American Journal of Organic Chemistry

p-ISSN: 2163-1271    e-ISSN: 2163-1301

2017;  7(1): 13-18

doi:10.5923/j.ajoc.20170701.03

 

New Triterpenoid from the Roots of Calotropis gigantea (L) Dryand (Asclepiadaceae)

Iman Omer1, 2, Ibrahim Abdurrahman1, 3, Yang Cai-Xia1

1College of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Northwest Normal University, Lanzhou City, China

2School of Health Science, Ahfad Uuniversity for Women, Omdurman, Sudan

3Unit of Basic Science, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Zalingei, Zalingei, Sudan

Correspondence to: Yang Cai-Xia, College of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Northwest Normal University, Lanzhou City, China.

Email:

Copyright © 2017 Scientific & Academic Publishing. All Rights Reserved.

This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY).
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Abstract

Seven triterpenoid derivatives were isolated from the roots of Calotropis gigantea (L) Dryand, a Chinese traditional medicinal plant. Their structures were established on the basis of their spectroscopic data and comparison with those in the literature. A new triterpenoid acetate derivative, compound 7, Calotropisis, was isolated and characterized by spectral methods.

Keywords: Calotropis gigantean, Acelepiadaceae, Triterpenoid derivatives

Cite this paper: Iman Omer, Ibrahim Abdurrahman, Yang Cai-Xia, New Triterpenoid from the Roots of Calotropis gigantea (L) Dryand (Asclepiadaceae), American Journal of Organic Chemistry, Vol. 7 No. 1, 2017, pp. 13-18. doi: 10.5923/j.ajoc.20170701.03.

1. Introduction

Calotropis gigantea (L) Dryand (Asclepiadaceae) is mostly distributed in tropical and semitropical areas, mainly in Southwest China and South China in the wild [1-3]. It has been used in traditional medicine for the treatment of various ailments like parasitic diseases, digestive bloating from gas, cough, leprosy, and asthma by the people of the Li nationality, who are indigenous to Hainan island in China. Additionally, the plant is also used as a source of methane through anaerobic fermentation for bio fuel production [4]. This plant has been thoroughly explored for its many medicinal properties [5-7]. The chemistry of C. gigantea has been extensively investigated, leading to the isolation, of pregnanes [8, 9], flavonoids [10], a nonprotein amino acid [11], cardenolides [12-14] and terpenes [15-19]. In the present paper, we describe the isolation and structural elucidation of new triterpenoid acetates identified as calotropisis.

2. Experimental

2.1. Instrumentation and Materials

NMR Spectra were recorded on a Bruker-DRX-400-NMR, (1H at 400Hz and 13C at 100Hz) spectrometer (Bruker Biospin Inc., Germany) and chemical shift values are given on a δ (ppm) scale with TMS as internal standard. 2D-NMR experiment was performed using standard Bruker micro-program (XWIN-NMR version 2.6 software. HR-EI-MS experiments were performed using a micro-mass–QTOF micro instrument, with an electro-spray ionization source (eV= 70 V, 80°C) (Waters Ltd., England). Column chromatography was carried out on silica gel (Merck kiesel gel 300-400 mesh, Qingdao Haiyang Chemical Group Company, China), TLCs were carried out on GF254 silica gel plates (Merck, Qingdao Haiyang Chemical Group Company, China). All solvents were of commercial grade and used after further purification by simple distillation.

2.2. Plant Material

The Roots of C. gigantea were collected in August 2016 from Hunan province, south of China, and the plant was authenticated by prof. Chen Quan Yuan at the college of biology, Northwest Normal University, China, where a voucher specimen (No. 20141016) has been deposited in the herbarium of author’s laboratory.

