American Journal of Operational Research
2012; 2(4): 27-30
doi: 10.5923/j.ajor.20120204.01
Rakesh Kumar , Sumeet Kumar Sharma
School of Mathematics, Shri Mata Vaishno Devi University, Katra, Sub Post- Office, University Campus, Postcode 182320, Jammu and Kashmir, India
Correspondence to: Rakesh Kumar , School of Mathematics, Shri Mata Vaishno Devi University, Katra, Sub Post- Office, University Campus, Postcode 182320, Jammu and Kashmir, India.
| Email: |  | 
Copyright © 2012 Scientific & Academic Publishing. All Rights Reserved.
Inventory management plays a crucial role in managing production processes as well as the supply chains. The study of inventory systems with perishable products has a special significance as it influences the cost and revenue of a firm. Product replacement policies act like safeguards to the retailers (firms) dealing with the business of perishable products. The quantitative analysis of product replacement policies facilitates the decision making in the management of perishable inventory systems. In this paper, the cost-profit analysis of a single server, finite capacity Markovian queueing model with reneging and retention of reneged customers has been performed to study quantitatively the effect of product replacement policies (provided on perished products) on the cost and profit of the retailer. Some important measures of performance are also obtained for the detailed analysis of the model. Through this study, it has been observed that as the percentage of product replacement on perished products increases, the total expected cost of the retailer decreases and total expected profit increases.
Keywords: Perishable Products, Reneging, Markovian Queuing System, Product Replacement, Cost-profit Analysis
 . An outdated item may be replaced by a new item ( i. e. retained) by the supplier (company) to the retailer with some probability, say, q in the form of its product replacement policy and may not be replaced with probability 1-q (= p).
. An outdated item may be replaced by a new item ( i. e. retained) by the supplier (company) to the retailer with some probability, say, q in the form of its product replacement policy and may not be replaced with probability 1-q (= p). the probability that there are n customer in the system, that is,
the probability that there are n customer in the system, that is,  in the queue and one in service. The differential-difference equations of the model are:
 in the queue and one in service. The differential-difference equations of the model are:|  | (1) | 
|  | (2) | 
|  | (3) | 
 and therefore,
 and therefore,  and hence, the solution of equations (1) to (3) gives:
and hence, the solution of equations (1) to (3) gives: |  | (4) | 
 we get
 we get|  | (5) | 
 , we get
 , we get|  | (6) | 
 In the inventory case, this will be expected number of products in the inventory.
In the inventory case, this will be expected number of products in the inventory. (ii) The Expected Number of Customers Served
(ii) The Expected Number of Customers Served  The expected number of customers served (demand completions) is given by:
The expected number of customers served (demand completions) is given by: .(iii) Rate of Abandonment,
.(iii) Rate of Abandonment,  The average rate at which the customers (units in inventory) abandon (perish) is given by:
The average rate at which the customers (units in inventory) abandon (perish) is given by: (iv) Expected number of waiting customers, who actually wait,
(iv) Expected number of waiting customers, who actually wait,  The actual number of units that remain in the inventory for their sale is given by:
The actual number of units that remain in the inventory for their sale is given by:  .Where P0 has been given in (6).
.Where P0 has been given in (6).
 For a finite capacity system some customers can not join the system when they find that the system is full, then immediately they go elsewhere and are said to be lost from the system with rate  λlost = number of lost customers per unit time.Thus,
For a finite capacity system some customers can not join the system when they find that the system is full, then immediately they go elsewhere and are said to be lost from the system with rate  λlost = number of lost customers per unit time.Thus,  , where
 , where Where
Where .We can obtain the average reneging rate
.We can obtain the average reneging rate  as follows:
 as follows: .Where
.Where  .The total expected cost (TEC) of the system is:
.The total expected cost (TEC) of the system is: .Let R be the earned revenue for providing service to each customer per unit time then RLs would be total earned revenue for providing service to average number of customers in the system. Also, λRPN and RRr would be the losses in the revenue of the system due to capacity constraint and reneging of customers respectively. Hence, total expected revenue (TER) of the system is given by
.Let R be the earned revenue for providing service to each customer per unit time then RLs would be total earned revenue for providing service to average number of customers in the system. Also, λRPN and RRr would be the losses in the revenue of the system due to capacity constraint and reneging of customers respectively. Hence, total expected revenue (TER) of the system is given by .Now, total expected profit (TEP) of the system is defined as:
.Now, total expected profit (TEP) of the system is defined as: .Numerically, the impact of probability of retaining the impatient customers (q) on the profit obtained is shown in table-1. We have taken λ=2, μ=3, ξ = 0.1, N=4, Cs=18, Ch=8, Cr=6, and R=75. From table-1, we can see that as the probability of retaining the reneged customers (percentage of product replacement on perished products) increases, the total expected revenue of the system increases because of the increase in expected system size due to customer retention, while the total expected cost decreases. This in turn results in the increase in the total expected profit (TEP) of the system with the increase in probability of retaining the reneged customers. The value of TEP is minimum when q=0 (the case of no product replacement) and it is maximum when q=1 (the case of 100% product replacement on perished products). Thus, a retailer can know the variation in total expected profit and total expected cost with the change in probability of retaining the reneged customers, q (percentage of product replacement on perished products) and can decide about the percentage of product replacement to be demanded from the supplier.
