni(II)-HBAPy-MFMEDA (500 μg/ml) and Cu(II)-HBAPy-MFMEDA (125 μg/ml) are equivalent to the MIC value of ampicillin against S.aureus, while the MIC value of complex Zn(II)-HBAPy-MFMEDA metal complexes (63 μg/ml) is slightly more than the standard drug chloramphenicol against S.aureus. The MIC values of the complex Co(II)-HBAPy-MFMEDA (250 μg/ml), Ni(II)-HBAPy-MFMEDA (500 μg/ml) and Cu(II)-HBAPy-MFMEDA (120 μg/ml) are nearly equivalent to the MIC value of ampicillin against E.coli. The MIC values of the complexes Co(II)-HBAPy-MFMEDA (500 μg/ml), Ni(II)-HBAPy-MFMEDA (1000 μg/ml) and Cu(II)-HBAPy-MFMEDA (250 μg/ml) against Salmonella typhimurium are similar to that of standard drug ampicillin, while the complexes Zn(II)-HBAPy-MFMEDA (100 μg/ml) show relatively low MIC value. The MIC values of metal complexes Co(II)-HBAPy-MFMEDA (500 μg/ml), Ni(II)-HBAPy-MFMEDA (500 μg/ml), Cu(II)-HBAPy-MFMEDA (500 μg/ml) and Zn(II)-HBAPy-MFMEDA (500 μg/ml) against C. albicans are similar to that of standard drug greseofulvin. The MIC values of complexes Zn(II)-HBAPy-MFMEDA (100 μg/ml) against A.nidulence are comparable to the standard drugs nystatin and greseofulvin. The MIC values of the complexes Zn(II)-HBAPy-MFMEDA (100 μg/ml) against Saccharomyces cerevisiae are comparable to standard drugs nystatin and greseofulvin.