2.3. Extraction and Isolation

The roots of the C. gigantean (Linn.) were air-dried for four weeks and ground into a powder. The root (15Kg) was sequentially extracted three times with 17 liters of ethanol at room temperature for 7 days each. Then, the extracts were filtered through cotton and concentrated with a rotary evaporator at 45C for removal of the organic solvent and dried. A total of 3kg of ethanolic extracts were dissolved in 5L hot distilled water and then prepared by successive partition with petroleum ether (PE) (40-60C) (fraction I), chloroform (fraction II), ethyl acetate (fraction III) and methanol (fraction IV). Each partition step was repeated three times to ensure complete extraction in each case.
Fraction I was evaporated to yield 20g, which was chromatographed on 500g of silica gel (Merck kiesel gel 300-400 mesh) using (PE:C6H6) in a gradient elution (30:1-0:1) as the mobile phase. Three sub-fractions were obtained (A1, A2 and A3). Fraction A1 was again subjected to column chromatography, eluted with PE: EtOAC (gradient 30:1- 20:1) to obtained two further sub-fractions (A1-1–A1-2). Sub-fraction A1-1 chromatographed using a PE:EtOAc gradient (30:1-17:1) elution to yield compound 1. Sub-fraction A1-2 was chromatographed using a PE-EtOAc (17:1) elution and then recrystallized with a 1:1 mixture of MeOH:CHCl3 to obtain compound 2. Fraction A2 was also subjected to chromatography with a PE: EtOAc gradient (15:1-5-1) elution to yield compounds 3, 4 and 5 respectively. Fraction A3 was loaded onto a column and chromatography using a PE:EtOAC gradient (10:1-1:1) elution to provide compounds 6 and 7 respectively.
Taraxasteryl acetate 1, obtained as white needle crystal, 34 mg, m.p 253-255°C. EI-MS m/z: 468 [M-CH3], C33H54O2. 1H-NMR: (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ 0.73 (3H, s, H-28), 0.79-083 (9H, s, H-23, 24, 29), 0.85 ( 3H, t , J= 7.3Hz, H-3'), 0.95 (3H, s, H-26), 0.97 (3H, s, H-25), 1,03 (3H, s, H-27), 2.21 (2H, t, H-2'), 4.05 (1H, dd, J= 8.7, 3.2 Hz, H-3), 4.53 (1H, br s, H-30). 13C-NMR (CDCl3, 100MHz) δ 38.34 (C-1), 23.31 (C-2), 80.61 (C-3), 37.65 (C-4), 55.29 (C-5), 18.18 (C-6), 33.60 (C-7), 40.0 (C-8), 50.03 (C-9), 37.57 (C-10), 21.33 (C-11), 25.8 (C-12), 38.84 (C-13), 41.95 (C-14), 26.58 (C-15), 39.14 (C-16), 34.41 (C-17), 48.59 (C-18), 38.25 (C-19), 154.4 (C-20), 25.65 (C-21), 39.35 (C-22), 27.88 (C-23), 16.60 (C-24), 15.38 (C-25), 16.25 (C-26), 14.06 (C-27), 26.08 (C-28), 19.43 (C-29), 107.23 (C-30), 171.92 (C-1'), 21.16 (C-2').
α-amyrin acetate 2, obtained as white crystal, 154 mg, m.p 259-262°C. EI-MS m/z 468, C32H52O2. 1H-NMR: (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ 0.79 (3H, s, H-28), 0.86 (12H, s, H-23), 0.87(3H, s, H-24), 0.97(3H, s, H-29) ,1.00( 3H, s, H-30), 1.06 (3H, s, H-26) 1.24( 3H, s, H-25), 0.93 (3H, s, H-26), 0.96 (3H, s, H-25), 1,02 (3H, s, H-27), 2.03(3H, s, O-CH3), 2.27 (1H, dd, J = 7.6, 3.2 Hz, H-18), 4.50 (1H, dd, J= 8.7, 4.3 Hz, H-3), 5.12 (1H, br s, H-12). 13C-NMR (CDCl3, 100MHz) δ 38.45 (C-1), 28.73 (C-2), 80.33 (C-3), 38.45 (C-4), 55.24 (C-5), 18.23 (C-6), 32.85 (C-7), 40.01 (C-8), 47.41 (C-9), 36.80 (C-10), 23.36 (C-11), 124.25 (C-12), 139.49 (C-13), 42.5 (C-14), 26.91 (C-15), 26.85 (C-16), 33.7 (C-17), 59.04 (C-18), 39.59 (C-19), 39.62 (C-20), 31.23 (C-21), 41.5 (C-22), 28.05 (C-23), 15.63 (C-24), 15.47 (C-25), 16.8 (C-26), 23.5 (C-27), 28.38 (C-28), 17.04 (C-29), 21.3 (C-30), 170.94 (C-1'), 21.40 (C-2').
