American Journal of Operational Research

p-ISSN: 2324-6537    e-ISSN: 2324-6545

2015;  5(5): 103-110

doi:10.5923/j.ajor.20150505.01

 

Optimization of Fuzzified Economic Order Quantity Model Allowing Shortage and Deterioration with Full Backlogging

Mishra S. S.1, Gupta S.2, Yadav S. K.1, Rawat S.1

1Department of Mathematics and Statistics (A Centre of Excellence on Advanced Computing), Dr. Ram Manohar Lohia Avadh University, Faizabad, U.P., India

2Department of Mathematics and Statistics, University of North Carolina, Greensboro, USA

Correspondence to: Mishra S. S., Department of Mathematics and Statistics (A Centre of Excellence on Advanced Computing), Dr. Ram Manohar Lohia Avadh University, Faizabad, U.P., India.

Email:

Copyright © 2015 Scientific & Academic Publishing. All Rights Reserved.

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY).
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Abstract

In this paper, an attempt has been made to optimize fuzzified economic order quantity model allowing shortage and deterioration with full backlogging. Triangular membership function using Zadeh’s extension principle and method of centroid for defuzzification has been used to develop a system of non-linear equations which is further solved by using fast converging Newton-Raphson (N-R) method. The optimized and fuzzified total cost of economic order quantity model as an important performance measure has been computed and sensitivity analysis has been also presented to demonstrate the use of the model under consideration.

Keywords: Optimization of Fuzzified EOQ Control System, Fuzzification and Defuzzification, System of Nonlinear Equations, Computational Approach

Cite this paper: Mishra S. S., Gupta S., Yadav S. K., Rawat S., Optimization of Fuzzified Economic Order Quantity Model Allowing Shortage and Deterioration with Full Backlogging, American Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 5 No. 5, 2015, pp. 103-110. doi: 10.5923/j.ajor.20150505.01.

