S. I. Hamidov
Baku State University, Department of Mathematic Cybernetics, Baku, Azerbaijan
Correspondence to: S. I. Hamidov, Baku State University, Department of Mathematic Cybernetics, Baku, Azerbaijan.
Email: | |
Copyright © 2018 Scientific & Academic Publishing. All Rights Reserved.
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY).
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Abstract
We consider the two-sector model of the economic dynamics. The problem of the distribution of labor between sectors is considered under the condition that the total consumption is maximized. As a production function is taken a function with constant elasticity of the substitution (CES). Potential opportunity of the sectors is analyzed.
Keywords:
Problem of maximization, Consumption, Production function
Cite this paper: S. I. Hamidov, On a Problem of Maximization in the Discrete Time Models of Economic Dynamics, Applied Mathematics, Vol. 8 No. 1, 2018, pp. 1-4. doi: 10.5923/j.am.20180801.01.
1. Introduction
Consider Neumann type two-sector model [1] that is denoted as . Let’s introduce the denotations: base funds of the sector; number of the labor in the sector; consumption fund of the sector; specific consumption (wage rate) in the sector; national income in the sector; capital-labor force ratio in the sector, ratio of fixed assets disposals in the sector; production function of the sector. Sometimes instead of the function we’ll consider the function It is expected that the total labor force is In paper [2] the dependence of the consumption volume on the labor force is investigated. In this paper the following problem is set: to distribute the labor between the sectors such that to maximize the total consumption. At the same time as a production function the function with constant elasticity of substitution (CES) is considered [1, 3, 4, 6, 8].
2. Main Part
So, consider the problem of maximizing the total consumption | (1) |
under the condition | (2) |
Here is a consumption fund in the sector, under the assumption that the special consumption is chosen by the formula | (3) |
where is the unique root of the equation | (4) |
Since may be expressed as function of | (5) |
where and are defined by the equalitiesthen the following relations are valid | (6) |
where is an inverse to function defined by the formula (5).Now suppose that as a production function will be considered the function with a constant elasticity of substitution (CES) | (7) |
where It is proved that [2] in the case when is a production function with a constant elasticity of substitution (CES) the consumption computed by the formula (6), reaches its maximum in some point and is a unique local extremum point, the function has the only inflection point which changes the concavity to the convexity while Note that capital-labor ratio in which the maximum of the consumption function of the defined by the formula (6) is reached is the same at all times. Therefore, the point depends only on the national wealth | (8) |
where Suppose that (3) has a unique solution and is a point in which the function reaches its maximum. As above and are found from the conditionsHere we give Lemma 1. Let the following conditions be fulfilled а) b) for some moment .Then Proof. Let and . Since and are increasing functions and then and therefore Since we have Considering (8) we get Lemma is proved. Note. It is easy to check that the condition is satisfied if Let’s show this. The points and are solutions of the equations where ThenLetNote that the functions and are increasing and - decreasing and moreoverandIt follows from the last that the equation has a unique solution if and only if, when that is equivalent to the inequality Then if and only if when Due to the properties of and we have (Fig.1). | Figure 1 |
Therefore the inequality is satisfied if | (9) |
Let’s calculate and As follows from (9)From this we obtainConsequently, for the fulfillment of the condition а) of Lemma 1 it is enough to take from the interval Let and It is validTheorem 1. Let the conditions а) b) be satisfied. Then for all and moreover decreases.Proof. First we show that Actually, from the condition and (8) follows that Since the total number of the labor is equal to unit, the function is increasing and concave on the interval . Considering that we obtain from the last that increases on the interval and decreases on . Therefore the solution of problem (1) lies on the interval It givesSuppose that Then from the second condition of b) follows that This means that If then and then From we get Thus Besides in the proof was shown that and so considering we get Now using Lemma 1 we obtainFrom this considering after the similar considerations may be shown that and Continuing this process we arrive at the proof of the theorem.
3. Consequence
If the conditions of Theorem 1 are satisfied then and total consumptiontends to .Assume that the potential of the second sector is higher than the first sector. Then Theorem 1 is an example of the fact that under certain assumptions in the problem of maximization of the total consumption in contrast to the problems with the same wage rates we do not observe the replacement of the labor force to the second, more "better" production [2]. Moreover, in fact, the labor force in the second sector is upper bounded by the decreasing sequence. Also limit the total consumption is less than the similar limit in the problem with the same wages.
References
[1] | Rubinov A.M. Mathematical Models of the Expanded Reproduction, L., Nauka, 1983. |
[2] | Hamidov S.I. Dependence of consumption volume on the labor-force in one-productive models of ecomonic dynamics, Journal of Mathematics and System Sciences, No.5, 2015, pp.113-117. |
[3] | Kleiner G. Production Functions, M., Statistics, 1987. |
[4] | Krass I.A. Mathematical Models of the Economic Dynamics, Moscow, Soviet Radio, 1972. |
[5] | Rubinov A.M. Superlinear Multivalued Mappings and their Applications to Economical-Mathematical Problems. L, Nauka, 1980. |
[6] | Romer R.M. Mathiness in the Theory of Economic Growth. The American Economic Review, v 105, № 5, 2015. |
[7] | Nishimura K, Yano M. Non Lineqrets and Business Cycles in a Two-Sector Equilibrium Model: An Example with Cobb-Douqlas Production Function, 1995. |
[8] | Torres J.L. Introduction to Dynamic Macroeconomic General Equilibrium Models, 2013. |