α- amyrin caprylate 3, obtained as white crystal, 43 mg, m.p. 160-163°C. EI-Ms m/z 552, C38H64O2, 1H-NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ 0.78 (3H, s, H-28), 0.85 (12H, s, H-23, 24, 29, 30), 0.88 (3H, t, J= 7.3Hz, H-8'), 0.94 (3H, s, H-26), 0.95 (3H, s, H-25), 1,15 (3H, s, H-27), 1.21-1.30 ( 10H, m, H-3'-7') 2.02 (2H, t, H-2'), 2.76 (1H, m, H-18), 4.49 (1H, dd, J= 8.7, 4.5 Hz, H-3), 5.11(1H, br s, H-12). 13C-NMR (CDCl3, 100MHz) δ 38.76 (C-1), 28.70 (C-2), 80.29 (C-3), 38.14 (C-4), 55.01 (C-5), 18.69 (C-6), 32.56 (C-7), 40.89 (C-8), 47.53 (C-9), 36.80 (C-10), 23.36 (C-11), 124.28 (C-12), 139.58 (C-13), 42.31 (C-14), 27.20 (C-15), 26.38 (C-16), 33.69 (C-17), 59.89 (C-18), 39.24 (C-19), 39.58 (C-20), 31.03 (C-21), 41.50 (C-22), 28.68 (C-23), 16.23 (C-24), 15.71 (C-25), 16.71 (C-26), 23.55 (C-27), 28.07 (C-28), 17.42 (C-29), 21.38 (C-30), 170.94 (C-1'), 34.42 (C-2'), 25.12 (C-3'), 29.24-29.33(C-4', 5', 6'), 23.69 (C-7'), 14.10 (C-8').
11-oxo-α-amyrin ethylated 4, was obtained as white crystal, 31 mg, m.p. 278-281°C. EI-MS m/z 496, C33H52O3. 1H-NMR: (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ 0.79 (3H, s, H-28), 0.86 (12H, s, H-23, 24, 29, 30), 0.88 ( 3H, t , J= 7.3Hz, H-3') 0.94 (3H, s, H-26), 0.95 (3H, s, H-25), 1,15 (3H, s, H-27), 2.02 (3H, q, H-2'), 2.76 (1H, m, H-18), 4.50 (1H, dd, J= 10.7, 4.5 Hz, H-3), 5.57(1H, s, H-12). 13C-NMR (CDCl3, 100MHz) δ 38.93 (C-1), 28.68 (C-2), 80.89 (C-3), 38.24 (C-4), 55.23 (C-5), 18.92 (C-6), 32.35 (C-7), 40.21 (C-8), 47.20 (C-9), 36.92 (C-10), 199.55 (C-11), 130.36 (C-12), 164.85 (C-13), 42.01 (C-14), 27.11 (C-15), 26.43 (C-16), 33.33 (C-17), 59.03 (C-18), 39.60 (C-19), 39.18 (C-20), 31.22 (C-21), 41.67 (C-22), 28.80 (C-23), 16.25 (C-24), 15.53 (C-25), 16.90 (C-26), 23.67 (C-27), 28.37 (C-28), 17.45 (C-29), 21.27 (C-30), 170.90 (C-1'), 34. 36 (C-2'), 14.24 (C-3').
1l, 12-Oxidotaraxerol acetate 5, obtained as colourless needles, 29 mg, m.p. over 300°C. EI-MS, m/z 482, C32H50O23. 1H-NMR (400MHz): 0.79, 0.84, 0.88, 0.90, 0 93, 0.98, 1.13, l.29 (each 3H,s, Me x 8), 2.02 (3H, s, OAc) 2.52(1H,d,5=4.4Hz, H-12), 2.98 (d, J = 4.7 Hz, 1H), 3.12 (lH, t, J= 44 Hz, H- 11), 4.50 (lH, dd, 5=10.5, 5.8Hz, H-3), 5.56 (lH, dd, 5=8.3, 3 5 Hz., H-15). 13C-NMR (CDCl3, 100MHz) δ 37.99 (C-1), 23.23 (C-2), 80.29 (C-3), 37.62 (C-4), 54.59 (C-5), 18.77 (C-6), 33.12 (C-7), 38.87 (C-8), 51.80 (C-9), 37.45 (C-10), 53.71 (C-11), 58.12 (C-12), 36.46 (C-13), 157.0 (C-14), 118.89 (C-15), 35.20 (C-16), 35.33 (C-17), 48.06 (C-18), 40.21 (C-19), 28.70 (C-20), 36.77 (C-21), 38.20 (C-22), 27.89 (C-23), 17.44 (C-24), 16.51 (C-25), 27.11 (C-26), 30.20 (C-27), 29.90 (C-28), 33.66 (C-29), 19.50 (C-30) 172.13 (C-1'), 20.96 (C-2').
Germanicol acetate 6, was obtained as white powder, 36 mg, 279-283°C. EI-MS m/z 468, C32H52O2. 1H- NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ 0.77 (3H,s, H-27), 0.84 (3H,s, H-24), 0.85 (3H,s, H-23), 0.92 (3H,s, H-26), 0.93 (3H,s, H-29), 0.97 (3H,s, H-30), 1.05 (3H,s, H-28), 1.09 (3H,s, H-25), 2.01 (3H, s, CH3-CO), 4.48 (1H, dd, J =11.5, 6.2 Hz, H-3), 5.35 (1H, s, H-19) . 13C-NMR (CDCl3, 100MHz) δ 38.29 (C-1), 23.40 (C-2), 80.24 (C-3), 37.52 (C-4), 55.25 (C-5), 18.29 (C-6), 33.60 (C-7), 40.31 (C-8), 50.20 (C-9), 37.04 (C-10), 21.35 (C-11), 26.38 (C-12), 39.60 (C-13), 42.20 (C-14), 26.71 (C-15), 38.16 (C-16), 34.34 (C-17), 48.05 (C-18), 39.25 (C-19), 156.86 (C-20), 25.73 (C-21), 38.84 (C-22), 27.07 (C-23), 16.62 (C-24), 16.32 (C-25), 15.89 (C-26), 14.59 (C-27), 18.90 (C-28), 25.73 (C-29), 109.57 (C-30), 170.73 (C-1'), 21.19 (C-2').
Compound 7, obtained as a colorless powder, 33 mg, m.p. over 300°C, HR-ESI-MS (positive mode) m/z= 618.5548[M+NH4]+, 1H-NMR and 13C-NMR Table 1.
Table 1. 1H-NMR and 13C-NMR data of compound 7 (100 MHz, CDCl3)
     

