American Journal of Mathematics and Statistics
p-ISSN: 2162-948X e-ISSN: 2162-8475
2018; 8(1): 1-7
doi:10.5923/j.ajms.20180801.01

Shuker Mahmood Khalil, Mayadah Abd Ulrazaq
Department of Mathematics, College of Science, University of Basrah, Basrah, Iraq
Correspondence to: Shuker Mahmood Khalil, Department of Mathematics, College of Science, University of Basrah, Basrah, Iraq.
| Email: | ![]() |
Copyright © 2018 Scientific & Academic Publishing. All Rights Reserved.
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International License (CC BY).
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

In this paper, in the first we introduce the concept of
algebra of the power set and new notions connected to it are investigated and discussed like
subalgebra of the power set, soft
algebra of the power set and soft
subalgebra of the power set. Then some binary operations between two soft
algebras of the power set are studied. Further, we state the relations between soft
algebra of the power set and soft 
algebra of the power set. Moreover, several examples are given to illustrate the notations introduced in this work.
Keywords:
Soft sets theory, Proper
algebra,
algebras
Cite this paper: Shuker Mahmood Khalil, Mayadah Abd Ulrazaq, Soft BCH-Algebras of the Power Sets, American Journal of Mathematics and Statistics, Vol. 8 No. 1, 2018, pp. 1-7. doi: 10.5923/j.ajms.20180801.01.
algebras two classes of abstract algebras are introduced by Imai and Iseki ([22], [23]). The class of BCK-algebras is a proper subclass of the class of
algebras. Also, Hu and Li introduced a wider class of abstract algebras, it is said to be BCH-algebras ([5], [6]). Next, the concept of
algebras, which is another useful generalization of BCK –algebras are introduced (see [2], [3], [20]). After then, the concept of
algebra is introduced and studied [9]. The basic notions of soft sets theory are introduced by Molodtsov ([18]) to deal with uncertainties when solving problems in practice as in engineering, social science, environment, and economics. This notion is convenient and easy to apply as it is free from the difficulties that appear when using other mathematical tools as theory of theory of fuzzy sets, rough sets and theory of vague sets etc. Moreover, many researches on soft sets theory and some of their applications are studied (see [10]-[15]). On other word, many authors applied the notion of soft set on several classes of algebras like soft
algebras [7] and soft
algebras [16]. In recent years, for any
(finite set
), the notations of
algebra of the power set,
algebra of the power set,
algebra of the power set, soft
algebra of the power set, soft
algebra of the power set, soft
algebra of the power set, soft
algebra of the power set, soft edge
algebra of the power set, soft edge
algebra of the power set, soft edge
algebra of the power set are introduced (see [16], [17]). The aim of this paper is to introduce new branch of the pure algebra it's called
algebra of the power set. Then some binary operations between two soft
algebras of the power set are stated. Further, we study the relations between soft
algebra of the power set and soft 
algebra of the power set. Also, several examples are given to illustrate the notations introduced in this work.
algebra is a non-empty set
with a constant 0 and a binary operation* satisfying the following axioms:(i)-
(ii)-
(iii)-
and
imply that
for all x, y in X.Definition 2.2: ([19]) A
algebra
is said to be
algebra if
satisfies the following additional axioms:(1).
(2).
for all
Definition 2.3 ([8]) A
algebra
is a non-empty set
with a constant
and a binary operation* satisfying the following axioms:(i)-
(ii)-
(iii)-
imply that
(iv)- For all
imply that 
Definition 2.4: ([21]) A
algebra is a non-empty set
with a constant 0 and a binary operation* satisfying the following axioms:(i)-
