Applied Mathematics
p-ISSN: 2163-1409 e-ISSN: 2163-1425
2015; 5(6): 111-124
doi:10.5923/j.am.20150506.02

Usama H. Hegazy
Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Science, Al-Azhar University, Gaza, Palestine
Correspondence to: Usama H. Hegazy, Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Science, Al-Azhar University, Gaza, Palestine.
| Email: | ![]() |
Copyright © 2015 Scientific & Academic Publishing. All Rights Reserved.
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY).
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

The dynamic behavior of a three dimensional suspended elastic cable subjected to external and parametric excitations are investigated. The case of subharmonic resonance in the presence of 1:1:1 internal resonance between the modes of the cable is considered and examined. The method of multiple scales is applied to study the steady-state response and the stability of the system at resonance conditions. Numerical simulations illustrated that multiple-valued solutions, jump and saturation phenomenon, hardening and softening nonlinearities occur in the resonant frequency response curves. The effects of different parameters on system behavior have been studied applying frequency response function.
Keywords: In-Plane mode, Out-of-Plane mode, Parametric Resonance, Quadratic and cubic nonlinearities
Cite this paper: Usama H. Hegazy, In-Plane and Out-of-Plane Dynamic Responses of Elastic Cables under External and Parametric Excitations, Applied Mathematics, Vol. 5 No. 6, 2015, pp. 111-124. doi: 10.5923/j.am.20150506.02.
![]() | Figure 1. Schematic diagram of the suspended elastic cable, [6] |
![]() | (1) |
![]() | (2) |
for k = 2,3.
are nondimensional displacements with respect to the static equilibrium configuration of the cable in the normal and binormal directions, respectively, s is the nondimensional arc length coordinate of the cable and t is the nondiemnsional time.
and
denote the nondimensional transverse and longitudinal wave speeds of the cable, respectively. The partial differential equations (1) and (2) are discretized considering one in-plane mode and two out-of plane modes using the following expansions, which represent separable solutions![]() | (3) |
![]() | (4) |
is the in-plane mode shape with the corresponding natural frequency ω1 and
are out-of-plane mode shapes with the corresponding natural frequencies ω1,2. These mode shape functions are obtained by substituting Eqs. (3) and (4) into the linear equations of motion governing the free motion about the equilibrium position for normal and binormal directions, that are extracted from Eqs. (1) and (2). Then using separation of variables and applying the boundary conditions gives:
where D1 and Dk are arbitrary constants. Substituting Eqs. (3) and (4) into Eqs. (1) and (2), applying the applying the Galerkin method and adding linear viscous damping coefficients µ1,2,3 lead to the following three nonlinear coupled ordinary differential equations in terms of the nondimensional generalized coordinates u1,2,3(t): ![]() | (5) |
![]() | (6) |
![]() | (7) |
is a small perturbation parameter, F and Ω1 are the in-plane external forcing amplitude and frequencies, fj ( j =1,2,3) and Ω2 are parametric forcing amplitudes and frequency. These parameters are defined as follows
where
![]() | (8) |
.Substituting Eq. (8) into Eqs. (5-7) and equating the coefficients of the same powers of ε , yield the followingOrder ε0: ![]() | (9) |
![]() | (10) |
![]() | (11) |
![]() | (12) |
![]() | (13) |
![]() | (14) |
![]() | (15) |
![]() | (16) |
![]() | (17) |
![]() | (18) |
![]() | (19) |
![]() | (20) |
, k = 1,2,3, and the eliminating of the secular terms provides the following four equations governing the amplitude and phase modulations![]() | (21) |
![]() | (22) |
![]() | (23) |
![]() | (24) |
![]() | (25) |
![]() | (26) |
and
, for j = 1,2,3. Using these conditions in Eqs. (21-26) leads to![]() | (27) |
![]() | (28) |
![]() | (29) |
![]() | (30) |
![]() | (31) |
![]() | (32) |
![]() | (33) |
![]() | (34) |
![]() | (35) |
