S. I. Hamidov
Baku State University, Department of Mathematic Cybernetics, Baku, Azerbaijan
Correspondence to: S. I. Hamidov, Baku State University, Department of Mathematic Cybernetics, Baku, Azerbaijan.
Email: |  |
Copyright © 2018 Scientific & Academic Publishing. All Rights Reserved.
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY).
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Abstract
We consider the two-sector model of the economic dynamics. The problem of the distribution of labor between sectors is considered under the condition that the total consumption is maximized. As a production function is taken a function with constant elasticity of the substitution (CES). Potential opportunity of the sectors is analyzed.
Keywords:
Problem of maximization, Consumption, Production function
Cite this paper: S. I. Hamidov, On a Problem of Maximization in the Discrete Time Models of Economic Dynamics, Applied Mathematics, Vol. 8 No. 1, 2018, pp. 1-4. doi: 10.5923/j.am.20180801.01.
1. Introduction
Consider Neumann type two-sector model
[1] that is denoted as
. Let’s introduce the denotations:
base funds of the
sector;
number of the labor in the
sector;
consumption fund of the
sector;
specific consumption (wage rate) in the
sector;
national income in the
sector;
capital-labor force ratio in the
sector, 
ratio of fixed assets disposals in the
sector;
production function of the
sector. Sometimes instead of the function
we’ll consider the function
It is expected that the total labor force is
In paper [2] the dependence of the consumption volume on the labor force is investigated. In this paper the following problem is set: to distribute the labor between the sectors such that to maximize the total consumption. At the same time as a production function the function with constant elasticity of substitution (CES) is considered [1, 3, 4, 6, 8].
2. Main Part
So, consider the problem of maximizing the total consumption | (1) |
under the condition | (2) |
Here
is a consumption fund in the
sector, under the assumption that the special consumption
is chosen by the formula  | (3) |
where
is the unique root of the equation  | (4) |
Since
may be expressed as function of 
 | (5) |
where
and
are defined by the equalities
then the following relations are valid | (6) |
where
is an inverse to function defined by the formula (5).Now suppose that as a production function will be considered the function with a constant elasticity of substitution (CES)  | (7) |
where
It is proved that [2] in the case when
is a production function with a constant elasticity of substitution (CES) the consumption computed by the formula (6), reaches its maximum in some point
and
is a unique local extremum point, the function
has the only inflection point
which changes the concavity to the convexity while
Note that capital-labor ratio
in which the maximum of the consumption function of the defined by the formula (6) is reached is the same at all times. Therefore, the point
depends only on the national wealth 
 | (8) |
where
Suppose that (3) has a unique solution
and
is a point in which the function
reaches its maximum. As above
and
are found from the conditions
Here we give Lemma 1. Let the following conditions be fulfilled а)
b)
for some moment
.Then
Proof. Let
and
. Since
and
are increasing functions and
then
and therefore
Since
we have
Considering (8) we get
Lemma is proved. Note. It is easy to check that the condition
is satisfied if
Let’s show this. The points
and
are solutions of the equations
where
Then
Let
Note that the functions
and
are increasing and
- decreasing and moreover
and
It follows from the last that the equation
has a unique solution
if and only if, when
that is equivalent to the inequality
Then
if and only if when
Due to the properties of
and
we have
(Fig.1). | Figure 1 |
Therefore the inequality
is satisfied if | (9) |
Let’s calculate
and 

As follows from (9)
From this we obtain
Consequently, for the fulfillment of the condition а) of Lemma 1 it is enough to take
from the interval
Let
and
It is validTheorem 1. Let the conditions а)
b)
be satisfied. Then
for all
and moreover
decreases.Proof. First we show that
Actually, from the condition
and (8) follows that
Since the total number of the labor is equal to unit, the function
is increasing and concave on the interval
. Considering that
we obtain from the last that
increases on the interval
and decreases on
. Therefore the solution
of problem (1) lies on the interval
It gives
Suppose that
Then from the second condition of b) follows that
This means that
If
then
and then
From
we get
Thus
Besides in the proof was shown that
and so considering
we get
Now using Lemma 1 we obtain
From this considering
after the similar considerations may be shown that
and
Continuing this process we arrive at the proof of the theorem.
3. Consequence
If the conditions of Theorem 1 are satisfied then
and total consumption
tends to
.Assume that the potential of the second sector is higher than the first sector. Then Theorem 1 is an example of the fact that under certain assumptions in the problem of maximization of the total consumption in contrast to the problems with the same wage rates we do not observe the replacement of the labor force to the second, more "better" production [2]. Moreover, in fact, the labor force in the second sector is upper bounded by the decreasing sequence. Also limit the total consumption is less than the similar limit in the problem with the same wages.
References
[1] | Rubinov A.M. Mathematical Models of the Expanded Reproduction, L., Nauka, 1983. |
[2] | Hamidov S.I. Dependence of consumption volume on the labor-force in one-productive models of ecomonic dynamics, Journal of Mathematics and System Sciences, No.5, 2015, pp.113-117. |
[3] | Kleiner G. Production Functions, M., Statistics, 1987. |
[4] | Krass I.A. Mathematical Models of the Economic Dynamics, Moscow, Soviet Radio, 1972. |
[5] | Rubinov A.M. Superlinear Multivalued Mappings and their Applications to Economical-Mathematical Problems. L, Nauka, 1980. |
[6] | Romer R.M. Mathiness in the Theory of Economic Growth. The American Economic Review, v 105, № 5, 2015. |
[7] | Nishimura K, Yano M. Non Lineqrets and Business Cycles in a Two-Sector Equilibrium Model: An Example with Cobb-Douqlas Production Function, 1995. |
[8] | Torres J.L. Introduction to Dynamic Macroeconomic General Equilibrium Models, 2013. |