1. Introduction

Inventory items are elaborated by man, material, machine, money and method to optimize the cost of inventory control system, (see Ackoff and Sasieni (1993)). The first inventory model of inventory control system was developed by Harris (1915). Later, significant amount of research has been conducted in the area of inventory control system including fuzzified inventory control system. Attention of several authors has been drawn to this area of research, most notably that of and ultimately culminated into notable reporting of results of Zadeh (1965, 1965a) who introduced the concept of fuzzy set as an extension of classical set theory. In fuzzy set theory elements of the set have degrees of membership. Moreover, the fuzzy set theory was extended to various systems. Zadeh (1978) propounded the theory of possibility on the basis of fuzzy set as a revolutionary area of knowledge in scientific applications.
A mathematical model on decision making in a fuzzy environment was developed by Zadeh and Bellman (1970). Jain (1976) developed a fuzzy decision model using fuzzy variables and some important operations were discussed by Dubois and Prade (1978). An application of fuzzy sets in the area of operations research was suggested by Zimmerman (1983). It gradually proliferated and embraced the inventory management problems for its wider spectrum of accessibility. A fresh attempt was made by Kacpryzk and Staniewski (1982) who dwelt upon a model on long-term inventory policy-making through fuzzy-decision making models.
A fuzzy set theoretical interpretation of economic order quantity inventory problem was presented by Park (1987). Considering inventory cost as a fuzzy number, an economic order quantity was discussed by Vujosevic et al. (1996). A fuzzified inventory control system is given in figure 1.1 as under.
Figure 1.1. Fuzzified EOQ Control System
The above figure in the context of present problem consists of several processes. Crisp EOQ function is input; it is fuzzified by membership function and its relevant extension principle given by Zadeh. Further, operations on fuzzy system are introduced and later it is defuzzified by some suitable method of defuzzification which ultimately provides single scalar quantity as output. This output may be one of performance measures of the fuzzified EOQ control system under consideration, as per Van and Kerre (1999).
A fuzzy inventory model with or without backorder for fuzzy order quantity with trapezoidal fuzzy number was investigated by Yao and Lee (1999). Yao and Lee (1999a) also proposed and discussed an economic order quantity model in fuzzy sense for inventory without backorder model.
Zimmermann (2001) conceptualized the fuzzy set and developed its applications. Kao and Hsu (2002) made an attempt to discuss an inventory model with fuzzy demand under single period and Hsieh (2002) analyzed optimization of fuzzified production for an inventory model. An inventory without back order with fuzzy total cost and fuzzy storing cost defuzzified by centroid and signed distance was discussed by Yao and Chiang (2003). They compared the optimal results obtained by both the defuzzification methods. Deterioration of an item in the inventory system is one of integral characteristics which needs to be explored at deeper level. If these characterisrtics are fuzzified then its applications are more realistic and meaningful. Inventory model involving fuzzy demand rate and fuzzy deterioration rate was attempted by Kumar et al. (2003). A fuzzified deteriorating inventory model with breakdown of machine and shortage cost was investigated by Mishra et al. (2004).
Lengari (2005) has attempted to deal with fuzzy logic intelligence control system of information. Syed and Aziz (2007) formulated an inventory model without shortage and fuzzified it by applying signed distance method. Mahata and Goswami (2007) investigated an EOQ model for deteriorating items over trade credit financing in the fuzzy sense. A production inventory model with remanufacturing for defective and usable items in fuzzy environment was reported by Roy et al. (2008). Roy and Maity (2009) proposed an inventory model with remanufacturing. Mishra and Mishra (2011) investigated an inventory model for deterioration item under cobweb phenomenon and permissible delay in payment for fuzzy environment. A fuzzy inventory model without shortages using triangular fuzzy number was formulated and analyzed by De and Rawat (2011). A technique of possibility and necessity approach was developed by Pathak and Sarkar (2012) for fuzzy production model of deteriorating inventory allowing shortage subject to time dependent learning and forgetting. Phase wise supply chain model of EOQ with normal life time for queued customers using a computational approach was analyzed at length by Mishra and Mishra (2012).
A fuzzy inventory model for deteriorating items with time-varying demand and shortages was discussed by Jaggi et al. (2012). Similarly, a fuzzy EOQ model for time dependent deteriorating items and time dependent demand with shortages was investigated by Saha and Chakrabarti (2012). A fuzzy inventory model without shortage was discussed by Dutta and Pawan (2012) by using trapezoidal fuzzy number and further by Dutta and Pawan (2013) who considered fuzziness in demand, holding cost and ordering cost for an inventory model without shortages.
Pathak and Mondal (2013) considered an EOQ model for random Weibull deterioration with Ramp-type demand, partial backlogging and inflation under trade credit financing in the fuzzy sense. Prasath and Seshaiah (2013) discussed an inventory model allowing shortage for fuzzy production distribution. Mishra (2014) developed intelligent index for fuzzified inventory of supply chain by using neural computing. Further, Mishra et al. (2015) analyzed an inventory flow in supply chain with deteriorating items for customers in queue for computation of profit optimization in fuzzy environment. Recently, Dutta and Pawan (2013) attempted Fuzzy inventory model for deteriorating items with shortage under the fully backlogged condition. Kumar and Rajput (2015) attempted to describe fuzzy inventory model for deteriorating items with time dependent demand and partial backlogging. Sen and Malakar (2015) discussed a fuzzy inventory model with shortages using different fuzzy numbers. Dinagar and Kannan (2015) dealt with fuzzy inventory model with allowable shortage.
In the present paper, we attempt optimization of fuzzified economic order quantity model allowing shortage and deterioration with full backlogging using different methods of fuzzification and defuzzification to compute fuzzified total optimal cost of the system as to explore more efficient results. The present method is sought to employ the Zadeh’s extension principle using triangular fuzzy membership and defuzzified by centroid method so as to develop a system of non-linear equations and to solve it by using fast converging Newton-Raphson (N-R) method by using C++ language, as in Jeffery (2004). Proposed work intends to leverage the edge of consistency of centroid method of defuzzification and fast convergence of N-R method over previous works in order to yield more efficient and stable results, as in Saneifard and Saneifard (2011), Abbasbandy and Ghanbari (2013). A sensitivity analysis has been also presented to demonstrate the use of the model under consideration.

