Applied Mathematics
p-ISSN: 2163-1409 e-ISSN: 2163-1425
2012; 2(3): 77-89
doi: 10.5923/j.am.20120203.06
Abdallah S. Waziri1, Estomih S. Massawe1, Oluwole Daniel Makinde2
1Mathematics Department, University of Dar es Salaam, P. O. Box 35062, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania
2Institute for Advance Research in Mathematical Modelling and Computations, Cape-Peninsula University of technology, P. O. Box 1906, Bellville 7535, South Africa
Correspondence to: Estomih S. Massawe, Mathematics Department, University of Dar es Salaam, P. O. Box 35062, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.
| Email: | ![]() |
Copyright © 2012 Scientific & Academic Publishing. All Rights Reserved.
This paper examines the dynamics of HIV/AIDS with treatment and vertical transmission. A nonlinear deterministic mathematical model for the problem is proposed and analysed qualitatively using the stability theory of differential equations. Local stability of the disease free equilibrium of the model was established by the next generation method. The results show that the disease free equilibrium is locally stable at threshold parameter less than unity and unstable at threshold parameter greater than unity. Globally, the disease free equilibrium is not stable due existence of forward bifurcation at threshold parameter equal to unity. However, it is shown that using treatment measures (ARVs) and control of the rate of vertical transmission have the effect of reducing the transmission of the disease significantly. Numerical simulation of the model is implemented to investigate the sensitivity of certain key parameters on the spread of the disease.
Keywords: HIV/AIDS Dynamics, Treatment, Vertical Transmission
at time
with constant inflow of susceptible with rate
where
is the rate of recruitment into susceptible population is divided into five groups: Susceptibles
, infectives
(also assumed to be infectious), pre-AIDS patients
, treated class
and AIDS patients
with natural mortality rate
in all classes.![]() | Figure 2.1. Flow diagram of the model |
and others die effectively at birth
where
is the fraction of newborns infected with HIV who dies immediately after birth and
is the rate of newborns infected with HIV. We do not consider direct recruitment of the infected persons but by vertical transmission only.It is also assumed that some of the infectives join the pre-AIDS class, depending on the viral counts, with a rate
where
is the rate of movement from infectious class and
is the fraction of
joining the pre-AIDS class. They then proceed with a rate
to develop full blown AIDS. Some of the infectives proceed to join the treated class with a rate
where
is the fraction of
joining treated class and then proceed with a rate
to develop full blown AIDS while others with serious infection directly join the AIDS class with a rate
. A Fraction of
is assumed to get treatment. Taking into account the above considerations, we then have the following schematic flow diagramIt is also assumed that some of the infectives join the pre-AIDS class, depending on the viral counts, with a rate
where
is the rate of movement from infectious class and
is the fraction of
joining the pre-AIDS class. They then proceed with a rate
to develop full blown AIDS. Some of the infectives proceed to join the treated class with a rate
where
is the fraction of
joining treated class and then proceed with a rate
to develop full blown AIDS while others with serious infection directly join the AIDS class with a rate
. A Fraction of
is assumed to get treatment. Taking into account the above considerations, we then have the following schematic flow diagramThe model is thus governed by the following system of non linear ordinary differential equations:![]() | (1) |
are the sexual contact rates
is the average number of sexual partners per unit time
is the disease induced death rate in the AIDS patients class
is the rate at which AIDS patients get treatmentThe initial conditions are taken as
and
To simplify the model, it is reasonable to assume that the AIDS patients and those in pre-AIDS class are isolated and sexually inactive and hence they are not capable of producing children i.e.
and also they do not contribute to viral transmission horizontally i.e.
and
are negligible[1].In view of the above assumptions, the system reduces to![]() | (2) |
at any time
is given by
.This givesWe note that in the absence of the disease and infectives, the total population size
is stationary for
, declines for
and grows exponentially for
. So we shall assume that mortality rate
, will be a function of state variables. Since the model is homogeneous of degree one, the variables can be normalized by setting
,
. This leads to the normalized system![]() | (3) |
and
.Continuity of right-hand side of the system (3) and its derivative imply that the model is well posed for
.
, one can determine if the disease become endemic in a population or not.