3. Results and Discussion

The seven isolated compounds were identified as taraxasteryl acetate (1), α-amyrin acetate (2), α- amyrin caprylate (3), 11-oxo-α-amyrin ethylate (4), 1 l, 12-Oxidotaraxerol acetate (5), germanicol acetate (6), and Calotropisis (7). Figure 1 shows the structures of the triterpenoid isolated.
Figure 1. Structures of compounds 1–7
The six first compounds identified by direct comparison of their 1H- and 13C-NMR spectroscopic data with those reported in the literature [20-26] respectively. Compound 7 was obtained as a colorless powder, (25 mg), molecular formula C37H60O6, HR-ESI-MS (positive mode) showed beak at 618.5548 m/z which correspond to [M+NH4]+. 1H-NMR spectrum, exhibited six methyl protons δ 0.83-0.87 (12H, s, H-26, 24, 29, 30), 0.96 (3H, s, H-25) and 1,02 (3H, s, H-27), two signal triplet at δ 0.88 ( 3H, t, J= 7.3Hz, H-5') and 0.93 (3H, t, J= 7.3Hz, H-3'') also 1H-NMR spectrum showed extra signals, quartet appeared at δ 4.11 (2H, q, J= 14.1, 7.0, H-2") and triplet at δ 2.27 (2H, t, H-2'), one olefinic proton at δ 5.17 (1H, br s, H-12) and one signals at δ 4.47 (1H, dd, J= 10.7, 4.4 Hz, H-3), were observed in the 1H-NMR Spectrum. The 13C-NMR spectrum also showed six methyl carbons at δ 16.01, 14.66, 16.57, 28.31, 33.46 and 24.32ppm, two olefinic carbons at δ 122.58 and 144.80 ppm, three oxygenated methane carbons at δ 60.14, 65.38 and 73.17 ppm, and two carbonyls at δ 172.08 and 173.07, Table 1. The analysis of COSY, and HMBC experiments showed the correlation between methane proton at C-12 (δC 122.68) and C-9 (δC 47.48), C-14 (δC 41.60) and two bonds correlated with C-11(δC 23.72) and C-4 (δC 38.33). Also the HMBC, Fig 2 and 3 respectively, showed the connection between methyl proton at δ 0.93 (3H, t, J= 7.3Hz, H-3'') and C-2" (δc 60.14) which indicated the presence of ethyl group, the position of it was established from correlation of methylene group at δH 4.11(2H, q, J= 7.0, H-2") with C=O -28 at 173.07. Further confirmation was obtained from the upfield shift of carbonyl group at C-28 to 173.07 ppm compared with that of the ursolic acid carbonyl at δ 180.49 [27]. Another correlation between the methylene group at δ 2.27 (2H, t, H-2') with the carbonyl group at δ 172.08 indicated the presence of aliphatic shain on the other side of molecule. According to the above information and by comparison with related reported literatures of related compounds [28], the structure of compound 7 was elucidated as Calotropisis.
Figure 2. 1H-1H COSY spectra of compound 7
Figure 3. HMBC spectra of compound 7
Figure 4. The key HMBC correlations observed in compound 7