2. Notations and Assumptions

The proposed inventory model uses the following notations and assumptions:

2.1. Notations

The following notations are used in the present paper:
i. : Ordering cost per order.
ii. : Holding cost per unit per unit time.
iii. : Shortage cost per unit time.
iv. : Purchasing cost per unit per unit time.
v. : Demand rate at any time t per unit time.
vi. : Deterioration rate function, where .
vii. : Length of each ordering cycle.
viii. : Order quantity per unit.
ix. : Total shortage cost per unit time.
x. : Total cost per unit time.
xi. : Total cost per unit time in fuzzy environment.
xii. : The inventory level at any instant of time t,

2.2. Assumptions

The following assumptions are made in the paper:
i. The inventory system involves only one items.
ii. Demand rate r is constant.
iii. Lead time is zero.
iv. The replenishment rate is infinite.
v. Shortages are allowed and fully backlogged. Therefore, the lost sale cost is zero.
vi. There is no replacement of the deteriorated items during the production cycle.

3. Mathematical Formulation

The status of inventory model is shown in figure 3.1 as given below:
Figure 3.1. Graphical Representation of EOQ model
Crisp model given by Dutta and Pawan (2013) uses the inventory level at time t, which is the rate of change of inventory and is governed by the following differential equation:
(3.1)
(3.2)
with the initial condition and the boundary condition
(3.3)
Solving equation (3.1) and (3.2) using the boundary condition in (3.3), the final solution is given by
(3.4)
and
(3.5)
using exponential series expansion in (3.4). Since , we ignore higher power of term of , and get
(3.6)
Using the initial condition in (3.6), we get
(3.7)
Total average number of holding units due to the period [0,T] is given by
(3.8)
Total number of deteriorated units due to the period [0,T] is given by
(3.9)
Total average number of shortage units due to the period [0, T] is given by
(3.10)
Total shortage cost per unit time
(3.11)
Therefore, the total cost of the system per unit time is given by
(3.12)
(3.13)
(3.14)
where, is rate of deteriorating during production

4. Formulation in Fuzzy Environment

In case of fuzzification, deterioration rate changes into fuzzified deterioration rate , and equation (3.14) becomes
(4.1)
Let and let traingular membership function of fuzzified dereriotion rate be given as
where are the positive variables and and the centroid of is given as
We further observe that
This shows that , where are lower, middle and upper cost at time t from above equation and we can express membership function for cost at time t
As we know the extension principle of Zadeh is a very important tool in the fuzzy set theory for providing procedure to fuzzify a crisp function which is given below. Let f: be a crisp function and F(m) (respectively F(n)) be the set of all fuzzy sets ( called fuzzy power set ) of M (respectively n ). The function f: induces two functions f: and f-1: and the extension principal of Zadeh gives formulas to compute the membership function of fuzzy sets f (A ) in N ( respectively f-1 ( B ) in M ) in terms of membership function of fuzzy set A in M ( respectively B in N ).
Definition 4.1 (Zadeh’s Extension Principle): In terms of the notations introduced above, extension principle of Zadeh states that
Hence, from the above theorem, we get the following equation as
Now, we find the quantities and so that we can find centroid for defuzzification as
The centroid to is given by which gives the total cost in fuzzified environment.
We have and as
After evaluating integrals of and from the above equations, we get the centroid of as , which finally turns out to be
For obtaining optimal solution of , i,e for total cost of the model, we take first order partial derivatives w. r. t. and equating them to zero with the condition of . Note that is given by as
Similarly, we can differentiate w. r. t. , and get
After solving both partial derivatives with respect to for fixed values of and t, we get a system of non-linear equations for respectively as follows:
(4.2)
(4.3)
where,
This system of non-linear equations in given by (4.2) and (4.3) is solved by using fast converging N-R method which is programmed in C++.