. This will be established by the following theorem.Theorem 1Let
. Then the solutions
of the system (3) are positive
.ProofFrom the first equation of the system (3), we obtain the inequality expression![]() | (4) |
As
we obtain
. Hence all feasible solution of system (3) enter the region
. Similar proofs can be established for the positivity of
.![]() | (5) |
,
and the system (3) becomesTherefore the disease free equilibrium (DFE) denoted by
of the system (3) is given by![]() | (6) |
![]() | (7) |
established by the next generation method on the system (3), computation of the basic reproduction number is essential. The basic reproduction number
is defined as the effective number of secondary infections caused by typical infected individual during his entire period of infectiousness[14]. This definition is given for the models that represent the spreading of infection in a population. It is obtained by taking the largest (dominant) eigenvalue (spectral radius) of![]() | (8) |
is the rate of appearance of new infection in compartment
,
is the transfer of individuals out of the compartment
by all other means,
is the disease free equilibrium.By linearization approach, the associated matrix at disease free equilibrium is obtained asIt can be shown that the Eigen values of
are
.where![]() | (9) |
for the normalised model system (3) with treatment and vertical transmission is given by![]() | (10) |
and unstable if
,Remark: It is noted that with high
, which is a function of the number of sexual partners C , the number of invectives will increase which in turn increases the AIDS patients population. Thus in order to keep the spread of the disease at minimum, the number of sexual partners should be restricted.
, we set each equation in the model (3) equal to zero. Solving the system while expressing each equilibrium point in terms of
at steady state, we get
, and
as an endemic equilibrium point. Thus
is an endemic equilibrium wherewith
andWe note that
are always positive and this will happen if and only if
. The model also exhibits a forward bifurcation for some estimated parameters as seen in figure 3.1 below:A Forward or Transcritical bifurcation at the stationary solutions occurs at
. If
no biologically meaningful endemic stationary solution exists, and the disease free stationary solution is a global attractor. But if
, the endemic solution exists and it is a global attractor, while the disease free solution is a saddle point. This is referred to as a forward bifurcation because in the neighbourhood of the bifurcation point, the endemic disease prevalence is an increasing function of 
![]() | Figure 3.1. Forward Bifurcation of the model (3) |
, the endemic equilibrium
of the model (3) is globally asymptotically stable.ProofTo establish the global stability of the endemic equilibrium
, we construct the following Lyapunov function:
By direct calculation of the derivative of
along the solution of (3) we obtain![]() | (11) |
whereand Therefore from (11), if
then,
will be negative definite, implying that
. Also
, if and only if
and
. Therefore, the largest compact invariant set in
is the singleton
, where
is endemic equilibrium of the normalized model system (3). By LaSalle’s invariant principle, it then implies that
is globally asymptotically stable in
if
.
and
versus susceptibles are computed and shown graphically in figures 4.1(a) - 4.1(d)The equilibrium points of the endemic equilibrium
was obtained asIt is observed that for any starting initial value, the solution curves tend to the equilibrium point
. Therefore it can be concluded that the system (3) is globally stable about this endemic equilibrium point
for the estimated parameters.![]() | Figure 4.1(a). Endemic equilibrium of proportion of infectives Vs Susceptibles |
![]() | Figure 4.1(b). Endemic equilibrium of proportion of Pre-AIDS population |
![]() | Figure 4.1(c). Endemic equilibrium of proportion of treated class |
![]() | Figure 4.1(d). Endemic equilibrium of proportion of AIDS population |
and
.It is seen that in the absence of vertical transmission into the community, the proportion of susceptible population decreases continuously resulting in the increase of the proportion of infective population initially but then decreases as all infectives subsequently develop full blown AIDS and the die naturally or by disease-induced deaths.Figure 4.2(b) shows the variation of proportion of population in all classes with both recruitment of susceptibles and fraction of new born children which are infected at birth.From figure 4.2(b) it can be seen that susceptibles first decrease with time. After undergoing ARV treatment their lives time are prolonged and thus their number increase reaching an equilibrium point. ![]() | Figure 4.2(b). Variation of population in different classes for and ![]() |
![]() | Figure 4.3(a). Variation of infected population for different values of ![]() |
![]() | Figure 4.3(b). Variation of AIDS population for different values of ![]() |
![]() | Figure 4.3(c). Variation of Treated class for different values of ![]() |
![]() | Figure 4.4(a). Variation of Susceptibles for different values of ![]() |
increase, the proportion of infective population also increases. In figure 4.3(b) it is seen that if the value of
is increased, the proportion of AIDS population decrease with time and then increase until it reach its equilibrium position. Thus if infected born children are intervened by treatment, the overall infective population will remain under control thus reducing the AIDS population. In 4.3(c) it is seen that as the rate of infected born children increase, the treated population decrease.Figures 4.4(a) – 4.4(c) below show the impact of recruitment rate for susceptibles, treated class and AIDS patients for different values of