4. Conclusions

Based on the results of our present study, roots of C. gigantean contain triterpenoid derivatives, as the principal secondary metabolites. A new triterpenoid acetate derivative, calotropisis with six known compounds were separated and their structures identified by spectral analysis.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

The authors are grateful to the China scholarship council (CSC) for the research scholarship. Authors are also grateful to College of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Northwest Normal University for providing the necessary facilities and infrastructure for the study.

References

[1]  Kumar, P. S.; Suresh, E.; Kalavathy, S. Review on a potential herb Calotropis gigantea (L.) R. Br. Scholars Academic Journal of Pharmacy, 2(2), (2013) 135-143.
[2]  Academiae, D. F. Sinicae Edita: Flora Reipublicae Popularis Sinicae, Tomus. 63, (1977) 384-386.
[3]  Ahmed, K. M.; Rana, A. C.; Dixit, V. K. Calotropis Species (Ascelpediaceace)-A Comprehensive Review. Pharmacognosy Magazine, 1(2), (2005) 48-47.
[4]  Luo, M.; Liu, H.; Ge, X. Study on the Biomass Measuration for the Artificial Forest of Calotropis gigantea (L.) Dryand. Open Journal of Forestry, 5(04), (2015) 454-463.
[5]  Kumar, G.; Karthik, L.; Bhaskara Rao, K. V. Antimicrobial activity of latex of Calotropis gigantea against pathogenic microorganisms-an in vitro study. Pharmacologyonline, 3(3), (2010) 155-163.
[6]  Chitme, H. R.; Chandra, R.; Kaushik, S. Studies on anti-diarrhoeal activity of Calotropis gigantea R. Br. in experimental animals. J Pharm Pharm Sci, 7(1), (2004) 70-75.
[7]  Chitme, H. R.; Chandra, R.; Kaushik, S. Evaluation of antipyretic activity of Calotropis gigantea (Asclepiadaceae) in experimental animals. Phytotherapy research, 19(5), (2005) 454-456.
[8]  Kitagawa, I.; Zhang, R. S.; Park, J. D.; Baek, N. I.; Takeda, Y.; Yoshikawa, M.; Shibuya, H. Chemical structures of calotroposides A and B, two new oxypregnane-oligoglycosides from the root of Calotropis gigantea (Asclepiadaceae). Chemical and pharmaceutical bulletin, 40(8), (1992) 2007-2013.
[9]  Kitagawa, I.; Zhang, R. S.; Park, J. D.; Baek, N. I.; Takeda, Y.; Yoshikawa, M.; Shibuya, H. Indonesian medicinal plants. V. Chemical structures of calotroposides C, D, E, F, and G, five additional new oxypregnane-oligoglycosides from the root of Calotropis gigantea (Asclepiadaceae). Chemical and pharmaceutical bulletin, 40(10), (1992) 2647-2653.
[10]  Sen, S.; Sahu, N. P.; Mahato, S. B. Flavonol glycosides from Calotropis gigantea. Phytochemistry, 31(8), (1992) 2919-2921.
[11]  Pari, K.; Rao, P. J.; Devakumar, C.; Rastogi, J. N. A novel insect antifeedant nonprotein amino acid from Calotropis gigantea. Journal of natural products, 61(1) (1998) 102-104.
[12]  Kiuchi, F.; Fukao, Y; Maruyama, T.; Obata, T.; Tanaka, M.; Sasaki, T.; Tsuda, Y. Cytotoxic principles of a Bangladeshi crude drug, akond mul (roots of Calotropis gigantea L.). Chemical and pharmaceutical bulletin, 46(3), (1998) 528-530.