5. Computing Algorithm

We use the following algorithm with C++ language to compute the optimal results.
Step i: Begin.
Step ii: Input data.
Step iii: Compute the value of
Step iv: Compute the lower cost.
Step v: Compute the middle cost.
Step vi: Compute the upper cost.
Step vii: Compute the coefficient of first non-linear equation by Jacobi method.
Step viii: Compute the coefficient of second non-linear equation by Jacobi method.
Step ix: Compute optimal value of alpha one.
Step x: Compute optimal value of alpha two.
Step xi: Compute optimal value of cost in fuzzy case.
Step xii: End.

6. Sensitivity Analysis of the Model

A sensitivity analysis of the inventory model seeks to study the model impact due to variation of various parameters involved therein. Optimal performance measure of the model under consideration is jointly affected by these parameters and thus inputting these data can fix their variational range for obtaining optimal solution in the form of performance measure as total optimal cost of the fuzzified model in reference. We generate the data for input by using the simulation technique based on Gaussian distribution using R-software. Setting this kaleidoscopic pattern of data is intended to draw future line of action of attempting the findings of the model under consideration. Values of various parameters are computed in the following tables.
It is evident from table (6.1) that the purchasing cost, shortage cost and ordering costs increase when level of inventory keeps increasing indicating a positive correlation between them in the fuzzy environment. From table (6.2) we can draw the conclusion that as time for transaction cycle diminishes pressure for demand increases and it amounts to greater holding cost leading to negative correlation between them when environment is fuzzy. The values of all constants involved in the model are computed in order to produce the optimal values of deterioration of items and their corresponding total cost and are given in tables (6.3), (6.4), (6.5) and (6.6) respectively. The optimal values of deteriorations and total cost in fuzzy environment are given in table (6.7).
Table 6.1.
     
Table 6.2.
     
Table 6.3.
     
Table 6.4.
     
Table 6.5.
     
Table 6.6.
     
Table 6.7.
     

7. Conclusions

Fuzzified EOQ control system under consideration allows us to nicely discuss the fuzzified total optimum cost of the system with deteriorating items with shortage under full backlogging. The relevant result is computed and displayed in table (6.7). This result can be used as future guideline for an enterprising decision system for a better supply network of inventory items. Zadeh’s extension principle and membership function in together have become conscious approach of fuzzification to the model; a popular and versatile centroid method of defuzzification provides the computational insight to attain its optimum solution for various parameters involved therein, as seen in tables (6.1-6.7).
The present research presents the state-of-art application of nuanced technique of fuzzified EOQ control system. A fast converging numerical computational technique has been sought to interface with the fuzzified system to yield the stable results of the model unfolding the point of realization towards seeking solution techniques in the area. The present problem may lead to future research for multi-ware house for classified customers queued for EOQ items.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The authors are very thankful to the editor of American Journal of Operational Research and the unknown referees for critically examining the manuscript and giving the valuable suggestions to improve the paper in present form.
This is to also acknowledge that the work is supported by the grant of a research project of National Board for Higher Mathematics, Bombay, India (vide Ref. No. 2/48(6)/2012/ NBHM/R&D II/13614, December 29, 2012, P.I. : S S Mishra).