(ii)-
and
imply that
(iii)-
for all x, y ,z in X.Definition 2.4: ([5]) A
algebra is a non-empty set
with a constant 0 and a binary operation* satisfying the following axioms:(i)-
(ii)-
and
imply that
(iii)-
for all x, y ,z in X.Definition 2.5: ([18]) Let
be an initial universe set and let
be a set of parameters. The power set of
is denoted by
. Let
be a subset of
. A pair
is said to be a soft set over
if
is a set-valued functions of
into the set of all subsets of the set
. Definition 2.6: ([11]) Let
and
be two soft sets over
, then their union is the soft set
where
and for all
if
if
if
We write
Further, [4] for any two soft sets
and
over
their intersection is the soft set
over
, and we write
where
and
for all
Definition 2.7: ([8]) Let
be a soft set over
. Then
is said to be a soft
algebra over
if
is a
algebra for all
Definition 2.8: ([7]) Let
be a soft set over
. Then
is said to be a soft
algebra over
if
is a
algebra for all
Definition 2.9: ([7]) Let
be a soft set over
. Then
is said to be a soft
algebra over
if
is a
algebra for all
Definition 2.10: ([16]) Let
be a soft set over
. Then
is said to be a soft
algebra over
if
is a
algebra for all
Definition 2.10: ([24]) Let
be a soft set over
. Then
is said to be a soft
algebra over
if
is a
algebra for all
Definition 2.11: ([16]) Let
be non-empty set and
be a power set of
. Then
with a constant
and a binary operation* is said to be
algebra of the power set of
if
satisfying the following axioms:(i)-
(ii)-
(iii)-
and
imply that
for all
Definition 2.12: ([16]) Let
be a
algebra of the power set of
. Then
is said to be
algebra of the power set of
if it satisfies the following additional axioms:(1).
(2).
Definition: 2.13: ([16]) Let
be a
algebra of the power set of
. Then
is said to be a
algebra of the power set of
if it satisfies the identity
for all
Definition 2.14: ([16]) Let
be a
algebra of the power set of
. Then
is said to be a
algebra of the power set of
if it satisfies the identity
for all
Definition 3.1: ([17]) Let
be non-empty set and
be a power set of
. Then
with a constant
and a binary operation
is said to be
algebra of the power set of
if
satisfying the following axioms:(i)-
(ii)-
and
imply that
for all
(iii)-
for all
Definition 2.15: ([16], [17]) Let
be a
algebra
algebra,
algebra,
algebra) of the power set of
and let
be a collection of some random subsets of
. Then
is said to be
subalgebra (resp.
subalgebra,
subalgebra,
subalgebra,
subalgebra) of the power set of
, if
for any
Definition 2.16: ([16], [17]) Let
be a
algebra (resp.
algebra,
algebra,
algebra,
algebra) of the power set of
and let
be a set valued function , where
is a collection of some random subsets of
defined by
for all
where
is an arbitrary binary operation from
to
. Then the pair
is a soft set over
. Further,
is said to be a soft
algebra (resp. soft ρ-algebra, soft
algebra, soft
algebra, soft
algebra) of the power set of
, if
is a
subalgebra (resp.
subalgebra,
subalgebra,
subalgebra,
subalgebra) of the power set of
for all 
algebra of the power set and soft
subalgebra of the power set. We will illustrate the definitions with examples.Definition 3.1 Let
be non-empty set and
be a power set of
. Then
with a constant
and a binary operation
is said to be
algebra of the power set of
if
satisfying the following axioms:(i)-
(ii)-
and
imply that
for all
(iii)-
for all
Definition 3.2 A
algebra of power set is said to be proper
algebra of power set if it satisfies
, for some
Example 3.3 Let
and let
be a binary operation defined by the following table:
|
is a proper
algebra of the power set of
, since there are 
such that
Definition 3.4 Let
be a
algebra of the power set of
and let
be a collection of some random subsets of
. Then
is said to be
subalgebra of the power set of
, if
, for any
Example 3.5 Let
be
algebra of the power set of
in example (3.3). Then 