[13]  Singh, B.; Rastogi, R. P. Structure of asclepin and some observations on the NMR spectra of Calotropis glycosides. Phytochemistry, 11(2), (1972) 757-762.
[14]  Lhinhatrakool, T.; Sutthivaiyakit, S. 19-Nor-and 18, 20-epoxy-cardenolides from the leaves of Calotropis gigantea. Journal of natural products, 69(8), (2006) 1249-1251.
[15]  Anjaneyulu, V.; Row, L. R. The triterpenes of Calotropis gigantea Linn. Current Science, 37, (1968) 156—157.
[16]  Thakur, S.; Das, P.; Itoh, T.; Imai, K.; Matsumoto, T. Latex extractables of Calotropis gigantea. Phytochemistry, 23(9), (1984) 2085-2087.
[17]  Ali, M.; Gupta, J. New pentacyclic triterpenic esters from the roots of Calotropis gigantea. Indian Journal of Chemistry 388, (1999) 877-881.
[18]  Bhutani, K. K.; Gupta, D. K.; Kapil, R. S. Occurrence of D/E trans stereochemistry isomeric to ursane (cis) series in a new pentacyclic triterpene from Calotropis procera. Tetrahedron letters, 33(49), (1992) 7593-7596.
[19]  Saha, S.; Subrahmanyam, E. V. S.; Kodangala, C.; Shastry, S. C. Isolation and characterization of triterpenoids and fatty acid ester of triterpenoid from leaves of Bauhinia variegata. Der Pharma Chemica, 3(4), (2011) 28-37.
[20]  Reynolds, W. F.; McLean, S.; Poplawski, J.; Enriquez, R. G.; Escobar, L. I.; Leon, I. Total assignment of 13C and 1H spectra of three isomeric triterpenol derivatives by 2D NMR: an investigation of the potential utility of 1H chemical shifts in structural investigations of complex natural products. Tetrahedron, 42(13), (1986) 3419-3428.
[21]  Okoye, N. N.; Ajaghaku, D. L.; Okeke, H. N.; Ilodigwe, E. E.; Nworu, C. S.; Okoye, F. B. C. beta-Amyrin and alpha-amyrin acetate isolated from the stem bark of Alstonia boonei display profound anti-inflammatory activity. Pharmaceutical biology, 52(11), (2014) 1478-1486.
[22]  Rasoanaivo, L. H.; Wadouachi, A.; Andriamampianina, T. T.; Andriamalala, S. G.; Razafindrakoto, E. J.; Raharisololalao, A.; Randimbivololona, F. Triterpenes and steroids from the stem bark of Gambeya boiviniana Pierr. J Pharmacogn Phytochem, 3(1), (2014) 68-72.
[23]  Barreiros, M. L.; David, J. M.; Pereira, P. A. D. P.; Guedes, M. L.; David, J. P. Fatty acid esters of triterpenes from Erythroxylum passerinum. Journal of the Brazilian Chemical Society, 13(5), (2002) 669-673.
[24]  Ibrahim, S. A.; Ali, M. S. Constituents of Nepeta crassifolia (Lamiaceae). Turkish Journal of Chemistry, 31(4), (2007) 463-470.
[25]  Fingolo, C. E.; Santos, T. D. S.; Kaplan, M. A. C. Triterpene esters: natural products from Dorstenia arifolia (Moraceae). Molecules, 18(4), (2013) 4247-4256.
[26]  Bhattacharyya, J.; Barros, C. B. Triterpenoids of Cnidosculus urens. Phytochemistry, 25(1), (1985) 274-276.
[27]  Sun, G.; Zhang, X.; Xu, X.; Yang, J.; Zhong, M.; Yuan, J. A new triterpene from the plant of Uncaria macrophylla. Molecules, 17(1), (2012) 504-510.
[28]  Ahmad, V. U. Handbook of natural products data. Volume 2: pentacyclic triterpenoids. Elsevier Science, 1994.