References

[1]  Abbasbandy. S. and Ghanbari. R. Nuraeiandm (2013): Revision of sign distance method for ranking of fuzzy numbers, Iranian Journal of Fuzzy Systems vol. 10, no. 4, (2013) pp. 101-117 101.
[2]  Ackoff R L and Sasieni M W (1993): Fundamentals of Operations Research, Wiley Eastern Ltd.
[3]  Dinagar, D.S. and Kannan, J.R. (2015): On fuzzy inventory model with allowable shortage, International journal of pure and applied mathematics, 99, 1, pp. 65-76.
[4]  Dutta D. and Kumar P. (2012): Fuzzy inventory model without shortage using trapezoidal fuzzy number with sensitivity analysis, IOSR-Journal of Mathematics, vol. 4(3), pp.32-37.
[5]  Dutta D. and Kumar P. (2013): Fuzzy inventory model for deteriorating items with shortage under the fully backlogged condition, IJSCE, 3(2), pp.393-398.
[6]  Dutta D. and Kumar P. (2013a): Optimal policy for an inventory model without shortages considering fuzziness in demand, holding cost and ordering cost, International Journal of Advanced Innovation and Research, vol. 2(3), pp.320-325.
[7]  Dubois D. and Prade H. (1978): Operations on fuzzy numbers, International Journal of Systems Science, vol. 9(6), pp.613-626.
[8]  De P. K. and Rawat A. (2011): A fuzzy inventory model without shortages using triangular fuzzy number, Fuzzy Information & Engineering, vol. 1, pp.59-68.
[9]  Harris F. (1915): Operations and cost, AW Shaw Co. Chicago.
[10]  Hsieh C. H. (2002): Optimization of fuzzy production inventory models, Information Sciences, vol. 146(1-4), pp.29-40.
[11]  Jeffery J. Leader (2004): Numerical Analysis and Scientific Computation, Pearson Addition Wesley, Boston, San Francisco, New York.
[12]  Jain R. (1976): Decision making in the presence of fuzzy variables, IIIE Transactions on systems, Man and Cybernetics, vol. 17, pp.698-703.
[13]  Jaggi C. K., Pareek S., Sharma A. and Nidhi (2012): Fuzzy inventory model for deteriorating items with time-varying demand and shortages, American Journal of Operational Research, vol. 2(6), pp.81-92.
[14]  Kacpryzk J. and Staniewski P. (1982): Long-term inventory policy-making through fuzzy-decision making models, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, vol. 8, pp.117-132.
[15]  Kao C. K. and Hsu W. K. (2002): A single-period inventory model with fuzzy demand, Computers and Mathematics with Applications, vol. 43, pp.841-848.
[16]  Kumar S. D., Kundu P. K. and Goswami A. (2003): An economic production quantity inventory model involving fuzzy demand rate and fuzzy deterioration rate. Journal of Applied Mathematics and Computing, vol. 12(1-2), pp.251-260.
[17]  Kumar, S. and Rajput, U.S. (2015): Fuzzy inventory model for deteriorating items with time dependent demand and partial backlogging, American journal of operations research, 6, 3, pp.496-509.
[18]  Lengari John Yen Reza (2005): Fuzzy Logic Intelligence, Control an Information Pearson Prentice Hall, Pearson education, Inc.
[19]  Mishra S. S., Pandey H. and Singh R.S. (2004): A fuzzified deteriorating inventory model with breakdown of machine and shortage cost, International Journal of Mathematical Science 3, 241-255.
[20]  Mishra S. S. and Mishra P. P. (2011): A (Q, R) model for fuzzified deterioration under cobweb phenomenon and permissible delay in payment, Computers and Mathematics with Applications, Vol. 61, No. 4, pp. 921-932.
[21]  Mishra S. S., Yadav S. K. and Rawat S. (2015): Inventory flow in supply chain with deteriorating items for customers in queue: computation of profit optimization in fuzzy environment, American Journal of Operations Research, Scientific and Academic Publishing,p-ISSN:2324-6537e-ISSN:2324-6545,5(1): 1-8,doi:10.5923/j.ajor.ajor201501.
[22]  Mahata G.C. and Goswami A. (2007): An EOQ model for deteriorating items under trade credit financing in the fuzzy sense, production planning and control 18, 681-692.
[23]  Mishra (2014): Developing intelligent index for fuzzified inventory of supply chain by using neural computing, International Journal of Operations Research, Inderscience, accepted.