It is seen that for different values of
, as recruitment rate increase, the susceptible population also increase. While the inflow of susceptible increase, the treated population and AIDS population decrease with time until they reach equilibrium due to treatment.![]() | Figure 4.4(b). Variation of Treated population for different values of ![]() |
![]() | Figure 4.4(c). Variation of AIDS population for different values of ![]() |
of individuals from infective class to pre-AIDS, Treatment or AIDS depending upon the viral counts.![]() | Figure 4.5(a). Variation of Infective population for different values of ![]() |
![]() | Figure 4.5(b). Variation of pre-AIDS population for different values of ![]() |
![]() | Figure 4.5(c). Variation of Treated class for different values of ![]() |
![]() | Figure 4.5(d). Variation of AIDS population for different values of ![]() |
, the infected population decrease which in turn increase the treated population. Also with the increase of
, the pre-AIDS and AIDS population decrease with time until they reach the equilibrium values.Figures 4.6(a) – 4.6(d) shows the Variation of population in the classes with fraction of movement rate from infectious class
. ![]() | Figure 4.6(a). Variation of pre-AIDS population for different values of ![]() |
![]() | Figure 4.6(b). Variation of AIDS population for different values of ![]() |
![]() | Figure 4.6(c). Variation of Treated population for different values of ![]() |
![]() | Figure 4.6(d). Variation of AIDS population for different values of ![]() |
increases, the pre-AIDS population decrease continuously. It might be it is because of treatment to the patients. The case is different for the AIDS class. It can be seen that when
increases, the AIDS population decrease with time it reaching equilibrium point and then increase with time. This is caused by ARVs treatment and its effect in prolonging the life span.. It can also be noted from the graph that, as
increases treated population initially increase. As time progress, it decrease, but the AIDS patients population decrease continuously reaching equilibrium and then increase implying that the disease still exist.Figures 4.7(a) – 4.7(d) predict the variation of the contact rates of susceptibles with respect to infectives
and susceptibles with respect to treated class
in the susceptibles and infectives classes.![]() | Figure 4.7(a). Variation of susceptibles population for different values of ![]() |
![]() | Figure 4.7(b). Variation of infectives population for different values of |
![]() | Figure 4.7(c). Variation of susceptibles population for different values of ![]() |
![]() | Figure 4.7(d). Variation of infectives population for different values of ![]() |
increases, the susceptibles decrease, infectives class decrease implying that treatment increase. Also as the contact rates of susceptible with treated population
increase the susceptible initially increase with time and then it reaches its equilibrium point. But it is differerent to infectives as
increases. The infectives decrease with time reaching its equilibrium point and then increase again.Figures 4.8(a) – 4.8(b) below show the variation of susceptibles and infectives population for different values of number of sexual partners of susceptibles with infectives
, and between susceptibles with treated population
.![]() | Figure 4.8(a). Variation of Susceptibles population for different values of ![]() |
![]() | Figure 4.8(b). Variation of Infectives population for different values of ![]() |
![]() | Figure 4.8(c). Variation of Susceptibles population for different values of ![]() |
![]() | Figure 4.8(d). Variation of Infectives population for different values of ![]() |
increases with time, susceptibles decreases continuously and infectives increases continuously. Also it is seen that if the number of sexual partners of susceptibles with treated population
increases with time, susceptibles first increase and then decrease with time as shown in fig. 4.8(c) due to the loss of immunity. But for infectives, it seen that as
increases, the infectives also increase. Thus it can be concluded that, in order to reduce the spread of the disease, the number of sexual partners as well as unsafe sexual interaction with an infectives should be restricted.Figures 4.9(a) and 4.9(b) shows the variation of treatment rates in treated class and AIDS population. ![]() | Figure 4.9(a). Variation of AIDS patients for different values of and . |
![]() | Figure 4.9(a). Variation of treated patients for different values of and . |
is shown.![]() | Figure 4.10. Variation of AIDS populations for different values of . |
increases, the population of AIDS patients decrease. It is found that the AIDS induced death rate
, can be controlled by ARVs strengthening health education regarding the AIDS disease. It can also be noted that the respective populations tend to the equilibrium level as time progresses. Hence the endemic equilibrium
is globally asymptotically stable for the chosen set of parameter value.
and for
it is unstable and the infection is persists in the population.The endemic equilibrium, which exist only when
, is always locally asymptotically stable. It is found that an increase in the rate of vertical transmission leads to the increase of the population of infectives which in turn increase the pre-AIDS and AIDS population. From the numerical simulation, it is shown that by controlling the rate of vertical transmission, the spread of the disease can be reduced significantly.