are implemented. From the resulting equations, the frequency response Eqs. (33-35) are obtained and solved numerically using the MAPLE© software. The analysis of local stability is determined by linearization of Eqs. (21-26) for the parameters a1,2,3 and η1,2,3 about each singular point, which will result in a set of linear equations with constant coefficients and hence lead to an eigen-value problem. Then, these eigen-values associated with the resulting linear equations will be examined. If the real part of every eigen-value of the coefficient matrix is positive then the point is unstable, otherwise must be stable. These linear equations are formed by assuming that each one of the parameters a1,2,3 and η1,2,3 is expressed in the form ![]() | (36) |
and
and an1 and ηn1 are small perturbations. Inserting Eq. (36) into Eqs. (21-26) and keeping the linear terms in an1 and ηn1, then solving the resulted the state-space equation
, where the matrix [A] is the Jacobian matrix, in order to calculate the eigen-values. The numerical results are presented in Figs. (2-5) as the steady-state amplitudes a1,2,3 are varied against the detuning parameters σ1,2,3 for different values of the system parameters. In these figures, Each curve consists of right and left branches. The left branch stands for the stable solutions and the right one stands for the unstable solutions. Considering Fig. (2a) as a basic case for comparison, where σ1 is plotted against a1 (in-plane mode). It can be seen from Figs. (2b) that as the linear viscous damping coefficient µ1 increases, the steady state amplitude of the first mode a1 decreases. Figures (2c) and (2d) show several representative curves for the cubic nonlinear term α2. Comparing these curves shows that the nonlinearity effect (either hardening or softening nonlinearity) bends the frequency response curves to right when α2 is positive and to left when α2 is negative. The figures also illustrate the variation of the steady-state amplitude as α2 is varied. The remaining cubic nonlinear terms α5 and α6, Figs. (2e, 2f), do not strongly change the amplitude as they are varied and hence no effect on the response curves. As the natural frequency ω1 increases, Fig. (2g), the branches of the response curves converge, and the region of unstable solutions decreases. The steady-state amplitude a1 is increased as the parametric excitation amplitude f1 increases as shown in Fig. (2h), whereas Fig. (2k) indicates that the variation of the external forcing amplitude F1 shows different effect and behavior on the frequency response curves. In Figs. (2i) and (2j), the resonant response curves are shifted to right as the steady-state amplitudes of the second and third modes a2 and a3 are increased.In addition, the force response curves presented in Fig. 3 illustrate the variations of the steady-state amplitude a1 with the forcing parametric excitation f1 for different values of the cubic nonlinear terms α2, α5 and α6. The significant effects of α5 and α6 are shown in Figs. (3c) and (3d), where the first mode amplitude increases as these nonlinear terms increase. For the second mode of vibration (first out-of-plane mode), the steady-state amplitude a2 is plotted against the detuning parameter σ2, as shown in Fig. (4). These curves illustrate the effects of the damping coefficient µ2, the cubic nonlinear terms β1,3,4, the natural frequency ω2, the parametric excitation amplitude f2, the steady-state amplitudes of the first and third modes a1 and a3. The force response curves of the second mode of vibration for different values of the damping term and nonlinear terms are shown in Fig. (5). It is noticed from Fig. (5b) that as the parametric excitation amplitude f2 increases beyond 25.0, the effect of increasing the linear damping coefficient µ2 becomes insignificant and the steady-state amplitude a2 of the first out-of-plane mode saturates. It is also noted that the curves are shifted to the right as µ2 is increased further, which means that the amplitude of the excitation f2 must exceed a critical value before the first out-of-plane amplitude a2 is to be strongly excited.Similar effects and curves are reported for the variation of the second out-of-plane amplitude a3 with σ1 and f3 for different values of system parameters, therefore they are not included in the figures.![]() | Figure 2. Resonant frequency response curves for the first mode of the system |
![]() | Figure 3. Resonant force response curves for the first mode of the system |
![]() | Figure 4. Resonant frequency response curves for the second mode of the system |
![]() | Figure 5. Resonant force response curves for the second mode of the system |