[1] | Edificiopara el Patronato Juan de la Cierva. In: RevistaNacional de Arquitectura. Madrid 1953, 142: 12. |
[2] | T6 Ediciones ed. Los brillantescincuenta. Pamplona: Pozo, 2004: 134-139. |
[3] | T6 Ediciones ed. Los brillantescincuenta. Pamplona: Pozo, 2004: 38. |
[4] | “The lack of knowledge about the work of this architect is such that on the CSIC website his works are wrongly attributed to his brother Arístides, even though Ricardo’s name does appear on the façades of the buildings. Also, in the first three editions of Volume II of the COAM ‘Guía de Arquitectura de Madrid’, the Instituto Torres Quevedo and the Juan de la Cierva Trust are dealt with as if they formed a single building”. Los Brillantescincuenta. Op. cit: 134. This historical disarray is also applicable to Fisac’s contribution, because when you search for the ‘Fundación Miguel Fisac’ with reference to this building, a different one appears and there is absolutely no reference to Ricardo Fernández Vallespín or the system of installations used. |
[5] | For further information, see e. g. FernándezGaliano et. al. Miguel Fisac. Arquitectura Viva 2003; 101. |
[6] | Cátedra S.A. ed. Arquitecturaespañolasiglo XX. Madrid: Urrutia, 1997: 414. |
[7] | See e. g. Capitel, La construcción de la ‘Colina de lasChopos’ en Madrid (de Antonio Flórez a Miguel Fisac). In: Arquitectura. Madrid, 1983: 241. At present, the building is the headquarters of the State Department of Education. |
[8] | “In fact, the works were directed only by Miguel Fisac, who, in the interview mentioned, explained his intention to be as faithful as possible to the project of FernándezVallespín, due to the respect the Galician architect had always felt for the solutions presented by his Manchego partner. Indeed, Miguel Fisac only altered, slightly, the solution for the assembly hall, únicamentealteró, y pormuypoco, la solución del salón de actos, splaying its floor a little”. Ricardo FernándezVallespín Archive, Universidad de Navarra, School of Architecture. |
[9] | Edificiopara el Patronato Juan de la Cierva. In: RevistaNacional de Arquitectura. Madrid 1953, 142: 12. |
[10] | Edificiopara el Patronato Juan de la Cierva. In: RevistaNacional de Arquitectura. Madrid 1953, 142: 10. |
[11] | Fisac, M. Pequeñasala de conferencias. In: Informes de la Construcción. Madrid 1954; 60: 146-37 et. seq. |
[12] | Fisac, M. Pequeñasala de conferencias. In: Informes de la Construcción. Madrid 1954; 60: 146-37 et. seq. |
[13] | Fisac, M. Pequeñasala de conferencias. In: Informes de la Construcción. Madrid 1954; 60: 146-37 et. seq. |
[14] | Fisac, M. Pequeñasala de conferencias. In: Informes de la Construcción. Madrid 1954; 60: 146-37 et. seq. |
[15] | Edificiopara el Patronato Juan de la Cierva. In: RevistaNacional de Arquitectura. Madrid 1953, 142: 10-11. |
[16] | We should say that the architects’ intuition was well-founded, as they protected the south and west-facing façades, but they used the same protective geometry on both sides, although the sun reaches each of them at a different angle. |
[17] | Infinitoed. The architecture of the well-tempered environment. Buenos Aires: Banham, 1975: 172. |
[18] | Edificiopara el Patronato Juan de la Cierva. In: RevistaNacional de Arquitectura. Madrid 1953, 142: 13. |
[19] | In fact, the name of the engineer who designed the different building services has not been found. |
[20] | Fisac, M. Pequeñasala de conferencias. In: Informes de la Construcción. Madrid 1954; 60: 146-37 et. seq. |
[21] | Fisac, M. Pequeñasala de conferencias. In: Informes de la Construcción. Madrid 1954; 60: 146-37 et. seq. |
[22] | Considerations for the design of movie theatre projection rooms. In: Informes de la Construcción 1948; 4: 146-1. |
[23] | Fisac, M. Pequeñasala de conferencias. In: Informes de la Construcción. Madrid 1954; 60: 146-37. |
[24] | Infinitoed. The architecture of the well-tempered environment. Buenos Aires: Banham, 1975:199 et. seq. |
[25] | Together with the batteries for heating and water evaporation discussed in the following paragraphs, this is a description of the air-conditioning unit in the building. |
[26] | Using this information and an approximate volume of 5,400 m³ for the air-conditioned area, we can calculate that originally the total volume of the building was renewed almost twice per hour. |
[27] | Edificiopara el Patronato Juan de la Cierva. In: RevistaNacional de Arquitectura. Madrid 1953, 142: 12. |
[28] | Originally placed, according to the plans available, in the basement under one of the staircases, as seen in the re-drawn plans of the building. |
[29] | The power installed both for the production and for the extraction of water is unknown. Later, an auxilary construction was built between the conference hall and the south wing of the building, with a new hot water production for the building and a water-water cooler, whose corresponding refrigerating tower was placed on the roof. On the subject of cooled water, the up-keep problems in the anti-legionella treatment have forced the production of cooled water to be abandonded, which means that a large amount of independent equipment has been plced on the façade to serve different areas. |
[30] | This type of air-conditioning system with a single air-treatmet unit was still common in the 1940’s. The information memtioned is contrasted with the present-day installations: the original air-treatment unit was replaced in the 1960’s by two air-treatment units (northern area and southern area), and the new equipment had a humidifier pump which was abandoned shortly afterwards due to maintenance problems. |
[31] | Fisac, M. Pequeñasala de conferencias. In: Informes de la Construcción. Madrid 1954; 60: 146-37 et. seq. |