.Numerically, the impact of probability of retaining the impatient customers (q) on the profit obtained is shown in table-1. We have taken λ=2, μ=3, ξ = 0.1, N=4, Cs=18, Ch=8, Cr=6, and R=75. From table-1, we can see that as the probability of retaining the reneged customers (percentage of product replacement on perished products) increases, the total expected revenue of the system increases because of the increase in expected system size due to customer retention, while the total expected cost decreases. This in turn results in the increase in the total expected profit (TEP) of the system with the increase in probability of retaining the reneged customers. The value of TEP is minimum when q=0 (the case of no product replacement) and it is maximum when q=1 (the case of 100% product replacement on perished products). Thus, a retailer can know the variation in total expected profit and total expected cost with the change in probability of retaining the reneged customers, q (percentage of product replacement on perished products) and can decide about the percentage of product replacement to be demanded from the supplier.| [1] | Barrer, D. Y., 1957, Queuing with impatient customers and indifferent clerks, Operations research, 5, 644-649. | 
| [2] | Graves, S.C., and Keilson, J., 1981, The compensation method applied to a one-product production/inventory problem, Mathematics of Operations Research, 6 (2), 246-262. | 
| [3] | Graves, S.C., 1982, The application of queuing theory to continuous perishable inventory systems, Management Science, 28 (4), 400-406. | 
| [4] | Goswami, A., Mahata, G.C. and Prakash, O., 2010, Optimal retailer replenishment decisions in the EPQ model for deteriorating items with two level of trade credit financing. International Journal of Mathematics in Operational Research, 2 (1), 17–39. | 
| [5] | Karaesmen, I., S.-W. A. and Deniz, B., 2011, Managing perishable and aging invetories: review and future research directions. in planning production and inventories in the extended enterprise, a state of the art handbook, Vol. 1, 393–438, Kempf, K., Keskinocak, P. and Uzsoy, P. (eds.), International Series in Operations Research and Management Science, Springer. | 
| [6] | Kumar, R. and Sharma, S. K., 2012, An M/M/1/N queuing model with retention of reneged customers and balking, American Journal of Operational Research, 2(1), 1-5. | 
| [7] | Manuel, P., and Lawrence, A.S., 2007, A stochastic perishable inventory system with random supply quantity, International Journal of Information and Management Sciences, 18(4), 317-334. | 
| [8] | Nahmias, S., 1980, Queuing models for controlling perishable inventories, Proc. First Symp. Inventories, Budapest, 449–457. | 
| [9] | Nahmias, S., 1982, Perishable inventory theory: a review. Operations Research, 30 (4), 680-708. | 
| [10] | Sasieni, M. W., 1961, Double queues and impatient customers with an application to inventory theory, Operations Research, 9 (6), 771-781. | 
| [11] | Shukla, D. and Khedlekar, U.K., 2010, An order level inventory model with three component demand rate (TCDR) for a newly launched deteriorating item, International Journal of Operations Research, 7 (2), 61-70. | 
| [12] | Shukla, D., Khedlekar, U.K., Chandel, R..P.S., and Bhagwat, S., 2012, Simulation of inventory policy for product with price and time dependent demand for deteriorating items, International Journal of Modelling, Simulation and Scientific Computing, 3 (1), 115001-1-30. | 
| [13] | Teimoury, E., Mazlomi, A., Nadafioun, R.,Khondabi, I.G., and Fathi, M.,2011, Inventory planning with batch ordering in multi-echelon multi-product supply chain by queuing approach, Proceeding of International Multi-Conference of engineering and computer scientists, 2, IMECS -2011, Hong Kong. | 
| [14] | William, K., 1957, A queuing model for an inventory problem, Operations Research, 5 (5), 693-703. |