[24]  Mishra S. S. and Mishra P.P. (2012), Phase Wise Supply Chain Model of EOQ with Normal Life Time for Queued Customers: A Computational Approach, American Journal of Operations Research,2, 296-307,doi:10.4236/ajor.2012.23036.
[25]  Park K. S. (1987): Fuzzy set theoretical interpretation of economic order quantity, IEEE Trans. Systems Man. Cybernet SMC, vol. 17, pp.1082-1084.
[26]  Pathak S. and Sarkar (Mondol) S. (2012): A fuzzy EOQ inventory model for random Weibull deterioration with Ramp-Type demand, partial backlogging and inflation under trade credit financing, Int. J. Res. Commer. IT Manag. 2(2), 8-18. With ISSN 2231-5756.
[27]  Prasath G. M. Arun and Seshaiah C. V. (2013): A fuzzy production-distribution inventory model with shortage, International Journal of Innovation and Applied Studies, vol. 2, pp. 131-137.
[28]  Pathak S., Kar S. Sarkar (Mondal) S. (2013): Fuzzy production inventory model for deteriorating items with shortage under the effect of the time dependent learning and forgetting: a possibility/necessity approach, OPSEARCH (Apr-Jun 2013) 50(2): 149-181.
[29]  Roy A. and Maiti M. (2009): An inventory model for deteriorating item with displayed stock dependent demand under fuzzy inflation and time discounting over a random planning horizon, Appl. Math. Model 33(2), 744-759.
[30]  Roy A., Maity K., Kar, S. and Maity M. (2008): A production inventory model with remanufacturing for defective and usable items in fuzzy environment, Comput. Ind. Eng. 56, 87-97.
[31]  Syed J. K. and Aziz L. A. (2007): Fuzzy inventory model without shortages using signed distance method, Applied Mathematics & Information Sciences, vol. 1(2), pp.203-209.
[32]  Saha S. and Chakrabarti T. (2012): Fuzzy EOQ model for time dependent deteriorating items and time dependent demand with shortages, IOSR-Journal of Mathematics, vol. 2(4), pp.46-54.
[33]  Saneifard Rahim and Saneifard Rasoul (2011): A method for defuzzification based on centroid point, TJFS: Turkish Journal of Fuzzy Systems (eISSN: 1309–1190) An Official Journal of Turkish Fuzzy Systems Association Vol.2, No.1, pp. 36-44.
[34]  Sen, N. and Malakar, S. (2015): A fuzzy inventory model with shortages using different fuzzy numbers, American journal of mathematics and statistics, 5, 5, pp. 238-248.
[35]  Van Leekwijck W. and Kerre E. E. (1999): Defuzzification: criteria and classification, Fuzzy Sets and Systems 108 (2): 159–178. doi:10.1016/S0165-0114(97)00337-0.
[36]  Vujosevic M., Petrovic D. and Petrovic R. (1996): EOQ formula when inventory cost is fuzzy”, International Journal of Production Economics, vol. 45, pp.499-504.
[37]  Yao J. S. and Lee H. M. (1999): Fuzzy inventory with or without backorder for fuzzy order quantity with trapezoidal fuzzy number, Fuzzy sets and systems, vol. 105, pp.311-337.
[38]  Yao J. S. and Lee H. M. (1999a): Economic order quantity in fuzzy sense for inventory without backorder model, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, vol. 105, pp.13-31.
[39]  Yao J. S. and Chiang J. (2003): Inventory without back order with fuzzy total cost and fuzzy storing cost defuzzified by centroid and signed distance, European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 148, pp.401-409.
[40]  Zadeh L.A. (1965a): Fuzzy sets and system, In: Fox J, Editor. System Theory, Brooklyn NY: Polytechnic Press, pp.29–39.
[41]  Zadeh (1965): Fuzzy sets, Information Control, vol. 8, pp.338-353.
[42]  Zadeh L.A. and Bellman R.E. (1970): Decision making in a fuzzy environment, Management Science, vol. 17, pp.140-164.
[43]  Zadeh L.A. (1978): Fuzzy Set as a basis for a theory of possibility, Fuzzy Set Syst.1,3-28.
[44]  Zimmerman H. J. (1983): Using fuzzy sets in operational research, European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 13, pp.201-206.
[45]  Zimmermann H. J. (2001): Fuzzy Set Theory and its Applications, Springer.