are
subalgebra of the power set of
.Remark 3.6 we will show that not necessary every
algebra of the power set is
algebra of the power set.Example 3.7 Let
and let 
be a binary operation defined by 
for all
. Then
is a
algebra of the power set of
with the following table (2).In other word, 
, for some
. Then
is not
algebra. Also, for example, 




and
are
subalgebra of the power set of
, but not
subalgebra. Example 3.8: Let
and let
be a binary operation defined by
for all
. Then
is a
algebra of the power set of
with the following table (3).
|
|
algebra of the power set of
is
algebra of the power set. In example (3.8), let
. Then
is not
algebra of the power set of
, since
Also, let
Then
is not
of the power set of
, since
Also,
is a
algebra of the power set of
. On the other hand, 

and
are
subalgebras. However,
and
are not
subalgebras. Further, see example (3.7)
is not ρ-algebra. (2) Further, if
is a
algebra of the power set of
satisfying
for any
Then
is a d-algebra of the power set of X. Definition 3.10 Let
be a
algebra of the power set of
and let
be a set valued function , where
is a collection of some random subsets of
defined by
for all
where
is an arbitrary binary operation from
to
. Then the pair
is a soft set over
. Further,
is said to be a soft
algebra of the power set of
, if
is a
subalgebra of the power set of
for all
Example: 3.11 Let
be a proper
algebra of the power set of
with the following table:
|
be a soft set over
where
and
is a set valued function defined by
for all
. Then 
which are soft
subalgebras of the power set of
. Hence
is a soft
algebra of the power set of
. The next example shows that there exist set-valued functions
where
the soft set is not a soft
algebra of the power set of
.Example 3.12: Consider the
algebra in example (3.11) with a set valued function defined by
for all
We have
is not a soft
algebra of the power set of
, since there exists
, but
is not soft
subalgebras of the power set of
.Definition: 3.13 Let
be a soft
algebra of the power set of
, and let
, where
is defined by
for all
. Then
is defined by
for all
Lemma 3.14: If
is a soft
algebra of the power set of
, then
is a soft
algebra of the power set of
, for any
Proof: Let
be a
algebra of the power set of
and let
be a soft
algebra of the power set of
, then
is a
subalgebra of the power set of
, for all
. Moreover, for all
we have
, but
(since
). Hence
is a
subalgebra of the power set of
, for all
. Then
is a soft
algebra of the power set of
.Definition 3.15: Let
be a soft
algebra of the power set of
. Then
is said to be a null soft
algebra of the power set of
if
for all
. Also,
is said to be an absolutely soft
algebra of the power set of
if
for all
.Example 3.16 Let
be the
algebra of the power set of
in example (3.11) and let 
where
are defined by 
and
. Thus,
and hence
is an absolutely soft
algebra of the power set
. Moreover,
and hence
is a null soft
algebra of the power set
.Lemma: 3.17 Let
be a
algebra of the power set of
. Then
is a
algebra of the power set of
, if
is a
algebra of the power set of
. Proof: Since
is a
algebra of the power set of
. Then
satisfying the following axioms:(i)-
(ii)-
(iii)-
and
imply that
for all
Also, let
be a
algebra of the power set of
, then
for all. Hence, from (i) we consider that
Further, from (ii) we have
and this implies that
Therefore, the following are hold:(1)-
(2)-
and
imply that
(3)-
for all
. The
is a
algebra of the power set of
.Corollary 3.18 If
is a
algebra of the power set of
. Then
is a
algebra of the power set of
, if
and
for all
Proof: Since
is a
algebra of the power set of
. Then
satisfying the following axioms:(i)-
(ii)-
(iii)-
and
imply that
, for all
(iv)-
for all
Therefore, we consider only the following are hold:1)-
2)-
and
imply that
Then, to prove that
is a
algebra of the power set of
, we need also to prove that
for any
Thus we have to show that
and hence we have 

For any
we have the all cases that are cover all probabilities as following:(1) If
.(2) If
.(3) If
, but
(4) If
, then 




Hence, for all (1),(2),(3), and (4) we consider that
is a
algebra of the power set of
, since
for any
(5) If
thus since
and
is a
algebra of the power set of
. Then from (iv) we have
and this implies that
and hence
Then
is a
algebra of the power set of
and by[Lemma (3.17)] we have
is a
algebra of the power set of
.Remark 3.19 From [Lemma (3.17) and Corollary (3.18)] we consider that, if
is a
algebra of the power set of
and
for all
Then
is a
algebra of the power set of
.Theorem 3.20: Let
and
be two soft
algebras over
. If
then the union
is a soft
algebra of the power set of
. Proof: Since
and by definition (2.6), we have for all 
If
then
is a
subalgebra of the power set of
. Similarly, if
then
is a
subalgebra of the power set of
. Hence
is a soft
algebra of the power set of
. Thus the union of two soft
algebras of the power set of
is a soft
algebra of the power set of
.Example 3.21: In example (3.4), let
and
be two soft sets over
where
and
. Define
by
for all
and
by
for all
. Note that
Thus, we have


and 
Then 

and
which are
subalgebras of the power set of
. Hence,
is a soft
algebra of the power set of
.Remark 3.22: The condition
is important as if
then the theorem does not apply. In above example, if
and
. Then
which is not a
subalgebra of the power set of
. Therefore, is not a soft
algebra of the power set of
. Theorem 3.23: Let
and
be two soft
algebras over
. If
, then the union
is a soft
algebra of the power set of
.Proof: Since
, where
and
for all
[by definition (2.6)], Note that
is a mapping and so
is a soft set over
. We have,
or
is a
subalgebra of the power set of
. Hence, 
is a soft
algebra of the power set of
. Therefore, the intersection of two soft
algebras is a soft
algebra.Example 3.24: Consider the algebra in example (3.21) with
and
. Then
or
Note that both are
subalgebras of the power set of
. Hence,
is a soft
algebras of the power set of
.Theorem 3.25: Let
be a
algebra of the power set of
with the condition
for any
. If
is a soft
algebra of the power set of
, then
is a soft
algebra of the power set of
.Proof: Straightforward from Definitions [(3.10), (2.7)] and remark [(2)-(3.9)].Theorem 3.26: Let
be a
algebra of the power set of
and
is a soft
algebra of the power set of
. Then
is a soft
algebra of the power set of
, if
is
algebra of the power set.Proof: Straightforward from Definitions [(3.10), (2.7)] and [Lemma (3.17)].The author would like to thank from the anonymous reviewers for carefully reading of the manuscript and giving useful comments, which will help to improve the paper.